Fe–Y system
476 accepted literature values from 4 paper(s) (experimental 157, model 285, DFT 26, unspecified 8); 5 calculated phase diagram(s). 25 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (10) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 157 |
| model | 285 |
| DFT | 26 |
| unspecified | 8 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 218 |
| phase transition | 50 |
| formation | 153 |
| mixing / partial | 12 |
| heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy | 12 |
| activity / EMF / Gibbs energy | 18 |
| crystal structure | 13 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | S. Kardellas, C. Servant, N. Selhaoui, A. Iddaoudi, M. Ait Amar, L. Bouirden, J. Alloys Compd., 583, 598-606(2014). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.010 | 0e4a9e2361dc9c9839bfc4a51be7d414a41b29cd1b3f6931cbc6ff40fbc4949c | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | I. Saenko, O. Fabrichnaya, A. Udovsky, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 38, 684-99(2017). doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0574-3 | d5fb4919023990bf125fd52bbdf9b0b9a20764cfa0aec1b2b8388eda0c460968 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | L. Fan, C. Shen, K. Hu, H. Liu, H. Zhang, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 42, 348-62(2021). doi:10.1007/s11669-021-00887-9 | d085f7eb5ccf15a0491d39b5c5a026ee3e18d96cdec7bdcd49f1177de01e0fdf | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | H. Ye, M. Rong, Q. Chen, Q. Yao, J. Wang, G. Rao, H. Zhou, J. Mater. Inf., 3, 15(2023). | 88f70e0778e85ffb26889a0c2a8eebe168ee56fbce9660ad9f539a1d022affe5 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | Z. Du, W. Zhang, Y. Zhuang, Rare Met., 16, 52-58(1997). | 6ffcbf8e63537db7c8cd5750a5c9d980e3078175c98aacbbddd3e2f2c034b3a3 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TDB file | T (K) | Phases at the invariant |
|---|---|---|
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1749.69 | LIQUID (x(Y) 0.97891) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0.99806) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99834) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1672.05 | BCC_A2 (x(Y) 1.100e-4) + FCC_A1 (x(Y) 2.700e-4) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.04586) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1631.93 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 4.300e-4) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.05675) + FE17Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1631.93 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 4.300e-4) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.05671) + FE17Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1602.95 | FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.19821) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.2051) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1602.95 | FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.19831) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.20541) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1602.53 | FE17Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.10526) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.18248) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.19064) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1420.81 | FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) + FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.31034) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.436) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1184.7 | BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Y) 1.000e-5) + FE17Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1184.7 | BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Y) 1.000e-5) + FE17Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1150.25 | FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.32929) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.61298) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.9859) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1138.93 | BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0) + FE17Y2_LT (x(Y) 0.10526) + FE17Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-14Kar.tdb | 1138.93 | FE17Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.10526) + FE17Y2_LT (x(Y) 0.10526) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.20361) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1755.67 | LIQUID (x(Y) 0.98254) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99864) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0.9995) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1664.89 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 9.300e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0.00103) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.07198) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1640.57 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0.00104) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.08407) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1640.57 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0.00103) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.08406) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1605.45 | FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.19743) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.20767) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1604 | FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.21318) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.23371) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1396.22 | FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) + FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33546) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.52473) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1396.22 | FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) + FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33545) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.52442) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1200.95 | FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33731) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.66092) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99197) |
| FeY-17Sae.tdb | 1184.8 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 1.000e-5) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 1.000e-5) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1754.16 | LIQUID (x(Y) 0.98199) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99889) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0.99947) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1660.71 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 1.200e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 3.600e-4) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.06047) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1635.95 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 1.400e-4) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.06948) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1635.95 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 1.400e-4) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.06948) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1618.62 | FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.2306) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1618.62 | FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.23125) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1614.08 | FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.17356) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1414.78 | FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) + FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.46108) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1414.78 | FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) + FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.46079) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1184.86 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 1.000e-5) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1184.86 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 1.000e-5) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 1119.28 | FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.63307) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99054) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 464.62 | FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-21Fan.tdb | 429.12 | FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1756.01 | LIQUID (x(Y) 0.98297) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99884) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0.99977) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1664.62 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 5.600e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 6.600e-4) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.07753) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1641.32 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 6.100e-4) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.09093) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1641.32 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 6.100e-4) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.09089) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1601.93 | FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.22028) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1601.92 | FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.22093) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1601.67 | FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.19097) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1601.67 | FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.19095) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1420.94 | FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) + FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.49038) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1420.94 | FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) + FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.4903) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1184.8 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 2.000e-5) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 2.000e-5) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1168.06 | FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.65518) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99311) |
| FeY-23Ye.tdb | 1168.05 | FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.65527) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99311) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1751.13 | LIQUID (x(Y) 0.98061) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0.99999) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99999) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1751.13 | LIQUID (x(Y) 0.98062) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 0.99999) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0.99999) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1667.43 | BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.05849) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1667.43 | BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0) + FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.05843) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1667.43 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.05839) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1624 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.07401) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1624 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.07403) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1574.87 | LIQUID (x(Y) 0.18563) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1574.87 | LIQUID (x(Y) 0.18557) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1574.87 | LIQUID (x(Y) 0.18577) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) + FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1554.69 | FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.16482) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1554.69 | FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.1647) + FE23Y6_D8A (x(Y) 0.2069) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1398.96 | FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) + FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.42146) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1398.96 | FE3Y (x(Y) 0.25) + FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.42124) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1184.81 | FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 0) + FE17Y2 (x(Y) 0.10526) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1177.64 | FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.64989) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 1) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1177.64 | FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.64987) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 1) |
| FeY-97Du.tdb | 1177.64 | FE2Y_C15 (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.64993) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 1) |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull FeY-14Kar · CALPHAD hull FeY-17Sae · CALPHAD hull FeY-21Fan · CALPHAD hull FeY-97Du
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1811.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ δ Fe | Liq: Y 0 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 3 report | |
| 1811.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ δ Fe | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 2 report | ||
| 1811.15 | congruent melting: L -> δFe | δFe: Y 0 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Massalski 1991 | Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report | |
| 1810.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ δ Fe | δ Fe: Y 0 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 1 report | |
| 1795.15 | congruent melting: L -> βY | βY: Y 1 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report | |
| 1758 | peritectic: Liq + β Y ↔ α Y | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Dinsdale 1991 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 41 report | ||
| 1756 | peritectic: Liq + β Y ↔ α Y | Liq: Y 0.9826; β Y: Y 0.9974; α Y: Y 0.9973 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 42 report | |
| 1756 | eutectic: βY+L → αY | βY: Y 0.9974; L: Y 0.9826; αY: Y 0.9973 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Konar 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 45 report | |
| 1754 | eutectic: βY+L → αY | βY: Y 0.9995; L: Y 0.98; αY: Y 0.999 | model | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 2, p. 4, row 46 report | |
| 1751.15 | Liq + (βY) ↔ (α Y) | βY: Y 0.991; α Y: Y 0.99 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 48 report | |
| 1751.15 | metatectic/catatectic: L + βY -> αY | βY: Y 0.97 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 1, p. 3, row 19 report | |
| 1751 | peritectic: βY → αY+L | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 2, p. 4, row 41 report | ||
| 1750.15 | Liq + (βY) ↔ (α Y) | Liq: Y 0.9789 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 50 report | |
| 1750 | peritectic: Liq + β Y ↔ α Y | Liq: Y 0.9789 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 43 report | |
| 1750 | peritectic: βY → αY+L | L: Y 0.979 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 44 report | |
| 1749.15 | Liq + (βY) ↔ (α Y) | Liq: Y 0.976 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 49 report | |
| 1749 | peritectic: βY → αY+L | L: Y 0.976 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 43 report | |
| 1749 | peritectic: Liq + β Y ↔ α Y | Liq: Y 0.976 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 44 report | |
| 1725 | metatectic/catatectic: bcc(δ-Fe) ↔ fcc(γ-Fe) + L | L: Y 0.039 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 4 report | |
| 1725 | peritectic: L+δFe → γFe | L: Y 0.039 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Konar 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| 1681 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe3Y | L: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 57 report | |
| 1679 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 26 report | |
| 1676.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 23 report | |
| 1676 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 15 report | |
| 1676 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 27 report | |
| 1673.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 21 report | |
| 1673.15 | congruent melting: L -> Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | unspecified | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| 1673 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Domagala 1961 | Table 4, p. 10, row 13 report | |
| 1673 | metatectic/catatectic: bcc(δ-Fe) ↔ fcc(γ-Fe) + L | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | Table 10, p. 18, row 1 report | ||
| 1673 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | Table 10, p. 18, row 23 report | |
| 1673 | peritectic: L+δFe → γFe | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report | ||
| 1673 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 24 report | |
| 1673 | congruent melting: L → Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 2, p. 4, row 47 report | |
| 1672.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 22 report | |
| 1672 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 28 report | |
| 1672 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 16 report | |
| 1667.15 | Liq+(δ Fe) ↔ (γ Fe) | δ Fe: Y 0 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 5 report | |
| 1667 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | L: Y 0.21; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 49 report | |
| 1667 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.207; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 41 report | |
| 1667 | metatectic/catatectic: bcc(δ-Fe) ↔ fcc(γ-Fe) + L | L: Y 0.058 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 2 report | |
| 1667 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6+Fe3Y | L: Y 0.21; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Konar 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 28 report | |
| 1665.8 | metatectic/catatectic: bcc(δ-Fe) ↔ fcc(γ-Fe) + L | L: Y 0.077 | model | [4] Ye 2023 | Table 10, p. 18, row 8 report | |
| 1665 | peritectic: L+δFe → γFe | L: Y 0.0719 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| 1665 | metatectic/catatectic: bcc(δ-Fe) ↔ fcc(γ-Fe) + L | L: Y 0.072 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 3 report | |
| 1665 | metatectic/catatectic: Liq + δ Fe ↔ γ Fe | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 4, p. 10, row 1 report | ||
| 1665 | metatectic/catatectic: Liq + δ Fe ↔ γ Fe | Liq: Y 0.0719 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 2 report | |
| 1664.15 | Liq+(δ Fe) ↔ (γ Fe) | Liq: Y 0.0479 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 6 report | |
| 1664 | peritectic: L+δFe → γFe | L: Y 0.0479 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| 1664 | metatectic/catatectic: Liq + δ Fe ↔ γ Fe | Liq: Y 0.0479 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 4 report | |
| 1664 | metatectic/catatectic: bcc(δ-Fe) ↔ fcc(γ-Fe) + L | L: Y 0.048 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 6 report | |
| 1663.15 | Liq ↔ (δ Fe) + Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.0719; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 15 report | |
| 1663.15 | Liq+(δ Fe) ↔ (γ Fe) | Liq: Y 0.0479 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 7 report | |
| 1663 | metatectic/catatectic: bcc(δ-Fe) ↔ fcc(γ-Fe) + L | L: Y 0.048 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 5 report | |
| 1663 | metatectic/catatectic: Liq + δ Fe ↔ γ Fe | Liq: Y 0.0479 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 3 report | |
| 1663 | eutectic: Liq ↔ δ Fe + Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.0719; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 9 report | |
| 1663 | peritectic: L+δFe → γFe | L: Y 0.0479 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| 1663 | eutectic: L → δFe + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.0719; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 11 report | |
| 1663 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + fcc(γ-Fe) | L: Y 0.072 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 20 report | |
| 1660 | peritectic: L+δFe → γFe | L: Y 0.06 | model | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| 1660 | metatectic/catatectic: bcc(δ-Fe) ↔ fcc(γ-Fe) + L | L: Y 0.06 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 7 report | |
| 1659 | eutectic: L → γFe + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.069; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Konar 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| 1657 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + fcc(γ-Fe) | L: Y 0.069 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 18 report | |
| 1654.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 37 report | |
| 1654.15 | congruent melting: L -> Fe3Y | L: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Massalski 1991 | Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report | |
| 1652.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 20 report | |
| 1650.1 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [4] Ye 2023 | Table 10, p. 18, row 30 report | |
| 1650 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 29 report | |
| 1650 | congruent melting: L → Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | model | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 2, p. 4, row 48 report | |
| 1647.3 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + fcc(γ-Fe) | L: Y 0.088 | model | [4] Ye 2023 | Table 10, p. 18, row 22 report | |
| 1647.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 38 report | |
| 1647 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 32 report | |
| 1647 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe3Y | L: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 59 report | |
| 1645 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.159; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 34 report | |
| 1645 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6 + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.159; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Konar 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 22 report | |
| 1644 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 25 report | |
| 1644 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 14 report | |
| 1641.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.2075; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 30 report | |
| 1641 | eutectic: L → γFe + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.084; γFe: Y 0.001; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| 1641 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.207; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 43 report | |
| 1641 | eutectic: Liq ↔ γ Fe + Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.0841; γ Fe: Y 0.001; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 11 report | |
| 1641 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + fcc(γ-Fe) | L: Y 0.084 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 17 report | |
| 1641 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.2075; Fe23Y6: Y 0.2075 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 24 report | |
| 1640.15 | Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.2163; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 34 report | |
| 1640 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6+Fe3Y | L: Y 0.2163; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 26 report | |
| 1640 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | L: Y 0.216; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 51 report | |
| 1640 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.2163; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 28 report | |
| 1638.15 | Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.179; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 26 report | |
| 1638 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.179; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 36 report | |
| 1638 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6 + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.179; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 20 report | |
| 1638 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.179; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 20 report | |
| 1635 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + fcc(γ-Fe) | L: Y 0.07 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 21 report | |
| 1635 | eutectic: L → γFe + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.07; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| 1633.15 | Liq ↔ (γ Fe) + Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.0563; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 18 report | |
| 1633 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + fcc(γ-Fe) | L: Y 0.056 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 19 report | |
| 1633 | eutectic: Liq ↔ γ Fe + Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.0563; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 12 report | |
| 1623.15 | eutectic: L -> γFe + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.082; γFe: Y 0.082; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | unspecified | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| 1623.15 | Liq ↔ (γ Fe) + Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.082; γ Fe: Y 0.1; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 17 report | |
| 1623.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 39 report | |
| 1623 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe3Y | L: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 55 report | |
| 1623 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.207; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 44 report | |
| 1623 | eutectic: L → γFe + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.082; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| 1623 | eutectic: Liq ↔ γ Fe + Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.082; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Domagala 1961 | Table 4, p. 10, row 10 report | |
| 1623 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 31 report | |
| 1623 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + fcc(γ-Fe) | L: Y 0.082 | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | Table 10, p. 18, row 15 report | |
| 1623 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe3Y | L: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 58 report | |
| 1623 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + fcc(γ-Fe) | L: Y 0.074 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 16 report | |
| 1621 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe3Y | L: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 60 report | |
| 1619 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | L: Y 0.207; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 52 report | |
| 1619 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6+Fe3Y | L: Y 0.2069; Fe23Y6: Y 0.2069; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 2, p. 4, row 24 report | |
| 1614.15 | Liq ↔ (γ Fe) + Fe17Y2 | Liq: Y 0.082; γ Fe: Y 0.1; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 16 report | |
| 1614.15 | eutectic: L -> γFe + Fe17Y2 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Massalski 1991 | Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report | ||
| 1613 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.173; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 37 report | |
| 1613 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6 + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.173; Fe23Y6: Y 0.2069; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 2, p. 4, row 18 report | |
| 1612.15 | (δ Fe) ↔ (γ Fe) + Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 19 report | |
| 1608.15 | congruent melting: L -> Fe3Y | L: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | unspecified | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report | |
| 1608.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 36 report | |
| 1608 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Domagala 1961 | Table 4, p. 10, row 29 report | |
| 1608 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe3Y | L: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | Table 10, p. 18, row 54 report | |
| 1606.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.2075; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 31 report | |
| 1606 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.207; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 42 report | |
| 1606 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.201; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 40 report | |
| 1606 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.2005; Fe23Y6: Y 0.2005 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 22 report | |
| 1606 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.2075; Fe23Y6: Y 0.2075 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 23 report | |
| 1605.5 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe3Y | L: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 | Table 10, p. 18, row 61 report | |
| 1605.15 | Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.1815; Fe17Y2: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 27 report | |
| 1605.15 | Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.207; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 35 report | |
| 1605 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6 + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.1815; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 21 report | |
| 1605 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.197; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 33 report | |
| 1605 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6+Fe3Y | L: Y 0.2069; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 27 report | |
| 1605 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | L: Y 0.207; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 50 report | |
| 1605 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6 + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.1974; Fe23Y6: Y 0.207; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 19 report | |
| 1605 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.182; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 35 report | |
| 1605 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.1974; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105; Fe23Y6: Y 0.207 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 18 report | |
| 1605 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.207; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 27 report | |
| 1605 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe3Y | L: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 56 report | |
| 1605 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.1815; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 19 report | |
| 1605 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.25; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 30 report | |
| 1604 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6+Fe3Y | L: Y 0.2336; Fe23Y6: Y 0.205; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 25 report | |
| 1604 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | L: Y 0.237; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 48 report | |
| 1604 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.2336; Fe23Y6: Y 0.205; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 26 report | |
| 1603 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.207; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 | Table 10, p. 18, row 45 report | |
| 1602.7 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.197; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 | Table 10, p. 18, row 38 report | |
| 1602.4 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | L: Y 0.221; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 | Table 10, p. 18, row 53 report | |
| 1573.15 | congruent melting: L -> Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.206; Fe23Y6: Y 0.206 | unspecified | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report | |
| 1573.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.206; Fe23Y6: Y 0.206 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 29 report | |
| 1573 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 | Liq: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Domagala 1961 | Table 4, p. 10, row 21 report | |
| 1573 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | L: Y 0.186; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 47 report | |
| 1573 | congruent melting: L ↔ Fe23Y6 | L: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | Table 10, p. 18, row 39 report | |
| 1563.15 | congruent melting: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.206; Fe23Y6: Y 0.206 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 28 report | |
| 1563.15 | congruent melting: L -> Fe23Y6 | L: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Massalski 1991 | Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report | |
| 1553.15 | Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.14; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105; Fe23Y6: Y 0.206 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 25 report | |
| 1553.15 | eutectic: L -> Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.129; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105; Fe23Y6: Y 0.206 | unspecified | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| 1553 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.129; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Domagala 1961 | Table 4, p. 10, row 17 report | |
| 1553 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.164; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 32 report | |
| 1553 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6 + Fe17Y2 | L: Y 0.129; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 2, p. 4, row 17 report | |
| 1553 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | L: Y 0.129; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897 | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | Table 10, p. 18, row 31 report | |
| 1544.15 | Liq ↔ Fe17Y2 + Fe23Y6 | Liq: Y 0.14; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105; Fe23Y6: Y 0.206 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 24 report | |
| 1523.15 | Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.237; Fe23Y6: Y 0.207; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 33 report | |
| 1523.15 | eutectic: L -> Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | L: Y 0.237; Fe23Y6: Y 0.2069; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | unspecified | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report | |
| 1523 | eutectic: L ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | L: Y 0.237; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | Table 10, p. 18, row 46 report | |
| 1523 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.237; Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Domagala 1961 | Table 4, p. 10, row 25 report | |
| 1523 | eutectic: L → Fe23Y6+Fe3Y | L: Y 0.237; Fe23Y6: Y 0.2069; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 2, p. 4, row 23 report | |
| 1522.15 | eutectic: L -> Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | Fe23Y6: Fe 0.793103, Y 0.206897; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Massalski 1991 | Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report | |
| 1522.15 | Liq ↔ Fe23Y6 + Fe3Y | Liq: Y 0.237; Fe23Y6: Y 0.207; Fe3Y: Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 32 report | |
| 1416 | peritectic: L+Fe3Y → Fe2Y | L: Y 0.467; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | model | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 2, p. 4, row 30 report | |
| 1409.15 | Liq + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | Liq: Y 0.4427; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 43 report | |
| 1409 | peritectic: L+Fe3Y → Fe2Y | L: Y 0.443; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 33 report | |
| 1409 | peritectic: Liq + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | Liq: Y 0.4427; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 35 report | |
| 1409 | peritectic: L + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | L: Y 0.443; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 66 report | |
| 1398.15 | peritectic: L + Fe3Y -> Fe2Y | L: Y 0.423; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | unspecified | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report | |
| 1398.15 | Liq + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | Liq: Y 0.424; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 41 report | |
| 1398 | peritectic: L+Fe3Y → Fe2Y | L: Y 0.424; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 2, p. 4, row 29 report | |
| 1398 | peritectic: L + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | L: Y 0.424; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | Table 10, p. 18, row 62 report | |
| 1398 | peritectic: L + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | L: Y 0.421; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 63 report | |
| 1398 | peritectic: Liq + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | Liq: Y 0.42; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Domagala 1961 | Table 4, p. 10, row 33 report | |
| 1397.15 | Liq + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | Liq: Y 0.4818; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 42 report | |
| 1397 | peritectic: L + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | L: Y 0.482; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 67 report | |
| 1397 | peritectic: L+Fe3Y → Fe2Y | L: Y 0.475; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Konar 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 34 report | |
| 1397 | peritectic: Liq + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | Liq: Y 0.4818; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 36 report | |
| 1397 | peritectic: L + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | L: Y 0.475; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 65 report | |
| 1396 | peritectic: L + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | L: Y 0.525; Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 64 report | |
| 1396 | peritectic: L+Fe3Y → Fe2Y | L: Y 0.5248; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.3354 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 31 report | |
| 1396 | peritectic: Liq + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | Liq: Y 0.5248; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.3354 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 34 report | |
| 1394 | peritectic: L+Fe3Y → Fe2Y | L: Y 0.482; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 32 report | |
| 1388.15 | L + Fe3Y -> Fe2Y | Fe3Y: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Massalski 1991 | Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report | |
| 1388.15 | Liq + Fe3Y ↔ Fe2Y | Liq: Y 0.424; Fe3Y: Y 0.25; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 40 report | |
| 1201 | eutectic: L → Fe2Y+αY | L: Y 0.6609; Fe2Y: Y 0.337; αY: Y 0.992 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 37 report | |
| 1201 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe2Y + α Y | Liq: Y 0.6609; Fe2Y: Y 0.337; α Y: Y 0.992 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 38 report | |
| 1185.15 | γFe ↔ (α Fe) + Fe17Y2_HT | γFe: Y 0; α Fe: Y 0; Fe17Y2_HT: Y 0.105 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 8 report | |
| 1185.15 | polymorphic: Fe17Y2_HT ↔ Fe17Y2_LT | Fe17Y2_HT: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2_LT: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 11 report | |
| 1185.15 | γFe ↔ (α Fe) + Fe17Y2_HT | Fe17Y2_HT: Y 0.105 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 9 report | |
| 1185 | eutectoid: γFe → αFe + Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 15 report | |
| 1185 | peritectoid: γ Fe ↔ α Fe + Fe17Y2 | α Fe: Y 1.000e-5; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 4, p. 10, row 6 report | |
| 1185 | eutectoid: fcc(γ-Fe) ↔ bcc(α-Fe) + Fe17Y2 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 11 report | ||
| 1185 | peritectoid: γ Fe ↔ α Fe + Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 7 report | |
| 1185 | eutectoid: γFe → αFe + Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 2, p. 4, row 13 report | |
| 1185 | eutectoid: fcc(γ-Fe) ↔ bcc(α-Fe) + Fe17Y2 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (PTD) (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 13 report | ||
| 1185 | eutectoid: fcc(γ-Fe) ↔ bcc(α-Fe) + Fe17Y2 | model | [4] Ye 2023 cites (cal | Table 10, p. 18, row 10 report | ||
| 1185 | eutectoid: γFe → αFe + Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 14 report | |
| 1185 | eutectoid: fcc(γ-Fe) ↔ bcc(α-Fe) + Fe17Y2 | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | Table 10, p. 18, row 9 report | ||
| 1185 | eutectoid: γFe → αFe + Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 2, p. 4, row 12 report | |
| 1184.8 | eutectoid: fcc(γ-Fe) ↔ bcc(α-Fe) + Fe17Y2 | model | [4] Ye 2023 | Table 10, p. 18, row 14 report | ||
| 1184.15 | polymorphic: Fe17Y2_HT ↔ Fe17Y2_LT | Fe17Y2_HT: Y 0.105; Fe17Y2_LT: Fe 0.894737, Y 0.105263 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 12 report | |
| 1184 | peritectoid: γ Fe ↔ α Fe + Fe17Y2 | α Fe: Y 3.800e-4; Fe17Y2: Y 0.105 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 4, p. 10, row 5 report | |
| 1173.15 | eutectic: L + Fe2Y -> αY | L: Y 0.659; Fe2Y: Y 0.3333; αY: Y 0.984 | unspecified | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report | |
| 1173.15 | Liq ↔ Fe2Y + (α Y) | Liq: Y 0.66; Fe2Y: Y 0.33; α Y: Y 0.984 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 45 report | |
| 1173 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe2Y + α Y | Liq: Y 0.66; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Domagala 1961 | Table 4, p. 10, row 37 report | |
| 1173 | eutectic: L → Fe2Y+αY | L: Y 0.66; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333; αY: Y 0.984 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kubuschewski 1982 | Table 2, p. 4, row 35 report | |
| 1168.15 | L + Fe2Y -> αY | Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Massalski 1991 | Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report | |
| 1168.15 | Liq ↔ Fe2Y + (α Y) | Liq: Y 0.66; Fe2Y: Y 0.33; α Y: Y 0.984 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Gschneider 1961 | Table 7, p. 8, row 44 report | |
| 1156 | eutectic: L → Fe2Y+αY | L: Y 0.601; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Konar 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 4, row 40 report | |
| 1146.15 | Liq ↔ Fe2Y + (α Y) | Liq: Y 0.6118; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 47 report | |
| 1146 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe2Y + α Y | Liq: Y 0.6118; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 39 report | |
| 1146 | eutectic: L → Fe2Y+αY | L: Y 0.612; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 39 report | |
| 1128 | eutectic: L → Fe2Y+αY | L: Y 0.64; Fe2Y: Y 0.333 | model | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 2, p. 4, row 36 report | |
| 1118.15 | Liq ↔ Fe2Y + (α Y) | Liq: Y 0.6365; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 7, p. 8, row 46 report | |
| 1118 | eutectic: L → Fe2Y+αY | L: Y 0.637; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 2, p. 4, row 38 report | |
| 1118 | eutectic: Liq ↔ Fe2Y + α Y | Liq: Y 0.6365; Fe2Y: Fe 0.666667, Y 0.333333 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 4, p. 10, row 40 report |
Formation enthalpies
Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.
| Phase | Compound | Value | T (K) | Class | MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -9.47 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 8 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | -9.47 per mol-atom | 973 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 2 report | ||||
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -9.47 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 12 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -8.76 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 13 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -8.76 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 9 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | -8.76 per mol-atom | 973 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 3 report | ||||
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -8.7 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Gozzi 2007 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 2 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -8.35 kJ/mol-atom | 895 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 8 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -7.93 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.01 | 895 | experimental | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Gozzi 2007 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 6 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -7.77 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 11 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -7.77 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 6 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -7.66 kJ/mol-atom | 895 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 9 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -6.66 kJ/mol-atom | 895 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 7 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -6.38 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.31 | 973 | experimental | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 10 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -6.38 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.31 | 973 | experimental | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 4 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | -6.38 per mol-atom ± 0.31 | 973 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 1 report | ||||
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -5.99 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 8 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | -5.99 per mol-atom | 298.15 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 4 report | ||||
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -5.99 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 4 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -5.691 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 2 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -5.691 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 38 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -5.29 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 9 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -5.29 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 5 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | -5.28 per mol-atom | 298.15 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 5 report | ||||
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -4.36 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 3 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -4.36 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 6 report | |
| Fe17Y2 | -2.672 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kirklin 2015 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 5 report | ||||
| Fe17Y2 | Fe17Y2 | -2.287 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -0.76 (mp-aaacqbgm) | -1.077 (oqmd-657319) | [3] Fan 2021 | p. 11 report | The enthalpy of formation of Fe17 Y2 at 298 K (- 2.287 kJ/mol-atom) is also close to the values obtained by our DFT calculation (- 1.04 kJ/mol-atom). |
| Fe17Y2 | -1.78 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 1 report | ||||
| Fe17Y2 | -1.634 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 7 report | ||||
| Fe17Y2 | -1.056 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Jain 2013 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 3 report | ||||
| Fe17Y2 | -1.04 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 1 report | ||||
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -12.97 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 18 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -12.97 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 17 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -12.97 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | -12.65 per mol-atom | 973 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 8 report | ||||
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -12.65 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 18 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -12.65 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 21 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | -12.05 per mol-atom | 298.15 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 9 report | ||||
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -12.05 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 16 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | -11.69 per mol-atom | 973 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 7 report | ||||
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -11.69 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 20 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -9.22 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 19 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -9.22 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 15 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | -8.09 per mol-atom ± 0.49 | 973 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 6 report | ||||
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -8.09 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.49 | 973 | experimental | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 13 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -8.09 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.49 | 973 | experimental | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 18 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -6.523 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 11 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -6.25 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 15 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -6.25 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 15 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | Fe23Y6 | -5.752 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -4.013 (mp-aaaabtin) | -4.022 (oqmd-30269) | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 11 report | |
| Fe23Y6 | -4.85 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 14 report | ||||
| Fe23Y6 | -4.829 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 16 report | ||||
| Fe23Y6 | -4.416 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Jain 2013 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 14 report | ||||
| Fe23Y6 | -4.089 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 10 report | ||||
| Fe23Y6 | -4.031 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kirklin 2015 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 12 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -12.55 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 38 report | |
| Fe2Y | -12.55 per mol-atom | 973 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 18 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -12.47 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 36 report | |
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -12.47 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 35 report | |
| Fe2Y | -12.47 per mol-atom | 298.15 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 22 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -11.8 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 36 report | |
| Fe2Y | -11.8 per mol-atom | 973 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 19 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -11.8 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 39 report | |
| Fe2Y | -9.99 per mol-atom | 298.15 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 21 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -9.99 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 34 report | |
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -9.99 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 35 report | |
| Fe2Y | -7.87 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 31 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -7.77 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 37 report | |
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -7.77 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 33 report | |
| Fe2Y | -7.646 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 34 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | -7.09 per mol-atom ± 0.61 | 973 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 17 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -7.09 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.61 | 973 | experimental | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 36 report | |
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -7.09 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.61 | 973 | experimental | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 31 report | |
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -6.825 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 29 report | |
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -6.412 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 29 report | |
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -6.3 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 33 report | |
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -6.3 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 33 report | |
| Fe2Y | -6.24 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Jain 2013 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 32 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | -6.048 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kirklin 2015 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 30 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | -5.92 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 28 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | -2 per mol-atom | 298.15 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Miedema 1976 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 20 report | ||||
| Fe2Y | Fe2Y | -1 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -6.024 (mp-aaaaacik) | -6.077 (oqmd-18348) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Niessen 1983 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 32 report | |
| Fe3Y | -13.31 per mol-atom | 298.15 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 16 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -13.31 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 27 report | |
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -13.31 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 26 report | |
| Fe3Y | -13.04 per mol-atom | 298.15 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 15 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -13.04 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 25 report | |
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -12.77 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Conclusions | Table 3, p. 5, row 27 report | |
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -12.77 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 30 report | |
| Fe3Y | -12.77 per mol-atom | 973 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 13 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -12.49 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 29 report | |
| Fe3Y | -12.49 per mol-atom | 973 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 12 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | -8.97 per mol-atom ± 0.54 | 973 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 11 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -8.97 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.54 | 973 | experimental | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 27 report | |
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -8.97 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.54 | 973 | experimental | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 22 report | |
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -8.94 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 28 report | |
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -8.94 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 24 report | |
| Fe3Y | -7.6 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 22 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | -7.519 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 25 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -6.96 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 24 report | |
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -6.96 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [3] Fan 2021 cites Saenko 2017 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 24 report | |
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -6.774 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 20 report | |
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -6.374 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 20 report | |
| Fe3Y | -6.144 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Kirklin 2015 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 21 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | -6.144 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 cites Jain 2013 doi | Table 3, p. 5, row 23 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | -6.06 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 3, p. 5, row 19 report | ||||
| Fe3Y | Fe3Y | -1 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | -5.882 (mp-aaacksts) | -6.168 (oqmd-30268) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Niessen 1983 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 23 report | |
| Fe3Y | -1 per mol-atom | 298.15 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Miedema 1976 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 14 report | ||||
| FeY | FeY | -12.5 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | 0.618 (oqmd-1435280) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Watson 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 42 report | ||
| FeY | FeY | -9.4 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | 0.618 (oqmd-1435280) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 45 report | ||
| FeY | -9 per mol-atom | 973 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 4, p. 4, row 24 report | ||||
| FeY | FeY | -8.8 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | 0.618 (oqmd-1435280) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 46 report | ||
| FeY | FeY | -5.9 kJ/mol-atom | 0 | model | 0.618 (oqmd-1435280) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Mihalkovic 2004 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 40 report | ||
| FeY | FeY | -5.8 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | 0.618 (oqmd-1435280) | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 44 report | ||
| FeY | FeY | -5.3 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | model | 0.618 (oqmd-1435280) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 43 report | ||
| FeY | -5.3 per mol-atom | 973 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 4, p. 4, row 23 report | ||||
| FeY | FeY | -2 kJ/mol-atom | 298.15 | model | 0.618 (oqmd-1435280) | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Niessen 1983 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 41 report |
Other properties
Phase transition (50)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase transition | 295 K | 295 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Mandal 2004 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 16 report | |
| Phase transition | 300 K | 300 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Fujii 1995 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 2 report | |
| Phase transition | 300 K | 300 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Koyama 2000 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 15 report | |
| Phase transition | 300.15 K | 300.15 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| Phase transition | 308 K | 308 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Paoluzi 2000 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 8 report | |
| Phase transition | 309 K | 309 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Knyazev 2001 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 7 report | |
| Phase transition | 309 K | 309 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kuchin 1996 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 10 report | |
| Phase transition | 310 K | 310 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kou 2017 | Table 2, p. 5, row 4 report | |
| Phase transition | 320.15 K | 320.15 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| Phase transition | 322 K | 322 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Liao 1992 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 1 report | |
| Phase transition | 324 K | 324 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Buschow 1977 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 14 report | |
| Phase transition | 324 K | 324 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Shen 1995 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 9 report | |
| Phase transition | 324.15 K | 324.15 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Inoue 1985 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 8 report | |
| Phase transition | 327 K | 327 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Steiner 1976 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 11 report | |
| Phase transition | 328 K | 328 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Wang 1996 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 5 report | |
| Phase transition | 328.15 K | 328.15 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 5 report | |
| Phase transition | 333.15 K | 333.15 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| Phase transition | 336 K | 336 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Shen 1997 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 6 report | |
| Phase transition | 337.15 K | 337.15 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| Phase transition | 341 K | 341 | magnetic: Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Tereshina 2002 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 3 report | |
| Phase transition | 480.15 K | 480.15 | magnetic: Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 11 report | |
| Phase transition | 481 K | 481 | magnetic: Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Buschow 1977 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 22 report | |
| Phase transition | 484 K | 484 | magnetic: Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Herbst 1984 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 17 report | |
| Phase transition | 484.15 K | 484.15 | magnetic: Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Inoue 1985 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 13 report | |
| Phase transition | 485.15 K | 485.15 | magnetic: Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 12 report | |
| Phase transition | 490 K | 490 | magnetic: Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kirchmayr 1968 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 18 report | |
| Phase transition | 529.15 K | 529.15 | magnetic: Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 19 report | |
| Phase transition | 534 K | 534 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Muraoka 2017 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 29 report | |
| Phase transition | 535 K | 535 | magnetic | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites ref. 124 | p. 6 report | However, Dariel et al. did not report the specific heat data but only gave the Curie temperature of Fe2Y to be 535 K[124]. |
| Phase transition | 535.15 K | 535.15 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 24 report | |
| Phase transition | 542 K | 542 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Buschow 1977 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 32 report | |
| Phase transition | 545 K | 545 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Buschow 1975 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 28 report | |
| Phase transition | 545 K | 545 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Brouha 1973 | Table 2, p. 5, row 27 report | |
| Phase transition | 545 K | 545 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Buschow 1970 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 31 report | |
| Phase transition | 545 K | 545 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kirchmayr 1968 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 30 report | |
| Phase transition | 545.15 K | 545.15 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 23 report | |
| Phase transition | 545.15 K | 545.15 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Buschow 1976 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 22 report | |
| Phase transition | 545.15 K | 545.15 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Shenoy 1983 doi | Table 3, p. 3, row 21 report | |
| Phase transition | 549.15 K | 549.15 | magnetic: Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 18 report | |
| Phase transition | 550.15 K | 550.15 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 25 report | |
| Phase transition | 552 K | 552 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Arout 2006 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 26 report | |
| Phase transition | 552.15 K | 552.15 | magnetic: Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Pauling | Table 3, p. 3, row 26 report | |
| Phase transition | 569 K | 569 | magnetic: Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Buschow 1977 doi | Table 2, p. 5, row 25 report | |
| Phase transition | 1573 K | 1573 | congruent transformation | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | p. 5 report | The intermetallic compounds Fe17Y2, Fe23Y6, and Fe3Y are produced by congruent reactions at 1,673 ± 25 K, 1,573 K, and 1,608 K, respectively. |
| Phase transition | 1608 K | 1608 | congruent transformation | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | p. 5 report | The intermetallic compounds Fe17Y2, Fe23Y6, and Fe3Y are produced by congruent reactions at 1,673 ± 25 K, 1,573 K, and 1,608 K, respectively. |
| Phase transition | 1621 K | 1621 | congruent transformation | model | [3] Fan 2021 | p. 12 report | Since there is no critical evidence of congruent melting for Fe23 Y6 and Fe3 Y, their congruent temperature, i.e., 1622 K and 1621 K are calculated based on our DFT results and involved eutectic reactions. |
| Phase transition | 1622 K | 1622 | congruent transformation | model | [3] Fan 2021 | p. 12 report | Since there is no critical evidence of congruent melting for Fe23 Y6 and Fe3 Y, their congruent temperature, i.e., 1622 K and 1621 K are calculated based on our DFT results and involved eutectic reactions. |
| Phase transition | 1650 K | 1650 | congruent transformation | model | [3] Fan 2021 | p. 12 report | Furthermore, the calculated congruent-melting point of Fe17 Y2 (1650 K) from the current thermodynamic model is within the experimental temperature range from 1648 to 1698 K. |
| Phase transition | 1673 K | 1673 | congruent transformation | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites (exp | p. 5 report | The intermetallic compounds Fe17Y2, Fe23Y6, and Fe3Y are produced by congruent reactions at 1,673 ± 25 K, 1,573 K, and 1,608 K, respectively. |
| Phase transition | 1673 K | 1673 | congruent transformation | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Domagala 1961 | p. 2 report | Domagala et al.[14] reported that Fe3Y melts congruently at about 1673 K. |
Formation (35)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entropy of formation | -1.72 J/mol-atom/K ± 20 | 895 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Gozzi 2007 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 6 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -1.74 J/mol-atom/K | 895 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 7 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -0.167 J/mol-atom/K | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 13 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -1.9 J/mol-atom/K ± 280 | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 10 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -1.121 J/mol-atom/K | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 11 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -0.933 J/mol-atom/K | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 19 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -0.079 J/mol-atom/K | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 21 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -2.24 J/mol-atom/K ± 440 | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 18 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -0.96 J/mol-atom/K ± 550 | 973 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 36 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -0.184 J/mol-atom/K | 973 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 28 report | |
| Entropy of formation | -3.03 J/mol-atom/K ± 480 | 973 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 27 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -10.89 kJ/mol-atom | 895 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 8 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -8.57 kJ/mol-atom | 895 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 9 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -4.6 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.6 | 895 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Gozzi 2007 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 6 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -6.72 kJ/mol-atom | 895 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 7 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -8.6 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 13 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -4.54 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.05 | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 10 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -6.68 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 11 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -11.09 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 12 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -8.31 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 19 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -14.58 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 20 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -12.57 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 21 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -5.91 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.07 | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 18 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -15.34 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 38 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -8.09 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 37 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -6.15 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.09 | 973 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 36 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -12.91 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 39 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -15.96 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 29 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -8.76 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 28 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -13.61 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 30 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -6.02 kJ/mol-atom ± 0.08 | 973 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 27 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -4.6 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | FeY alloy: Y 0.5 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 43 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -11.5 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | FeY alloy: Y 0.5 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 45 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -6 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | FeY alloy: Y 0.5 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | Table 5, p. 12, row 44 report | |
| Gibbs energy of formation | -9.7 kJ/mol-atom | 973 | FeY alloy: Y 0.5 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Kardellass 2014 doi | Table 5, p. 12, row 46 report |
Mixing / partial (12)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔmixH | -7.96 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1873 | model | [2] Saenko 2017 | p. 7 report | Figure 3 shows the integral enthalpy of mixing of the liquid phase versus the mole fraction of yttrium at temperature of 1873 K calculated in the present work and in the work of Kardellass et al.[9] in comparison with experimental data of Ryss et al.[32] The reference state of both elements was accepted as liquid at 1873 K. The calculated curve had a minimum value of -7.96 kJ mol-1 47 at.% Y, whi… | |
| Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔmixH | -8.44 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1873 | experimental | [2] Saenko 2017 cites Ryss 1976 | p. 7 report | Figure 3 shows the integral enthalpy of mixing of the liquid phase versus the mole fraction of yttrium at temperature of 1873 K calculated in the present work and in the work of Kardellass et al.[9] in comparison with experimental data of Ryss et al.[32] The reference state of both elements was accepted as liquid at 1873 K. The calculated curve had a minimum value of -7.96 kJ mol-1 47 at.% Y, whi… | |
| Enthalpy of mixing printed: enthalpy of mixing | -8.44 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1873 | experimental | [4] Ye 2023 cites ref. 121 | p. 6 report | The experimental results[121] show that the minimum enthalpy of mixing at 1,873 K is -8.44 kJ/mol at around 47 at.% Y. | |
| Enthalpy of mixing printed: Hmix | -8.44 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1873 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Ryss 1976 | p. 2 report | Ryss et al.[23] measured the enthalpies of mixing (Hmix ) of the liquid phase at 1873 K in the entire composition range with an interval of 5 at.%. The results show a minimum of integral enthalpy, about - 8.44 kJ/mol at 47 at.% Y. | |
| Enthalpy of mixing printed: enthalpy of mixing | -8.23 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1873 | Liquid | model | [3] Fan 2021 | p. 10 report | As shown in Fig. 5, the enthalpy of mixing for the liquid phase calculated at 1873 K are in good agreement with the experiments.[23] The calculated curve had a minimum value of - 8.23 kJ/mol at the composition of 47 at.% Y, perfectly matching the experimental value (- 8.44 kJ/mol). |
| Enthalpy of mixing printed: enthalpy of mixing | -8.44 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1873 | Liquid | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Ryss 1976 | p. 10 report | As shown in Fig. 5, the enthalpy of mixing for the liquid phase calculated at 1873 K are in good agreement with the experiments.[23] The calculated curve had a minimum value of - 8.23 kJ/mol at the composition of 47 at.% Y, perfectly matching the experimental value (- 8.44 kJ/mol). |
| Gibbs energy of mixing printed: i*(μ(Fe,liq)) + j*(μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -188 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1573 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Fe 0.895, Y 0.105 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Gibbs energy of mixing printed: i*(μ(Fe,liq)) + j*(μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -225 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1573 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Fe 0.895, Y 0.105 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| Gibbs energy of mixing printed: i*(μ(Fe,liq)) + j*(μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -489 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1573 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Fe 0.794, Y 0.206 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| Gibbs energy of mixing printed: i*(μ(Fe,liq)) + j*(μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -431 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1573 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Fe 0.794, Y 0.206 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| Gibbs energy of mixing printed: i*(μ(Fe,liq)) + j*(μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -74 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1573 | Fe3Y alloy: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 15 report | |
| Gibbs energy of mixing printed: i*(μ(Fe,liq)) + j*(μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -66 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 1573 | Fe3Y alloy: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 14 report |
Heat capacity / entropy / enthalpy (12)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | 1.66 unknown | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 2 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | -1.9 unknown ± 0.28 | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 4, row 1 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | -0.167 unknown | 973 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 3 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | -0.079 unknown | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | -2.24 unknown ± 0.44 | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | 2.97 unknown | 973 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | -0.96 unknown ± 0.55 | 973 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 4, row 16 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | 1.14 unknown | 973 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 18 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | 2.87 unknown | 973 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 17 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | -3.03 unknown ± 0.48 | 973 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Subramanian 1984 doi | Table 5, p. 4, row 11 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | 3.57 unknown | 973 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 12 report | |
| Entropy printed: ΔS973 0 | 0.859 unknown | 973 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 13 report |
Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (18)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Y)1573 | -60 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Fe 0.895, Y 0.105 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Fe)1573 | -4 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Fe 0.895, Y 0.105 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: i* (μ(Fe,liq)) + j* (μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -188 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Fe 0.895, Y 0.105 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 4 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: i* (μ(Fe,liq)) + j* (μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -225 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Fe 0.895, Y 0.105 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Y)1573 | -53 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Fe 0.895, Y 0.105 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Fe)1573 | -7 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Fe 0.895, Y 0.105 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 5 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Y)1573 | -47 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Fe 0.794, Y 0.206 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Fe)1573 | -9 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Fe 0.794, Y 0.206 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: i* (μ(Fe,liq)) + j* (μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -489 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Fe 0.794, Y 0.206 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 10 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Y)1573 | -45 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Fe 0.794, Y 0.206 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Fe)1573 | -7 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Fe 0.794, Y 0.206 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: i* (μ(Fe,liq)) + j* (μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -431 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Fe 0.794, Y 0.206 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: i* (μ(Fe,liq)) + j* (μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -74 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe3Y alloy: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 15 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Y)1573 | -47 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe3Y alloy: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 15 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Fe)1573 | -9 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe3Y alloy: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | model | [1] Kardellass 2014 | Table 5, p. 4, row 15 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Y)1573 | -42 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe3Y alloy: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 14 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: μ(Fe)1573 | -8 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe3Y alloy: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 14 report | |
| Chemical potential printed: i* (μ(Fe,liq)) + j* (μ(Y,liq)) = μ(FeiYj) | -66 kJ/mol.at | 1573 | Fe3Y alloy: Fe 0.75, Y 0.25 | experimental | [1] Kardellass 2014 cites Takashi 2010 | Table 5, p. 4, row 14 report |
Crystal structure (13)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattice a | 8.447 Å | 0 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report | |
| Lattice a | 12.04 Å | 0 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report | |
| Lattice a | 7.28 Å | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | model | [3] Fan 2021 cites Zhang 2016 doi | Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report | ||
| Lattice a | 7.28 Å | 0 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.111 Å | 0 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report | |
| Lattice a | 8.46 Å | 298.15 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Villars 1985 | Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report | |
| Lattice a | 12.12 Å | 298.15 | Fe23Y6 alloy: Y 0.206897 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Villars 1985 | Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report | |
| Lattice a | 7.363 Å | 298.15 | Fe2Y alloy: Y 0.333333 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Villars 1985 | Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report | |
| Lattice a | 5.095 Å | 298.15 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Villars 1985 | Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report | |
| Lattice c | 12.386 Å | 0 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report | |
| Lattice c | 24.28 Å | 0 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | DFT | [3] Fan 2021 | Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report | |
| Lattice c | 12.41 Å | 298.15 | Fe17Y2 alloy: Y 0.105263 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Villars 1985 | Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report | |
| Lattice c | 24.39 Å | 298.15 | Fe3Y alloy: Y 0.25 | experimental | [3] Fan 2021 cites Villars 1985 | Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- S. Kardellass, C. Servant, N. Selhaoui, A. Iddaoudi, M. Ait Amar, L. Bouirden, A thermodynamic assessment of the iron–yttrium system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 583, 598-606 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.07.010
- I. Saenko, O. Fabrichnaya, A. Udovsky, New Thermodynamic Assessment of the Fe-Y System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 38, 684-699 (2017). doi:10.1007/s11669-017-0574-3
- Ling Fan, Chen Shen, Kun Hu, Huashan Liu, Hongbin Zhang, DFT Calculations and Thermodynamic Re-Assessment of the Fe-Y Binary System, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 42, 348-362 (2021). doi:10.1007/s11669-021-00887-9
- Hongjian Ye, Maohua Rong, Qing Chen, Qingrong Yao, Jiang Wang, Guanghui Rao et al., Assessment of phase equilibria and thermodynamic properties in the Fe-RE (RE = rare earth metals) binary systems, J Mater Inf 3 (2023). doi:10.20517/jmi.2023.08