FeY: enthalpy of formation
9 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 8); OQMD 0.618 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1435280).
Systems: Fe–Y
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -5.3 per mol-atom | FeY | 973 | experimental | Interpolation | Fe–Y | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 23 report | |
| -12.5 kJ/mol-atom | FeY | 298.15 | model | Prediction (b) | Fe–Y | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Watson 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 42 report | |
| -9.4 kJ/mol-atom | FeY | 973 | model | Interpolation | Fe–Y | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 45 report | |
| -9 per mol-atom | FeY | 973 | model | Interpolation | Fe–Y | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 24 report | |
| -8.8 kJ/mol-atom | FeY | 973 | model | Interpolation | Fe–Y | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 46 report | |
| -5.9 kJ/mol-atom | FeY | 0 | model | Interpolation | Fe–Y | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 40 report | |
| -5.8 kJ/mol-atom | FeY | 973 | model | Interpolation | Fe–Y | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 44 report | |
| -5.3 kJ/mol-atom | FeY | 973 | model | Interpolation | Fe–Y | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 43 report | |
| -2 kJ/mol-atom | FeY | 298.15 | model | Prediction (a) | Fe–Y | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Niessen 1983 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 41 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -5.3 | per mol-atom | 0.05 | unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -12.5 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -9.4 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -9 | per mol-atom | 0.5 | unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | unit 'per mol-atom' not convertible to kJ/mol-atom | ||||
| -8.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -5.9 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -5.8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -5.3 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OQMD | oqmd-1435280 | 0.618 | 0.006405 | Cmcm | 5.1754 | 0.0536 | yes |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- S. Kardellass, C. Servant, N. Selhaoui, A. Iddaoudi, M. Ait Amar, L. Bouirden, A thermodynamic assessment of the iron–yttrium system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 583, 598-606 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.010
- I. Saenko, O. Fabrichnaya, A. Udovsky, New Thermodynamic Assessment of the Fe-Y System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 684-699 (2017). doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0574-3