NbNi3: enthalpy of formation
14 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 6, model 3, DFT 5); experimental median -31.715 kJ/mol-atom (n = 5); Materials Project -28.233 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaaaacdv); OQMD -28.755 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-30781).
Systems: Nb–Ni
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -32 kJ/mol-atom ± 2 | NbNi3 | 600.15 | experimental | Experimental | Nb–Ni | [1] Santhy 2015 cites Kubaschewski 2015 | Table 6, p. 4, row 7 report | |
| -32 kJ/mol-atom | NbNi3 | 298.15 | experimental | Experimental | Nb–Ni | [1] Santhy 2015 cites Hultgren 1973 | Table 6, p. 4, row 8 report | |
| -31.715 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.218 | Ni3Nb | 298.15 | experimental | Nb–Ni | [2] Bolcavage 1996 cites Argent 1959 | Table 4, p. 8, row 2 report | ||
| -31.714 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 2.552 | NbNi3 | 298.15 | experimental | Experimental | Nb–Ni | [3] Joubert 2004 cites Argent 1959 | Table 4, p. 5, row 4 report | |
| -31.71 kJ/mol-atom ± 2.5 | NbNi3 | 298.15 | experimental | Experimental | Nb–Ni | [1] Santhy 2015 cites Argent 1959 | Table 6, p. 4, row 6 report | |
| -31.71 kJ/mol-atom | δ-NbNi3 | 298.15 | experimental | Nb–Ni | [4] Sun 2023 cites Argent 1959 | Table 6, p. 33, row 2 report | ||
| -33.925 kJ/mol-atom | Ni3Nb | 298.15 | model | Nb–Ni | [2] Bolcavage 1996 | Table 4, p. 8, row 1 report | ||
| -32 kJ/mol-atom | NbNi3 | 298.15 | model | Miedema | Nb–Ni | [1] Santhy 2015 cites Niessen 1988 doi | Table 6, p. 4, row 9 report | |
| -30.645 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | NbNi3 | 298.15 | model | Nb–Ni | [3] Joubert 2004 | Table 4, p. 5, row 3 report | ||
| -33.41 kJ/mol-atom | NbNi3 | DFT | First-principle | Nb–Ni | [1] Santhy 2015 cites Ravindran 1996 doi | Table 6, p. 4, row 10 report | ||
| -33.409 kJ/mol (basis unstated) | NbNi3 | 298.15 | DFT | First principles | Nb–Ni | [3] Joubert 2004 cites Ravindran 1996 doi | Table 4, p. 5, row 5 report | |
| -31.2 kJ/mol-atom | NbNi3 | 0 | DFT | First-principle | Nb–Ni | [1] Santhy 2015 | Table 6, p. 4, row 11 report | |
| -28.51 kJ/mol-atom | δ-NbNi3 | 298.15 | DFT | DFT and phonon calculations | Nb–Ni | [4] Sun 2023 | Table 6, p. 33, row 1 report | |
| -28.38 kJ/mol-atom | δ-NbNi3 | 0 | DFT | DFT and phonon calculations | Nb–Ni | [4] Sun 2023 | Table 6, p. 33, row 1 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -32 | kJ/mol-atom | 2 | 0.05 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | |||
| -32 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.5 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | ||||
| -31.715 | kJ/mol-atom | 2.218 | 5.000e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | |||
| -31.714 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 2.552 | 5.000e-4 | 16.4 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 16.4 | |||
| -31.71 | kJ/mol-atom | 2.5 | 0.005 | 4.1 (experimental_unspecified, cleaned_below_threshold) | 4.1 | |||
| -31.71 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -33.925 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -32 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -30.645 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 15.6 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 15.6 | ||||
| -33.41 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.929 (dft, calibrated) | 3.929 | ||||
| -33.409 | kJ/mol (basis unstated) | 5.000e-4 | 15.72 (dft, calibrated) | 15.72 | ||||
| -31.2 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.05 | 3.929 (dft, calibrated) | 3.929 | ||||
| -28.51 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.929 (dft, calibrated) | 3.929 | ||||
| -28.38 | kJ/mol-atom | 0.005 | 3.929 (dft, calibrated) | 3.929 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaaaacdv | -28.233 | -0.292619 | Pmmn | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-30781 | -28.755 | -0.298027 | Pmmn | 0 | 0 | no |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- K. Santhy, K.C. Hari Kumar, Thermodynamic reassessment of Nb-Ni-Ti system with order–disorder model, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 619, 733-747 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.08.200
- A. Bolcavage, U. R. Kattner, A reassessment of the calculated Ni-Nb phase diagram, JPE 17, 92-100 (1996). doi:10.1007/bf02665782
- J.-M. Joubert, B. Sundman, N. Dupin, Assessment of the niobium–nickel system, Calphad 28, 299-306 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2004.09.004
- Hui Sun, Shun-Li Shang, Rushi Gong, Brandon J. Bocklund, Allison M. Beese, Zi-Kui Liu, Thermodynamic modeling of the Nb-Ni system with uncertainty quantification using PyCalphad and ESPEI, Calphad 82, 102563 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102563