Yb system

28 accepted literature values from 8 paper(s) (experimental 15, model 7, DFT 5, unspecified 1); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental15
model7
DFT5
unspecified1
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction7
phase transition11
crystal structure10

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Yb system (7)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1053other: Yb(bcc) = Yb(fcc)experimental[1] Brutti 2005
cites Palenzona 2002
Table 5, p. 6, row 2
report
1033polymorphic: BCC(Yb) -> FCC(Yb)unspecified[2] Zhang 2007
cites Dinsdale 1991 doi
Table 4, p. 5, row 2
report
1033polymorphic: BCC(Yb) -> FCC(Yb)model[2] Zhang 2007Table 4, p. 5, row 1
report
1033polymorphic: β(Yb) -> γ(Yb)β(Yb): experimental[3] Dai-man 2018
cites Okamoto 2005
Table 1, p. 3, row 26
report
1033other: Yb(bcc) = Yb(fcc)model[1] Brutti 2005Table 5, p. 6, row 1
report
1033polymorphic: β(Yb) -> γ(Yb)β(Yb): model[3] Dai-man 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 27
report
1023polymorphic: β(Yb) -> γ(Yb)β(Yb): experimental[3] Dai-man 2018
cites Pani 2003
Table 1, p. 3, row 25
report

Other properties

Phase transition (11)

Phase transition, Yb system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1013.15 K1013.15Ybexperimental[4] Meng 2008
cites Palenzona 1972 doi
p. 2
report
The accepted ␤ ↔ ␥ transformation temperature by Gschneidner et al. [10] was 795 ◦ C, while the given value by Palenzona et al. [9] was 740 ◦ C.
Phase transition1033 K1033polymorphic: (βYb) -> (γYb)
(βYb):
model[5] Ghamri 2015Table 5, p. 6, row 10
report
Phase transition1053 K1053polymorphic: Yb(bcc) = Yb(fcc)
alloy: Yb 1
experimental[1] Brutti 2005
cites Palenzona 2002
Table 2, p. 3, row 40
report
Phase transition1053.15 K1053.15polymorphic: γYb -> βYbmodel[6] Achgar 2018Table 5, p. 8, row 6
report
Phase transition1053.15 K1053.15polymorphic: γYb -> βYbmodel[6] Achgar 2018Table 5, p. 8, row 5
report
Phase transition1053.15 K1053.15polymorphic: γYb -> βYbexperimental[6] Achgar 2018
cites Pani 2003
Table 5, p. 8, row 4
report
Phase transition1061 K1061polymorphic: (βYb) -> (γYb)
(βYb):
experimental[5] Ghamri 2015
cites Kh 1970
Table 5, p. 6, row 7
report
Phase transition1065 K1065polymorphicexperimental[7] Hu 2017
cites Gschneidner 1986 doi
p. 20
report
In fact, the experimentally measured temperature is even lower than the commonly acceptable polymorphic transformation temperature between fcc-Yb and bcc-Yb, which is 1065K [41].
Phase transition1068 K1068polymorphic: (βYb) -> (γYb)
(βYb):
experimental[5] Ghamri 2015
cites Okamoto 1990
Table 5, p. 6, row 9
report
Phase transition1068.15 K1068.15Ybmodel[4] Meng 2008
cites Gschneidner 1989 doi
p. 2
report
The accepted ␤ ↔ ␥ transformation temperature by Gschneidner et al. [10] was 795 ◦ C, while the given value by Palenzona et al. [9] was 740 ◦ C.
Phase transition1071 K1071polymorphic: (βYb) -> (γYb)
(βYb):
experimental[5] Ghamri 2015
cites Spedding 1961 doi
Table 5, p. 6, row 8
report

Crystal structure (10)

Crystal structure, Yb system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a3.81 Å0(Yb-γ)
alloy: Yb 1
DFT[8] Kali-Ali 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 4
report
Lattice a
printed: a
5.451 Å0fcc-Yb
alloy: Yb 1
DFT[7] Hu 2017Table 3, p. 26, row 7
report
Lattice a
printed: a
5.491 Å0fcc-Yb
alloy: Yb 1
DFT[7] Hu 2017Table 3, p. 26, row 8
report
Lattice a3.87 Å298.15(Yb-γ)
alloy: Yb 1
experimental[8] Kali-Ali 2017
cites Kayser 1971 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
Lattice a
printed: a
5.484 Å298.15fcc-Yb
alloy: Yb 1
experimental[7] Hu 2017
cites Palenzona 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 26, row 6
report
Lattice a
printed: Lattice parameter a
5.486 Å298.15fcc-Yb
alloy: Yb 1
experimental[7] Hu 2017
cites Buschow 1972 doi
Table 3, p. 26, row 5
report
Lattice b3.81 Å0(Yb-γ)
alloy: Yb 1
DFT[8] Kali-Ali 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 4
report
Lattice b3.87 Å298.15(Yb-γ)
alloy: Yb 1
experimental[8] Kali-Ali 2017
cites Kayser 1971 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
Lattice c6.33 Å0(Yb-γ)
alloy: Yb 1
DFT[8] Kali-Ali 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 4
report
Lattice c6.38 Å298.15(Yb-γ)
alloy: Yb 1
experimental[8] Kali-Ali 2017
cites Kayser 1971 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. S. Brutti, G. Balducci, A. Ciccioli, G. Gigli, Thermodynamic assessment of the Yb–Si system, Calphad 29, 254-261 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2005.06.004
  2. L.G. Zhang, L.B. Liu, H.S. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of Cu–Eu and Cu–Yb system, Calphad 31, 264-268 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2006.11.003
  3. Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018). doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217
  4. F.G. Meng, L.G. Zhang, H.S. Liu, L.B. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic optimization of the Al–Yb binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 452, 279-282 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.11.023
  5. H. Ghamri, Y. Djaballah, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Thermodynamic modeling of the Eu–Te and Te–Yb systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 643, 121-128 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.224
  6. Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x
  7. Yong-Jie Hu, Yi Wang, Samad A. Firdosy, Kurt E. Star, Jean-Pierre Fleurial, Vilupanur A. Ravi et al., First-principles calculations and thermodynamic modeling of the Yb-Ni binary system, Calphad 59, 207-217 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2017.09.004
  8. F. Kali-Ali, Y. Djaballah, S. Triaa, Ş. Uğur, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, M. Drir et al., Ab-Initio Calculations and Thermodynamic Description of the Yb-Cd and Yb-Sn Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 665-675 (2017). doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0588-x