Au–Sb system

37 accepted literature values from 4 paper(s) (experimental 25, model 12); 5 calculated phase diagram(s). 22 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (6) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental25
model12
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction19
formation18

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
AuSb-02Kim.tdbJ.H. Kim, S.W. Jeong, H.M. Lee, J. Electron. Mater., 31, 557-63(2002). doi:10.1007/s11664-002-0125-4db53175b1bacbeb54c082f94e32ca97f2b6ebd2a28301607b8d360d59b2f1b5bviewer · TDB · JSON
AuSb-03Liu.tdbH.S. Liu, C.L. Liu, C. Wang, Z.P. Jin, K. Ishida, J. Electron. Mater., 32, 81-88(2003). doi:10.1007/s11664-003-0240-xc4f2198262a6e367e11338497d75b5c84bcefe7e950f8a87f4897c54bd47bde9viewer · TDB · JSON
AuSb-11Wan.tdbJ. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, J. Alloys Compd., 509, 3057-64(2011). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.11.1990354d7420fa903d8915784b58a78b1d68a88f2e8050380bc6e5b31328553a0b5viewer · TDB · JSON
AuSb-13Gie.tdbW. Gierlotka, J. Alloys Compd., 579, 533-39(2013). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.04.186420d77300456541e4cfb5840a604a34acfba0b49c40f29c0b30803e81dee7683viewer · TDB · JSON
AuSb-89Che-LB.tdbP.-Y. Chevalier, Thermochim. Acta, 155, 211-25(1989). doi:10.1016/0040-6031(89)87147-3080bb55f5b27634800b3566052b781e0cccf39ef4af46ad11ed4086cc5ca59deviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
AuSb-02Kim.tdb735.55LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.63909) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-02Kim.tdb735.55LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.63939) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-02Kim.tdb735.55LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.6396) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-02Kim.tdb634.7FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.00726) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.3722) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)
AuSb-02Kim.tdb634.7FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.00727) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.37215) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)
AuSb-03Liu.tdb739.98LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.65502) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-03Liu.tdb739.98LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.65532) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-03Liu.tdb739.98LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.65568) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-03Liu.tdb626.23FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.00842) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.36614) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)
AuSb-03Liu.tdb626.23FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.00843) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.36607) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)
AuSb-11Wan.tdb732.32LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.65267) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-11Wan.tdb732.32LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.65279) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-11Wan.tdb732.32LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.65311) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-11Wan.tdb629.67FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.00707) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.36945) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)
AuSb-11Wan.tdb629.67FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.00707) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.3693) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)
AuSb-13Gie.tdb726.24LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.64778) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-13Gie.tdb726.24LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.64786) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-13Gie.tdb726.24LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.64831) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-13Gie.tdb628.38FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.0102) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.36517) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)
AuSb-13Gie.tdb628.38FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.0102) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.36504) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)
AuSb-89Che-LB.tdb732.13LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.6597) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-89Che-LB.tdb732.13LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.6601) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-89Che-LB.tdb732.13LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.66075) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667) + RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Sb) 1)
AuSb-89Che-LB.tdb630.25FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.01054) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.3488) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)
AuSb-89Che-LB.tdb630.25FCC_A1 (x(Sb) 0.01053) + LIQUID (x(Sb) 0.34869) + AUSB2_C2 (x(Sb) 0.66667)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull AuSb-02Kim · CALPHAD hull AuSb-03Liu · CALPHAD hull AuSb-11Wan · CALPHAD hull AuSb-89Che-LB

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Au–Sb system (19)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
740peritectic: L + (Sb) -> AuSb2AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Wallbrecht 1981 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 4
report
734.3peritectic: L + (Sb) -> AuSb2L: Sb 0.663; AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667model[1] Kim 2002
cites Chevalier 1989 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 7
report
733.17peritectic: L + (Sb) -> AuSb2L: Sb 0.655; (Sb): Sb 1; AuSb2: Sb 0.667experimental[1] Kim 2002Table II, p. 3, row 8
report
733peritectic: L + (Sb) -> AuSb2AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Gaither 1976
Table II, p. 3, row 3
report
733peritectic: L + (Sb) -> AuSb2L: Sb 0.666; AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Okamoto 1984 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 5
report
732.4peritectic: L + (Sb) -> AuSb2L: Sb 0.66; AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667model[1] Kim 2002
cites Chevalier 1989 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 6
report
725peritectic: L + (Sb) -> AuSb2L: Sb 0.666; AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Grigorjew 1932 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 2
report
723peritectic: L + (Sb) -> AuSb2L: Sb 0.666; AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Vogel 1906 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 1
report
634eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Wallbrecht 1981 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 13
report
633eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2L: Sb 0.355; AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Okamoto 1984 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 14
report
633eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Gasgnier 1974 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 11
report
633eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Gaither 1976
Table II, p. 3, row 12
report
632.74eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2L: Sb 0.362; (Au): Sb 0.007; AuSb2: Sb 0.667experimental[1] Kim 2002Table II, p. 3, row 18
report
632eutecticexperimental[2] Gierlotka 2013p. 1
report
There is also an eutectic reaction between liquid, IMC and FCC_A1(Au) phase at 632 K.
630.9eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2L: Sb 0.349; (Au): Sb 0.01; AuSb2: Sb 0.667model[1] Kim 2002
cites Chevalier 1989 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 15
report
630.37eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2L: Sb 0.35; AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Hayer 1995
Table II, p. 3, row 17
report
630eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2L: Sb 0.33; AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Vogel 1906 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 9
report
629.4eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2L: Sb 0.353; (Au): Sb 0.0076; AuSb2: Sb 0.667model[1] Kim 2002
cites Chevalier 1989 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 16
report
624eutectic: L -> (Au) + AuSb2AuSb2: Au 0.333333, Sb 0.666667experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Grigorjew 1932 doi
Table II, p. 3, row 10
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Au–Sb system (18)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
AuSbAuSb-4.895 kJ/mol-atom363experimental-5.168 (oqmd-1105404)[3] Chevalier 1989
cites Biltz 1934
p. 3
report
The heat of formation of the intermetallic compound AuSb, referred to the pure solid components was measured calorimetrically by: Jena and Bever [16], T = 273 K, AH = - 4351 J (g at.))'; by Kleppa [17], T = 723 K, AH = - 3138 J (g at.)-'; and by Biltz et al. [18], T = 363 K, AH = - 4895 J (g at.))'.
AuSbAuSb-4.351 kJ/mol-atom273experimental-5.168 (oqmd-1105404)[3] Chevalier 1989
cites Jena 1968
p. 3
report
The heat of formation of the intermetallic compound AuSb, referred to the pure solid components was measured calorimetrically by: Jena and Bever [16], T = 273 K, AH = - 4351 J (g at.))'; by Kleppa [17], T = 723 K, AH = - 3138 J (g at.)-'; and by Biltz et al. [18], T = 363 K, AH = - 4895 J (g at.))'.
AuSbAuSb-3.138 kJ/mol-atom723experimental-5.168 (oqmd-1105404)[3] Chevalier 1989
cites Kleppa 1956 doi
p. 3
report
The heat of formation of the intermetallic compound AuSb, referred to the pure solid components was measured calorimetrically by: Jena and Bever [16], T = 273 K, AH = - 4351 J (g at.))'; by Kleppa [17], T = 723 K, AH = - 3138 J (g at.)-'; and by Biltz et al. [18], T = 363 K, AH = - 4895 J (g at.))'.
AuSb2-6.364 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[1] Kim 2002
cites Chevalier 1989 doi
Table III, p. 4, row 5
report
AuSb2-6.364 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Gierlotka 2013
cites Chevalier 1989 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 3
report
AuSb2-5.54 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Gierlotka 2013
cites Liu 2003 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 6
report
AuSb2-5.5 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Gierlotka 2013
cites Kim 2002 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 5
report
AuSb2-5.41 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Gierlotka 2013
cites Chevalier 1989 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 2
report
AuSb2-5.41 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[1] Kim 2002
cites Chevalier 1989 doi
Table III, p. 4, row 4
report
AuSb2-5.40955 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[4] Wang 2011p. 5
report
The enthalpy of formation of AuSb2 referred to fcc A1(Au) and rhombohedral A7(Sb) at 298 K is calculated to be -5409.55 J/mol, which agrees well with the experimental values measured by Hayer and Castanet [41] (-5400 ± 600 J/mol) as well as the assessed values by Liu et al. [20] (-4962 J/mol) and Kim et al. [32] (-5500 J/mol).
AuSb2-5.4 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.6298.15experimental[2] Gierlotka 2013
cites Hayer 1995
Table 2, p. 2, row 4
report
AuSb2-5.148 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Gierlotka 2013Table 2, p. 2, row 7
report
AuSb2-4.9 kJ/mol (basis unstated)363experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Biltz 1934 doi
Table III, p. 4, row 1
report
AuSb2-4.9 kJ/mol (basis unstated)363experimental[2] Gierlotka 2013
cites Blitz 1934
Table 2, p. 2, row 8
report
AuSb2-4.35 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.13298.15experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Jena 1968
Table III, p. 4, row 2
report
AuSb2-4.35 kJ/mol (basis unstated) ± 0.13298.15experimental[2] Gierlotka 2013
cites Jena 1968
Table 2, p. 2, row 1
report
AuSb2-3.14 kJ/mol (basis unstated)723experimental[1] Kim 2002
cites Kleppa 1956 doi
Table III, p. 4, row 3
report
AuSb2-3.14 kJ/mol (basis unstated)723experimental[2] Gierlotka 2013
cites Kleppa 1956 doi
Table 2, p. 2, row 9
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Jong Hoon Kim, Sang Won Jeong, Hyuck Mo Lee, A thermodynamic study of phase equilibria in the Au-Sb-Sn solder system, Journal of Elec Materi 31, 557-563 (2002). doi:10.1007/s11664-002-0125-4
  2. Wojciech Gierlotka, Thermodynamic description of the binary Au–Sb and ternary Au–In–Sb systems, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 579, 533-539 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.04.186
  3. Pierre-Yves Chevalier, A thermodynamic evaluation of the Au-Sb and Au-Tl systems, Thermochimica Acta 155, 211-225 (1989). doi:10.1016/0040-6031(89)87147-3
  4. J. Wang, Y.J. Liu, L.B. Liu, H.Y. Zhou, Z.P. Jin, Thermodynamic modeling of the Au–Sb–Si ternary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 509, 3057-3064 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.11.199