Ru2Sm: enthalpy of formation
9 accepted literature formation-enthalpy value(s) (model 5, DFT 2, unspecified 2); Materials Project -21.247 kJ/mol-atom (mp-aaacksvm); OQMD -20.066 kJ/mol-atom (oqmd-1375455).
Systems: Ru–Sm
Literature values
| Value | Phase as printed | T (K) | Class | Method | System | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -66.9039 kJ/mol-atom | SmRu2 | model | Optimization LM | Ru–Sm | [1] Kardellass 2023 | Table 3, p. 9, row 69 report | ||
| -45.7907 kJ/mol-atom | SmRu2 | model | Miedema’s model | Ru–Sm | [1] Kardellass 2023 cites De 2014 | Table 3, p. 9, row 72 report | ||
| -36.702 kJ/mol-atom | SmRu2 | model | Optimization EM | Ru–Sm | [1] Kardellass 2023 | Table 3, p. 9, row 70 report | ||
| -36.0316 kJ/mol-atom | SmRu2 | model | Modified Miedema’s model | Ru–Sm | [1] Kardellass 2023 cites Zhang 2007 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 73 report | ||
| -34.0161 kJ/mol-atom | SmRu2 | model | Optimization CM | Ru–Sm | [1] Kardellass 2023 | Table 3, p. 9, row 71 report | ||
| -19.177 kJ/mol-atom | SmRu2 | DFT | Ab-initio | Ru–Sm | [1] Kardellass 2023 cites Ceder 2010 | Table 3, p. 9, row 74 report | ||
| -17.828 kJ/mol-atom | SmRu2 | DFT | Ab-initio | Ru–Sm | [1] Kardellass 2023 cites Oses 2018 doi | Table 3, p. 9, row 76 report | ||
| -21.297 kJ/mol-atom | SmRu2 | unspecified | Ru–Sm | [1] Kardellass 2023 | Table 3, p. 9, row 75 report | |||
| -20.044 kJ/mol-atom | SmRu2 | unspecified | Ru–Sm | [1] Kardellass 2023 | Table 3, p. 9, row 77 report |
Uncertainty budget
Components kept separate, in the value's unit (literature SCHEMA.md, UNCERTAINTY_CALIBRATION.md): effective = max(sqrt(max(printed, reading, method)^2 + composition^2 + conversion^2), scatter). The method floor is the robust between-study scatter of the method class in ORCHID (calibrated) or a documented prior; printed values and printed uncertainties are unchanged.
| Value | Unit | Printed | Reading | Method (class, basis) | Composition | Scatter | Conversion | Effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -66.9039 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-5 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -45.7907 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-6 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.702 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -36.0316 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-6 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -34.0161 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-6 | 3.9 (model_calculated, calibrated) | 3.9 | ||||
| -19.177 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -17.828 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 8.395 (dft, calibrated) | 8.395 | ||||
| -21.297 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 | ||||
| -20.044 | kJ/mol-atom | 5.000e-4 | 3.5 (unknown, calibrated) | 3.5 |
DFT formation energies
Lowest-energy entries at this composition. Materials Project and OQMD use different energy references and are never averaged. 1 eV/atom = 96.485 kJ/mol-atom.
| Source | Entry | kJ/mol-atom | eV/atom | Space group | E above hull (kJ/mol-atom) | E above hull (eV/atom) | Theoretical |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Materials Project | mp-aaacksvm | -21.247 | -0.220206 | P6_3/mmc | 0 | 0 | no |
| OQMD | oqmd-1375455 | -20.066 | -0.207968 | P63/mmc | 0 | 0 | yes |
DFT sources: A. Jain et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002. doi:10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501-1509; S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010. doi:10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 (CC BY 4.0);
Sources
- S. Kardellass, C. Corvalan-Moya, V. P. Vassiliev, Thermodynamic Modeling of the (Ce and Sm)-Ru Binary Systems Based on Linear, Exponential, and Combined Models Aided by Ab-Initio Calculations, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 44, 300-323 (2023). doi:10.1007/s11669-023-01043-1