Ce–Si system

159 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 75, model 56, unspecified 28); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 16 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (13) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	75
model	56
unspecified	28

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	45
phase transition	8
phase equilibrium	23
formation	39
mixing / partial	44

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	J. Groebner, D. Mirkovic, R. Schmid-Fetzer, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 35A, 3349-62(2004). doi:10.1007/s11661-004-0172-y	`1de57b4b73d0894d20c60e7017a15cb92ff94dc494d1a2161dfc754d677d859c`	viewer · TDB · JSON
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	D. Huang, S. Liu, Y. Tang, Y. Du, P. Nash, B. Sundman, Thermochim. Acta, 646, 49-58(2016). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2016.11.003	`bf95d2efc0a2b00bd8b5e240b1394608057b133acf1217f5beb18f2a654c2f73`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1834.99	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.58639) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.625) + CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1834.99	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.58637) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.625) + CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1834.99	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.5865) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.625) + CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1741.67	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.49374) + CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.625)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1741.66	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.49324) + CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.625)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1741.66	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.4932) + CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.625)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1711.63	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.42087) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444) + CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1711.62	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.42031) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444) + CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1711.62	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.41997) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444) + CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1665.73	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.33551) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1665.73	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.33529) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1665.73	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.3357) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1665.73	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.33528) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1643.64	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.29966) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1643.64	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.29973) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1643.64	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.29953) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1472.47	CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.88445) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1472.47	CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.88446) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1049.75	BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.01181) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1049.75	BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.01177) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375)
CeSi-04Gro.tdb	1000	BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Si) 0) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1853.56	CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.54594) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.63)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1853.56	CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.54602) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.63)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1853.56	CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.54587) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.63)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1833.56	CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.63) + CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.7212)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1833.56	CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.63) + CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.72113)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1772.89	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.41951) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444) + CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1772.89	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.4196) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444) + CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1610.29	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.343) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1610.29	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.34297) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1610.29	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.34301) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4) + CE5SI4 (x(Si) 0.44444)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1536.25	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.30896) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1536.25	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.30895) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1536.25	LIQUID (x(Si) 0.30911) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375) + CE3SI2_D5A (x(Si) 0.4)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1502.28	CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.83151) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1502.28	CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.83162) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1502.28	CESI2_CC (x(Si) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.83165) + DIAMOND_A4 (x(Si) 1)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1471.38	CESI_B27 (x(Si) 0.5) + CE3SI4 (x(Si) 0.57265) + CE3SI5 (x(Si) 0.63)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1000	BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.04591)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	1000	FCC_A1 (x(Si) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.04569)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	900.07	FCC_A1 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.10933) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	900.07	FCC_A1 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.1094) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375)
CeSi-16Hua.tdb	900.07	FCC_A1 (x(Si) 0) + LIQUID (x(Si) 0.10925) + CE5SI3_D8L (x(Si) 0.375)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CeSi-04Gro

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ce–Si system (45)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location	Quote
2004.5	congruent melting: L ↔ CeSi1.68	L: Si 0.625; CeSi1.68: Si 0.625	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 32 report
1998	congruent melting: L ↔ CeSi1.68	L: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 31 report
1993	congruent melting: L ↔ CeSi1.68	L: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Bulanova 2002 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 29 report
1992.1	congruent melting: L ↔ CeSi1.68	L: Si 0.63; CeSi1.68: Si 0.63	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 28 report
1988	congruent melting: L ↔ CeSi1.68	L: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 30 report
1913	congruent melting: L ↔ CeSi	L: Si 0.5; CeSi: Si 0.5	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 20 report
1903	congruent melting: L ↔ CeSi	L: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5; CeSi: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Bulanova 2002 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 18 report
1903	congruent melting: L ↔ CeSi	L: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5; CeSi: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 19 report
1899.5	congruent melting: L ↔ CeSi	L: Si 0.5; CeSi: Si 0.5	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 17 report
1887	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi + CeSi1.68	CeSi: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 23 report
1860.6	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi + CeSi1.68	L: Si 0.545; CeSi: Si 0.5; CeSi1.68: Si 0.625	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 25 report
1860	peritectic: L + CeSi1.68 ↔ CeSi2	CeSi1.68: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63; CeSi2: Ce 0.333333, Si 0.666667	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 35 report
1859.2	peritectic: L + CeSi1.68 ↔ CeSi2	L: Si 0.71; CeSi1.68: Si 0.625; CeSi2: Si 0.667	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 36 report
1853.6	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi + CeSi1.68	L: Si 0.546; CeSi: Si 0.5; CeSi1.68: Si 0.63	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 21 report
1848	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi + CeSi1.68	CeSi: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 24 report
1833.6	peritectic: L + CeSi1.68 ↔ CeSi2	L: Si 0.721; CeSi1.68: Si 0.63; CeSi2: Si 0.667	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 33 report
1833	peritectic: L + CeSi1.68 ↔ CeSi2	CeSi1.68: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63; CeSi2: Ce 0.333333, Si 0.666667	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Bulanova 2002 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 34 report
1805.5	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi + CeSi1.68	L: Si 0.55; CeSi: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Bulanova 2002 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 22 report
1790	peritectic: L + CeSi ↔ Ce5Si4	CeSi: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5; Ce5Si4: Ce 0.555556, Si 0.444444	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 15 report
1773	peritectic: L + CeSi ↔ Ce5Si4	CeSi: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5; Ce5Si4: Ce 0.555556, Si 0.444444	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Bulanova 2002 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 14 report
1772.9	peritectic: L + CeSi ↔ Ce5Si4	L: Si 0.419; CeSi: Si 0.5; Ce5Si4: Si 0.444	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 13 report
1771.8	peritectic: L + CeSi ↔ Ce5Si4	L: Si 0.42; CeSi: Si 0.5; Ce5Si4: Si 0.444	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 16 report
1617	peritectic: L + Ce5Si4 ↔ Ce3Si2	Ce5Si4: Ce 0.555556, Si 0.444444; Ce3Si2: Ce 0.6, Si 0.4	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 11 report
1610.3	peritectic: L + Ce5Si4 ↔ Ce3Si2	L: Si 0.343; Ce5Si4: Si 0.444; Ce3Si2: Si 0.4	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 9 report
1608	peritectic: L + Ce5Si4 ↔ Ce3Si2	Ce5Si4: Ce 0.555556, Si 0.444444; Ce3Si2: Ce 0.6, Si 0.4	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Bulanova 2002 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 10 report
1600.6	peritectic: L + Ce5Si4 ↔ Ce3Si2	L: Si 0.353; Ce5Si4: Si 0.444; Ce3Si2: Si 0.4	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 12 report
1550	peritectic: L + Ce3Si2 ↔ Ce5Si3	Ce3Si2: Ce 0.6, Si 0.4; Ce5Si3: Ce 0.625, Si 0.375	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 7 report
1545.6	peritectic: L + Ce3Si2 ↔ Ce5Si3	L: Si 0.326; Ce3Si2: Si 0.4; Ce5Si3: Si 0.375	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 8 report
1536.2	peritectic: L + Ce3Si2 ↔ Ce5Si3	L: Si 0.308; Ce3Si2: Si 0.4; Ce5Si3: Si 0.375	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 5 report
1533	peritectic: L + Ce3Si2 ↔ Ce5Si3	Ce3Si2: Ce 0.6, Si 0.4; Ce5Si3: Ce 0.625, Si 0.375	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Bulanova 2002 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 6 report
1514	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi2 + (Si)	L: Si 0.815; CeSi2: Ce 0.333333, Si 0.666667	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Vogel 1913 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 39 report
1502.6	eutectic: liquid ↔ (Si) + CeSi2		experimental	[1] Huang 2016	p. 1 report	The eutectic reaction liquid ↔ (Si) + CeSi2 is observed to occurs at 1502.6 K.
1502.6	eutectic: liquid ↔ (Si) + CeSi2		experimental	[1] Huang 2016	p. 10 report	The eutectic reaction liquid ↔ (Si) + CeSi2 is observed to occur at 1502.6 K.
1502.6	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi2 + (Si)	CeSi2: Ce 0.333333, Si 0.666667	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 38 report
1502.3	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi2 + (Si)	L: Si 0.832; CeSi2: Si 0.667; (Si): Si 1	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 37 report
1471	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi2 + (Si)	L: Si 0.82; CeSi2: Ce 0.333333, Si 0.666667	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Bulanova 2002 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 41 report
1469.1	peritectoid: CeSi + CeSi1.68 ↔ CeSi1.34	CeSi: Si 0.5; CeSi1.68: Si 0.63; CeSi1.34: Si 0.573	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 26 report
1469	peritectoid: CeSi + CeSi1.68 ↔ CeSi1.34	CeSi: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63; CeSi1.34: Ce 0.42735, Si 0.57265	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 27 report
1465.6	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi2 + (Si)	L: Si 0.843; CeSi2: Si 0.667; (Si): Si 1	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 43 report
1463	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi2 + (Si)	L: Si 0.87; CeSi2: Ce 0.333333, Si 0.666667	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Benesovsky 1966 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 40 report
1460	eutectic: L ↔ CeSi2 + (Si)	CeSi2: Ce 0.333333, Si 0.666667	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 42 report
908	eutectic: L ↔ (γCe) + Ce5Si3	L: Si 0.105; (γCe): Si 0; Ce5Si3: Si 0.375	experimental	[1] Huang 2016 cites Bulanova 2002 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 2 report
900.1	eutectic: L ↔ (γCe) + Ce5Si3	L: Si 0.109; (γCe): Si 0; Ce5Si3: Si 0.375	unspecified	[1] Huang 2016	Table 7, p. 8, row 1 report
899	eutectic: L ↔ (γCe) + Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3: Ce 0.625, Si 0.375	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 3 report
898.9	eutectic: L ↔ (γCe) + Ce5Si3	L: Si 0.106; (γCe): Si 0; Ce5Si3: Si 0.375	model	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 7, p. 8, row 4 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ce–Si system (39)
Phase	Compound	Value	T (K)	Class	MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	Source	Location
Ce3Si2	Ce3Si2	-66.239 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-52.537 (mp-aaacjkeh)	-57.374 (oqmd-29190)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 34 report
Ce3Si2	Ce3Si2	-66.239 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-52.537 (mp-aaacjkeh)	-57.374 (oqmd-29190)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 24 report
Ce3Si2	Ce3Si2	-65.6 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-52.537 (mp-aaacjkeh)	-57.374 (oqmd-29190)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 17 report
Ce3Si2	Ce3Si2	-65.6 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-52.537 (mp-aaacjkeh)	-57.374 (oqmd-29190)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 33 report
Ce3Si2	Ce3Si2	-65 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-52.537 (mp-aaacjkeh)	-57.374 (oqmd-29190)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 31 report
Ce3Si2	Ce3Si2	-65 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-52.537 (mp-aaacjkeh)	-57.374 (oqmd-29190)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Grobner 2004 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 5 report
Ce3Si2	Ce3Si2	-60.9 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-52.537 (mp-aaacjkeh)	-57.374 (oqmd-29190)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 32 report
Ce3Si2	Ce3Si2	-60.9 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-52.537 (mp-aaacjkeh)	-57.374 (oqmd-29190)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 11 report
Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3	-64.31 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-51.113 (mp-aaabgllv)	-53.612 (oqmd-29191)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 34 report
Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3	-64.31 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-51.113 (mp-aaabgllv)	-53.612 (oqmd-29191)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 23 report
Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3	-63.44 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-51.113 (mp-aaabgllv)	-53.612 (oqmd-29191)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 33 report
Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3	-63.44 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-51.113 (mp-aaabgllv)	-53.612 (oqmd-29191)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 16 report
Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3	-61 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-51.113 (mp-aaabgllv)	-53.612 (oqmd-29191)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 31 report
Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3	-61 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-51.113 (mp-aaabgllv)	-53.612 (oqmd-29191)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Grobner 2004 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 4 report
Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3	-57.225 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-51.113 (mp-aaabgllv)	-53.612 (oqmd-29191)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 32 report
Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3	-57.225 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-51.113 (mp-aaabgllv)	-53.612 (oqmd-29191)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 10 report
Ce5Si3	Ce5Si3	-52.8 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.6	298.15	experimental	-51.113 (mp-aaabgllv)	-53.612 (oqmd-29191)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Meschel 1996 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 3 report
Ce5Si4	Ce5Si4	-69 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-55.383 (mp-aaacqclx)	-62.628 (oqmd-107477)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 31 report
Ce5Si4	Ce5Si4	-69 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-55.383 (mp-aaacqclx)	-62.628 (oqmd-107477)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Grobner 2004 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 6 report
Ce5Si4	Ce5Si4	-68.985 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-55.383 (mp-aaacqclx)	-62.628 (oqmd-107477)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 34 report
Ce5Si4	Ce5Si4	-68.985 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-55.383 (mp-aaacqclx)	-62.628 (oqmd-107477)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 25 report
Ce5Si4	Ce5Si4	-67.78 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-55.383 (mp-aaacqclx)	-62.628 (oqmd-107477)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 18 report
Ce5Si4	Ce5Si4	-67.78 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-55.383 (mp-aaacqclx)	-62.628 (oqmd-107477)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 33 report
Ce5Si4	Ce5Si4	-65.689 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-55.383 (mp-aaacqclx)	-62.628 (oqmd-107477)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 32 report
Ce5Si4	Ce5Si4	-65.689 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-55.383 (mp-aaacqclx)	-62.628 (oqmd-107477)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 12 report
CeSi	CeSi	-71.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.3	298.15	unspecified	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 30 report
CeSi	CeSi	-71.1 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 31 report
CeSi	CeSi	-71.1 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Grobner 2004 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 7 report
CeSi	CeSi	-71.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 3.3	298.15	experimental	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Meschel 1995 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 1 report
CeSi	CeSi	-70.5 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 32 report
CeSi	CeSi	-70.5 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Shukla 2009 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 13 report
CeSi	CeSi	-70.082 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 34 report
CeSi	CeSi	-70.082 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 26 report
CeSi	CeSi	-70 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 19 report
CeSi	CeSi	-70 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified	-59.9 (mp-aaaabfgd)	-69.324 (oqmd-18278)	[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 33 report
CeSi1.68		-70 kJ/mol-atom ± 6	1373	experimental			[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 22 report
CeSi1.68		-70 kJ/mol-atom ± 6	298.15	model			[1] Huang 2016 cites Kim 2015 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 19 report
CeSi1.68		-65 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	unspecified			[1] Huang 2016	Table 8, p. 9, row 31 report
CeSi1.68		-65 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[1] Huang 2016 cites Grobner 2004 doi	Table 8, p. 9, row 8 report

Other properties

Phase transition (8)

Phase transition, Ce–Si system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Phase transition	1469 K	1469	other	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	p. 10 report	A phase with composition close to CeSi1.34 was observed and the decomposition temperature of 1469 K was detected.
Phase transition	1663.15 K	1663.15	Ce3Si2	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004	p. 2 report	Six intermediate phases were found with corresponding melting temperatures: Ce5Si3 (1400 °C), Ce3Si2 (1390 °C), Ce5Si4 (1440 °C), CeSi (1470 °C), Ce3Si5 (1560 °C), and CeSi2 (1620 °C).
Phase transition	1673.15 K	1673.15	Ce5Si3	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004	p. 2 report	Six intermediate phases were found with corresponding melting temperatures: Ce5Si3 (1400 °C), Ce3Si2 (1390 °C), Ce5Si4 (1440 °C), CeSi (1470 °C), Ce3Si5 (1560 °C), and CeSi2 (1620 °C).
Phase transition	1713.15 K	1713.15	Ce5Si4	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004	p. 2 report	Six intermediate phases were found with corresponding melting temperatures: Ce5Si3 (1400 °C), Ce3Si2 (1390 °C), Ce5Si4 (1440 °C), CeSi (1470 °C), Ce3Si5 (1560 °C), and CeSi2 (1620 °C).
Phase transition	1743.15 K	1743.15	CeSi	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004	p. 2 report	Six intermediate phases were found with corresponding melting temperatures: Ce5Si3 (1400 °C), Ce3Si2 (1390 °C), Ce5Si4 (1440 °C), CeSi (1470 °C), Ce3Si5 (1560 °C), and CeSi2 (1620 °C).
Phase transition	1833.15 K	1833.15	Ce3Si5	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004	p. 2 report	Six intermediate phases were found with corresponding melting temperatures: Ce5Si3 (1400 °C), Ce3Si2 (1390 °C), Ce5Si4 (1440 °C), CeSi (1470 °C), Ce3Si5 (1560 °C), and CeSi2 (1620 °C).
Phase transition	1893.15 K	1893.15	CeSi2	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004	p. 2 report	Six intermediate phases were found with corresponding melting temperatures: Ce5Si3 (1400 °C), Ce3Si2 (1390 °C), Ce5Si4 (1440 °C), CeSi (1470 °C), Ce3Si5 (1560 °C), and CeSi2 (1620 °C).
Phase transition	1993 K	1993	other	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	p. 7 report	Since the error bars of the work by Ryss et al. [8,9] were not given, and one should notice their experimental temperature (1923 K) is lower than the melting temperature of CeSi1.68 (1993 K) and across the two-phase regions, the deviation between the calculated curve and the experimental one is acceptable.

Phase equilibrium (23)

Phase equilibrium, Ce–Si system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase assemblage	1373	(Si) + CeSi2 alloy: Ce 0.08, Si 0.92	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 1 report
Phase assemblage	1373	Ce5Si3 + Ce5Si3 + (Ce) alloy: Si 0.375	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 4, p. 3, row 8 report
Phase assemblage	1373	CeSi1.68 alloy: Ce 0.37, Si 0.63	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 9 report
Phase assemblage	1373	CeSi2 alloy: Ce 0.36, Si 0.64	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 7 report
Phase assemblage	1373	CeSi2 alloy: Ce 0.35, Si 0.65	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 6 report
Phase assemblage	1373	CeSi2 alloy: Ce 0.33, Si 0.67	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 4 report
Phase assemblage	1373	CeSi2 alloy: Ce 0.34, Si 0.66	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 5 report
Phase composition	1373	(Si) + CeSi2 CeSi2: Ce 0.33, Si 0.67	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 4, p. 3, row 1 report
Phase composition	1373	(Si) + CeSi2 (Si): Ce 0.002, Si 0.998; CeSi2: Ce 0.332, Si 0.668	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 3 report
Phase composition	1373	(Si) + CeSi2 (Si): Ce 0.001, Si 0.999; CeSi2: Ce 0.334, Si 0.666	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 2 report
Phase composition	1373	Ce3Si2 + Ce5Si3 Ce3Si2: Ce 0.597, Si 0.403; Ce5Si3: Ce 0.618, Si 0.382	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 4, p. 3, row 7 report
Phase composition	1373	Ce5Si4 + Ce3Si2 Ce5Si4: Ce 0.549, Si 0.451; Ce3Si2: Ce 0.598, Si 0.402	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 4, p. 3, row 6 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi + Ce5Si4 CeSi: Ce 0.501, Si 0.499; Ce5Si4: Ce 0.551, Si 0.449	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 4, p. 3, row 5 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi1.34 + CeSi CeSi1.34: Ce 0.424, Si 0.576; CeSi: Ce 0.492, Si 0.508	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 14 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi1.34 + CeSi CeSi1.34: Ce 0.427, Si 0.573; CeSi: Ce 0.495, Si 0.505	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 12 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi1.34 + CeSi CeSi1.34: Ce 0.426, Si 0.574; CeSi: Ce 0.488, Si 0.512	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 4, p. 3, row 4 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi1.34 + CeSi (trace) CeSi1.34: Ce 0.432, Si 0.568; CeSi (trace): Ce 0.505, Si 0.495	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 11 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi1.68 CeSi1.68: Ce 0.364, Si 0.636	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 8 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi1.68 + CeSi1.34 CeSi1.68: Ce 0.368, Si 0.632; CeSi1.34: Ce 0.42, Si 0.58	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 4, p. 3, row 3 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi1.68 + CeSi1.34 CeSi1.68: Ce 0.369, Si 0.631; CeSi1.34: Ce 0.431, Si 0.569	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 10 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi1.68* + CeSi* + CeSi1.68 + CeSi CeSi1.68: Ce 0.36, Si 0.64; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.36, Si 0.64; CeSi: Ce 0.497, Si 0.503; CeSi: Ce 0.497, Si 0.503	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 15 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi1.68* + CeSi* + CeSi1.68 + CeSi CeSi1.68: Ce 0.364, Si 0.636; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.364, Si 0.636; CeSi: Ce 0.499, Si 0.501; CeSi: Ce 0.499, Si 0.501	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 5, p. 5, row 13 report
Phase composition	1373	CeSi2 + CeSi1.68 CeSi2: Ce 0.358, Si 0.642; CeSi1.68: Ce 0.362, Si 0.638	experimental	[1] Huang 2016	Table 4, p. 3, row 2 report

Mixing / partial (44)

Mixing / partial, Ce–Si system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-11 kJ/mol-atom	1890.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.05, Si 0.95	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Sudavtsova 1988	Table VIII, p. 11, row 45 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-35 kJ/mol-atom	1890.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.15, Si 0.85	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Sudavtsova 1988	Table VIII, p. 11, row 39 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-45 kJ/mol-atom	1890.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.2, Si 0.8	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Sudavtsova 1988	Table VIII, p. 11, row 36 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-23 kJ/mol-atom	1890.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.1, Si 0.9	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Sudavtsova 1988	Table VIII, p. 11, row 42 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-15.7 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.3, Si 0.7	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 32 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-13.6 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.9, Si 0.1	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 6 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-22.1 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.8, Si 0.2	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 10 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-43.3 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.2, Si 0.8	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 35 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-23.2 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.45, Si 0.55	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 26 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-33.4 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.15, Si 0.85	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 38 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-20.9 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.4, Si 0.6	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 28 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-72 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.55, Si 0.45	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 19 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-26.3 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.55, Si 0.45	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 20 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-11.65 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.05, Si 0.95	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 44 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-71.3 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.4, Si 0.6	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 27 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-73.9 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 21 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-24.9 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.5, Si 0.5	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 22 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-56.6 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.7, Si 0.3	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 13 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-24.7 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.75, Si 0.25	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 12 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-7.1 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.15, Si 0.85	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 40 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-27.1 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.65, Si 0.35	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 16 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-30.4 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.85, Si 0.15	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 7 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-63.3 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.65, Si 0.35	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 15 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-27.04 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.6, Si 0.4	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 18 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-73.75 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.45, Si 0.55	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 25 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-2 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.05, Si 0.95	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 46 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-68.4 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.6, Si 0.4	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 17 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-52.3 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.25, Si 0.75	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 33 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-20.5 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.9, Si 0.1	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 5 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-60.2 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.3, Si 0.7	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 31 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-12.8 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.25, Si 0.75	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 34 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-9.9 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.2, Si 0.8	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 37 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-48.6 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.75, Si 0.25	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 11 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-18.4 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.85, Si 0.15	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 8 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-10.3 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.95, Si 0.05	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 3 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-7.5 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.95, Si 0.05	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 4 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-66.7 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.35, Si 0.65	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 29 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-74 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.48, Si 0.52	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 23 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-22.8 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.1, Si 0.9	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 41 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-4.4 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.1, Si 0.9	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 43 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-24.3 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.48, Si 0.52	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 24 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-18.4 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.35, Si 0.65	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 30 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-26.3 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.7, Si 0.3	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 14 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	-39.8 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 0.8, Si 0.2	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 9 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Dandan Huang, Shuhong Liu, Ying Tang, Yong Du, Philip Nash, Bo Sundman, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the Ce-Si system, Thermochimica Acta 646, 49-58 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2016.11.003
Joachim Gröbner, Djordje Mirković, Rainer Schmid-Fetzer, Thermodynamic aspects of the constitution, grain refining, and solidification enthalpies of Al-Ce-Si alloys, Metall Mater Trans A 35, 3349-3362 (2004). doi:10.1007/s11661-004-0172-y

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}