Au51Ce14: enthalpy of formation

9 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 5, model 4); experimental median -49.5 kJ/mol-atom (n = 5).

Systems: Au–Ce

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Au51Ce14 reported in the literature (9)
Value	Phase as printed	T (K)	Class	Method	System	Source	Location
-55 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.7	αCe14Au51	1123	experimental	Calorimetry	Au–Ce	[1] Moustaine 2016 cites Janghorban 1994	Table 2, p. 3, row 22 report
-53.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.9	αCe14Au51	298.15	experimental	Calorimetry	Au–Ce	[1] Moustaine 2016 cites Janghorban 1994	Table 2, p. 3, row 24 report
-49.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.2	Au51Ce14	298.15	experimental	calorimetry	Au–Ce	[2] Dong 2013 cites Fitzner 1993	Table 4, p. 4, row 13 report
-49.5 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.2	αCe14Au51	298.15	experimental	Calorimetry	Au–Ce	[1] Moustaine 2016 cites Fitzner 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 25 report
-44 kJ/mol-atom ± 5	αCe14Au51	1223	experimental	Calorimetry	Au–Ce	[1] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 2, p. 3, row 23 report
-57.71 kJ/mol-atom	αCe14Au51	298.15	model	Optimization	Au–Ce	[1] Moustaine 2016 cites Dong 2013 doi	Table 2, p. 3, row 26 report
-57.71 kJ/mol-atom	Au51Ce14	289	model		Au–Ce	[2] Dong 2013	Table 4, p. 4, row 14 report
-55.99 kJ/mol-atom	αCe14Au51	298.15	model	Optimization	Au–Ce	[1] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 27 report
-53.1 kJ/mol-atom	βCe14Au51	298.15	model	Optimization	Au–Ce	[1] Moustaine 2016	Table 2, p. 3, row 28 report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Au51Ce14
Value	Unit	Printed	Reading	Method (class, basis)	Effective
-55	kJ/mol-atom	1.7	0.5	3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)	3.2
-53.2	kJ/mol-atom	1.9	0.05	3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)	3.2
-49.5	kJ/mol-atom	2.2	0.05	3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)	3.2
-49.5	kJ/mol-atom	2.2	0.05	3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)	3.2
-44	kJ/mol-atom	5	0.5	3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)	5
-57.71	kJ/mol-atom		0.005	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-57.71	kJ/mol-atom		0.005	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-55.99	kJ/mol-atom		0.005	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9
-53.1	kJ/mol-atom		0.05	3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)	3.9

Sources

D. Moustaine, K. Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the cerium gold binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 683, 599-609 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.116
H.Q. Dong, X.M. Tao, T. Laurila, V. Vuorinen, M. Paulasto-Kröckel, Thermodynamic modeling of Au–Ce–Sn ternary system, Calphad 42, 38-50 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.07.013

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735943
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); G. Kim, S. V. Meschel, P. Nash, W. Chen, Experimental formation enthalpies for intermetallic phases and other inorganic compounds, Scientific Data 4 (2017) 170162, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.162; B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file. Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_dft_benchmark_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735943},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735943},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}