Ti–U system
197 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 184, model 13); 3 calculated phase diagram(s). 3 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (7) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 184 |
| model | 13 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 16 |
| phase transition | 21 |
| phase equilibrium | 8 |
| crystal structure | 150 |
| other property | 2 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| TiU-11Ber.tdb | A. Berche, N. Dupin, C. Gueneau, C. Rado, B. Sundman, J.C. Dumas, J. Nucl. Mater., 411, 131-43(2011). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.043 | 305bf96c635dc687ba4dff85745fb700ce5dbbf627938fc6ed8e35b4da5088c7 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TiU-12Cao.tdb | Z. Cao, K. Wang, G. Du, Z. Qiao, Appl. Mech. Mater., 187, 272-77(2012). | 24682d23d60c12e43cb130585e7d8f37fb603d167473f62dac2edcf78fcd2f95 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TiU-21Mo.tdb | C. Mo, W. Mo, B. Bian, P. Zhou, Y. Du, T. Fa, X. Wang, J. Nucl. Mater., 557, 153317(2021). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153317 | 0468f8a21aeadb99e2bcde4abf9547a0a5ddd826b52712a1cad61b5c38d3313a | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TDB file | T (K) | Phases at the invariant |
|---|---|---|
| TiU-11Ber.tdb | 995.89 | TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(U) 0.95747) + TETRAGONAL_U (x(U) 0.98745) |
| TiU-11Ber.tdb | 924.45 | TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) + TETRAGONAL_U (x(U) 0.99306) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A20 (x(U) 1) |
| TiU-11Ber.tdb | 924.45 | TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) + TETRAGONAL_U (x(U) 0.9931) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A20 (x(U) 1) |
| TiU-11Ber.tdb | 919.93 | HCP_A3 (x(U) 0.01089) + BCC_A2 (x(U) 0.13567) + TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) |
| TiU-11Ber.tdb | 919.93 | HCP_A3 (x(U) 0.01089) + BCC_A2 (x(U) 0.13546) + TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) |
| TiU-12Cao.tdb | 1001.46 | TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(U) 0.97184) + TETRAGONAL_U (x(U) 0.99765) |
| TiU-12Cao.tdb | 939.53 | TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) + TETRAGONAL_U (x(U) 0.99904) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A20 (x(U) 1) |
| TiU-12Cao.tdb | 939.53 | TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) + TETRAGONAL_U (x(U) 0.99905) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A20 (x(U) 1) |
| TiU-12Cao.tdb | 936.93 | HCP_A3 (x(U) 0.0287) + BCC_A2 (x(U) 0.12784) + TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) |
| TiU-12Cao.tdb | 936.93 | HCP_A3 (x(U) 0.02867) + BCC_A2 (x(U) 0.12768) + TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) |
| TiU-21Mo.tdb | 991.25 | TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) + BCC_A2 (x(U) 0.94485) + TETRAGONAL_U (x(U) 0.9747) |
| TiU-21Mo.tdb | 934.4 | TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) + TETRAGONAL_U (x(U) 0.98251) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A20 (x(U) 0.98542) |
| TiU-21Mo.tdb | 934.4 | TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) + TETRAGONAL_U (x(U) 0.98267) + ORTHORHOMBIC_A20 (x(U) 0.98555) |
| TiU-21Mo.tdb | 909.91 | HCP_A3 (x(U) 0.05428) + BCC_A2 (x(U) 0.16783) + TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) |
| TiU-21Mo.tdb | 909.91 | HCP_A3 (x(U) 0.05425) + BCC_A2 (x(U) 0.16767) + TIU2 (x(U) 0.66667) |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull TiU-11Ber · CALPHAD hull TiU-12Cao
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1173 | congruent transformation: γ(U,Ti) -> δ-U2Ti | γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.333; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333333, U 0.666667 | model | [1] Mo 2021 cites Bajaj 2011 doi | Table 6, p. 10, row 12 report | |
| 1172 | congruent transformation: γ(U,Ti) -> δ-U2Ti | γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.333; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333333, U 0.666667 | model | [1] Mo 2021 cites Berche 2011 doi | Table 6, p. 10, row 11 report | |
| 1168.15 | congruent transformation: γ(U,Ti) -> δ-U2Ti | γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.333; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333333, U 0.666667 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 6, p. 10, row 14 report | |
| 1168 | congruent transformation: γ(U,Ti) -> δ-U2Ti | γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.333; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333333, U 0.666667 | model | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 6, p. 10, row 13 report | |
| 996 | bcc -> (β-U) + U2Ti | bcc: U 0.957; (β-U): U 0.987; U2Ti: U 0.667 | model | [2] Berche 2011 | Table 1, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| 996 | eutectoid: γ(U,Ti) -> βU + δ-U2Ti | γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.043; βU: Ti 0.013; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333 | model | [1] Mo 2021 cites Berche 2011 doi | Table 6, p. 10, row 1 report | |
| 991.65 | eutectoid: γ(U,Ti) -> βU + δ-U2Ti | γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.054; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 6, p. 10, row 3 report | |
| 991.2 | eutectoid: γ(U,Ti) -> βU + δ-U2Ti | γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.055; βU: Ti 0.025; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333 | model | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 6, p. 10, row 2 report | |
| 934.4 | eutectoid: βU -> αU + δ-U2Ti | βU: Ti 0.017; αU: Ti 0.014; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333 | model | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 6, p. 10, row 6 report | |
| 934.4 | eutectoid: βU -> αU + δ-U2Ti | δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 6, p. 10, row 7 report | |
| 928.15 | eutectoid: βU -> αU + δ-U2Ti | αU: Ti 0.01; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 cites Knapton 1954 | Table 6, p. 10, row 5 report | |
| 924 | (β-U) -> (α-U) + U2Ti | (β-U): U 1; (α-U): U 0.993; U2Ti: U 0.667 | model | [2] Berche 2011 | Table 1, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| 924 | eutectoid: βU -> αU + δ-U2Ti | βU: Ti 0.007; αU: Ti 0; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333 | model | [1] Mo 2021 cites Berche 2011 doi | Table 6, p. 10, row 4 report | |
| 920 | bcc -> U2Ti + hcp | bcc: U 0.135; U2Ti: U 0.667; hcp: U 0.011 | model | [2] Berche 2011 | Table 1, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| 920 | eutectoid: γ(U,Ti) -> αTi + δ-U2Ti | γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.865; αTi: Ti 0.989; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333 | model | [1] Mo 2021 cites Berche 2011 doi | Table 6, p. 10, row 8 report | |
| 910 | eutectoid: γ(U,Ti) -> αTi + δ-U2Ti | γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.83; αTi: Ti 0.95; δ-U2Ti: Ti 0.333 | model | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 6, p. 10, row 9 report |
Other properties
Phase transition (21)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase transition | 933.85 K | 933.85 | α→β | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 cites Rai 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 6, row 31 report | |
| Phase transition | 934.4 K | 934.4 | β→α+U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 21 report | |
| Phase transition | 934.75 K | 934.75 | α→β | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 cites Rai 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 6, row 32 report | |
| Phase transition | 935.15 K | 935.15 | α→β | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 cites Rai 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 6, row 33 report | |
| Phase transition | 935.85 K | 935.85 | α→β | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 cites Rai 2009 doi | Table 2, p. 6, row 34 report | |
| Phase transition | 937.65 K | 937.65 | α→β | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 27 report | |
| Phase transition | 938.55 K | 938.55 | eutectoid: β→α+U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 17 report | |
| Phase transition | 938.6 K | 938.6 | β→α+U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 20 report | |
| Phase transition | 938.65 K | 938.65 | eutectoid: β→α+U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 19 report | |
| Phase transition | 938.75 K | 938.75 | eutectoid: β→α+U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 18 report | |
| Phase transition | 939.15 K | 939.15 | α→β | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 28 report | |
| Phase transition | 939.85 K | 939.85 | α→β | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 29 report | |
| Phase transition | 991.65 K | 991.65 | γ→β+U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 16 report | |
| Phase transition | 995.15 K | 995.15 | eutectoid: γ→β+U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 14 report | |
| Phase transition | 995.85 K | 995.85 | γ→β+U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 15 report | |
| Phase transition | 995.95 K | 995.95 | eutectoid: γ→β+U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 12 report | |
| Phase transition | 1168.15 K | 1168.15 | γ→U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333, U 0.667 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 26 report | |
| Phase transition | 1172 K | 1172 | Liquid -> U2Ti L: U 0.667; U2Ti: U 0.667 | model | [2] Berche 2011 | Table 1, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| Phase transition | 1172.35 K | 1172.35 | congruent transformation: γ→U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333, U 0.667 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 22 report | |
| Phase transition | 1172.35 K | 1172.35 | γ→U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333, U 0.667 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 25 report | |
| Phase transition | 1172.55 K | 1172.55 | congruent transformation: γ→U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333, U 0.667 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 2, p. 6, row 24 report |
Phase equilibrium (8)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase assemblage | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.02, U 0.98 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 3, p. 6, row 1 report | ||
| Phase assemblage | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.05, U 0.95 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 3, p. 6, row 9 report | ||
| Phase assemblage | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.04, U 0.96 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 3, p. 6, row 8 report | ||
| Phase composition | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.053, U 0.947 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 3, p. 6, row 3 report | ||
| Phase composition | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.053, U 0.947 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 3, p. 6, row 2 report | ||
| Phase composition | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.052, U 0.948 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 3, p. 6, row 4 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.044, U 0.956 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 3, p. 6, row 7 report | ||
| Phase composition | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) γ(U,Ti): Ti 0.043, U 0.957 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 3, p. 6, row 6 report |
Crystal structure (150)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice a | 2.84875 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.85488 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 14 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.85299 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86199 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.85295 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 16 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.8818 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 18 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.85248 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 12 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.85716 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86016 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.85214 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0114, U 0.9886 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.83094 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 15 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.827 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.82875 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 17 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.81813 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 11 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.827 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.83712 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 19 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.84119 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.3316, U 0.6684 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 20 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.827 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.827 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.82632 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 13 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86538 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 27 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86591 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0114, U 0.9886 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 21 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.87977 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 25 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.87004 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 23 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.87037 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 22 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86315 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 29 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.8745 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 33 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.892 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 26 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.87439 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 37 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86956 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 24 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.85972 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 31 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.87997 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 35 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86607 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 28 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.827 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 34 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.84222 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 38 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.83927 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.3316, U 0.6684 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 39 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.827 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 30 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.83789 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 32 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.84083 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 36 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.85043 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 41 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86922 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 43 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86764 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 45 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86957 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0114, U 0.9886 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 40 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86519 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 46 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86807 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 44 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.88912 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 55 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86881 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 51 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.87101 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 49 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.85285 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 42 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.863 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 48 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.86988 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 53 report | |
| Lattice a | 2.88476 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 47 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.82562 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 54 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.85335 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.3316, U 0.6684 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 57 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.85824 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 56 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.827 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 52 report | |
| Lattice a | 4.827 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 50 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.86424 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87472 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 14 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87556 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87968 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87317 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 16 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.7888 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 18 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.86668 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 12 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87619 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87748 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.86735 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0114, U 0.9886 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.83216 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 27 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.88643 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0114, U 0.9886 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 21 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87306 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 25 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87016 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 23 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87944 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 22 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.84662 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 29 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.84613 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 33 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.77989 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 26 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.82922 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 37 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87032 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 24 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.82225 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 31 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.82865 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 35 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.84461 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 28 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87603 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 41 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.85459 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 43 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.8663 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 45 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.83525 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0114, U 0.9886 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 40 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.86719 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 46 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.85384 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 44 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.781 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 55 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.82464 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 51 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.83704 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 49 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.87024 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 42 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.86436 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 48 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.83822 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 53 report | |
| Lattice b | 5.79894 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 47 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.848 Å | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 30 report | ||
| Lattice c | 4.95895 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.9666 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 14 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96356 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97151 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96008 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 16 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.984 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 18 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96335 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 12 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96356 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96971 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.9605 Å | 913.15 | αU alloy: Ti 0.0114, U 0.9886 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.85436 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 15 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.848 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.84944 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 17 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.86397 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 11 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.848 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.84594 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 19 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.85035 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.3316, U 0.6684 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 20 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.848 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.848 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.85876 Å | 913.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 13 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.9844 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 27 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97554 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0114, U 0.9886 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 21 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97881 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 25 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97971 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 23 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97931 Å | 993.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 22 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97434 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 29 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.9852 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 33 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97792 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 26 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97957 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 37 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.98118 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 24 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97248 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 31 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.98661 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 35 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96857 Å | 993.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 28 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.848 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 34 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.84687 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 38 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.84585 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.3316, U 0.6684 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 39 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.85474 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 32 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.86953 Å | 993.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 36 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96399 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 41 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96802 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 43 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97117 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 45 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97317 Å | 1003.15 | βU alloy: Ti 0.0114, U 0.9886 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 40 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97041 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0392, U 0.9608 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 46 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96987 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0305, U 0.9695 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 44 report | |
| Lattice c | 5.00009 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 55 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.98405 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 51 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.98449 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 49 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96014 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0202, U 0.9798 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 42 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97314 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0611, U 0.9389 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 48 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.96137 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 53 report | |
| Lattice c | 4.97749 Å | 1003.15 | γ(U,Ti) alloy: Ti 0.0515, U 0.9485 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 47 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.83247 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.1493, U 0.8507 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 54 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.85101 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.3316, U 0.6684 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 57 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.8545 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.238, U 0.762 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 56 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.848 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.081, U 0.919 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 52 report | |
| Lattice c | 2.848 Å | 1003.15 | δ-U2Ti alloy: Ti 0.0708, U 0.9292 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | Table 1, p. 4, row 50 report |
Other property (2)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other printed: enthalpy of phase transition | 21484 J/(mol of atoms) | 1168.15 | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | p. 10 report | The congruent reaction γ (U,Ti) → δ -U2 Ti occurs at 895 °C with the enthalpy of phase transition of 21484 J/(mol of atoms). | |
| Other printed: enthalpy of the phase transition | 21484 J/mol | 1168.15 | δ -U2 Ti | experimental | [1] Mo 2021 | p. 8 report | For δ -U2 Ti phase, the congruent solid-state transformation of δ U2 Ti phase occurs at 895 °C, and the enthalpy of the phase transition is determined to be 21484 J/mol. |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Chuan Mo, Wenlin Mo, Baixue Bian, Peng Zhou, Yong Du, Tao Fa et al., Experimental investigation of the U-rich region and thermodynamic re-assessment of the U–Ti system, Journal of Nuclear Materials 557, 153317 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153317
- A. Berche, N. Dupin, C. Guéneau, C. Rado, B. Sundman, J.C. Dumas, Calphad thermodynamic description of some binary systems involving U, Journal of Nuclear Materials 411, 131-143 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.043