Bi2Mg3: enthalpy of formation
12 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 5, model 4, DFT 3).
Systems: Bi–Mg
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -37.181 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | experimental | EMF | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Moser 1974 | Table 3, p. 9, row 4 report | |
| -31.403 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | experimental | Calorimetry | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Kubaschewski 1939 | Table 3, p. 9, row 2 report | |
| -31.403 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | experimental | Evaluated | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Kubaschewski 1956 | Table 3, p. 9, row 3 report | |
| -30.146 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | experimental | Calorimetry | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Seith 1937 | Table 3, p. 9, row 1 report | |
| -25.377 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | experimental | Evaluated | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Kubaschewski 1979 | Table 3, p. 9, row 5 report | |
| -34.08 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | model | Optimized | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Paliwal 2009 | Table 3, p. 9, row 11 report | |
| -33.884 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | model | Optimized | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 | Table 3, p. 9, row 12 report | |
| -33.255 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | model | Optimized | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Oh 1992 | Table 3, p. 9, row 7 report | |
| -25.355 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | model | Calculated | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Alcock 1983 | Table 3, p. 9, row 6 report | |
| -71.276 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | DFT | First-principles calculated | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Zhou 2010 | Table 3, p. 9, row 10 report | |
| -31.454 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | DFT | First-principles calculated | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Zhou 2008 | Table 3, p. 9, row 9 report | |
| -24.369 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | Bi2Mg3 | 298.15 | DFT | First-principles calculated | Bi–Mg | [1] Acta Metall 2012 cites Curtarolo 2005 | Table 3, p. 9, row 8 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -37.181 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 23 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 23 | ||||
| -31.403 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 16 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 16 | ||||
| -31.403 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -30.146 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 16 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 16 | ||||
| -25.377 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 17.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated) | 17.5 | ||||
| -34.08 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -33.884 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -33.255 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -25.355 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 19.5 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 19.5 | ||||
| -71.276 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 41.97 (dft, calibrated) | 41.97 | ||||
| -31.454 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 41.97 (dft, calibrated) | 41.97 | ||||
| -24.369 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 41.97 (dft, calibrated) | 41.97 |
Sources
- Acta Metall. Sin. Engl. Lett., 25, 19-28(2012). doi:10.11890/1006-7191-121-19