Yb system
28 accepted literature values from 8 paper(s) (experimental 15, model 7, DFT 5, unspecified 1); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 15 |
| model | 7 |
| DFT | 5 |
| unspecified | 1 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 7 |
| phase transition | 11 |
| crystal structure | 10 |
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1053 | other: Yb(bcc) = Yb(fcc) | experimental | [1] Brutti 2005 cites Palenzona 2002 | Table 5, p. 6, row 2 report | ||
| 1033 | polymorphic: BCC(Yb) -> FCC(Yb) | unspecified | [2] Zhang 2007 cites Dinsdale 1991 doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 2 report | ||
| 1033 | polymorphic: BCC(Yb) -> FCC(Yb) | model | [2] Zhang 2007 | Table 4, p. 5, row 1 report | ||
| 1033 | polymorphic: β(Yb) -> γ(Yb) | β(Yb): | experimental | [3] Dai-man 2018 cites Okamoto 2005 | Table 1, p. 3, row 26 report | |
| 1033 | other: Yb(bcc) = Yb(fcc) | model | [1] Brutti 2005 | Table 5, p. 6, row 1 report | ||
| 1033 | polymorphic: β(Yb) -> γ(Yb) | β(Yb): | model | [3] Dai-man 2018 | Table 1, p. 3, row 27 report | |
| 1023 | polymorphic: β(Yb) -> γ(Yb) | β(Yb): | experimental | [3] Dai-man 2018 cites Pani 2003 | Table 1, p. 3, row 25 report |
Other properties
Phase transition (11)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase transition | 1013.15 K | 1013.15 | Yb | experimental | [4] Meng 2008 cites Palenzona 1972 doi | p. 2 report | The accepted  ↔ ␥ transformation temperature by Gschneidner et al. [10] was 795 ◦ C, while the given value by Palenzona et al. [9] was 740 ◦ C. |
| Phase transition | 1033 K | 1033 | polymorphic: (βYb) -> (γYb) (βYb): | model | [5] Ghamri 2015 | Table 5, p. 6, row 10 report | |
| Phase transition | 1053 K | 1053 | polymorphic: Yb(bcc) = Yb(fcc) alloy: Yb 1 | experimental | [1] Brutti 2005 cites Palenzona 2002 | Table 2, p. 3, row 40 report | |
| Phase transition | 1053.15 K | 1053.15 | polymorphic: γYb -> βYb | model | [6] Achgar 2018 | Table 5, p. 8, row 6 report | |
| Phase transition | 1053.15 K | 1053.15 | polymorphic: γYb -> βYb | model | [6] Achgar 2018 | Table 5, p. 8, row 5 report | |
| Phase transition | 1053.15 K | 1053.15 | polymorphic: γYb -> βYb | experimental | [6] Achgar 2018 cites Pani 2003 | Table 5, p. 8, row 4 report | |
| Phase transition | 1061 K | 1061 | polymorphic: (βYb) -> (γYb) (βYb): | experimental | [5] Ghamri 2015 cites Kh 1970 | Table 5, p. 6, row 7 report | |
| Phase transition | 1065 K | 1065 | polymorphic | experimental | [7] Hu 2017 cites Gschneidner 1986 doi | p. 20 report | In fact, the experimentally measured temperature is even lower than the commonly acceptable polymorphic transformation temperature between fcc-Yb and bcc-Yb, which is 1065K [41]. |
| Phase transition | 1068 K | 1068 | polymorphic: (βYb) -> (γYb) (βYb): | experimental | [5] Ghamri 2015 cites Okamoto 1990 | Table 5, p. 6, row 9 report | |
| Phase transition | 1068.15 K | 1068.15 | Yb | model | [4] Meng 2008 cites Gschneidner 1989 doi | p. 2 report | The accepted  ↔ ␥ transformation temperature by Gschneidner et al. [10] was 795 ◦ C, while the given value by Palenzona et al. [9] was 740 ◦ C. |
| Phase transition | 1071 K | 1071 | polymorphic: (βYb) -> (γYb) (βYb): | experimental | [5] Ghamri 2015 cites Spedding 1961 doi | Table 5, p. 6, row 8 report |
Crystal structure (10)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice a | 3.81 Å | 0 | (Yb-γ) alloy: Yb 1 | DFT | [8] Kali-Ali 2017 | Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| Lattice a printed: a | 5.451 Å | 0 | fcc-Yb alloy: Yb 1 | DFT | [7] Hu 2017 | Table 3, p. 26, row 7 report | |
| Lattice a printed: a | 5.491 Å | 0 | fcc-Yb alloy: Yb 1 | DFT | [7] Hu 2017 | Table 3, p. 26, row 8 report | |
| Lattice a | 3.87 Å | 298.15 | (Yb-γ) alloy: Yb 1 | experimental | [8] Kali-Ali 2017 cites Kayser 1971 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| Lattice a printed: a | 5.484 Å | 298.15 | fcc-Yb alloy: Yb 1 | experimental | [7] Hu 2017 cites Palenzona 1973 doi | Table 3, p. 26, row 6 report | |
| Lattice a printed: Lattice parameter a | 5.486 Å | 298.15 | fcc-Yb alloy: Yb 1 | experimental | [7] Hu 2017 cites Buschow 1972 doi | Table 3, p. 26, row 5 report | |
| Lattice b | 3.81 Å | 0 | (Yb-γ) alloy: Yb 1 | DFT | [8] Kali-Ali 2017 | Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| Lattice b | 3.87 Å | 298.15 | (Yb-γ) alloy: Yb 1 | experimental | [8] Kali-Ali 2017 cites Kayser 1971 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| Lattice c | 6.33 Å | 0 | (Yb-γ) alloy: Yb 1 | DFT | [8] Kali-Ali 2017 | Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| Lattice c | 6.38 Å | 298.15 | (Yb-γ) alloy: Yb 1 | experimental | [8] Kali-Ali 2017 cites Kayser 1971 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- S. Brutti, G. Balducci, A. Ciccioli, G. Gigli, Thermodynamic assessment of the Yb–Si system, Calphad 29, 254-261 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2005.06.004
- L.G. Zhang, L.B. Liu, H.S. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic assessment of Cu–Eu and Cu–Yb system, Calphad 31, 264-268 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2006.11.003
- Zhu Dai-man, Li Chang-rong, Guo Cui-ping, Du Zhen-min, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Yb binary system, Ferroelectrics 522, 80-87 (2018). doi:10.1080/00150193.2018.1392217
- F.G. Meng, L.G. Zhang, H.S. Liu, L.B. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic optimization of the Al–Yb binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 452, 279-282 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.11.023
- H. Ghamri, Y. Djaballah, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Thermodynamic modeling of the Eu–Te and Te–Yb systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 643, 121-128 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.224
- Khadija Achgar, Saïd Kardellass, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ytterbium–Germanium binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 131, 443-453 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10973-017-6203-x
- Yong-Jie Hu, Yi Wang, Samad A. Firdosy, Kurt E. Star, Jean-Pierre Fleurial, Vilupanur A. Ravi et al., First-principles calculations and thermodynamic modeling of the Yb-Ni binary system, Calphad 59, 207-217 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2017.09.004
- F. Kali-Ali, Y. Djaballah, S. Triaa, Ş. Uğur, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, M. Drir et al., Ab-Initio Calculations and Thermodynamic Description of the Yb-Cd and Yb-Sn Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 665-675 (2017). doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0588-x