Ni3C: enthalpy of formation

5 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 1, model 1, unspecified 3).

Systems: C–Ni

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Ni3C reported in the literature (5)
Value	Phase as printed	T (K)	Class	System	Source	Location
38.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	Ni3C	298.15	experimental	C–Ni	[1] Oikawa 2022 cites Roth 1929 doi	Table 4, p. 9, row 1 report
39.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	Ni3C	0	model	C–Ni	[1] Oikawa 2022 cites Gibson 2010 doi	Table 4, p. 9, row 2 report
26.3 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	Ni3C	0	unspecified	C–Ni	[1] Oikawa 2022 cites Nishitani 1985 doi	Table 4, p. 9, row 3 report
33.2 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	Ni3C	298.15	unspecified	C–Ni	[1] Oikawa 2022	Table 4, p. 9, row 5 report
40.2 kJ/mol (basis unstated)	Ni3C	298.15	unspecified	C–Ni	[1] Oikawa 2022 cites Gabriel 1988	Table 4, p. 9, row 4 report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Ni3C
Value	Unit	Reading	Method (class, basis)	Effective
38.5	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.05	14 (unknown, calibrated)	14
39.5	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.05	15.6 (model_calculated, calibrated)	15.6
26.3	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.05	14 (unknown, calibrated)	14
33.2	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.05	14 (unknown, calibrated)	14
40.2	kJ/mol (basis unstated)	0.05	14 (unknown, calibrated)	14

Sources

Katsunari Oikawa, Nobufumi Ueshima, Experimental Investigation and Thermodynamic Assessment of Ni–B and Ni–B–C Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 43, 814-826 (2022). doi:10.1007/s11669-022-00995-0

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735943
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); G. Kim, S. V. Meschel, P. Nash, W. Chen, Experimental formation enthalpies for intermetallic phases and other inorganic compounds, Scientific Data 4 (2017) 170162, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.162; B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file. Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_dft_benchmark_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Parity: DFT-vs-experiment formation-enthalpy benchmark}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735943},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735943},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}