Cs2Mo5O16: enthalpy of formation
3 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 2, model 1); experimental median -200.074 kJ/mol-atom (n = 2).
Systems: Cs–Mo–O
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -200.074 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.61957 | Cs2Mo5O16 | 298.15 | experimental | solution calorimetry | Cs–Mo–O | [1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi | Table 3, p. 4, row 12 report | |
| -200.074 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.25913 | Cs2Mo5O16 | 298.15 | experimental | Cs–Mo–O | [1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report | ||
| -199.357 kJ/mol-atom | Cs2Mo5O16 | 298.15 | model | Cs–Mo–O | [1] Smith 2021 | Table 8, p. 7, row 8 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -200.074 | kJ/mol-atom | 1.62 | 0.002174 | 3.2 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated) | 3.2 | |||
| -200.074 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.2591 | 0.002174 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | |||
| -199.357 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.002174 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 |
Sources
- A.L. Smith, T.N. Pham Thi, C. Guéneau, J.-C. Dumas, E. Epifano, W. van Burik et al., Thermodynamic modelling assessment of the ternary system Cs-Mo-O, Calphad 75, 102350 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2021.102350