CeSi1.68: enthalpy of formation
4 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 2, unspecified 1); experimental median -70 kJ/mol-atom (n = 1).
Systems: Ce–Si
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -70 kJ/mol-atom ± 6 | CeSi1.68 | 1373 | experimental | Calorimetry | Ce–Si | [1] Huang 2016 | Table 8, p. 9, row 22 report | |
| -70 kJ/mol-atom ± 6 | CeSi1.68 | 298.15 | model | Calculated | Ce–Si | [1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi | Table 8, p. 9, row 19 report | |
| -65 kJ/mol-atom | CeSi1.68 | 298.15 | model | Calculated | Ce–Si | [1] Huang 2016 cites Grobner 2004 doi | Table 8, p. 9, row 8 report | |
| -65 kJ/mol-atom | CeSi1.68 | 298.15 | unspecified | Ce–Si | [1] Huang 2016 | Table 8, p. 9, row 31 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -70 | kJ/mol-atom | 6 | 0.05 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 6 | |||
| -70 | kJ/mol-atom | 6 | 0.5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 6 | |||
| -65 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -65 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 |
Sources
- Dandan Huang, Shuhong Liu, Ying Tang, Yong Du, Philip Nash, Bo Sundman, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the Ce-Si system, Thermochimica Acta 646, 49-58 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2016.11.003