Ag–Bi–O system

26 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 18, model 8); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	18
model	8

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	20
phase transition	6

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ag–Bi–O system (20)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1211.6	(Ag) + L2 -> L1		model	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 22 report
1211	(Ag) + L2 -> L1	(Ag): Bi 0.33	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 16 report
1210	(Ag) + L2 -> L1		experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 19 report
1209	(Ag) + L2 -> L1	(Ag): Bi 0.75	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 13 report
1089.6	δ-Bi2O3 + L1 -> (Ag) + L2	L1: Ag 0.884, Bi 0.116, O 3.000e-5; (Ag): Ag 0.988, Bi 0.012, O 0; L2: Ag 0.001, Bi 0.4, O 0.599	model	[1] Assal 1999	Table V, p. 4, row 2 report
1002.1	α-Bi2O3 -> δ-Bi2O3 (+ (Ag) + L1)	(Ag): Ag 0.981, Bi 0.019, O 0; L1: Ag 0.818, Bi 0.182, O 1.000e-5	model	[1] Assal 1999	Table V, p. 4, row 1 report
1002.1	α-Bi2O3 -> δ-Bi2O3 (+ (Ag) + L2)	(Ag): Ag 1, Bi 0, O 4.000e-5; L2: Ag 0.033, Bi 0.38, O 0.587	model	[1] Assal 1999	Table V, p. 4, row 3 report
962	(Ag) + α -> L2	(Ag): Bi 0.974	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 1 report
961	(Ag) + α -> L2	(Ag): Bi 0.33	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 14 report
961	(Ag) + α -> L2	(Ag): Bi 0.75	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 11 report
959.5	(Ag) + α -> L2		model	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 20 report
959	(Ag) + α -> L2	(Ag): Bi 0.75	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 9 report
959	(Ag) + α -> L2	(Ag): Bi 0.33	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 15 report
959	(Ag) + α -> L2		experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 17 report
958	(Ag) + α -> L2	(Ag): Bi 0.95	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 3 report
958	(Ag) + α -> L2	(Ag): Bi 0.75	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 10 report
957	(Ag) + α -> L2	(Ag): Bi 0.89	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 7 report
951	(Ag) + α -> L2	(Ag): Bi 0.95	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 5 report
803.6	Ag2O + L2 + (Ag) -> L1	L2: Ag 0.446, Bi 0.133, O 0.422; (Ag): Ag 0.999, Bi 0, O 0.001; L1: Ag 0.749, Bi 0, O 0.251	model	[1] Assal 1999	Table V, p. 4, row 5 report
699.4	Ag2O + α-Bi2O3 -> L2 (+ (Ag))	L2: Ag 0.357, Bi 0.186, O 0.457; (Ag): Ag 1, Bi 0, O 1.000e-4	model	[1] Assal 1999	Table V, p. 4, row 4 report

Other properties

Phase transition (6)

Phase transition, Ag–Bi–O system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase transition	1002.1 K	1002.1	α -> δ	model	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 21 report
Phase transition	1003 K	1003	α -> δ α: Bi 0.95	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 4 report
Phase transition	1004 K	1004	α -> δ α: Bi 0.974	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 2 report
Phase transition	1004 K	1004	α -> δ α: Bi 0.89	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 8 report
Phase transition	1004 K	1004	α -> δ	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 18 report
Phase transition	1005 K	1005	α -> δ α: Bi 0.95	experimental	[1] Assal 1999	Table I, p. 1, row 6 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Jérôme Assal, Bengt Hallstedt, Ludwig J. Gauckler, Experimental Phase Diagram Study and Thermodynamic Optimization of the Ag‐Bi‐O System, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 82, 711-715 (1999). doi:10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb01821.x

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}