Ag–Cu–Sn system

54 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 54); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 24 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	54

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
phase transition	54

Other properties

Phase transition (54)

Phase transition, Ag–Cu–Sn system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Phase transition	490.05 K	490.05	eutectic: Sn 92.95 / Cu 1.05 / Ag 6.00 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0650454, Cu 0.0193224, Sn 0.915632	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 30 report
Phase transition	490.05 K	490.05	eutectic: Sn 93.60 / Cu 1.40 / Ag 5.00 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0540962, Cu 0.0257116, Sn 0.920192	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 41 report
Phase transition	490.15 K	490.15	eutectic: Sn 92.20 / Cu 0.60 / Ag 7.20 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0782627, Cu 0.0110708, Sn 0.910667	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 14 report
Phase transition	490.15 K	490.15	eutectic: Sn 93.40 / Cu 1.30 / Ag 5.30 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0573739, Cu 0.0238884, Sn 0.918738	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 35 report
Phase transition	490.15 K	490.15	eutectic: Sn 95.20 / Cu 2.30 / Ag 2.50 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0269079, Cu 0.0420216, Sn 0.931071	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 61 report
Phase transition	490.15 K	490.15	eutectic: Sn 95.80 / Cu 2.70 / Ag 1.50 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0161059, Cu 0.049211, Sn 0.934683	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 67 report
Phase transition	490.25 K	490.25	eutectic: Sn 91.70 / Cu 0.30 / Ag 8.00 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0871134, Cu 0.00554526, Sn 0.907341	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 8 report
Phase transition	490.25 K	490.25	eutectic: Sn 92.50 / Cu 0.80 / Ag 6.70 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0727392, Cu 0.0147431, Sn 0.912518	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 20 report
Phase transition	490.25 K	490.25	eutectic: Sn 92.70 / Cu 0.90 / Ag 6.40 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0694434, Cu 0.0165767, Sn 0.91398	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 26 report
Phase transition	490.25 K	490.25	eutectic: Sn 93.80 / Cu 1.50 / Ag 4.70 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.0508221, Cu 0.0275329, Sn 0.921645	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 46 report
Phase transition	490.25 K	490.25	eutectic: Sn 94.15 / Cu 1.75 / Ag 4.10 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.044266, Cu 0.0320723, Sn 0.923662	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 51 report
Phase transition	490.25 K	490.25	eutectic: Sn 94.50 / Cu 2.00 / Ag 3.50 wt.% - Cooling TE alloy: Ag 0.03773, Cu 0.0365978, Sn 0.925672	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 55 report
Phase transition	490.35 K	490.35	eutectic: Sn 92.95 / Cu 1.05 / Ag 6.00 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0650454, Cu 0.0193224, Sn 0.915632	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 27 report
Phase transition	490.35 K	490.35	eutectic: Sn 93.40 / Cu 1.30 / Ag 5.30 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0573739, Cu 0.0238884, Sn 0.918738	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 32 report
Phase transition	490.35 K	490.35	eutectic: Sn 93.60 / Cu 1.40 / Ag 5.00 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0540962, Cu 0.0257116, Sn 0.920192	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 38 report
Phase transition	490.35 K	490.35	eutectic: Sn 93.80 / Cu 1.50 / Ag 4.70 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0508221, Cu 0.0275329, Sn 0.921645	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 43 report
Phase transition	490.35 K	490.35	eutectic: Sn 94.15 / Cu 1.75 / Ag 4.10 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.044266, Cu 0.0320723, Sn 0.923662	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 48 report
Phase transition	490.35 K	490.35	eutectic: Sn 95.20 / Cu 2.30 / Ag 2.50 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0269079, Cu 0.0420216, Sn 0.931071	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 58 report
Phase transition	490.45 K	490.45	eutectic: Sn 92.20 / Cu 0.60 / Ag 7.20 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0782627, Cu 0.0110708, Sn 0.910667	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 11 report
Phase transition	490.45 K	490.45	eutectic: Sn 92.50 / Cu 0.80 / Ag 6.70 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0727392, Cu 0.0147431, Sn 0.912518	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 17 report
Phase transition	490.45 K	490.45	eutectic: Sn 92.70 / Cu 0.90 / Ag 6.40 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0694434, Cu 0.0165767, Sn 0.91398	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 23 report
Phase transition	490.45 K	490.45	eutectic: Sn 94.50 / Cu 2.00 / Ag 3.50 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.03773, Cu 0.0365978, Sn 0.925672	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 53 report
Phase transition	490.45 K	490.45	eutectic: Sn 95.80 / Cu 2.70 / Ag 1.50 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0161059, Cu 0.049211, Sn 0.934683	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 64 report
Phase transition	490.75 K	490.75	eutectic: Sn 91.70 / Cu 0.30 / Ag 8.00 wt.% - Heating TE alloy: Ag 0.0871134, Cu 0.00554526, Sn 0.907341	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 5 report
Phase transition	491.15 K	491.15	other: L+Ag3Sn/L+Ag3Sn + (Sn) alloy: Ag 0.0392076, Cu 0.0146049, Sn 0.946187	experimental	[1] Moon 2000 cites Loomans 2000 doi	Table IV, p. 10, row 3 report
Phase transition	491.85 K	491.85	other: L + Cu6Sn5/L + Cu6Sn5 + (Sn) alloy: Cu 1	experimental	[1] Moon 2000 cites Loomans 2000 doi	Table IV, p. 10, row 6 report
Phase transition	492.15 K	492.15	other: L+Ag3Sn/L+Ag3Sn + (Sn) alloy: Cu 1	experimental	[1] Moon 2000 cites Loomans 2000 doi	Table IV, p. 10, row 2 report
Phase transition	493.55 K	493.55	other: L+Ag3Sn/L+Ag3Sn + (Sn) alloy: Cu 1	experimental	[1] Moon 2000 cites Loomans 2000 doi	Table IV, p. 10, row 1 report
Phase transition	494.55 K	494.55	other: L + Cu6Sn5/L + Cu6Sn5 + (Sn) alloy: Cu 1	experimental	[1] Moon 2000 cites Loomans 2000 doi	Table IV, p. 10, row 5 report
Phase transition	497.35 K	497.35	other: L + Cu6Sn5/L + Cu6Sn5 + (Sn) alloy: Cu 1	experimental	[1] Moon 2000 cites Loomans 2000 doi	Table IV, p. 10, row 4 report
Phase transition	498.15 K	498.15	L + Cu6Sn5 + (Sn) + Ag3Sn	experimental	[1] Moon 2000 cites Gebhardt 1959	p. 1 report	Based on very little data, they proposed a transition reaction, L + Cu6Sn5 → (Sn) + Ag3Sn at 225°C with a liquid composition of 4.0 wt.% Ag, 0.5 wt.% Cu.
Phase transition	514.85 K	514.85	other: Sn 93.60 / Cu 1.40 / Ag 5.00 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0540962, Cu 0.0257116, Sn 0.920192	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 39 report
Phase transition	516.35 K	516.35	other: Sn 93.40 / Cu 1.30 / Ag 5.30 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0573739, Cu 0.0238884, Sn 0.918738	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 33 report
Phase transition	518.15 K	518.15	other: Sn 93.40 / Cu 1.30 / Ag 5.30 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.0573739, Cu 0.0238884, Sn 0.918738	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 31 report
Phase transition	518.15 K	518.15	other: Sn 93.60 / Cu 1.40 / Ag 5.00 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.0540962, Cu 0.0257116, Sn 0.920192	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 36 report
Phase transition	524.85 K	524.85	other: Sn 93.80 / Cu 1.50 / Ag 4.70 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0508221, Cu 0.0275329, Sn 0.921645	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 44 report
Phase transition	527.05 K	527.05	other: Sn 92.95 / Cu 1.05 / Ag 6.00 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0650454, Cu 0.0193224, Sn 0.915632	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 28 report
Phase transition	531.35 K	531.35	other: Sn 92.20 / Cu 0.60 / Ag 7.20 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0782627, Cu 0.0110708, Sn 0.910667	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 12 report
Phase transition	536.05 K	536.05	other: Sn 92.50 / Cu 0.80 / Ag 6.70 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0727392, Cu 0.0147431, Sn 0.912518	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 18 report
Phase transition	536.05 K	536.05	other: Sn 92.70 / Cu 0.90 / Ag 6.40 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0694434, Cu 0.0165767, Sn 0.91398	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 24 report
Phase transition	537.15 K	537.15	other: Sn 92.70 / Cu 0.90 / Ag 6.40 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.0694434, Cu 0.0165767, Sn 0.91398	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 21 report
Phase transition	540.15 K	540.15	other: Sn 92.50 / Cu 0.80 / Ag 6.70 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.0727392, Cu 0.0147431, Sn 0.912518	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 15 report
Phase transition	542.95 K	542.95	other: Sn 94.15 / Cu 1.75 / Ag 4.10 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.044266, Cu 0.0320723, Sn 0.923662	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 49 report
Phase transition	544.15 K	544.15	other: Sn 92.20 / Cu 0.60 / Ag 7.20 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.0782627, Cu 0.0110708, Sn 0.910667	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 9 report
Phase transition	544.15 K	544.15	other: Sn 94.15 / Cu 1.75 / Ag 4.10 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.044266, Cu 0.0320723, Sn 0.923662	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 47 report
Phase transition	552.05 K	552.05	other: Sn 94.50 / Cu 2.00 / Ag 3.50 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.03773, Cu 0.0365978, Sn 0.925672	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 54 report
Phase transition	553.25 K	553.25	other: Sn 91.70 / Cu 0.30 / Ag 8.00 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0871134, Cu 0.00554526, Sn 0.907341	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 6 report
Phase transition	560.15 K	560.15	other: Sn 91.70 / Cu 0.30 / Ag 8.00 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.0871134, Cu 0.00554526, Sn 0.907341	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 3 report
Phase transition	563.65 K	563.65	other: Sn 95.20 / Cu 2.30 / Ag 2.50 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0269079, Cu 0.0420216, Sn 0.931071	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 59 report
Phase transition	566.15 K	566.15	other: Sn 95.20 / Cu 2.30 / Ag 2.50 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.0269079, Cu 0.0420216, Sn 0.931071	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 56 report
Phase transition	568.15 K	568.15	other: Sn 91.10 / Cu 0.00 / Ag 8.90 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.097077, Cu 0, Sn 0.902923	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 1 report
Phase transition	580.45 K	580.45	other: Sn 95.80 / Cu 2.70 / Ag 1.50 wt.% - Cooling TL alloy: Ag 0.0161059, Cu 0.049211, Sn 0.934683	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 65 report
Phase transition	582.15 K	582.15	other: Sn 95.80 / Cu 2.70 / Ag 1.50 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0.0161059, Cu 0.049211, Sn 0.934683	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 62 report
Phase transition	598.15 K	598.15	other: Sn 96.73 / Cu 3.27 / Ag 0.00 wt.% - Heating TL alloy: Ag 0, Cu 0.0594005, Sn 0.940599	experimental	[1] Moon 2000	Table I, p. 4, row 68 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

K. -W. Moon, W. J. Boettinger, U. R. Kattner, F. S. Biancaniello, C. A. Handwerker, Experimental and thermodynamic assessment of Sn-Ag-Cu solder alloys, Journal of Elec Materi 29, 1122-1136 (2000). doi:10.1007/s11664-000-0003-x

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}