Ta system
51 accepted literature values from 10 paper(s) (experimental 10, model 3, DFT 33, unspecified 5); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 10 |
| model | 3 |
| DFT | 33 |
| unspecified | 5 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| formation | 15 |
| activity / EMF / Gibbs energy | 2 |
| crystal structure | 28 |
| other property | 6 |
Formation enthalpies
Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.
| Phase | Compound | Value | T (K) | Class | MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A15 | 3.0195 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [1] Wang 2019 | Table 2, p. 22, row 4 report | ||||
| C14 | 9.35 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 5 report | ||||
| C14 | 9.6703 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [1] Wang 2019 | Table 2, p. 22, row 12 report | ||||
| C14 | 9.7 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 cites Sluiter 2006 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 6 report | ||||
| C15 | 10.94 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 11 report | ||||
| C15 | 11.1655 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [1] Wang 2019 | Table 2, p. 22, row 16 report | ||||
| C15 | 11.2 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 cites Sluiter 2006 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 12 report | ||||
| C16 | 48.1965 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [1] Wang 2019 | Table 2, p. 22, row 20 report | ||||
| C36 | 10.15 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 3, p. 3, row 15 report | ||||
| FCC | 23.3493 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [1] Wang 2019 | Table 3, p. 27, row 10 report | ||||
| HCP | 26.9804 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 0 | DFT | [1] Wang 2019 | Table 3, p. 27, row 15 report | ||||
| Ta | 0 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 298.15 | experimental | [3] Witusiewicz 2011 | Table 4, p. 10, row 8 report | ||||
| Ta | 0 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [4] Zhou 2009 | Table 6, p. 7, row 6 report | |||||
| Ta | 26.23 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [4] Zhou 2009 | Table 6, p. 7, row 5 report | |||||
| Ta13 | 10.71 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [5] Rajkumar 2015 | Table 9, p. 6, row 8 report |
Other properties
Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (2)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibbs energy printed: Gm(ω)-Gm(β) | 7795 J/mol | 0 | UNKNOWN alloy: Ta 1 | model | [6] Yan 2016 | Table 4, p. 5, row 6 report | |
| Gibbs energy printed: Gm(ω)-Gm(β) | 21835 J/mol | 0 | UNKNOWN alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [6] Yan 2016 | Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report |
Crystal structure (28)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice a | 5.45 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| Lattice a | 7.65 Å | 0 | C15 alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 2, p. 3, row 12 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.44 Å | 0 | C36 alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 2, p. 3, row 21 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.31 Å | Nonmagnetic BCC Ta alloy: Ta 1 | unspecified | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report | ||
| Lattice a | 3.303 Å | 298.15 | (Ta) alloy: Ta 1 | model | [7] Broz 2013 cites Smith 1983 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.3 Å | 298.15 | Nonmagnetic BCC Ta alloy: Ta 1 | experimental | [2] Pavlů 2009 cites Villars 1991 | Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.328 Å | 298.15 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 | Table 1, p. 12, row 2 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.316 Å | 298.15 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 | Table 1, p. 12, row 1 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.32 Å | 298.15 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 cites ref. 36 | Table 1, p. 12, row 5 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.33 Å | 298.15 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 | Table 1, p. 12, row 3 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.3 Å | 298.15 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | experimental | [8] Marker 2017 cites ref. 35 | Table 1, p. 12, row 4 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.3065 Å | 298.15 | β, (Ta) alloy: Ta 1 | model | [3] Witusiewicz 2011 cites Massalski 1990 | Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.303 Å | 298.15 | β, (Ta), bcc_A2 alloy: Ta 1 | experimental | [9] Witusiewicz 2010 cites 3 vols 1990 | Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.303 Å | 300 | (Ta) alloy: Ta 1 | experimental | [7] Broz 2013 cites Smith 1983 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 48 report | |
| Lattice c | 8.68 Å | 0 | C14 alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| Lattice c | 17.43 Å | 0 | C36 alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 2, p. 3, row 21 report | |
| Molar volume printed: V | 18.241 ų/atom | 0 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 | Table 2, p. 13, row 1 report | |
| Molar volume printed: V | 18.313 ų/atom | 0 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 cites ref. 36 | Table 2, p. 13, row 3 report | |
| Molar volume printed: V | 17.9685 ų/atom | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | experimental | [8] Marker 2017 cites ref. 35 | Table 2, p. 13, row 2 report | ||
| lattice 2v atom | 3.724 10^7 pm^3 | 0 | C36 alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 2, p. 3, row 21 report | |
| lattice unspecified axis printed: Lattice constant | 3.3031 Å | Pure Ta alloy: Ta 1 | experimental | [10] Turchi 2005 | Table I, p. 5, row 1 report | ||
| lattice unspecified axis printed: Lattice constant | 3.2766 Å | Pure Ta alloy: Ta 1 | unspecified | [10] Turchi 2005 | Table I, p. 5, row 8 report | ||
| lattice unspecified axis printed: Lattice constant | 3.3098 Å | Pure Ta alloy: Ta 1 | unspecified | [10] Turchi 2005 | Table I, p. 5, row 4 report | ||
| lattice v atom | 1.861 10^7 pm^3 | 0 | C14 alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| lattice v atom | 1.862 10^7 pm^3 | 0 | C15 alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [2] Pavlů 2009 | Table 2, p. 3, row 12 report | |
| volume printed: V | 18.241 Å3/atom | 0 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 | Table 2, p. 13, row 1 report | |
| volume printed: V | 18.313 Å3/atom | 0 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 cites ref. 36 | Table 2, p. 13, row 3 report | |
| volume printed: V | 17.9685 Å3/atom | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | experimental | [8] Marker 2017 cites ref. 35 | Table 2, p. 13, row 2 report |
Other property (6)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bulk modulus printed: Bulk modulus | 196.1 GPa | Pure Ta alloy: Ta 1 | experimental | [10] Turchi 2005 | Table I, p. 5, row 1 report | ||
| bulk modulus printed: Bulk modulus | 206.4 GPa | Pure Ta alloy: Ta 1 | unspecified | [10] Turchi 2005 | Table I, p. 5, row 4 report | ||
| bulk modulus printed: Bulk modulus | 215.3 GPa | Pure Ta alloy: Ta 1 | unspecified | [10] Turchi 2005 | Table I, p. 5, row 8 report | ||
| bulk modulus printed: B | 193.7 GPa | 0 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 | Table 2, p. 13, row 1 report | |
| bulk modulus printed: B | 195.3 GPa | 0 | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | DFT | [8] Marker 2017 cites ref. 36 | Table 2, p. 13, row 3 report | |
| bulk modulus printed: B | 200 GPa | bcc-Ta alloy: Ta 1 | experimental | [8] Marker 2017 cites ref. 35 | Table 2, p. 13, row 2 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Peisheng Wang, Jörg Koßmann, Ursula R. Kattner, Mauro Palumbo, Thomas Hammerschmidt, Gregory B. Olson, Thermodynamic assessment of the Co-Ta system, Calphad 64, 205-212 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2018.12.002
- J. Pavlů, J. Vřešt’ál, M. Šob, Re-modeling of Laves phases in the Cr–Nb and Cr–Ta systems using first-principles results, Calphad 33, 179-186 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2008.04.006
- V.T. Witusiewicz, A.A. Bondar, U. Hecht, V.M. Voblikov, O.S. Fomichov, V.M. Petyukh et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic re-assessment of the binary Fe–Ta system, Intermetallics 19, 1059-1075 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2011.03.018
- S.H. Zhou, Y. Wang, L.-Q. Chen, Z.-K. Liu, R.E. Napolitano, Solution-based thermodynamic modeling of the Ni–Ta and Ni–Mo–Ta systems using first-principle calculations, Calphad 33, 631-641 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2009.06.006
- V.B. Rajkumar, K.C. Hari Kumar, Gibbs energy modeling of Fe–Ta system by Calphad method assisted by experiments and ab initio calculations, Calphad 48, 157-165 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.12.006
- Jia-Yi Yan, G.B. Olson, Computational thermodynamics and kinetics of displacive transformations in titanium-based alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 673, 441-454 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.251
- P. Broz, A.U. Khan, H. Niu, X.-Q. Chen, D. Li, J. Vrestal et al., The system Ta–V–Si: Thermodynamic modeling, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 199, 171-180 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2012.12.003
- Cassie Marker, ShunLi Shang, Xuan L. Liu, Greta Lindwall, Zi-Kui Liu, First-principles calculations and thermodynamic modeling of the Sn-Ta system, Calphad 57, 46-54 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2017.03.001
- V.T. Witusiewicz, A.A. Bondar, U. Hecht, J. Zollinger, V.M. Petyukh, O.S. Fomichov et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic re-assessment of the binary Al–Ta system, Intermetallics 18, 92-106 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2009.06.015
- P. E. A. Turchi, V. Drchal, J. Kudrnovský, C. Colinet, Larry Kaufman, Zi-Kui Liu, Application of<i>ab initio</i>and CALPHAD thermodynamics to Mo-Ta-W alloys, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005). doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.094206