Sm–Sn system

23 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 11, model 12); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (14) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental11
model12
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction23

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
SmSn-14Liu.tdbX.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He, D.L. Zhao, C.P. Wang, Calphad, 47, 129-35(2014). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.0024fa8160a500d1d8588f8013377cc37776c66b921d03b44b3018b9da7862a8541viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1713.67SM5SN3_D88 (x(Sn) 0.375) + SM4SN3_D73 (x(Sn) 0.42857) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.45716)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1713.67SM5SN3_D88 (x(Sn) 0.375) + SM4SN3_D73 (x(Sn) 0.42857) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.45725)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1713.67SM5SN3_D88 (x(Sn) 0.375) + SM4SN3_D73 (x(Sn) 0.42857) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.45697)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1690.91SM4SN3_D73 (x(Sn) 0.42857) + SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.49109)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1690.91SM4SN3_D73 (x(Sn) 0.42857) + SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.49117)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1690.91SM4SN3_D73 (x(Sn) 0.42857) + SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.49079)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1491.21SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + SM11SN10 (x(Sn) 0.47619) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.61826)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1491.2SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + SM11SN10 (x(Sn) 0.47619) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.61836)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1491.2SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + SM11SN10 (x(Sn) 0.47619) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.61832)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1472.88SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + SM11SN10 (x(Sn) 0.47619) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.62518)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1472.87SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + SM11SN10 (x(Sn) 0.47619) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.62523)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1377.89SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + SM2SN3 (x(Sn) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.6561)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1377.89SM5SN4 (x(Sn) 0.44444) + SM2SN3 (x(Sn) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.65595)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1365.94SM2SN3 (x(Sn) 0.6) + SMSN2 (x(Sn) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.67068)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1365.93SM2SN3 (x(Sn) 0.6) + SMSN2 (x(Sn) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.671)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1365.93SM2SN3 (x(Sn) 0.6) + SMSN2 (x(Sn) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.6711)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1352.63SMSN2 (x(Sn) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.71114) + SMSN3_L12 (x(Sn) 0.75)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1352.63SMSN2 (x(Sn) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.7109) + SMSN3_L12 (x(Sn) 0.75)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1352.63SMSN2 (x(Sn) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.71146) + SMSN3_L12 (x(Sn) 0.75)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1352.63SMSN2 (x(Sn) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.71146) + SMSN3_L12 (x(Sn) 0.75)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1189.13HCP_A3 (x(Sn) 1.000e-5) + BCC_A2 (x(Sn) 0.0015) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.1046)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1189.13HCP_A3 (x(Sn) 1.000e-5) + BCC_A2 (x(Sn) 0.0015) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.10458)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1179.15HCP_A3 (x(Sn) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.10968) + SM5SN3_D88 (x(Sn) 0.375)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1179.15HCP_A3 (x(Sn) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.10976) + SM5SN3_D88 (x(Sn) 0.375)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb1006.96RHOMB_C19 (x(Sn) 0) + HCP_A3 (x(Sn) 0) + SM5SN3_D88 (x(Sn) 0.375)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb504.19SMSN3_L12 (x(Sn) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.99729) + BCT_A5 (x(Sn) 1)
SmSn-14Liu.tdb504.19SMSN3_L12 (x(Sn) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Sn) 0.99736) + BCT_A5 (x(Sn) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Sm–Sn system (23)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1778.25congruent melting: L -> Sm5Sn3L: Sn 0.375; Sm5Sn3: Sn 0.375model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 6
report
1778.15congruent melting: L -> Sm5Sn3L: Sn 0.375; Sm5Sn3: Sn 0.375experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 5
report
1713.15peritectic: L + Sm5Sn3 -> Sm4Sn3Sm5Sn3: Sn 0.375; Sm4Sn3: Sn 0.429experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 7
report
1712.95peritectic: L + Sm5Sn3 -> Sm4Sn3L: Sn 0.458; Sm5Sn3: Sn 0.375; Sm4Sn3: Sn 0.429model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 8
report
1693.15peritectic: L + Sm4Sn3 -> Sm5Sn4Sm4Sn3: Sn 0.429; Sm5Sn4: Sn 0.444experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 9
report
1692.85peritectic: L + Sm4Sn3 -> Sm5Sn4L: Sn 0.488; Sm4Sn3: Sn 0.429; Sm5Sn4: Sn 0.444model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 10
report
1513.15peritectic: L + Sm5Sn4 -> Sm11Sn10Sm5Sn4: Sn 0.444; Sm11Sn10: Sn 0.476experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 11
report
1511.75peritectic: L + Sm5Sn4 -> Sm11Sn10L: Sn 0.61; Sm5Sn4: Sn 0.444; Sm11Sn10: Sn 0.476model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 12
report
1443.15metatectic/catatectic: Sm11Sn10 -> L + Sm5Sn4Sm11Sn10: Sn 0.476; L: Sn 0.635; Sm5Sn4: Sn 0.444model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 14
report
1443.15metatectic/catatectic: Sm11Sn10 -> L + Sm5Sn4Sm11Sn10: Sn 0.476; Sm5Sn4: Sn 0.444experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 13
report
1378.15peritectic: L + Sm5Sn4 -> Sm2Sn3Sm5Sn4: Sn 0.444; Sm2Sn3: Sn 0.6experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 15
report
1378.15peritectic: L + Sm5Sn4 -> Sm2Sn3L: Sn 0.656; Sm5Sn4: Sn 0.444; Sm2Sn3: Sn 0.6model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 16
report
1366.65other: L + Sm2Sn3 -> SmSn2L: Sn 0.67; Sm2Sn3: Sn 0.6; SmSn2: Sn 0.667model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 17
report
1363.35congruent melting: L -> SmSn3L: Sn 0.75; SmSn3: Sn 0.75model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 21
report
1363.15congruent melting: L -> SmSn3L: Sn 0.75; SmSn3: Sn 0.75experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 20
report
1353.15eutectic: L -> SmSn2 + SmSn3L: Sn 0.667; SmSn2: Sn 0.67; SmSn3: Sn 0.75experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 18
report
1353.05eutectic: L -> SmSn2 + SmSn3L: Sn 0.667; SmSn2: Sn 0.712; SmSn3: Sn 0.75model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 19
report
1189.15metatectic/catatectic: (γSm) -> L + (βSm)(γSm): Sn 0.001; L: Sn 0.105; (βSm): Sn 0experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 1
report
1189.15metatectic/catatectic: (γSm) -> L + (βSm)(γSm): Sn 0.001; L: Sn 0.105; (βSm): Sn 0model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 2
report
1179.15eutectic: L -> (βSm) + Sm5Sn3L: Sn 0.11; (βSm): Sn 0; Sm5Sn3: Sn 0.375model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 4
report
1179.15eutectic: L -> (βSm) + Sm5Sn3L: Sn 0.11; (βSm): Sn 0; Sm5Sn3: Sn 0.375experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 3
report
504.15eutectic: L -> SmSn3 + (Sn)L: Sn 0.997; SmSn3: Sn 0.75; (Sn): Sn 1model[1] Liu 2014Table 5, p. 6, row 23
report
502.15eutectic: L -> SmSn3 + (Sn)L: Sn 0.998; SmSn3: Sn 0.75; (Sn): Sn 1experimental[1] Liu 2014
cites Massalski 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 22
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. X.J. Liu, M.H. Chen, Y. Lu, Y.X. Huang, D. Wang, Q. He et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sb–Sm and Sm–Sn systems, Calphad 47, 129-135 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.07.002