H–Mn system

22 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 4, model 4, DFT 14); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · phases (8) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental4
model4
DFT14
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction8
formation14

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull MnH-11Lob

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the H–Mn system (8)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1489.15eutectic: L -> (δMn) + GasL: H 0.062; (δMn): H 0.042experimental[1] Liang 2018
cites Serdyuk 1982
Table 1, p. 3, row 1
report
1487.15eutectic: L -> (δMn) + GasL: H 0.062; (δMn): H 0.0416model[1] Liang 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 2
report
1418.15(δMn) + Gas -> (γMn)(δMn): H 0.0376; (γMn): H 0.0393model[1] Liang 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 4
report
1416.15(δMn) + Gas -> (γMn)(δMn): H 0.033; (γMn): H 0.046experimental[1] Liang 2018
cites Serdyuk 1982
Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
1330.15(γMn) -> (βMn) + Gas(γMn): H 0.041; (βMn): H 0.034experimental[1] Liang 2018
cites Serdyuk 1982
Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
1328.15(γMn) -> (βMn) + Gas(γMn): H 0.0381; (βMn): H 0.0328model[1] Liang 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
937.15(βMn) -> (αMn) + ε(βMn): H 0.0194; (αMn): H 0.0096model[1] Liang 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
935.15(βMn) -> (αMn) + ε(βMn): H 0.028; (αMn): H 0.018experimental[1] Liang 2018
cites Serdyuk 1982
Table 1, p. 3, row 7
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, H–Mn system (14)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Mn3H4.88 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Mn3H5.5 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
Mn3H48.9181 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Mn3H55.0931 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
MnH1.6 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites https://www 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
MnH2.33 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
MnH5.58 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
MnH16.1131 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites https://www 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
MnH23.3495 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
MnH55.865 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
MnH33.48 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
MnH33.62 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report
MnH334.8312 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
MnH336.2785 kJ/mol-atomDFT[1] Liang 2018
cites http://oqmd 2018
Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Yongpeng Liang, Shuhong Liu, Yong Du, Thermodynamic Assessment of the Mn-H and Mg-Mn-H Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 39, 186-195 (2018). doi:10.1007/s11669-018-0622-7