Ag–Cu system

5 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 1, model 4); 6 calculated phase diagram(s). 8 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (4) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental1
model4
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction5

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
AgCu-00Moo.tdbK.-W. Moon, W.J. Boettinger, U.R. Kattner, F.S. Biancaniello, C.A. Handwerker, J. Electron. Mater., 29, 1122-36(2000). doi:10.1007/s11664-000-0003-x1e55749c7312290300c9c5fa7b53b7cc4b6751f5e4be8d499617455a722fa46dviewer · TDB · JSON
AgCu-04Wit-LB.tdbV.T. Witusiewicz, U. Hecht, S.G. Fries, S. Rex, J. Alloys Compd. 385, 133-43(2004). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.04.126d0b7c5fc74190270704f7587ea82bd6b1da5411a4a683b4c734fcdf20b7b92d8viewer · TDB · JSON
AgCu-06He.tdbX.C. He, H. Wang, H.S. Liu, Z.P. Jin, Calphad, 30, 367-74(2006). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2006.09.001454efb43f047fe255393b279930392e55ab257030ed80cc647bf25400bc84cdaviewer · TDB · JSON
AgCu-86Hay.tdbF.H. Hayes, H.L. Lukas, G. Effenberg, G. Petzow, Z. Metallkd., 77, 749-54(1986). doi:10.1515/ijmr-1986-7711082dde865753d877b69ebcdcdb29022869da00057a3c65acdfd7addce94c28690dviewer · TDB · JSON
AgCu-88Joe.tdbB. Joensson, J. Agren, J. Less-Common Met., 145, 153-66(1988).efd48daf5625109e89e47a178983d5d683854fc33c88eb7cd863717be9b7f0caviewer · TDB · JSON
AgCu-98Luk.tdbH.L. Lukas, unpublished, 1998.b1f37711e5a07cb6c3c972242640ffb694b73cd6a7de208455d052c43b6ab73fviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
AgCu-00Moo.tdb1052.28FCC_A1 (x(Cu) 0.13274) + LIQUID (x(Cu) 0.40254) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Cu) 0.9546)
AgCu-04Wit-LB.tdb1053.36FCC_A1 (x(Cu) 0.12097) + LIQUID (x(Cu) 0.3983) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Cu) 0.95346)
AgCu-06He.tdb1055.79FCC_A1 (x(Cu) 0.14063) + LIQUID (x(Cu) 0.39678) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Cu) 0.95125)
AgCu-86Hay.tdb1056.01FCC_A1 (x(Cu) 0.13) + LIQUID (x(Cu) 0.41491) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Cu) 0.95421)
AgCu-88Joe.tdb1053.66FCC_A1 (x(Cu) 0.12878) + LIQUID (x(Cu) 0.40171) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Cu) 0.95478)
AgCu-98Luk.tdb1053.01FCC_A1 (x(Cu) 0.13144) + LIQUID (x(Cu) 0.4029) + FCC_A1#2 (x(Cu) 0.955)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull AgCu-00Moo · CALPHAD hull AgCu-04Wit-LB · CALPHAD hull AgCu-86Hay · CALPHAD hull AgCu-88Joe · CALPHAD hull AgCu-98Luk

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ag–Cu system (5)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1054eutectic: Liquid <-> (Ag) + (Cu)L: Cu 0.398; (Ag): Cu 0.146; (Cu): Cu 0.951model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Murray 1984
Table 8, p. 8, row 4
report
1053eutectic: Liquid <-> (Ag) + (Cu)L: Cu 0.399; (Ag): Cu 0.141; (Cu): Cu 0.951experimental[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Hansen 1958
Table 8, p. 8, row 1
report
1053eutectic: Liquid <-> (Ag) + (Cu)L: Cu 0.403; (Ag): Cu 0.131; (Cu): Cu 0.955model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites Kusoffsky 2002
Table 8, p. 8, row 6
report
1053eutectic: Liquid <-> (Ag) + (Cu)L: Cu 0.398; (Ag): Cu 0.121; (Cu): Cu 0.953model[1] Witusiewicz 2004Table 8, p. 8, row 7
report
1050eutectic: Liquid <-> (Ag) + (Cu)L: Cu 0.361; (Ag): Cu 0.129; (Cu): Cu 0.948model[1] Witusiewicz 2004
cites S-S 1997
Table 8, p. 8, row 5
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. V.T. Witusiewicz, U. Hecht, S.G. Fries, S. Rex, The Ag–Al–Cu system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 385, 133-143 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2004.04.126