Ag–In system

50 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 35, model 15); 6 calculated phase diagram(s). 12 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental35
model15
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction43
phase transition7

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdbP.-Y. Chevalier, E. Fischer, unpublished, Thermodata, 2001.4a54fce02faf2be33720e1ad4f7814b3af0abfcb083f44028ac2a25425acd9d8viewer · TDB · JSON
AgIn-01Mos.tdbZ. Moser, W. Gasior, J. Pstrus, W. Zakulski, I. Ohnuma, X.J. Liu, Y. Inohana, K. Ishida, J. Electron. Mater., 30, 1120-28(2001). doi:10.1007/s11664-001-0138-48135d127623e0a9013d8029e11addf46d43b24e1ec934005661f5597a0377f6dviewer · TDB · JSON
AgIn-12Gie.tdbW. Gierlotka, J. Electron. Mater., 41, 86-108(2012). doi:10.1007/s11664-011-1757-z2d44091621ab6487acdd987b8a85c922a12657311bfeb987b529323d1cdd15c5viewer · TDB · JSON
AgIn-18Muz.tdbC.P. Muzzillo, T. Anderson, J. Mater. Sci., 53, 6893-6910(2018). doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8c7853514773b1fdba4937525e737d4b9481d4c2e173df43539aa645b7b12db3bviewer · TDB · JSON
AgIn-19Fis.tdbE. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton, M. Barrachin, Calphad, 64, 292-305(2019). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.0014cca7ad748e801ffd31af18a3ee8dc141526869f2a465276cb689d1d48fee71fviewer · TDB · JSON
AgIn-98Kor.tdbT.-M. Korhonen, J.K. Kivilahti, J. Electron. Mater., 27, 149-58(1998). doi:10.1007/s11664-998-0205-14c8fd91ba6cf605ce7d3e75ea4083b0bd14cdd84879b05dc05cb92f028af15c5viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb977.82FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.1866) + BCC_A2 (x(In) 0.22525) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.27791)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb946.69FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.19227) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.22402) + BCC_A2 (x(In) 0.23093)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb933.35HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.25156) + BCC_A2 (x(In) 0.25293) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.32913)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb477.7AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.41961) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.92573)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb477.7AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.41964) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.92594)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb458.25AG3IN_L12 (x(In) 0.25) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.25596) + AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb443.76FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.19981) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.23289) + AG3IN_L12 (x(In) 0.25)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb439.19AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95054)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb439.18AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95042)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb439.18AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95041)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb414.6AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.96734) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-01Che-LB.tdb414.6AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.96734) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-01Mos.tdb948.41FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.19811) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.24204) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.30105)
AgIn-01Mos.tdb467.94AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.32) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.35928) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.93854)
AgIn-01Mos.tdb467.94AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.32) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.35928) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.93848)
AgIn-01Mos.tdb439.02AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.32) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95452)
AgIn-01Mos.tdb439.02AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.32) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95438)
AgIn-01Mos.tdb439.02AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.32) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95462)
AgIn-01Mos.tdb417.64AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.97484) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-01Mos.tdb417.64AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.97498) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-01Mos.tdb417.64AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.97507) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-12Gie.tdb949.14FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.21106) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.24334) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.31225)
AgIn-12Gie.tdb472.96AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.3379) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.37285) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.93454)
AgIn-12Gie.tdb448.95AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33808) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.94633)
AgIn-12Gie.tdb415.17AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.97216) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-12Gie.tdb415.17AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.97219) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-18Muz.tdb981.81FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.19129) + BCC_A2 (x(In) 0.24048) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.28346)
AgIn-18Muz.tdb939.45FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.21057) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.24283) + BCC_A2 (x(In) 0.25375)
AgIn-18Muz.tdb933.98HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.25506) + BCC_A2 (x(In) 0.26405) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.33185)
AgIn-18Muz.tdb477.41AG9IN4_D83 (x(In) 0.33621) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.37265) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.93226)
AgIn-18Muz.tdb438.98AG9IN4_D83 (x(In) 0.33622) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95121)
AgIn-18Muz.tdb414.09AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.97019) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-18Muz.tdb414.09AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.97027) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb965.97FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.19271) + BCC_A2 (x(In) 0.23241) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.29591)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb937.95FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.20342) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.2353) + BCC_A2 (x(In) 0.24193)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb932.71HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.24927) + BCC_A2 (x(In) 0.25479) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.33246)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb478.52AG3IN_L12 (x(In) 0.25) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.26002) + AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb477.63AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.41382) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.92898)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb477.63AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.41385) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.92918)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb460.03FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.19951) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.23094) + AG3IN_L12 (x(In) 0.25)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb439.22AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95205)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb439.22AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95184)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb439.22AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.95217)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb413.62AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.96751) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-19Fis.tdb413.62AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.96767) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-98Kor.tdb926.59FCC_A1 (x(In) 0.1972) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.23529) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.33016)
AgIn-98Kor.tdb475.58AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.41941) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.91711)
AgIn-98Kor.tdb475.58AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + HCP_A3 (x(In) 0.41941) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.91702)
AgIn-98Kor.tdb440.17AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.94205)
AgIn-98Kor.tdb440.17AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.94174)
AgIn-98Kor.tdb440.17AG2IN_D83 (x(In) 0.33333) + AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.94225)
AgIn-98Kor.tdb413.27AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.96739) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-98Kor.tdb413.27AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.96759) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)
AgIn-98Kor.tdb413.27AGIN2_C16 (x(In) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(In) 0.96778) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(In) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull AgIn-01Che-LB · CALPHAD hull AgIn-01Mos · CALPHAD hull AgIn-12Gie · CALPHAD hull AgIn-18Muz · CALPHAD hull AgIn-98Kor

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ag–In system (43)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
983L + α -> βL: In 0.194; α: In 0.286; β: In 0.242model[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Gierlotka 2012 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 6
report
968L + α -> βL: In 0.208; α: In 0.311; β: In 0.264experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Campbell 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 3
report
967.1L + α -> βL: In 0.204; α: In 0.3; β: In 0.249model[1] Muzzillo 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 7
report
967L + α -> βL: In 0.21; α: In 0.3; β: In 0.25experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Moser 2001 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 4
report
966.1L + α -> βL: In 0.19; α: In 0.282; β: In 0.249experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Bahari 2009 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 5
report
966L + α -> βL: In 0.183; α: In 0.283; β: In 0.239experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Hellner 1951
Table 1, p. 3, row 2
report
966L + α -> βL: In 0.188; α: In 0.29; β: In 0.239experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Weibke 1935 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 1
report
944.5α + β -> ζα: In 0.192; β: In 0.233; ζ: In 0.228experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Bahari 2009 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
944α + β -> ζα: In 0.209; β: In 0.265; ζ: In 0.25experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Moser 2001 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 11
report
943α + β -> ζα: In 0.204; β: In 0.275; ζ: In 0.262experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Campbell 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 10
report
940α + β -> ζα: In 0.186; β: In 0.237; ζ: In 0.231experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Weibke 1935 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
940α + β -> ζα: In 0.181; β: In 0.237; ζ: In 0.231experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Hellner 1951
Table 1, p. 3, row 9
report
935.8α + β -> ζα: In 0.221; β: In 0.26; ζ: In 0.251model[1] Muzzillo 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 14
report
935.7α + β -> ζα: In 0.221; β: In 0.26; ζ: In 0.251model[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Gierlotka 2012 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 13
report
934.4β -> L + ζβ: In 0.261; L: In 0.253; ζ: In 0.316experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Bahari 2009 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 19
report
934β -> L + ζβ: In 0.264; L: In 0.255; ζ: In 0.332model[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Gierlotka 2012 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 20
report
934β -> L + ζβ: In 0.264; L: In 0.255; ζ: In 0.332model[1] Muzzillo 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 21
report
933β -> L + ζβ: In 0.3; L: In 0.28; ζ: In 0.325experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Moser 2001 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 18
report
933β -> L + ζβ: In 0.247; L: In 0.242; ζ: In 0.311experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Hellner 1951
Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
933β -> L + ζβ: In 0.322; L: In 0.298; ζ: In 0.336experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Campbell 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 17
report
933β -> L + ζβ: In 0.247; L: In 0.242; ζ: In 0.317experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Weibke 1935 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 15
report
478.3ζ -> L + γ-Ag9In4ζ: In 0.387; L: In 0.95; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.332experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Bahari 2009 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 31
report
478ζ -> L + γ-Ag9In4ζ: In 0.476; L: In 0.353; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.928experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Campbell 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 30
report
477.4ζ -> L + γ-Ag9In4ζ: In 0.373; L: In 0.932; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.336model[1] Muzzillo 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 33
report
477ζ -> L + γ-Ag9In4L: In 0.925; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.319experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Hellner 1951
Table 1, p. 3, row 29
report
477ζ -> L + γ-Ag9In4L: In 0.928; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.322experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Weibke 1935 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 28
report
474.1α + ζ -> α'α: In 0.204; ζ: In 0.251; α': In 0.243experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Bahari 2009 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 37
report
473ζ -> L + γ-Ag9In4ζ: In 0.373; L: In 0.338; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.935model[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Gierlotka 2012 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 32
report
460α + ζ -> α'α: In 0.193; ζ: In 0.254; α': In 0.245experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Campbell 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 36
report
460ζ -> α + α'ζ: In 0.245; α: In 0.182; α': In 0.254experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Hellner 1951
Table 1, p. 3, row 35
report
460ζ -> α + α'ζ: In 0.248; α: In 0.186; α': In 0.256experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Weibke 1935 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 34
report
451.7L + γ-Ag9In4 -> AgIn2L: In 0.338; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.945; AgIn2: In 0.67model[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Gierlotka 2012 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 42
report
443.3L + γ-Ag9In4 -> AgIn2L: In 0.968; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.332; AgIn2: In 0.667experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Bahari 2009 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 41
report
439L + γ-Ag9In4 -> AgIn2L: In 0.951; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.336; AgIn2: In 0.667model[1] Muzzillo 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 43
report
439L + γ-Ag9In4 -> AgIn2L: In 0.355; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.955; AgIn2: In 0.667experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Campbell 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 40
report
439L + γ-Ag9In4 -> AgIn2L: In 0.951; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.319; AgIn2: In 0.731experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Hellner 1951
Table 1, p. 3, row 39
report
439L + γ-Ag9In4 -> AgIn2L: In 0.953; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.321; AgIn2: In 0.737experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Weibke 1935 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 38
report
418.7eutectic: L -> AgIn2 + InL: In 0.99; AgIn2: In 0.667; In: In 1experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Bahari 2009 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 47
report
417eutectic: L -> AgIn2 + InL: In 0.977; AgIn2: In 0.667; In: In 1experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Campbell 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 46
report
415.6eutectic: L -> AgIn2 + InL: In 0.973; AgIn2: In 0.67; In: In 1model[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Gierlotka 2012 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 48
report
414.1eutectic: L -> AgIn2 + InL: In 0.97; AgIn2: In 0.667; In: In 1model[1] Muzzillo 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 49
report
414eutectic: L -> AgIn2 + InL: In 0.97; AgIn2: In 0.742; In: In 1experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Weibke 1935 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 44
report
414eutectic: L -> AgIn2 + InL: In 0.962; AgIn2: In 0.738; In: In 1experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Hellner 1951
Table 1, p. 3, row 45
report

Other properties

Phase transition (7)

Phase transition, Ag–In system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition477 K477othermodel[2] Fischer 2019p. 15
report
The optimization based on the experimental points from Weibke and Eggers [59] for the (Ag2In + hcp) silver rich domain leads to a symmetric shape, the hcp composition reaches 42 at.% In at the metatectic temperature of 477 K.
Phase transition557.4 K557.4ζ -> γ-Ag9In4
ζ: In 0.327; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.327
experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Bahari 2009 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 25
report
Phase transition570 K570ζ -> γ-Ag9In4
ζ: In 0.342; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.342
experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Campbell 1970 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 24
report
Phase transition570.9 K570.9ζ -> γ-Ag9In4
ζ: In 0.318; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.318
model[1] Muzzillo 2018Table 1, p. 3, row 27
report
Phase transition572 K572ζ -> γ-Ag9In4
ζ: In 0.314; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.314
experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Hellner 1951
Table 1, p. 3, row 23
report
Phase transition574 K574ζ -> γ-Ag9In4
ζ: In 0.317; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.317
experimental[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Weibke 1935 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 22
report
Phase transition577.1 K577.1ζ -> γ-Ag9In4
ζ: In 0.33; γ-Ag9In4: In 0.33
model[1] Muzzillo 2018
cites Gierlotka 2012 doi
Table 1, p. 3, row 26
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Christopher P. Muzzillo, Tim Anderson, Thermodynamic assessment of Ag–Cu–In, J Mater Sci 53, 6893-6910 (2018). doi:10.1007/s10853-018-1999-8
  2. E. Fischer, K. Gajavalli, G. Mikaelian, P. Benigni, J. Rogez, A. Decreton et al., Experimental study and thermodynamic modelling of the Ag-Cd-In system, Calphad 64, 292-305 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2019.01.001