Ru–Sm system

86 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (model 66, DFT 10, unspecified 10); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
model	66
DFT	10
unspecified	10

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
formation	80
crystal structure	6

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	S. Kardellass, C. Corvalan-Moya, V.P. Vassiliev, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 44, 300-23(2023). doi:10.1007/s11669-023-01043-1	`a4c9d51d324b0c371c9957f7a23a704798167ea31d715adddf2e19896ba1a2ab`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	2001.11	HCP_A3 (x(Sm) 0.00164) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.20333) + RU2SM_C15 (x(Sm) 0.33333)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	2001.11	HCP_A3 (x(Sm) 0.00164) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.20326) + RU2SM_C15 (x(Sm) 0.33333)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1344.99	RU2SM_C15 (x(Sm) 0.33333) + BCC_A2 (x(Sm) 1) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 1)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1210.37	RU2SM_C15 (x(Sm) 0.33333) + RU25SM44 (x(Sm) 0.63768) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.65642)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1210.37	RU2SM_C15 (x(Sm) 0.33333) + RU25SM44 (x(Sm) 0.63768) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.65624)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1205.2	RU25SM44 (x(Sm) 0.63768) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.66688) + RU2SM5 (x(Sm) 0.71429)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1205.2	RU25SM44 (x(Sm) 0.63768) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.667) + RU2SM5 (x(Sm) 0.71429)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1205.2	RU25SM44 (x(Sm) 0.63768) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.6666) + RU2SM5 (x(Sm) 0.71429)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1195.12	LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.93253) + HCP_A3 (x(Sm) 0.99996) + BCC_A2 (x(Sm) 0.99999)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1195.12	LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.93256) + HCP_A3 (x(Sm) 0.99996) + BCC_A2 (x(Sm) 0.99999)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1194.35	RU2SM5 (x(Sm) 0.71429) + RUSM3_D011 (x(Sm) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.77297)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1194.34	RU2SM5 (x(Sm) 0.71429) + RUSM3_D011 (x(Sm) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.77318)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1048.98	RUSM3_D011 (x(Sm) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.87525) + HCP_A3 (x(Sm) 0.99994)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1048.98	RUSM3_D011 (x(Sm) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Sm) 0.87534) + HCP_A3 (x(Sm) 0.99994)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1002.51	RUSM3_D011 (x(Sm) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Sm) 0.99996) + RHOMB_C19 (x(Sm) 1)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1002.51	RUSM3_D011 (x(Sm) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Sm) 0.99996) + RHOMB_C19 (x(Sm) 1)
RuSm-23Kar.tdb	1002.51	RUSM3_D011 (x(Sm) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Sm) 0.99996) + RHOMB_C19 (x(Sm) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ru–Sm system (44)
Phase	Compound	Value	T (K)	Class	MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	Source	Location
Ln3Ru		-37.5761 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 13 report
Ln3Ru		-26.5979 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites De 2014	Table 3, p. 9, row 16 report
Ln3Ru		-23.2407 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Zhang 2007 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 17 report
Ln3Ru		-23.031 kJ/mol-atom		DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Ceder 2010	Table 3, p. 9, row 18 report
Ln3Ru		-22.261 kJ/mol-atom		DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Kirklin 2015 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 19 report
Ln3Ru		-21.4787 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 15 report
Ln3Ru		-21.3059 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 14 report
LnRu2		-66.9039 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 69 report
LnRu2		-45.7907 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites De 2014	Table 3, p. 9, row 72 report
LnRu2		-36.702 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 70 report
LnRu2		-36.0316 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Zhang 2007 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 73 report
LnRu2		-34.0161 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 71 report
LnRu2		-21.297 kJ/mol-atom		unspecified			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 75 report
LnRu2		-20.044 kJ/mol-atom		unspecified			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 77 report
LnRu2		-19.177 kJ/mol-atom		DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Ceder 2010	Table 3, p. 9, row 74 report
LnRu2		-17.828 kJ/mol-atom		DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Oses 2018 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 76 report
Sm3Ru	RuSm3	-37.5761 kJ/mol-atom		model	-23.003 (mp-aaacpppd)	-22.27 (oqmd-1437305)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 13 report
Sm3Ru	RuSm3	-26.5979 kJ/mol-atom		model	-23.003 (mp-aaacpppd)	-22.27 (oqmd-1437305)	[1] Kardellass 2023 cites De 2014	Table 3, p. 9, row 16 report
Sm3Ru	RuSm3	-23.2407 kJ/mol-atom		model	-23.003 (mp-aaacpppd)	-22.27 (oqmd-1437305)	[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Zhang 2007 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 17 report
Sm3Ru		-23.031 kJ/mol-atom		DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Ceder 2010	Table 3, p. 9, row 18 report
Sm3Ru		-22.261 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Kirklin 2015 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 19 report
Sm3Ru	RuSm3	-21.4787 kJ/mol-atom		model	-23.003 (mp-aaacpppd)	-22.27 (oqmd-1437305)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 15 report
Sm3Ru	RuSm3	-21.3059 kJ/mol-atom		model	-23.003 (mp-aaacpppd)	-22.27 (oqmd-1437305)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 14 report
Sm44Ru25		-45.3075 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 85 report
Sm44Ru25		-38.4054 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites De 2014	Table 3, p. 9, row 88 report
Sm44Ru25		-30.9578 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Zhang 2007 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 89 report
Sm44Ru25		-26.291 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 86 report
Sm44Ru25		-25.8035 kJ/mol-atom		model			[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 87 report
Sm5Ru2	Ru2Sm5	-39.9781 kJ/mol-atom		model	-25.912 (mp-aaackvjr)	-25.094 (oqmd-1484187)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 78 report
Sm5Ru2	Ru2Sm5	-30.4526 kJ/mol-atom		model	-25.912 (mp-aaackvjr)	-25.094 (oqmd-1484187)	[1] Kardellass 2023 cites De 2014	Table 3, p. 9, row 81 report
Sm5Ru2	Ru2Sm5	-25.9792 kJ/mol-atom		model	-25.912 (mp-aaackvjr)	-25.094 (oqmd-1484187)	[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Zhang 2007 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 82 report
Sm5Ru2		-25.922 kJ/mol-atom		DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Ceder 2010	Table 3, p. 9, row 83 report
Sm5Ru2		-25.055 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Kirklin 2015 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 84 report
Sm5Ru2	Ru2Sm5	-23.4727 kJ/mol-atom		model	-25.912 (mp-aaackvjr)	-25.094 (oqmd-1484187)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 79 report
Sm5Ru2	Ru2Sm5	-23.457 kJ/mol-atom		model	-25.912 (mp-aaackvjr)	-25.094 (oqmd-1484187)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 80 report
SmRu2	Ru2Sm	-66.9039 kJ/mol-atom		model	-21.247 (mp-aaacksvm)	-20.066 (oqmd-1375455)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 69 report
SmRu2	Ru2Sm	-45.7907 kJ/mol-atom		model	-21.247 (mp-aaacksvm)	-20.066 (oqmd-1375455)	[1] Kardellass 2023 cites De 2014	Table 3, p. 9, row 72 report
SmRu2	Ru2Sm	-36.702 kJ/mol-atom		model	-21.247 (mp-aaacksvm)	-20.066 (oqmd-1375455)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 70 report
SmRu2	Ru2Sm	-36.0316 kJ/mol-atom		model	-21.247 (mp-aaacksvm)	-20.066 (oqmd-1375455)	[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Zhang 2007 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 73 report
SmRu2	Ru2Sm	-34.0161 kJ/mol-atom		model	-21.247 (mp-aaacksvm)	-20.066 (oqmd-1375455)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 71 report
SmRu2	Ru2Sm	-21.297 kJ/mol-atom		unspecified	-21.247 (mp-aaacksvm)	-20.066 (oqmd-1375455)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 75 report
SmRu2	Ru2Sm	-20.044 kJ/mol-atom		unspecified	-21.247 (mp-aaacksvm)	-20.066 (oqmd-1375455)	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 77 report
SmRu2		-19.177 kJ/mol-atom		DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Ceder 2010	Table 3, p. 9, row 74 report
SmRu2		-17.828 kJ/mol-atom		DFT			[1] Kardellass 2023 cites Oses 2018 doi	Table 3, p. 9, row 76 report

Other properties

Formation (36)

Formation, Ru–Sm system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.03663 J/mol-atom/K		Ln3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 15 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.06146 J/mol-atom/K		Ln3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 14 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-1.9487 J/mol-atom/K		Ln3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 13 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-1.6456 J/mol-atom/K		LnRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 69 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.5529 J/mol-atom/K		LnRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 70 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.7669 J/mol-atom/K		LnRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 71 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.03663 J/mol-atom/K		Sm3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 15 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.06146 J/mol-atom/K		Sm3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 14 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-1.9487 J/mol-atom/K		Sm3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 13 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.41058 J/mol-atom/K		Sm44Ru25 alloy: Ru 0.362319, Sm 0.637681	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 85 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.16443 J/mol-atom/K		Sm44Ru25 alloy: Ru 0.362319, Sm 0.637681	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 87 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.11085 J/mol-atom/K		Sm44Ru25 alloy: Ru 0.362319, Sm 0.637681	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 86 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.6238 J/mol-atom/K		Sm5Ru2 alloy: Ru 0.285714, Sm 0.714286	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 78 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.01077 J/mol-atom/K		Sm5Ru2 alloy: Ru 0.285714, Sm 0.714286	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 79 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-6.900e-4 J/mol-atom/K		Sm5Ru2 alloy: Ru 0.285714, Sm 0.714286	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 80 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-1.6456 J/mol-atom/K		SmRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 69 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.5529 J/mol-atom/K		SmRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 70 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔSf	-0.7669 J/mol-atom/K		SmRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 71 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-21.4421 kJ/mol-atom		Ln3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 15 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-21.2445 kJ/mol-atom		Ln3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 14 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-35.6274 kJ/mol-atom		Ln3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 13 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-65.2583 kJ/mol-atom		LnRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 69 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-36.1491 kJ/mol-atom		LnRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 70 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-33.2492 kJ/mol-atom		LnRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 71 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-25.6391 kJ/mol-atom		Sm44Ru25 alloy: Ru 0.362319, Sm 0.637681	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 87 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-39.3543 kJ/mol-atom		Sm5Ru2 alloy: Ru 0.285714, Sm 0.714286	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 78 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-23.4619 kJ/mol-atom		Sm5Ru2 alloy: Ru 0.285714, Sm 0.714286	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 79 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf	-23.4563 kJ/mol-atom		Sm5Ru2 alloy: Ru 0.285714, Sm 0.714286	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 80 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf at 1000 K	-21.4421 kJ/mol-atom	1000	Sm3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 15 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf at 1000 K	-21.2445 kJ/mol-atom	1000	Sm3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 14 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf at 1000 K	-35.6274 kJ/mol-atom	1000	Sm3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 13 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf at 1000 K	-44.8969 kJ/mol-atom	1000	Sm44Ru25 alloy: Ru 0.362319, Sm 0.637681	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 85 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf at 1000 K	-26.1801 kJ/mol-atom	1000	Sm44Ru25 alloy: Ru 0.362319, Sm 0.637681	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 86 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf at 1000 K	-65.2583 kJ/mol-atom	1000	SmRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 69 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf at 1000 K	-36.1491 kJ/mol-atom	1000	SmRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 70 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔGf at 1000 K	-33.2492 kJ/mol-atom	1000	SmRu2 alloy: Ru 0.666667, Sm 0.333333	model	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 3, p. 9, row 71 report

Crystal structure (6)

Crystal structure, Ru–Sm system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	7.33 Å	298.15	Sm3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	unspecified	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 2, p. 6, row 20 report
Lattice a	7.33 Å	925 (<)	Sm3Ru Sm3Ru: Ru 0.25	unspecified	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 2, p. 6, row 19 report
Lattice b	9.508 Å	298.15	Sm3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	unspecified	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 2, p. 6, row 20 report
Lattice b	9.461 Å	925 (<)	Sm3Ru Sm3Ru: Ru 0.25	unspecified	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 2, p. 6, row 19 report
Lattice c	6.361 Å	298.15	Sm3Ru alloy: Ru 0.25, Sm 0.75	unspecified	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 2, p. 6, row 20 report
Lattice c	6.334 Å	925 (<)	Sm3Ru Sm3Ru: Ru 0.25	unspecified	[1] Kardellass 2023	Table 2, p. 6, row 19 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

S. Kardellass, C. Corvalan-Moya, V. P. Vassiliev, Thermodynamic Modeling of the (Ce and Sm)-Ru Binary Systems Based on Linear, Exponential, and Combined Models Aided by Ab-Initio Calculations, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 44, 300-323 (2023). doi:10.1007/s11669-023-01043-1

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}