Cd6Gd: enthalpy of formation
4 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 2, unspecified 1); experimental median -28.2 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1).
Systems: Cd–Gd
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -28.2 kJ/mol-atom | Cd6Gd | 728 | experimental | Electromotive Force (E.M.F) | Cd–Gd | [1] Azza 2024 cites Roshchina 1981 | Table 4, p. 7, row 11 report | |
| -26.78 kJ/mol-atom | Cd6Gd | 298.15 | model | Optimization | Cd–Gd | [1] Azza 2024 cites Kurata 2001 doi | Table 4, p. 7, row 13 report | |
| -24.73 kJ/mol-atom | Cd6Gd | 298.15 | model | Optimization | Cd–Gd | [1] Azza 2024 | Table 4, p. 7, row 14 report | |
| -22.9 kJ/mol-atom | Cd6Gd | 298.15 | unspecified | Cd–Gd | [1] Azza 2024 | Table 4, p. 7, row 12 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -28.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 4.6 (emf, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.6 | ||||
| -26.78 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -24.73 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -22.9 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 |
Sources
- Hassan Azza, Mustapha Ait Boukideur, Khadija Achgar, Mohamed Idbenali, Najim Selhaoui, Thermodynamic Description of the Gadolinium-Cadmium Phase Diagram, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 45, 714-722 (2024). doi:10.1007/s11669-024-01127-6