Cs–Mo–O system

102 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 78, model 20, unspecified 4); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	78
model	20
unspecified	4

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	26
formation	26
heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy	12
crystal structure	38

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cs–Mo–O system (26)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Class	Source	Location
848	peritectic: Cs2Mo7O22 = MoO3 + Liq	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Spitsyn 1951	Table 7, p. 7, row 47 report
846	peritectic: Cs2Mo7O22 = MoO3 + Liq	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Hoekstra 1973 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 48 report
837	peritectic: Cs2Mo7O22 = MoO3 + Liq	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Salmon 1969	Table 7, p. 7, row 49 report
836.2	peritectic: Cs2Mo7O22 = MoO3 + Liq	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 7, p. 7, row 45 report
836	peritectic: Cs2Mo7O22 = MoO3 + Liq	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 53 report
835	peritectic: Cs2Mo7O22 = MoO3 + Liq	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 46 report
823	peritectic: Cs2Mo5O16 = Cs2Mo7O22 + Liq.	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Hoekstra 1973 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 43 report
818	peritectic: Cs2Mo5O16 = Cs2Mo7O22 + Liq.	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Salmon 1969	Table 7, p. 7, row 44 report
813	peritectic: Cs2Mo5O16 = Cs2Mo7O22 + Liq.	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 52 report
810	peritectic: Cs2Mo5O16 = Cs2Mo7O22 + Liq.	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 42 report
808.7	peritectic: Cs2Mo5O16 = Cs2Mo7O22 + Liq.	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 7, p. 7, row 41 report
798	eutectic: Liq. = Cs2Mo3O10 + Cs2Mo5O16	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Hoekstra 1973 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 33 report
797	peritectoid: Cs2Mo4O13 = Cs2Mo3O10 + Cs2Mo5O16	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Salmon 1969	Table 7, p. 7, row 38 report
796	eutectic: Liq. = Cs2Mo3O10 + Cs2Mo5O16	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Spitsyn 1951	Table 7, p. 7, row 34 report
793.2	eutectic: Liq. = Cs2Mo3O10 + Cs2Mo5O16	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 7, p. 7, row 32 report
792	eutectic: Liq. = Cs2Mo3O10 + Cs2Mo5O16	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Salmon 1969	Table 7, p. 7, row 35 report
787	peritectoid: Cs2Mo4O13 = Cs2Mo3O10 + Cs2Mo5O16	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 40 report
783.9	peritectoid: Cs2Mo4O13 = Cs2Mo3O10 + Cs2Mo5O16	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 7, p. 7, row 36 report
781	peritectoid: Cs2Mo4O13 = Cs2Mo3O10 + Cs2Mo5O16	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 39 report
776	peritectoid: Cs2Mo4O13 = Cs2Mo3O10 + Cs2Mo5O16	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Hoekstra 1973 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 37 report
736	eutectic: Liq. = β-Cs2Mo2O7 + Cs2Mo3O10	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Salmon 1969	Table 7, p. 7, row 26 report
736	eutectic: Liq. = β-Cs2Mo2O7 + Cs2Mo3O10	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Hoekstra 1973 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 25 report
733	eutectic: Liq. = α-Cs2MoO4 + β-Cs2Mo2O7	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Salmon 1969	Table 7, p. 7, row 14 report
732.5	eutectic: Liq. = β-Cs2Mo2O7 + Cs2Mo3O10	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 7, p. 7, row 24 report
732.2	eutectic: Liq. = α-Cs2MoO4 + β-Cs2Mo2O7	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 7, p. 7, row 12 report
731	eutectic: Liq. = α-Cs2MoO4 + β-Cs2Mo2O7	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Hoekstra 1973 doi	Table 7, p. 7, row 13 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Cs–Mo–O system (26)
Phase	Value	T (K)	Class	Source	Location
Cs2Mo3O10	-205.145 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.231333	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report
Cs2Mo3O10	-205.145 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.49	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 9 report
Cs2Mo3O10	-205.04 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.433333	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report
Cs2Mo3O10	-205.04 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.54	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 10 report
Cs2Mo3O10	-204 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 5 report
Cs2Mo4O13	-201.453 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 7 report
Cs2Mo5O16	-200.074 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.61957	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 12 report
Cs2Mo5O16	-200.074 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.25913	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report
Cs2Mo5O16	-199.357 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 8 report
Cs2Mo7O22	-196.4 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 10 report
Cs2Mo7O22	-196.36 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.283548	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report
Cs2Mo7O22	-196.36 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.68258	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 13 report
α-Cs2Mo2O7	-209.309 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.35455	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Cordfunke 1990	Table 3, p. 4, row 5 report
α-Cs2Mo2O7	-209.309 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.190909	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Cordfunke 1990	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
α-Cs2Mo2O7	-209.291 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 3 report
α-Cs2Mo2O7	-209.258 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.215455	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report
α-Cs2Mo2O7	-209.258 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.37	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 6 report
α-Cs2Mo2O7	-209.236 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.40909	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 7 report
α-Cs2Mo2O7	-209.236 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.427273	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report
α-Cs2MoO4	-216.829 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 1 report
α-Cs2MoO4	-216.384 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.22	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2018 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report
α-Cs2MoO4	-216.384 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.07714	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2017 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 2 report
α-Cs2MoO4	-216.357 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.06429	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Cordfunke 1990	Table 3, p. 4, row 1 report
α-Cs2MoO4	-216.357 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.142857	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Cordfunke 1990	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report
α-Cs2MoO4	-216.223 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.158571	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report
α-Cs2MoO4	-216.223 kJ/mol-atom ± 1.07429	298.15	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Benigni 2020 doi	Table 3, p. 4, row 3 report

Other properties

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy (12)

Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy, Cs–Mo–O system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Entropy printed: S°m (298.15 K)	27.6533 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Cs2Mo3O10 alloy: Mo 0.2, O 0.666667	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 5 report
Entropy printed: S°m (298.15 K)	24.8211 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 7 report
Entropy printed: S°m (298.15 K)	23.5261 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Cs2Mo5O16 alloy: Mo 0.217391, O 0.695652	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 8 report
Entropy printed: S°m (298.15 K)	22.1613 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Cs2Mo7O22 alloy: Mo 0.225806, O 0.709677	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 10 report
Entropy printed: S°m (298.15 K)	28.6909 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	α-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 3 report
Entropy printed: S°m	28.8545 J/mol-atom/K ± 0.390909	298.15	α-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Cordfunke 1990	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
Entropy printed: S°m (298.15 K)	28.8545 J/mol-atom/K ± 0.390909	298.15	α-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 4 report
Entropy printed: S°m (298.15 K)	35.4786 J/mol-atom/K ± 0.0428571	298.15	α-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 2 report
Entropy printed: S°m	35.4786 J/mol-atom/K ± 0.0428571	298.15	α-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Cordfunke 1990	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report
Entropy printed: S°m (298.15 K)	35.3571 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	α-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	model	[1] Smith 2021	Table 8, p. 7, row 1 report
Heat capacity printed: C°p,m	211.9 unknown ± 0.190909	298.15	α-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Cordfunke 1990	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
Heat capacity printed: C°p,m	148.67 unknown ± 0.0214286	298.15	α-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Cordfunke 1990	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report

Crystal structure (38)

Crystal structure, Cs–Mo–O system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	1.4472 not_printed ± 2.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo3O10 alloy: Mo 0.2, O 0.666667	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
Lattice a	4.592 not_printed ± 0.005	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	unspecified	[1] Smith 2021 cites Marrot 1995 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
Lattice a	0.8396 not_printed ± 5.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Pakhomova 2011 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice a	2.1444 not_printed ± 2.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo5O16 alloy: Mo 0.217391, O 0.695652	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
Lattice a	2.1546 not_printed ± 1.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo7O22 alloy: Mo 0.225806, O 0.709677	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
Lattice a	1.556 not_printed ± 2.000e-4	298.15	α-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Lattice a	1.15623 not_printed ± 8.000e-5	298.15	α-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2017 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report
Lattice a	0.799136 not_printed ± 1.100e-5	683	β-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2017 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Lattice a	0.684 not_printed ± 1.000e-4	948	β-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Wallez 2014 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
Lattice b	0.8404 not_printed ± 1.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo3O10 alloy: Mo 0.2, O 0.666667	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
Lattice b	1.0418 not_printed ± 3.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	unspecified	[1] Smith 2021 cites Marrot 1995 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
Lattice b	0.8655 not_printed ± 5.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Pakhomova 2011 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice b	0.556 not_printed ± 4.000e-5	298.15	Cs2Mo5O16 alloy: Mo 0.217391, O 0.695652	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
Lattice b	0.55385 not_printed ± 3.000e-5	298.15	Cs2Mo7O22 alloy: Mo 0.225806, O 0.709677	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
Lattice b	1.5184 not_printed ± 1.000e-4	298.15	α-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Lattice b	0.65406 not_printed ± 4.000e-5	298.15	α-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2017 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report
Lattice b	1.5486 not_printed ± 2.100e-5	683	β-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2017 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Lattice b	0.684 not_printed ± 1.000e-4	948	β-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Wallez 2014 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
Lattice c	0.9464 not_printed ± 1.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo3O10 alloy: Mo 0.2, O 0.666667	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
Lattice c	0.7923 not_printed ± 8.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	unspecified	[1] Smith 2021 cites Marrot 1995 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
Lattice c	1.0413 not_printed ± 5.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Pakhomova 2011 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
Lattice c	1.4339 not_printed ± 1.000e-4	298.15	Cs2Mo5O16 alloy: Mo 0.217391, O 0.695652	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
Lattice c	1.89179 not_printed ± 9.000e-5	298.15	Cs2Mo7O22 alloy: Mo 0.225806, O 0.709677	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
Lattice c	0.72244 not_printed ± 7.000e-5	298.15	α-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Lattice c	0.84906 not_printed ± 5.000e-5	298.15	α-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2017 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report
Lattice c	0.724613 not_printed ± 1.100e-5	683	β-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2017 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Lattice c	0.8977 not_printed ± 2.000e-4	948	β-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Wallez 2014 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
lattice alpha	106.158 not_printed ± 0.005	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Pakhomova 2011 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
lattice beta	97.731 not_printed ± 0.006	298.15	Cs2Mo3O10 alloy: Mo 0.2, O 0.666667	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report
lattice beta	92.94 not_printed ± 0.05	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	unspecified	[1] Smith 2021 cites Marrot 1995 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
lattice beta	103.686 not_printed ± 0.005	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Pakhomova 2011 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
lattice beta	122.735 not_printed ± 0.005	298.15	Cs2Mo5O16 alloy: Mo 0.217391, O 0.695652	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report
lattice beta	122.744 not_printed ± 0.003	298.15	Cs2Mo7O22 alloy: Mo 0.225806, O 0.709677	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
lattice beta	90.12 not_printed ± 0.007	298.15	α-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2021 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
lattice beta	90 °	298.15	α-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2017 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report
lattice beta	90 °	683	β-Cs2Mo2O7 alloy: Mo 0.181818, O 0.636364	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Smith 2017 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
lattice beta	90 °	948	β-Cs2MoO4 alloy: Mo 0.142857, O 0.571429	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Wallez 2014 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
lattice gamma	109.761 not_printed ± 0.005	298.15	Cs2Mo4O13 alloy: Mo 0.210526, O 0.684211	experimental	[1] Smith 2021 cites Pakhomova 2011 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

A.L. Smith, T.N. Pham Thi, C. Guéneau, J.-C. Dumas, E. Epifano, W. van Burik et al., Thermodynamic modelling assessment of the ternary system Cs-Mo-O, Calphad 75, 102350 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2021.102350

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}