Ce5Sn3: enthalpy of formation
7 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 2, model 2, DFT 3); experimental median -74.26 kJ/mol-atom (n = 2); Materials Project -51.357 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaabkgtw); OQMD -68.361 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-18282).
Systems: Ce–Sn
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -75.3 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.2 | αCe5Sn3 | 300 | experimental | calorimetry | Ce–Sn | [1] Dong 2013 cites Borsese 1980 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 26 report | |
| -73.22 kJ/mol-atom ± 4.2 | αCe5Sn3 | 300 | experimental | calorimetry | Ce–Sn | [1] Dong 2013 cites Borzone 1982 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 24 report | |
| -75 kJ/mol-atom | αCe5Sn3 | 300 | model | Ce–Sn | [1] Dong 2013 cites Colinet 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 25 report | ||
| -70.03 kJ/mol-atom | βCe5Sn3 | 289 | model | Ce–Sn | [1] Dong 2013 | Table 4, p. 4, row 22 report | ||
| -73.794 kJ/mol-atom | Ce5Sn3 | 0 | DFT | first-principles calculation | Ce–Sn | [2] Li 2013 | Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| -65.89 kJ/mol-atom | αCe5Sn3 | 0 | DFT | Ce–Sn | [1] Dong 2013 | Table 4, p. 4, row 23 report | ||
| -65.34 kJ/mol-atom | βCe5Sn3 | 0 | DFT | Ce–Sn | [1] Dong 2013 | Table 4, p. 4, row 21 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -75.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 4.2 | 0.05 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 4.2 | |||
| -73.22 | kJ/mol-atom | 4.2 | 0.005 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 4.2 | |||
| -75 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -70.03 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -73.794 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -65.89 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -65.34 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaabkgtw | -51.357 | -0.53228 | I4/mcm | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-18282 | -68.361 | -0.708519 | I4/mcm | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- H.Q. Dong, X.M. Tao, T. Laurila, V. Vuorinen, M. Paulasto-Kröckel, Thermodynamic modeling of Au–Ce–Sn ternary system, Calphad 42, 38-50 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.07.013
- Juan Li, Xiaoma Tao, Sisi Dong, Feng Yang, Huashan Liu, Zhanpeng Jin et al., Thermodynamic assessment of Sn–Cu–Ce system, Calphad 43, 124-132 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.04.003