Ta system

51 accepted literature values from 10 paper(s) (experimental 10, model 3, DFT 33, unspecified 5); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental10
model3
DFT33
unspecified5
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
formation15
activity / EMF / Gibbs energy2
crystal structure28
other property6

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ta system (15)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
A153.0195 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[1] Wang 2019Table 2, p. 22, row 4
report
C149.35 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 3, p. 3, row 5
report
C149.6703 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[1] Wang 2019Table 2, p. 22, row 12
report
C149.7 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Pavlů 2009
cites Sluiter 2006 doi
Table 3, p. 3, row 6
report
C1510.94 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 3, p. 3, row 11
report
C1511.1655 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[1] Wang 2019Table 2, p. 22, row 16
report
C1511.2 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Pavlů 2009
cites Sluiter 2006 doi
Table 3, p. 3, row 12
report
C1648.1965 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[1] Wang 2019Table 2, p. 22, row 20
report
C3610.15 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 3, p. 3, row 15
report
FCC23.3493 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[1] Wang 2019Table 3, p. 27, row 10
report
HCP26.9804 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[1] Wang 2019Table 3, p. 27, row 15
report
Ta0 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15experimental[3] Witusiewicz 2011Table 4, p. 10, row 8
report
Ta0 kJ/mol-atomDFT[4] Zhou 2009Table 6, p. 7, row 6
report
Ta26.23 kJ/mol-atomDFT[4] Zhou 2009Table 6, p. 7, row 5
report
Ta1310.71 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[5] Rajkumar 2015Table 9, p. 6, row 8
report

Other properties

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (2)

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy, Ta system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Gibbs energy
printed: Gm(ω)-Gm(β)
7795 J/mol0UNKNOWN
alloy: Ta 1
model[6] Yan 2016Table 4, p. 5, row 6
report
Gibbs energy
printed: Gm(ω)-Gm(β)
21835 J/mol0UNKNOWN
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[6] Yan 2016Table 4, p. 5, row 5
report

Crystal structure (28)

Crystal structure, Ta system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a5.45 Å0C14
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
Lattice a7.65 Å0C15
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 12
report
Lattice a5.44 Å0C36
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 21
report
Lattice a3.31 ÅNonmagnetic BCC Ta
alloy: Ta 1
unspecified[2] Pavlů 2009Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
Lattice a3.303 Å298.15(Ta)
alloy: Ta 1
model[7] Broz 2013
cites Smith 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 1
report
Lattice a3.3 Å298.15Nonmagnetic BCC Ta
alloy: Ta 1
experimental[2] Pavlů 2009
cites Villars 1991
Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
Lattice a3.328 Å298.15bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017Table 1, p. 12, row 2
report
Lattice a3.316 Å298.15bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017Table 1, p. 12, row 1
report
Lattice a3.32 Å298.15bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017
cites ref. 36
Table 1, p. 12, row 5
report
Lattice a3.33 Å298.15bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017Table 1, p. 12, row 3
report
Lattice a3.3 Å298.15bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
experimental[8] Marker 2017
cites ref. 35
Table 1, p. 12, row 4
report
Lattice a3.3065 Å298.15β, (Ta)
alloy: Ta 1
model[3] Witusiewicz 2011
cites Massalski 1990
Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
Lattice a3.303 Å298.15β, (Ta), bcc_A2
alloy: Ta 1
experimental[9] Witusiewicz 2010
cites 3 vols 1990
Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
Lattice a3.303 Å300(Ta)
alloy: Ta 1
experimental[7] Broz 2013
cites Smith 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 48
report
Lattice c8.68 Å0C14
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
Lattice c17.43 Å0C36
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 21
report
Molar volume
printed: V
18.241 ų/atom0bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017Table 2, p. 13, row 1
report
Molar volume
printed: V
18.313 ų/atom0bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017
cites ref. 36
Table 2, p. 13, row 3
report
Molar volume
printed: V
17.9685 ų/atombcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
experimental[8] Marker 2017
cites ref. 35
Table 2, p. 13, row 2
report
lattice 2v atom3.724 10^7 pm^30C36
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 21
report
lattice unspecified axis
printed: Lattice constant
3.3031 ÅPure Ta
alloy: Ta 1
experimental[10] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 1
report
lattice unspecified axis
printed: Lattice constant
3.2766 ÅPure Ta
alloy: Ta 1
unspecified[10] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 8
report
lattice unspecified axis
printed: Lattice constant
3.3098 ÅPure Ta
alloy: Ta 1
unspecified[10] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 4
report
lattice v atom1.861 10^7 pm^30C14
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
lattice v atom1.862 10^7 pm^30C15
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[2] Pavlů 2009Table 2, p. 3, row 12
report
volume
printed: V
18.241 Å3/atom0bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017Table 2, p. 13, row 1
report
volume
printed: V
18.313 Å3/atom0bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017
cites ref. 36
Table 2, p. 13, row 3
report
volume
printed: V
17.9685 Å3/atombcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
experimental[8] Marker 2017
cites ref. 35
Table 2, p. 13, row 2
report

Other property (6)

Other property, Ta system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
bulk modulus
printed: Bulk modulus
196.1 GPaPure Ta
alloy: Ta 1
experimental[10] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 1
report
bulk modulus
printed: Bulk modulus
206.4 GPaPure Ta
alloy: Ta 1
unspecified[10] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 4
report
bulk modulus
printed: Bulk modulus
215.3 GPaPure Ta
alloy: Ta 1
unspecified[10] Turchi 2005Table I, p. 5, row 8
report
bulk modulus
printed: B
193.7 GPa0bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017Table 2, p. 13, row 1
report
bulk modulus
printed: B
195.3 GPa0bcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
DFT[8] Marker 2017
cites ref. 36
Table 2, p. 13, row 3
report
bulk modulus
printed: B
200 GPabcc-Ta
alloy: Ta 1
experimental[8] Marker 2017
cites ref. 35
Table 2, p. 13, row 2
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Peisheng Wang, Jörg Koßmann, Ursula R. Kattner, Mauro Palumbo, Thomas Hammerschmidt, Gregory B. Olson, Thermodynamic assessment of the Co-Ta system, Calphad 64, 205-212 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2018.12.002
  2. J. Pavlů, J. Vřešt’ál, M. Šob, Re-modeling of Laves phases in the Cr–Nb and Cr–Ta systems using first-principles results, Calphad 33, 179-186 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2008.04.006
  3. V.T. Witusiewicz, A.A. Bondar, U. Hecht, V.M. Voblikov, O.S. Fomichov, V.M. Petyukh et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic re-assessment of the binary Fe–Ta system, Intermetallics 19, 1059-1075 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2011.03.018
  4. S.H. Zhou, Y. Wang, L.-Q. Chen, Z.-K. Liu, R.E. Napolitano, Solution-based thermodynamic modeling of the Ni–Ta and Ni–Mo–Ta systems using first-principle calculations, Calphad 33, 631-641 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2009.06.006
  5. V.B. Rajkumar, K.C. Hari Kumar, Gibbs energy modeling of Fe–Ta system by Calphad method assisted by experiments and ab initio calculations, Calphad 48, 157-165 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.12.006
  6. Jia-Yi Yan, G.B. Olson, Computational thermodynamics and kinetics of displacive transformations in titanium-based alloys, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 673, 441-454 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.02.251
  7. P. Broz, A.U. Khan, H. Niu, X.-Q. Chen, D. Li, J. Vrestal et al., The system Ta–V–Si: Thermodynamic modeling, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 199, 171-180 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jssc.2012.12.003
  8. Cassie Marker, ShunLi Shang, Xuan L. Liu, Greta Lindwall, Zi-Kui Liu, First-principles calculations and thermodynamic modeling of the Sn-Ta system, Calphad 57, 46-54 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2017.03.001
  9. V.T. Witusiewicz, A.A. Bondar, U. Hecht, J. Zollinger, V.M. Petyukh, O.S. Fomichov et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic re-assessment of the binary Al–Ta system, Intermetallics 18, 92-106 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.intermet.2009.06.015
  10. P. E. A. Turchi, V. Drchal, J. Kudrnovský, C. Colinet, Larry Kaufman, Zi-Kui Liu, Application of<i>ab initio</i>and CALPHAD thermodynamics to Mo-Ta-W alloys, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005). doi:10.1103/physrevb.71.094206