Ag–In phases

9 phases (tier A 7, liquid 1, needs_review 1); 9 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · Ag–In system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the Ag–In system (9)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	Literature values	TDB models
TETRAGONAL_A6 phase:ag-in:a6-tetragonal	In · A6 · tI2 · I4/mmm (139)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 300–2499.52 K, x(In) 1–1	6	6
AG2IN_D83 phase:ag-in:ag2in-d83		needs_review	stable in 5 of 5 calculated diagram(s): 300–585 K, x(In) 0.31959–0.33808	0	5
AG3IN_L12 phase:ag-in:ag3in-l12	AuCu3 · L1_2 · cP4 · Pm-3m (221)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–485.03 K, x(In) 0.25–0.25	4	2
AG9IN4_D83 phase:ag-in:ag9in4-d83	Al4Cu9 · D8_3 · cP52 · P-43m (215)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–570 K, x(In) 0.3077–0.33623	14	1
AGIN2_C16 phase:ag-in:agin2-c16	Al2Cu · C16 · tI12 · I4/mcm (140)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 300–448.95 K, x(In) 0.66667–0.66667	12	6
BCC_A2 phase:ag-in:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 3 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 932.71–981.81 K, x(In) 0.22525–0.26405	19	6
FCC_A1 phase:ag-in:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 300–1235.93 K, x(In) 0–0.21106	11	6
HCP_A3 phase:ag-in:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 300–949.14 K, x(In) 0.2047–0.92	26	6
LIQUID phase:ag-in:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 413.27–2500 K, x(In) 0–1	32	6

TETRAGONAL_A6 (Ag–In)

Id: phase:ag-in:a6-tetragonal; status assigned
Structure: In · A6 · tI2 · I4/mmm (139); type st:a6-in-ti2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: In 1.0000
Stability: stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 300–2499.52 K, x(In) 1–1
Literature: 6 values (6 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (9): corpus: corpus:phase:ag-in:a6-tetragonal, corpus:phase:ag-in:tetragonal-a6
paper: paper:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8:In
tdb: tdb:AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6, tdb:AgIn-01Mos.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6, tdb:AgIn-12Gie.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6, tdb:AgIn-18Muz.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6, tdb:AgIn-19Fis.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6, tdb:AgIn-98Kor.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6

TDB models of TETRAGONAL_A6 (6): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 4a54fce02faf2be3…

44: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
45: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN : !

AgIn-01Mos.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 8135d127623e0a90…

43: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
44: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN : !

AgIn-12Gie.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 2d44091621ab6487…

44: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
45: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN : !

AgIn-18Muz.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 c7853514773b1fdb…

48: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
49: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN : !

AgIn-19Fis.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 4cca7ad748e801ff…

41: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
42: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN : !

AgIn-98Kor.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 4c8fd91ba6cf605c…

42: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
43: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN : !

Example references (8 of 8; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8 Christopher P. Muzzillo, Tim Anderson, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Cu–In, J Mater Sci 53, 6893-6910 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1757-z Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic Description of the Quaternary Ag-Cu-In-Sn System, Journal of Elec Materi 41, 86-108 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-001-0138-4 Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Pstrus, W. Zakulski, I. Ohnuma, X. J. Liu et al., Studies of the Ag-In phase diagram and surface tension measurements, J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1120-1128 (2001).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-998-0205-1 T.-M. Korhonen, J. K. Kivilahti, Thermodynamics of the Sn-In-Ag solder system, Journal of Elec Materi 27, 149-158 (1998).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.001 E. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the Ag-Cd-In system, Calphad 64, 292-305 (2019).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19352220205 Friedrich Weibke, Hans Eggers, Das Zustandsdiagramm des Systems Silber–Indium, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 222, 145-160 (1935).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.030 Zahra Bahari, Mohamed Elgadi, Jacques Rivet, Jérôme Dugué, Experimental study of the ternary Ag–Cu–In phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 477, 152-165 (2009).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v70-281 A. N. Campbell, R. Wagemann, R. B. Ferguson, The silver–indium system: thermal analysis, photomicrography, electron microprobe, and X-ray powder diffraction results, Can. J. Chem. 48, 1703-1715 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AG2IN_D83 (Ag–In)

Id: phase:ag-in:ag2in-d83; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: assessment_declared_blocked_by:models_disagree_on_composition; models_disagree_on_composition; stoichiometry_contradicts_D8_3:AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb; stoichiometry_contradicts_D8_3:AgIn-01Mos.tdb; stoichiometry_contradicts_D8_3:AgIn-19Fis.tdb; stoichiometry_contradicts_D8_3:AgIn-98Kor.tdb
Candidate (name_token): Al4Cu9 · D8_3 · cP52 · P-43m (215) — Strukturbericht/word 'D83' in the TDB name
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): Al4Cu9 · D8_3 · cP52 · P-43m (215) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for AG2IN_D83: Ag2In
Candidate (tdb_comment): Al4Cu9 · cP52 · P-43m — AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb: 'Prototype Al4Cu9 (cP52, P-43m), D0_3 suggested in LB'
Candidate (tdb_comment): Al4Cu9 · cP52 · P-43m — AgIn-01Mos.tdb: 'Prototype Al4Cu9 (cP52, P-43m)'
Candidate (tdb_comment): Al4Cu9 · cP52 · P-43m — AgIn-12Gie.tdb: 'Prototype Al4Cu9 (cP52, P-43m)'
Candidate (tdb_comment): Al4Cu9 · cP52 · P-43m — AgIn-19Fis.tdb: 'Prototype Al4Cu9 (cP52, P-43m)'
Candidate (tdb_comment): Al4Cu9 · cP52 · P-43m — AgIn-98Kor.tdb: 'Prototype Al4Cu9 (cP52, P-43m)'
Stability: stable in 5 of 5 calculated diagram(s): 300–585 K, x(In) 0.31959–0.33808
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (6): corpus: corpus:phase:ag-in:ag2in-d83
tdb: tdb:AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb:AG2IN_D83, tdb:AgIn-01Mos.tdb:AG2IN_D83, tdb:AgIn-12Gie.tdb:AG2IN_D83, tdb:AgIn-19Fis.tdb:AG2IN_D83, tdb:AgIn-98Kor.tdb:AG2IN_D83

TDB models of AG2IN_D83 (5): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb: AG2IN_D83, type code %, sha256 4a54fce02faf2be3…

54: PHASE AG2IN_D83 % 2 2 1 !
55: CONST AG2IN_D83 : AG : IN : !

AgIn-01Mos.tdb: AG2IN_D83, type code %, sha256 8135d127623e0a90…

48: PHASE AG2IN_D83 % 2 0.68 0.32 !
49: CONST AG2IN_D83 : AG : IN : !

AgIn-12Gie.tdb: AG2IN_D83, type code %, sha256 2d44091621ab6487…

49: PHASE AG2IN_D83 % 3 0.654 0.115 0.231 !
50: CONST AG2IN_D83 : AG : AG IN : IN : !

AgIn-19Fis.tdb: AG2IN_D83, type code %, sha256 4cca7ad748e801ff…

51: PHASE AG2IN_D83 % 2 2 1 !
52: CONST AG2IN_D83 : AG : IN : !

AgIn-98Kor.tdb: AG2IN_D83, type code %, sha256 4c8fd91ba6cf605c…

47: PHASE AG2IN_D83 % 2 2 1 !
48: CONST AG2IN_D83 : AG : IN : !

Example references (4 of 4; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s11664-001-0138-4 Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Pstrus, W. Zakulski, I. Ohnuma, X. J. Liu et al., Studies of the Ag-In phase diagram and surface tension measurements, J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1120-1128 (2001).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1757-z Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic Description of the Quaternary Ag-Cu-In-Sn System, Journal of Elec Materi 41, 86-108 (2012).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-998-0205-1 T.-M. Korhonen, J. K. Kivilahti, Thermodynamics of the Sn-In-Ag solder system, Journal of Elec Materi 27, 149-158 (1998).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.001 E. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the Ag-Cd-In system, Calphad 64, 292-305 (2019).
assessment that models this phase

AG3IN_L12 (Ag–In)

Id: phase:ag-in:ag3in-l12; status assigned
Structure: AuCu3 · L1_2 · cP4 · Pm-3m (221); type st:l1-2-aucu3-cp4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Ag 0.7500, In 0.2500
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–485.03 K, x(In) 0.25–0.25
Literature: 4 values (4 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:ag-in:ag3in-l12
paper: paper:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8:α'
system_alias: system_alias:ag-in:alphaprime
tdb: tdb:AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb:AG3IN_L12, tdb:AgIn-19Fis.tdb:AG3IN_L12

TDB models of AG3IN_L12 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb: AG3IN_L12, type code %, sha256 4a54fce02faf2be3…

49: PHASE AG3IN_L12 % 2 3 1 !
50: CONST AG3IN_L12 : AG : IN : !

AgIn-19Fis.tdb: AG3IN_L12, type code %, sha256 4cca7ad748e801ff…

46: PHASE AG3IN_L12 % 2 3 1 !
47: CONST AG3IN_L12 : AG : IN : !

Example references (5 of 5; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.001 E. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the Ag-Cd-In system, Calphad 64, 292-305 (2019).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8 Christopher P. Muzzillo, Tim Anderson, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Cu–In, J Mater Sci 53, 6893-6910 (2018).
reports values for this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19352220205 Friedrich Weibke, Hans Eggers, Das Zustandsdiagramm des Systems Silber–Indium, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 222, 145-160 (1935).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.030 Zahra Bahari, Mohamed Elgadi, Jacques Rivet, Jérôme Dugué, Experimental study of the ternary Ag–Cu–In phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 477, 152-165 (2009).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v70-281 A. N. Campbell, R. Wagemann, R. B. Ferguson, The silver–indium system: thermal analysis, photomicrography, electron microprobe, and X-ray powder diffraction results, Can. J. Chem. 48, 1703-1715 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AG9IN4_D83 (Ag–In)

Id: phase:ag-in:ag9in4-d83; status assigned
Structure: Al4Cu9 · D8_3 · cP52 · P-43m (215); type st:d8-3-al4cu9-cp52; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Caveat: partitioned order/disorder model in AgIn-18Muz.tdb also describes the disordered state
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–570 K, x(In) 0.3077–0.33623
Literature: 14 values (14 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:ag-in:ag9in4-d83
paper: paper:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8:γ-Ag9In4
tdb: tdb:AgIn-18Muz.tdb:AG9IN4_D83

TDB models of AG9IN4_D83 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AgIn-18Muz.tdb: AG9IN4_D83, type code %, sha256 c7853514773b1fdb…

53: PHASE AG9IN4_D83 % 4 6 3 3 1 !
54: CONST AG9IN4_D83 : AG : AG% IN : AG IN% : IN : !

Example references (5 of 5; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8 Christopher P. Muzzillo, Tim Anderson, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Cu–In, J Mater Sci 53, 6893-6910 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19352220205 Friedrich Weibke, Hans Eggers, Das Zustandsdiagramm des Systems Silber–Indium, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 222, 145-160 (1935).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.030 Zahra Bahari, Mohamed Elgadi, Jacques Rivet, Jérôme Dugué, Experimental study of the ternary Ag–Cu–In phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 477, 152-165 (2009).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1757-z Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic Description of the Quaternary Ag-Cu-In-Sn System, Journal of Elec Materi 41, 86-108 (2012).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v70-281 A. N. Campbell, R. Wagemann, R. B. Ferguson, The silver–indium system: thermal analysis, photomicrography, electron microprobe, and X-ray powder diffraction results, Can. J. Chem. 48, 1703-1715 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase

AGIN2_C16 (Ag–In)

Id: phase:ag-in:agin2-c16; status assigned
Structure: Al2Cu · C16 · tI12 · I4/mcm (140); type st:c16-al2cu-ti12; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: Ag 0.3333, In 0.6667
Stability: stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 300–448.95 K, x(In) 0.66667–0.66667
Literature: 12 values (12 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (8): corpus: corpus:phase:ag-in:agin2-c16
paper: paper:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8:AgIn2
tdb: tdb:AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb:AGIN2_C16, tdb:AgIn-01Mos.tdb:AGIN2_C16, tdb:AgIn-12Gie.tdb:AGIN2_C16, tdb:AgIn-18Muz.tdb:AGIN2_C16, tdb:AgIn-19Fis.tdb:AGIN2_C16, tdb:AgIn-98Kor.tdb:AGIN2_C16

TDB models of AGIN2_C16 (6): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb: AGIN2_C16, type code %, sha256 4a54fce02faf2be3…

59: PHASE AGIN2_C16 % 2 1 2 !
60: CONST AGIN2_C16 : AG : IN : !

AgIn-01Mos.tdb: AGIN2_C16, type code %, sha256 8135d127623e0a90…

53: PHASE AGIN2_C16 % 2 1 2 !
54: CONST AGIN2_C16 : AG : IN : !

AgIn-12Gie.tdb: AGIN2_C16, type code %, sha256 2d44091621ab6487…

54: PHASE AGIN2_C16 % 2 1 2 !
55: CONST AGIN2_C16 : AG : IN : !

AgIn-18Muz.tdb: AGIN2_C16, type code %, sha256 c7853514773b1fdb…

58: PHASE AGIN2_C16 % 2 1 2 !
59: CONST AGIN2_C16 : AG : IN : !

AgIn-19Fis.tdb: AGIN2_C16, type code %, sha256 4cca7ad748e801ff…

56: PHASE AGIN2_C16 % 2 1 2 !
57: CONST AGIN2_C16 : AG : IN : !

AgIn-98Kor.tdb: AGIN2_C16, type code %, sha256 4c8fd91ba6cf605c…

52: PHASE AGIN2_C16 % 2 1 2 !
53: CONST AGIN2_C16 : AG : IN : !

Example references (8 of 8; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8 Christopher P. Muzzillo, Tim Anderson, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Cu–In, J Mater Sci 53, 6893-6910 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1757-z Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic Description of the Quaternary Ag-Cu-In-Sn System, Journal of Elec Materi 41, 86-108 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-001-0138-4 Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Pstrus, W. Zakulski, I. Ohnuma, X. J. Liu et al., Studies of the Ag-In phase diagram and surface tension measurements, J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1120-1128 (2001).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-998-0205-1 T.-M. Korhonen, J. K. Kivilahti, Thermodynamics of the Sn-In-Ag solder system, Journal of Elec Materi 27, 149-158 (1998).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.001 E. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the Ag-Cd-In system, Calphad 64, 292-305 (2019).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19352220205 Friedrich Weibke, Hans Eggers, Das Zustandsdiagramm des Systems Silber–Indium, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 222, 145-160 (1935).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.030 Zahra Bahari, Mohamed Elgadi, Jacques Rivet, Jérôme Dugué, Experimental study of the ternary Ag–Cu–In phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 477, 152-165 (2009).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v70-281 A. N. Campbell, R. Wagemann, R. B. Ferguson, The silver–indium system: thermal analysis, photomicrography, electron microprobe, and X-ray powder diffraction results, Can. J. Chem. 48, 1703-1715 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase

BCC_A2 (Ag–In)

Id: phase:ag-in:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 3 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 932.71–981.81 K, x(In) 0.22525–0.26405
Literature: 19 values (19 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (9): corpus: corpus:phase:ag-in:bcc-a2
paper: paper:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8:β
system_alias: system_alias:ag-in:beta
tdb: tdb:AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:AgIn-01Mos.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:AgIn-12Gie.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:AgIn-18Muz.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:AgIn-19Fis.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:AgIn-98Kor.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (6): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 4a54fce02faf2be3…

34: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
35: CONST BCC_A2 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-01Mos.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 8135d127623e0a90…

33: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
34: CONST BCC_A2 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-12Gie.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 2d44091621ab6487…

34: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
35: CONST BCC_A2 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-18Muz.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 c7853514773b1fdb…

38: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
39: CONST BCC_A2 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-19Fis.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 4cca7ad748e801ff…

31: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
32: CONST BCC_A2 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-98Kor.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 4c8fd91ba6cf605c…

32: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
33: CONST BCC_A2 : AG IN : VA : !

Example references (8 of 8; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8 Christopher P. Muzzillo, Tim Anderson, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Cu–In, J Mater Sci 53, 6893-6910 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1757-z Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic Description of the Quaternary Ag-Cu-In-Sn System, Journal of Elec Materi 41, 86-108 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-001-0138-4 Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Pstrus, W. Zakulski, I. Ohnuma, X. J. Liu et al., Studies of the Ag-In phase diagram and surface tension measurements, J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1120-1128 (2001).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-998-0205-1 T.-M. Korhonen, J. K. Kivilahti, Thermodynamics of the Sn-In-Ag solder system, Journal of Elec Materi 27, 149-158 (1998).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.001 E. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the Ag-Cd-In system, Calphad 64, 292-305 (2019).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19352220205 Friedrich Weibke, Hans Eggers, Das Zustandsdiagramm des Systems Silber–Indium, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 222, 145-160 (1935).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.030 Zahra Bahari, Mohamed Elgadi, Jacques Rivet, Jérôme Dugué, Experimental study of the ternary Ag–Cu–In phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 477, 152-165 (2009).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v70-281 A. N. Campbell, R. Wagemann, R. B. Ferguson, The silver–indium system: thermal analysis, photomicrography, electron microprobe, and X-ray powder diffraction results, Can. J. Chem. 48, 1703-1715 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase

FCC_A1 (Ag–In)

Id: phase:ag-in:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 300–1235.93 K, x(In) 0–0.21106
Literature: 11 values (11 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (9): corpus: corpus:phase:ag-in:fcc-a1
paper: paper:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8:α
system_alias: system_alias:ag-in:alpha
tdb: tdb:AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:AgIn-01Mos.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:AgIn-12Gie.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:AgIn-18Muz.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:AgIn-19Fis.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:AgIn-98Kor.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (6): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 4a54fce02faf2be3…

29: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
30: CONST FCC_A1 : AG% IN : VA : !

AgIn-01Mos.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 8135d127623e0a90…

28: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
29: CONST FCC_A1 : AG% IN : VA : !

AgIn-12Gie.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 2d44091621ab6487…

29: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
30: CONST FCC_A1 : AG% IN : VA : !

AgIn-18Muz.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 c7853514773b1fdb…

33: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
34: CONST FCC_A1 : AG% IN : VA : !

AgIn-19Fis.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 4cca7ad748e801ff…

26: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
27: CONST FCC_A1 : AG% IN : VA : !

AgIn-98Kor.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 4c8fd91ba6cf605c…

27: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
28: CONST FCC_A1 : AG% IN : VA : !

Example references (8 of 8; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8 Christopher P. Muzzillo, Tim Anderson, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Cu–In, J Mater Sci 53, 6893-6910 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-001-0138-4 Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Pstrus, W. Zakulski, I. Ohnuma, X. J. Liu et al., Studies of the Ag-In phase diagram and surface tension measurements, J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1120-1128 (2001).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1757-z Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic Description of the Quaternary Ag-Cu-In-Sn System, Journal of Elec Materi 41, 86-108 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-998-0205-1 T.-M. Korhonen, J. K. Kivilahti, Thermodynamics of the Sn-In-Ag solder system, Journal of Elec Materi 27, 149-158 (1998).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.001 E. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the Ag-Cd-In system, Calphad 64, 292-305 (2019).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19352220205 Friedrich Weibke, Hans Eggers, Das Zustandsdiagramm des Systems Silber–Indium, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 222, 145-160 (1935).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.030 Zahra Bahari, Mohamed Elgadi, Jacques Rivet, Jérôme Dugué, Experimental study of the ternary Ag–Cu–In phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 477, 152-165 (2009).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v70-281 A. N. Campbell, R. Wagemann, R. B. Ferguson, The silver–indium system: thermal analysis, photomicrography, electron microprobe, and X-ray powder diffraction results, Can. J. Chem. 48, 1703-1715 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase

HCP_A3 (Ag–In)

Id: phase:ag-in:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 300–949.14 K, x(In) 0.2047–0.92
Literature: 26 values (26 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (9): corpus: corpus:phase:ag-in:hcp-a3
paper: paper:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8:ζ
system_alias: system_alias:ag-in:zeta
tdb: tdb:AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:AgIn-01Mos.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:AgIn-12Gie.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:AgIn-18Muz.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:AgIn-19Fis.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:AgIn-98Kor.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (6): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 4a54fce02faf2be3…

39: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
40: CONST HCP_A3 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-01Mos.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 8135d127623e0a90…

38: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
39: CONST HCP_A3 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-12Gie.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 2d44091621ab6487…

39: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
40: CONST HCP_A3 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-18Muz.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 c7853514773b1fdb…

43: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
44: CONST HCP_A3 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-19Fis.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 4cca7ad748e801ff…

36: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
37: CONST HCP_A3 : AG IN : VA : !

AgIn-98Kor.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 4c8fd91ba6cf605c…

37: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
38: CONST HCP_A3 : AG IN : VA : !

Example references (8 of 8; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8 Christopher P. Muzzillo, Tim Anderson, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Cu–In, J Mater Sci 53, 6893-6910 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1757-z Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic Description of the Quaternary Ag-Cu-In-Sn System, Journal of Elec Materi 41, 86-108 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-001-0138-4 Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Pstrus, W. Zakulski, I. Ohnuma, X. J. Liu et al., Studies of the Ag-In phase diagram and surface tension measurements, J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1120-1128 (2001).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-998-0205-1 T.-M. Korhonen, J. K. Kivilahti, Thermodynamics of the Sn-In-Ag solder system, Journal of Elec Materi 27, 149-158 (1998).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.001 E. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the Ag-Cd-In system, Calphad 64, 292-305 (2019).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19352220205 Friedrich Weibke, Hans Eggers, Das Zustandsdiagramm des Systems Silber–Indium, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 222, 145-160 (1935).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.030 Zahra Bahari, Mohamed Elgadi, Jacques Rivet, Jérôme Dugué, Experimental study of the ternary Ag–Cu–In phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 477, 152-165 (2009).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v70-281 A. N. Campbell, R. Wagemann, R. B. Ferguson, The silver–indium system: thermal analysis, photomicrography, electron microprobe, and X-ray powder diffraction results, Can. J. Chem. 48, 1703-1715 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase

LIQUID (Ag–In)

Id: phase:ag-in:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 6 of 6 calculated diagram(s): 413.27–2500 K, x(In) 0–1
Literature: 32 values (32 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (8): corpus: corpus:phase:ag-in:liquid
paper: paper:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8:L
tdb: tdb:AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:AgIn-01Mos.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:AgIn-12Gie.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:AgIn-18Muz.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:AgIn-19Fis.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:AgIn-98Kor.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (6): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 4a54fce02faf2be3…

24: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
25: CONST LIQUID:L : AG IN : !

AgIn-01Mos.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 8135d127623e0a90…

23: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
24: CONST LIQUID:L : AG IN : !

AgIn-12Gie.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 2d44091621ab6487…

24: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
25: CONST LIQUID:L : AG IN : !

AgIn-18Muz.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 c7853514773b1fdb…

28: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
29: CONST LIQUID:L : AG IN : !

AgIn-19Fis.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 4cca7ad748e801ff…

21: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
22: CONST LIQUID:L : AG IN : !

AgIn-98Kor.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 4c8fd91ba6cf605c…

22: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
23: CONST LIQUID:L : AG IN : !

Example references (8 of 8; assessments first):

doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8 Christopher P. Muzzillo, Tim Anderson, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Cu–In, J Mater Sci 53, 6893-6910 (2018).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1757-z Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic Description of the Quaternary Ag-Cu-In-Sn System, Journal of Elec Materi 41, 86-108 (2012).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-001-0138-4 Z. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Pstrus, W. Zakulski, I. Ohnuma, X. J. Liu et al., Studies of the Ag-In phase diagram and surface tension measurements, J. Electron. Mater. 30, 1120-1128 (2001).
assessment that models this phase; cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1007/s11664-998-0205-1 T.-M. Korhonen, J. K. Kivilahti, Thermodynamics of the Sn-In-Ag solder system, Journal of Elec Materi 27, 149-158 (1998).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.001 E. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the Ag-Cd-In system, Calphad 64, 292-305 (2019).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19352220205 Friedrich Weibke, Hans Eggers, Das Zustandsdiagramm des Systems Silber–Indium, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 222, 145-160 (1935).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.10.030 Zahra Bahari, Mohamed Elgadi, Jacques Rivet, Jérôme Dugué, Experimental study of the ternary Ag–Cu–In phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 477, 152-165 (2009).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v70-281 A. N. Campbell, R. Wagemann, R. B. Ferguson, The silver–indium system: thermal analysis, photomicrography, electron microprobe, and X-ray powder diffraction results, Can. J. Chem. 48, 1703-1715 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}