Bi2Gd: enthalpy of formation

10 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 5, DFT 5); OQMD -55.782 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1800951).

Systems: Bi–Gd

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Bi2Gd reported in the literature (10)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-67 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(GdSb2-2)0modelMiedema modelBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 5, p. 3, row 17
report
-67 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(EuSb2)0modelMiedema modelBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 5, p. 3, row 13
report
-67 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(EuBi2)0modelMiedema modelBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 5, p. 3, row 11
report
-67 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(YbSb2)0modelMiedema modelBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 5, p. 3, row 19
report
-67 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(GdSb2-1)0modelMiedema modelBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013
cites Colinet 1984 doi
Table 5, p. 3, row 15
report
-56.8759 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(EuSb2)0DFTfirst-principlesBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013Table 5, p. 3, row 12
report
-56.8396 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(YbSb2)0DFTfirst-principlesBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013Table 5, p. 3, row 18
report
-54.0316 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(EuBi2)0DFTfirst-principlesBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013Table 5, p. 3, row 10
report
-53.812 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(GdSb2-2)0DFTfirst-principlesBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013Table 5, p. 3, row 16
report
-21.5319 kJ/mol-atomGdBi2(GdSb2–1)0DFTfirst-principlesBi–Gd[1] Wang 2013Table 5, p. 3, row 14
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Bi2Gd
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-67kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-67kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-67kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-67kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-67kJ/mol-atom5.000e-43.9 (model_calculated, calibrated)3.9
-56.8759kJ/mol-atom5.000e-68.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-56.8396kJ/mol-atom5.000e-68.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-54.0316kJ/mol-atom5.000e-68.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-53.812kJ/mol-atom5.000e-48.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395
-21.5319kJ/mol-atom5.000e-68.395 (dft, calibrated)8.395

DFT formation energies

Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.

DFT formation energy of Bi2Gd
SourceEntrykJ/mol-atomeV/atomSpace groupE above hull (kJ/mol-atom)E above hull (eV/atom)Theoretical
OQMDoqmd-1800951-55.782-0.578139P21/m3.320.0344yes

DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);

Sources

  1. Jinsan Wang, Changrong Li, Cuiping Guo, Zhenmin Du, Bo Wu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Gd–Bi and the Ho–Bi systems, Calphad 41, 1-5 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.01.003