HfW2: enthalpy of formation
3 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 3); Materials Project -16.679 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaacbw); OQMD -16.555 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-17394).
Systems: Hf–W
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -14.1 kJ/mol-atom | HfW2–15 | model | CALPHAD | Hf–W | [1] Shao 2002 | Table 1, p. 5, row 3 report | ||
| -8 kJ/mol-atom | HfW2–15 | model | Estimation | Hf–W | [1] Shao 2002 cites de Boer FR 1989 | Table 1, p. 5, row 2 report | ||
| -3 kJ/mol-atom | HfW2–15 | model | CALPHAD | Hf–W | [1] Shao 2002 cites Lee 1986 doi | Table 1, p. 5, row 1 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -14.1 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -8 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -3 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaacbw | -16.679 | -0.172863 | Fd-3m | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-17394 | -16.555 | -0.171584 | Fd-3m | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- G. Shao, Thermodynamic assessment of the Hf–Mo and Hf–W systems, Intermetallics 10, 429-434 (2002). doi:10.1016/s0966-9795(02)00017-1