MnH: enthalpy of formation
6 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (DFT 6).
Systems: H–Mn
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 kJ/mol-atom | MnH | DFT | DFT | H–Mn | [1] Liang 2018 cites https://www 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | ||
| 2.33 kJ/mol-atom | MnH | DFT | DFT | H–Mn | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report | ||
| 5.58 kJ/mol-atom | MnH | DFT | DFT | H–Mn | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report | ||
| 16.1131 kJ/mol-atom | MnH | DFT | DFT | H–Mn | [1] Liang 2018 cites https://www 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | ||
| 23.3495 kJ/mol-atom | MnH | DFT | DFT | H–Mn | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report | ||
| 55.865 kJ/mol-atom | MnH | DFT | DFT | H–Mn | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.6 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 | ||||
| 2.33 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 | ||||
| 5.58 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 | ||||
| 16.1131 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.04824 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 | ||||
| 23.3495 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.04824 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 | ||||
| 55.865 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.04824 | 9.966 (dft, calibrated) | 9.966 |
Sources
- Yongpeng Liang, Shuhong Liu, Yong Du, Thermodynamic Assessment of the Mn-H and Mg-Mn-H Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 39, 186-195 (2018). doi:10.1007/s11669-018-0622-7