Pu2C3: enthalpy of formation

12 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (experimental 9, model 1, unspecified 2).

Systems: C–Pu

Literature values

Enthalpy of formation of Pu2C3 reported in the literature (12)
ValuePhase as printedT (K)ClassMethodSystemSourceLocationQuote
-102.09 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 11C3Pu2298.15experimentalCalorimetric bombC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Lorenzelli 1971 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report
-93.3 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 3.3C3Pu2298.15experimentalVapour pressure measurementsC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Besmann 1983 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
-88 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 8C3Pu2298.15experimentalCombustion calorimetryC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Lapage 1969
Table 2, p. 3, row 9
report
-82.84 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 4C3Pu2298.15experimentalCalorimetric measurements (C1.467Pu)C–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Johnson 2008
Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
-73.22 kJ/mol (basis unstated)C3Pu2298.15experimentalVapour pressure measurementsC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Harris 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 11
report
-67.53 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 4.6C3Pu2298.15experimentalKnudsen cell effusionC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Battles 1970
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
-66.53 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 8C3Pu2298.15experimentalKnudsen cell effusionC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Marcon 1970 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
-55.23 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 10.5C3Pu2298.15experimentalKnudsen effusion and emfC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Campbell 1970
Table 2, p. 3, row 8
report
-51.46 kJ/mol (basis unstated)C3Pu2298.15experimentalVapour pressure measurementsC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Olson 1967
Table 2, p. 3, row 10
report
-77.06 kJ/mol (basis unstated)C3Pu2298.15modelC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008Table 2, p. 3, row 14
report
-84.73 kJ/mol (basis unstated)C3Pu2298.15unspecifiedCompilationC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Barin 1995
Table 2, p. 3, row 13
report
-74.7 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 8.35C3Pu2298.15unspecifiedCompilationC–Pu[1] Fischer 2008
cites Lemire 2001
Table 2, p. 3, row 12
report

Uncertainty budget

Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.

Uncertainty budget of the literature values of Pu2C3
ValueUnitPrintedReadingMethod (class, basis)CompositionScatterConversionEffective
-102.09kJ/mol (basis unstated)110.0055 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)11
-93.3kJ/mol (basis unstated)3.30.0521 (kems_vapour, calibrated)21
-88kJ/mol (basis unstated)80.055 (combustion_calorimetry, cleaned_below_threshold)8
-82.84kJ/mol (basis unstated)40.00516 (solution_reaction_calorimetry, calibrated)16
-73.22kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.00521 (kems_vapour, calibrated)21
-67.53kJ/mol (basis unstated)4.60.00521 (kems_vapour, calibrated)21
-66.53kJ/mol (basis unstated)80.00521 (kems_vapour, calibrated)21
-55.23kJ/mol (basis unstated)10.50.00521 (kems_vapour, calibrated)21
-51.46kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.00521 (kems_vapour, calibrated)21
-77.06kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.00519.5 (model_calculated, calibrated)19.5
-84.73kJ/mol (basis unstated)0.00517.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated)17.5
-74.7kJ/mol (basis unstated)8.350.0517.5 (evaluated_compilation, calibrated)17.5

Sources

  1. Evelyne Fischer, Thermodynamic modeling of the C–Pu system, Calphad 32, 371-377 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2007.12.004