Sm–Zn system

100 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 48, model 52); 2 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (13) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental48
model52
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction39
phase transition16
formation45

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
SmZn-09Jia.tdbB.R. Jia, L.G. Zhang, G.X. Huang, H.Y. Qi, H. Yang, L.B. Liu, Z.P. Jin, F. Zheng, J. Alloys Compd., 473, 176-79(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.06.01986e42c0e5989ffc09af9a740da6909a1b4cb8c42942678f81b233c33f1af16efviewer · TDB · JSON
SmZn-09Liu.tdbX.J. Liu, X. Chen, C.P. Wang, J. Alloys Compd., 468, 115-21(2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.0037414e4f41bfa783a2504dada57fabb18868350649afff771a1ea3bb017c077e9viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1170.92SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.84226) + SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1170.92SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.84244) + SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1170.92SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.84233) + SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1161.39SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.58124) + SMZN2 (x(Zn) 0.66667)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1161.39SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.58136) + SMZN2 (x(Zn) 0.66667)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1161.39SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.5811) + SMZN2 (x(Zn) 0.66667)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1144.57SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169) + SM3ZN22 (x(Zn) 0.88) + SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1141.95LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.76786) + SM3ZN11 (x(Zn) 0.78571) + SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1141.94LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.76768) + SM3ZN11 (x(Zn) 0.78571) + SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1129.69SMZN2 (x(Zn) 0.66667) + SMZN3 (x(Zn) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.75253)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1129.68SMZN3 (x(Zn) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.75258) + SM3ZN11 (x(Zn) 0.78571)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1106.9SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474) + SMZN11_D2B (x(Zn) 0.91667) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.96323)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb1106.9SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474) + SMZN11_D2B (x(Zn) 0.91667) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.96324)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb953.18BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.06785) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.23992) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb953.18BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.06784) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.23987) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb943.18HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.02351) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.06672) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb943.18HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.02349) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.0667) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb692.68SMZN11_D2B (x(Zn) 0.91667) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 1) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 1)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb615.21RHOMB_C19 (x(Zn) 0) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.00502) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb615.2RHOMB_C19 (x(Zn) 0) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.00503) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Jia.tdb615.2RHOMB_C19 (x(Zn) 0) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.00503) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1169.28SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.84337) + SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1169.27SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.84361) + SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1169.27SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.84352) + SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1166.65SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.59243) + SMZN2 (x(Zn) 0.66667)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1166.65SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.59248) + SMZN2 (x(Zn) 0.66667)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1166.65SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.59224) + SMZN2 (x(Zn) 0.66667)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1162.12SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169) + SM3ZN22 (x(Zn) 0.88) + SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1142.58LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.76585) + SM3ZN11 (x(Zn) 0.78571) + SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1142.58LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.76594) + SM3ZN11 (x(Zn) 0.78571) + SM13ZN58 (x(Zn) 0.8169)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1133.06SMZN2 (x(Zn) 0.66667) + SMZN3 (x(Zn) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.75138)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1132.99SMZN3 (x(Zn) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.75263) + SM3ZN11 (x(Zn) 0.78571)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1033.02SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474) + SMZN11_D2B (x(Zn) 0.91667) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.97734)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb1033.02SM2ZN17 (x(Zn) 0.89474) + SMZN11_D2B (x(Zn) 0.91667) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.9773)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb993.88RHOMB_C19 (x(Zn) 1.700e-4) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 2.800e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.06377)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb993.88RHOMB_C19 (x(Zn) 1.700e-4) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 2.800e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.06376)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb993.88RHOMB_C19 (x(Zn) 1.700e-4) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 2.800e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.06372)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb956.21BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.09329) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.22574) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb956.21BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.09323) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.22567) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb935.81RHOMB_C19 (x(Zn) 1.600e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.08571) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb935.81RHOMB_C19 (x(Zn) 1.600e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.0858) + SMZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.5)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb692.67SMZN11_D2B (x(Zn) 0.91667) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 1) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 1)
SmZn-09Liu.tdb692.67SMZN11_D2B (x(Zn) 0.91667) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 1) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull SmZn-09Liu

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Sm–Zn system (39)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1173.15eutectic: L -> Sm13Zn58 + Sm2Zn17L: Zn 0.855; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.817; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.895experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 7
report
1173eutectic: L -> Sm13Zn58 + Sm2Zn17L: Zn 0.855; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 19
report
1171eutectic: L -> Sm13Zn58 + Sm2Zn17L: Zn 0.842; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 20
report
1169.15eutectic: L -> Sm13Zn58 + Sm2Zn17L: Zn 0.843; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.817; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.895model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 8
report
1167.15eutectic: L -> SmZn + SmZn2L: Zn 0.592; SmZn: Zn 0.5; SmZn2: Zn 0.667model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 4
report
1163.15eutectoid: Sm3Zn22 -> Sm13Zn58 + Sm2Zn17Sm3Zn22: Zn 0.88; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.817; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.895experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 15
report
1163.15eutectic: L -> SmZn + SmZn2L: Zn 0.564; SmZn: Zn 0.5; SmZn2: Zn 0.667experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 3
report
1163peritectoid: Sm13Zn58 + Sm2Zn17 -> Sm3Zn22Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737; Sm3Zn22: Zn 0.88model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 24
report
1163peritectoid: Sm13Zn58 + Sm2Zn17 -> Sm3Zn22Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737; Sm3Zn22: Zn 0.88experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 23
report
1163eutectic: L -> SmZn + SmZn2L: Zn 0.564; SmZn: Zn 0.5; SmZn2: Zn 0.666667experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
1162.15eutectoid: Sm3Zn22 -> Sm13Zn58 + Sm2Zn17Sm3Zn22: Zn 0.88; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.817; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.895model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 16
report
1161eutectic: L -> SmZn + SmZn2L: Zn 0.581; SmZn: Zn 0.5; SmZn2: Zn 0.666667model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 8
report
1143.15peritectic: L + Sm13Zn58 -> Sm3Zn11Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.817; Sm3Zn11: Zn 0.786experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 11
report
1143.15peritectic: L + Sm13Zn58 -> Sm3Zn11L: Zn 0.766; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.817; Sm3Zn11: Zn 0.786model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 12
report
1143peritectic: L + Sm13Zn58 -> Sm3Zn11Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901; Sm3Zn11: Zn 0.785714experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 15
report
1142peritectic: L + Sm13Zn58 -> Sm3Zn11L: Zn 0.768; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901; Sm3Zn11: Zn 0.785714model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 16
report
1133.15peritectic: L -> SmZn2 + SmZn3L: Zn 0.751; SmZn2: Zn 0.667; SmZn3: Zn 0.75model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 10
report
1133.15eutectic: L + Sm3Zn11 -> SmZn3L: Zn 0.753; Sm3Zn11: Zn 0.786; SmZn3: Zn 0.75model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 6
report
1130eutectic: L -> SmZn3 + Sm3Zn11L: Zn 0.753; SmZn3: Zn 0.75; Sm3Zn11: Zn 0.785714model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 14
report
1130peritectic: L + SmZn2 -> SmZn3L: Zn 0.753; SmZn2: Zn 0.666667; SmZn3: Zn 0.75model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 12
report
1128.15peritectic: L -> SmZn2 + SmZn3SmZn2: Zn 0.667; SmZn3: Zn 0.75experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 9
report
1128peritectic: L + SmZn2 -> SmZn3SmZn2: Zn 0.666667; SmZn3: Zn 0.75experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 11
report
1123.15eutectic: L + Sm3Zn11 -> SmZn3L: Zn 0.76; Sm3Zn11: Zn 0.786; SmZn3: Zn 0.75experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 5
report
1123eutectic: L -> SmZn3 + Sm3Zn11L: Zn 0.76; SmZn3: Zn 0.75; Sm3Zn11: Zn 0.785714experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 13
report
1033.15peritectic: L + Sm2Zn17 -> SmZn11Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.895; SmZn11: Zn 0.917experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 13
report
1033.15peritectic: L + Sm2Zn17 -> SmZn11L: Zn 0.977; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.895; SmZn11: Zn 0.917model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 14
report
1033peritectic: L + Sm2Zn17 -> SmZn11Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737; SmZn11: Zn 0.916667experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 25
report
1033peritectic: L + Sm2Zn17 -> SmZn11L: Zn 0.979; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737; SmZn11: Zn 0.916667model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 26
report
956.15eutectic: L -> bcc_A2 + SmZnL: Zn 0.226; bcc_A2: Zn 0.093; SmZn: Zn 0.5model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 2
report
953.15eutectic: L -> bcc_A2 + SmZnL: Zn 0.239; SmZn: Zn 0.5experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 1
report
953eutectic: L -> SmZn + BccL: Zn 0.24; SmZn: Zn 0.5model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
953eutectic: L -> SmZn + BccL: Zn 0.239; SmZn: Zn 0.5experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
943.15eutectoid: hcp + SmZn -> bcc_A2SmZn: Zn 0.5experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 17
report
943eutectoid: Bcc -> Hcp(Sm) + SmZnSmZn: Zn 0.5experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
943eutectoid: Bcc -> Hcp(Sm) + SmZnBcc: Zn 0.0667; SmZn: Zn 0.5model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
935.15eutectoid: hcp + SmZn -> bcc_A2hcp: Zn 0; SmZn: Zn 0.5; bcc_A2: Zn 0.086model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 18
report
693eutectic: L -> SmZn11 + Hcp(Zn)SmZn11: Zn 0.916667experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 29
report
693eutectic: L -> SmZn11 + Hcp(Zn)L: Zn 0.0099999; SmZn11: Zn 0.916667model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 30
report
615eutectoid: Hcp -> Rhom + SmZnHcp: Zn 0.005; Rhom: Zn 0; SmZn: Zn 0.5model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 28
report

Other properties

Phase transition (16)

Phase transition, Sm–Zn system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1181 K1181congruent melting: L -> Sm13Zn58
L: Zn 0.816901; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901
experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 17
report
Phase transition1181.15 K1181.15congruent melting: L -> Sm13Zn58
L: Zn 0.816901; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 23
report
Phase transition1181.15 K1181.15congruent melting: L -> Sm13Zn58
L: Zn 0.816901; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901
model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 24
report
Phase transition1184 K1184congruent melting: L -> Sm13Zn58
L: Zn 0.816901; Sm13Zn58: Zn 0.816901
model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 18
report
Phase transition1213 K1213congruent melting: L -> Sm2Zn17
L: Zn 0.894737; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737
experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 21
report
Phase transition1213.15 K1213.15congruent melting: L -> Sm2Zn17
L: Zn 0.894737; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 25
report
Phase transition1213.15 K1213.15congruent melting: L -> Sm2Zn17
L: Zn 0.894737; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737
model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 26
report
Phase transition1214.15 K1214.15congruent melting: L -> SmZn2
L: Zn 0.666667; SmZn2: Zn 0.666667
model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 22
report
Phase transition1215 K1215congruent melting: L -> SmZn2
L: Zn 0.666667; SmZn2: Zn 0.666667
experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 9
report
Phase transition1215.15 K1215.15congruent melting: L -> SmZn2
L: Zn 0.666667; SmZn2: Zn 0.666667
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 21
report
Phase transition1220 K1220congruent melting: L -> Sm2Zn17
L: Zn 0.894737; Sm2Zn17: Zn 0.894737
model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 22
report
Phase transition1225 K1225congruent melting: L -> SmZn2
L: Zn 0.666667; SmZn2: Zn 0.666667
model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 10
report
Phase transition1233 K1233congruent melting: L -> SmZn
L: Zn 0.5; SmZn: Zn 0.5
experimental[2] Jia 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report
Phase transition1233 K1233congruent melting: L -> SmZn
L: Zn 0.5; SmZn: Zn 0.5
model[2] Jia 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Phase transition1233.15 K1233.15congruent melting: L -> SmZn
L: Zn 0.5; SmZn: Zn 0.5
model[1] Liu 2009Table 5, p. 4, row 20
report
Phase transition1233.15 K1233.15congruent melting: L -> SmZn
L: Zn 0.5; SmZn: Zn 0.5
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 5, p. 4, row 19
report

Formation (45)

Formation, Sm–Zn system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-28.86 kJ/mol-atom773.15Sm13Zn58
alloy: Zn 0.816901
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 25
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-28.93 kJ/mol-atom773.15Sm13Zn58
alloy: Zn 0.816901
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 26
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-22.52 kJ/mol-atom773.15Sm2Zn17
alloy: Zn 0.894737
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 38
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-22.46 kJ/mol-atom773.15Sm2Zn17
alloy: Zn 0.894737
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 37
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-30.41 kJ/mol-atom773.15Sm3Zn11
alloy: Zn 0.785714
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 19
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-30.66 kJ/mol-atom773.15Sm3Zn11
alloy: Zn 0.785714
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 20
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-23.68 kJ/mol-atom773.15Sm3Zn22
alloy: Zn 0.88
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 31
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-23.96 kJ/mol-atom773.15Sm3Zn22
alloy: Zn 0.88
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 32
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-33.28 kJ/mol-atom773.15SmZn
alloy: Zn 0.5
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 2
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-33.17 kJ/mol-atom773.15SmZn
alloy: Zn 0.5
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 1
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-19.06 kJ/mol-atom773.15SmZn11
alloy: Zn 0.916667
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 43
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-35.45 kJ/mol-atom773.15SmZn2
alloy: Zn 0.666667
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 8
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-35.58 kJ/mol-atom773.15SmZn2
alloy: Zn 0.666667
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 7
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-31.99 kJ/mol-atom773.15SmZn3
alloy: Zn 0.75
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 13
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-32.14 kJ/mol-atom773.15SmZn3
alloy: Zn 0.75
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 14
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-25.81 kJ/mol-atom973.15Sm13Zn58
alloy: Zn 0.816901
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 28
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-25.89 kJ/mol-atom973.15Sm13Zn58
alloy: Zn 0.816901
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 27
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-19.17 kJ/mol-atom973.15Sm2Zn17
alloy: Zn 0.894737
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 40
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-19.34 kJ/mol-atom973.15Sm2Zn17
alloy: Zn 0.894737
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 39
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-27.47 kJ/mol-atom973.15Sm3Zn11
alloy: Zn 0.785714
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 21
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-27.52 kJ/mol-atom973.15Sm3Zn11
alloy: Zn 0.785714
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 22
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-20.68 kJ/mol-atom973.15Sm3Zn22
alloy: Zn 0.88
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 34
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-20.58 kJ/mol-atom973.15Sm3Zn22
alloy: Zn 0.88
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 33
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-31.35 kJ/mol-atom973.15SmZn
alloy: Zn 0.5
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 3
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-31.2 kJ/mol-atom973.15SmZn
alloy: Zn 0.5
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 4
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-15.66 kJ/mol-atom973.15SmZn11
alloy: Zn 0.916667
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 44
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-32.52 kJ/mol-atom973.15SmZn2
alloy: Zn 0.666667
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 10
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-32.82 kJ/mol-atom973.15SmZn2
alloy: Zn 0.666667
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 9
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-29.1 kJ/mol-atom973.15SmZn3
alloy: Zn 0.75
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 16
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-29.09 kJ/mol-atom973.15SmZn3
alloy: Zn 0.75
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 15
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-22.91 kJ/mol-atom1173.15Sm13Zn58
alloy: Zn 0.816901
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 29
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-22.23 kJ/mol-atom1173.15Sm13Zn58
alloy: Zn 0.816901
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 30
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-16.21 kJ/mol-atom1173.15Sm2Zn17
alloy: Zn 0.894737
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 41
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-15.47 kJ/mol-atom1173.15Sm2Zn17
alloy: Zn 0.894737
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 42
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-24.53 kJ/mol-atom1173.15Sm3Zn11
alloy: Zn 0.785714
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 23
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-24.12 kJ/mol-atom1173.15Sm3Zn11
alloy: Zn 0.785714
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 24
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-17.48 kJ/mol-atom1173.15Sm3Zn22
alloy: Zn 0.88
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 35
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-17.05 kJ/mol-atom1173.15Sm3Zn22
alloy: Zn 0.88
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 36
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-29.1 kJ/mol-atom1173.15SmZn
alloy: Zn 0.5
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 6
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-29.53 kJ/mol-atom1173.15SmZn
alloy: Zn 0.5
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 5
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-12.26 kJ/mol-atom1173.15SmZn11
alloy: Zn 0.916667
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 45
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-29.31 kJ/mol-atom1173.15SmZn2
alloy: Zn 0.666667
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 12
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-30.05 kJ/mol-atom1173.15SmZn2
alloy: Zn 0.666667
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 11
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-25.65 kJ/mol-atom1173.15SmZn3
alloy: Zn 0.75
experimental[1] Liu 2009
cites Chiotti 1967
Table 6, p. 6, row 18
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-26.19 kJ/mol-atom1173.15SmZn3
alloy: Zn 0.75
model[1] Liu 2009Table 6, p. 6, row 17
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. X.J. Liu, X. Chen, C.P. Wang, Thermodynamic assessments of the Sm–Zn and Nd–Zn systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 468, 115-121 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.003
  2. B.R. Jia, L.G. Zhang, G.X. Huang, H.Y. Qi, H. Yang, L.B. Liu et al., Thermodynamic assessment of the Sm–Zn binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 473, 176-179 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.06.019