Au–Sb–Si system

29 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 16, model 13); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	16
model	13

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	28
phase transition	1

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Sb–Si system (28)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
740	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2	L: Sb 0.655	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report
740	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2		experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Wallbrecht 1981 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
734	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2	L: Sb 0.663	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Chevalier 1989 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
733	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2		experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Gaither 1976	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
733	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2	L: Sb 0.655	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Kim 2002 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report
733	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2		experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Evans 1984	Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report
733	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2	L: Sb 0.666	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Okamoto 1984 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report
732	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2	L: Sb 0.653	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 1, p. 2, row 16 report
732	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2	L: Sb 0.67	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Zoro 2006 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
732	quasi-peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> (Si) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.649, Si 0.002	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 1, p. 2, row 29 report
730	quasi-peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> (Si) + AuSb2		experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Legendre 1986	Table 1, p. 2, row 28 report
725	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2	L: Sb 0.66	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Grigorjew 1932 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report
723	peritectic: L + (Sb) <-> AuSb2	L: Sb 0.66	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Vogel 1906 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report
637	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + (Si)	L: Si 0.207	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Meng 2007 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report
634	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2		experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Wallbrecht 1981 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 20 report
633	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2		experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Gaither 1976	Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report
633	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.362	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Kim 2002 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 25 report
633	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.355	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Okamoto 1984 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 23 report
631	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.36	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Zoro 2006 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 22 report
630	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.349	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Chevalier 1989 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 24 report
630	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.369	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 1, p. 2, row 27 report
630	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2		experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Hayer 1995	Table 1, p. 2, row 21 report
630	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2		experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Vogel 1906 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
626	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.366	model	[1] Wang 2011 cites Liu 2003 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 26 report
624	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + AuSb2		experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Grigorjew 1932 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report
608	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + (Si) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.133, Si 0.135	model	[1] Wang 2011	Table 1, p. 2, row 32 report
605	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + (Si) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.2, Si 0.1	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Legendre 1986	Table 1, p. 2, row 30 report
604	eutectic: L <-> (Au) + (Si) + AuSb2	L: Sb 0.125, Si 0.135	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Humpston 1993 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 31 report

Other properties

Phase transition (1)

Phase transition, Au–Sb–Si system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Phase transition	730 K	730	other: L + rhombohedral A7(Sb) ↔ diamond A4(Si) + AuSb2	experimental	[1] Wang 2011 cites Legendre 1986	p. 3 report	Experimental results obtained by Legendre and Hancheng [60] show that the Au-Sb-Si ternary system contains two invariant reactions: a transition reaction (U) at 730 K, L + rhombohedral A7(Sb) ↔ diamond A4(Si) + AuSb2 and a eutectic reaction (E) at 605 K, L ↔ fcc A1(Au) + diamond A4(Si) + AuSb2 .

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic modeling of the Au–Sb–Si ternary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 509, 3057-3064 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.11.199

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}