H–Mn system
22 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 4, model 4, DFT 14); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 4 |
| model | 4 |
| DFT | 14 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 8 |
| formation | 14 |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull MnH-11Lob
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1489.15 | eutectic: L -> (δMn) + Gas | L: H 0.062; (δMn): H 0.042 | experimental | [1] Liang 2018 cites Serdyuk 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report | |
| 1487.15 | eutectic: L -> (δMn) + Gas | L: H 0.062; (δMn): H 0.0416 | model | [1] Liang 2018 | Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report | |
| 1418.15 | (δMn) + Gas -> (γMn) | (δMn): H 0.0376; (γMn): H 0.0393 | model | [1] Liang 2018 | Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| 1416.15 | (δMn) + Gas -> (γMn) | (δMn): H 0.033; (γMn): H 0.046 | experimental | [1] Liang 2018 cites Serdyuk 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| 1330.15 | (γMn) -> (βMn) + Gas | (γMn): H 0.041; (βMn): H 0.034 | experimental | [1] Liang 2018 cites Serdyuk 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 5 report | |
| 1328.15 | (γMn) -> (βMn) + Gas | (γMn): H 0.0381; (βMn): H 0.0328 | model | [1] Liang 2018 | Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| 937.15 | (βMn) -> (αMn) + ε | (βMn): H 0.0194; (αMn): H 0.0096 | model | [1] Liang 2018 | Table 1, p. 3, row 8 report | |
| 935.15 | (βMn) -> (αMn) + ε | (βMn): H 0.028; (αMn): H 0.018 | experimental | [1] Liang 2018 cites Serdyuk 1982 | Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report |
Formation enthalpies
Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.
| Phase | Compound | Value | T (K) | Class | MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom) | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mn3H | 4.88 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report | |||||
| Mn3H | 5.5 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report | |||||
| Mn3H | 48.9181 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report | |||||
| Mn3H | 55.0931 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report | |||||
| MnH | 1.6 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites https://www 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | |||||
| MnH | 2.33 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report | |||||
| MnH | 5.58 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report | |||||
| MnH | 16.1131 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites https://www 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | |||||
| MnH | 23.3495 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report | |||||
| MnH | 55.865 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report | |||||
| MnH3 | 3.48 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report | |||||
| MnH3 | 3.62 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report | |||||
| MnH3 | 34.8312 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report | |||||
| MnH3 | 36.2785 kJ/mol-atom | DFT | [1] Liang 2018 cites http://oqmd 2018 | Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Yongpeng Liang, Shuhong Liu, Yong Du, Thermodynamic Assessment of the Mn-H and Mg-Mn-H Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 39, 186-195 (2018). doi:10.1007/s11669-018-0622-7