Bi–Rb system

212 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 73, model 78, DFT 54, unspecified 7); 2 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (11) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	73
model	78
DFT	54
unspecified	7

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	78
formation	70
crystal structure	64

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
BiRb-13Liu.tdb	M. Liu, C. Li, Z. Du, C. Guo, C. Niu, Thermochim. Acta, 551, 27-32(2013). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.10.012	`54503178dabfd72f350bda2fe4e748df19d107c0d4a5d7df5aa098d84f218774`	viewer · TDB · JSON
BiRb-22Dzi.tdb	F. Dziri, Y. Djaballah, E. Belbacha, A. Belgacem Bouzida, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 43, 382-92(2022). doi:10.1007/s11669-022-00968-3	`01fb3aa5b0cccfc6bf479aa7d66f33be3a3088cdcaae5029bef66599cddd608b`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
BiRb-13Liu.tdb	727.97	BI2RB3 (x(Rb) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.62898) + BIRB3_D03 (x(Rb) 0.75)
BiRb-13Liu.tdb	676.01	LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.53537) + BI4RB5 (x(Rb) 0.55556) + BI2RB3 (x(Rb) 0.6)
BiRb-13Liu.tdb	643	BI2RB_C15 (x(Rb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.50419) + BI4RB5 (x(Rb) 0.55556)
BiRb-13Liu.tdb	541.04	RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Rb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.01521) + BI2RB_C15 (x(Rb) 0.33333)
BiRb-13Liu.tdb	503	BIRB3_D018 (x(Rb) 0.75) + BIRB3_D03 (x(Rb) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.99938)
BiRb-13Liu.tdb	503	BI2RB3 (x(Rb) 0.6) + BIRB3_D018 (x(Rb) 0.75) + BIRB3_D03 (x(Rb) 0.75)
BiRb-13Liu.tdb	312.46	BIRB3_D018 (x(Rb) 0.75) + BCC_A2 (x(Rb) 1) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 1)
BiRb-22Dzi.tdb	715.86	BI2RB3 (x(Rb) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.63376) + BIRB3_D03 (x(Rb) 0.75)
BiRb-22Dzi.tdb	677.95	LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.55287) + BI4RB5 (x(Rb) 0.55556) + BI2RB3 (x(Rb) 0.6)
BiRb-22Dzi.tdb	642.53	BI2RB_C15 (x(Rb) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.48821) + BIRB (x(Rb) 0.5)
BiRb-22Dzi.tdb	639.77	BIRB (x(Rb) 0.5) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.51668) + BI4RB5 (x(Rb) 0.55556)
BiRb-22Dzi.tdb	536.96	RHOMBOHEDRAL_A7 (x(Rb) 0) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.0313) + BI2RB_C15 (x(Rb) 0.33333)
BiRb-22Dzi.tdb	505.05	BIRB3_D018 (x(Rb) 0.75) + BIRB3_D03 (x(Rb) 0.75) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 0.9997)
BiRb-22Dzi.tdb	505.05	BI2RB3 (x(Rb) 0.6) + BIRB3_D018 (x(Rb) 0.75) + BIRB3_D03 (x(Rb) 0.75)
BiRb-22Dzi.tdb	312.46	BIRB3_D018 (x(Rb) 0.75) + BCC_A2 (x(Rb) 1) + LIQUID (x(Rb) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull BiRb-13Liu

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Bi–Rb system (78)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
933	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.3333; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Zhuravlev 1958	Table 3, p. 6, row 7 report
930.98	congruent melting: Liq->βBiRb3	Liq: Rb 0.75; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 43 report
916.1	congruent melting: Liq->βBiRb3	Liq: Rb 0.75; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 42 report
915	congruent melting: L -> β-BiRb3	L: Rb 0.75; β-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 29 report
915	congruent melting: L -> β-BiRb3	L: Rb 0.75; β-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 27 report
915	congruent melting: Liq->βBiRb3	Liq: Rb 0.75; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 41 report
915	congruent melting: Liq->βBiRb3	Liq: Rb 0.75; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 39 report
915	congruent melting: L -> β-BiRb3	L: Rb 0.75; β-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	model	[2] Liu 2013 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 28 report
915	congruent melting: Liq->βBiRb3	Liq: Rb 0.75; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	unspecified	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 40 report
913	congruent melting: Liq->βBiRb3	Liq: Rb 0.75; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Zhuravlev 1958	Table 3, p. 6, row 38 report
887.26	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.3333; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 13 report
886	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.3333; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 9 report
885	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.3333; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 12 report
883	congruent melting: L -> Bi2Rb	L: Rb 0.333; Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 24 report
883	congruent melting: L -> Bi2Rb	L: Rb 0.333; Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 22 report
883	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.3333; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 11 report
883	congruent melting: L -> Bi2Rb	L: Rb 0.333; Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 21 report
883	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.3333; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	unspecified	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 10 report
883	congruent melting: L -> Bi2Rb	L: Rb 0.333; Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333	model	[2] Liu 2013 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 23 report
878	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.3333; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 8 report
838	congruent melting: L -> Bi2Rb3	L: Rb 0.6; Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6	model	[2] Liu 2013 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 25 report
838	congruent melting: L -> Bi2Rb3	L: Rb 0.6; Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 26 report
745.14	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb3	Liq: Rb 0.6; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 32 report
743	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb3	Liq: Rb 0.6; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 29 report
738	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb3	Liq: Rb 0.6; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	unspecified	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 28 report
738	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb3	Liq: Rb 0.6; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 31 report
738	congruent melting: Liq->Bi2Rb3	Liq: Rb 0.6; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 30 report
728	eutectic: L -> Bi2Rb3 + β-BiRb3	Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6; β-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report
728	eutectic: L -> Bi2Rb3 + β-BiRb3	L: Rb 0.629; Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6; β-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
728	eutectic: Liq->Bi2Rb3+βBiRb3	Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 34 report
728	eutectic: Liq->Bi2Rb3+βBiRb3	Liq: Rb 0.629; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 35 report
728	eutectic: L -> Bi2Rb3 + β-BiRb3	L: Rb 0.62; Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6; β-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	model	[2] Liu 2013 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report
728	eutectic: L -> Bi2Rb3 + β-BiRb3	Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6; β-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report
725.8	eutectic: Liq->Bi2Rb3+βBiRb3	Liq: Rb 0.627; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 36 report
723	eutectic: Liq->Bi2Rb3+βBiRb3	Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Zhuravlev 1958	Table 3, p. 6, row 33 report
716.11	eutectic: Liq->Bi2Rb3+βBiRb3	Liq: Rb 0.6337; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 37 report
678.5	peritectic: Liq+Bi2Rb3->Bi4Rb5	Liq: Rb 0.538; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 26 report
678.19	peritectic: Liq+Bi2Rb3->Bi4Rb5	Liq: Rb 0.5528; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 27 report
676.01	peritectic: Liq+Bi2Rb3->Bi4Rb5	Liq: Rb 0.5353; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 25 report
676	peritectic: L + Bi2Rb3 -> Bi4Rb5	L: Rb 0.538; Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Rb 0.556	model	[2] Liu 2013 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report
676	peritectic: L + Bi2Rb3 -> Bi4Rb5	Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Rb 0.556	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report
676	peritectic: L + Bi2Rb3 -> Bi4Rb5	Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Rb 0.556	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report
676	peritectic: L + Bi2Rb3 -> Bi4Rb5	L: Rb 0.535; Bi2Rb3: Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Rb 0.556	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report
676	peritectic: Liq+Bi2Rb3->Bi4Rb5	Liq: Rb 0.538; Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	unspecified	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 24 report
676	peritectic: Liq+Bi2Rb3->Bi4Rb5	Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 23 report
673	peritectic: Liq+Bi2Rb3->Bi4Rb5	Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 22 report
649	peritectic: Liq+ Bi2Rb->BiRb	Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333; BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	unspecified	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 14 report
645.74	congruent melting: Liq->BiRb	Liq: Rb 0.5; BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 17 report
645.5	congruent melting: Liq->BiRb	Liq: Rb 0.5; BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Stankus 2019 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 16 report
643	eutectic: L -> Bi2Rb + Bi4Rb5	L: Rb 0.504; Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333; Bi4Rb5: Rb 0.556	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 12 report
643	eutectic: Liq->BiRb+Bi4Rb5	BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 19 report
643	eutectic: L -> Bi2Rb + Bi4Rb5	Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333; Bi4Rb5: Rb 0.556	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report
643	eutectic: Liq->BiRb+Bi4Rb5	Liq: Rb 0.51; BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	unspecified	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 20 report
643	eutectic: L -> Bi2Rb + Bi4Rb5	Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333; Bi4Rb5: Rb 0.556	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report
643	eutectic: L -> Bi2Rb + Bi4Rb5	L: Rb 0.501; Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333; Bi4Rb5: Rb 0.556	model	[2] Liu 2013 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 11 report
642.77	eutectic: Liq->Bi2Rb+BiRb	Liq: Rb 0.4882; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333; BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 15 report
640.01	eutectic: Liq->BiRb+Bi4Rb5	Liq: Rb 0.5166; BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 21 report
631	eutectic: Liq->Bi2Rb+Bi4Rb5	Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333; Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444444, Rb 0.555556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 18 report
541.04	eutectic: Liq->Bi+Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.0152; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 4 report
541.02	eutectic: Liq->Bi+Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.0132; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 5 report
541	eutectic: L -> Rhomb_A7 + Bi2Rb	L: Rb 0.0152; Rhomb_A7: Rb 0; Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 16 report
541	eutectic: Liq->Bi+Bi2Rb	Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 2 report
541	eutectic: Liq->Bi+Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.016; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	unspecified	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 3 report
541	eutectic: L -> Rhomb_A7 + Bi2Rb	Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 13 report
541	eutectic: L -> Rhomb_A7 + Bi2Rb	L: Rb 0.016; Rhomb_A7: Rb 0; Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 14 report
541	eutectic: L -> Rhomb_A7 + Bi2Rb	L: Rb 0.016; Rhomb_A7: Rb 0; Bi2Rb: Rb 0.333	model	[2] Liu 2013 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 15 report
536.97	eutectic: Liq->Bi+Bi2Rb	Liq: Rb 0.0312; Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 6 report
513	eutectic: Liq->Bi+Bi2Rb	Bi2Rb: Bi 0.666667, Rb 0.333333	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Zhuravlev 1958	Table 3, p. 6, row 1 report
506	polymorphic: βBiRb3->α BiRb3	βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; Liq: Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 44 report
503.96	polymorphic: βBiRb3->α BiRb3	βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; Liq: Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 3, p. 6, row 48 report
503.4	polymorphic: βBiRb3->α BiRb3	βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; Liq: Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 47 report
503	polymorphic: βBiRb3->α BiRb3	βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; Liq: Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Chuntonov 1977	Table 3, p. 6, row 45 report
503	polymorphic: βBiRb3->α BiRb3	βBiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; Liq: Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 46 report
503	polymorphic: β-BiRb3 -> α-BiRb3	β-BiRb3: Rb 0.75; α-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 30 report
312.48	eutectic: L -> α-BiRb3 + BCC_A2	L: Rb 1; α-BiRb3: Rb 0.75; BCC_A2: Rb 1	model	[2] Liu 2013 cites Pelton 1993 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 19 report
312.46	eutectic: L -> α-BiRb3 + BCC_A2	L: Rb 1; α-BiRb3: Rb 0.75; BCC_A2: Rb 1	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 20 report
312	eutectic: L -> α-BiRb3 + BCC_A2	α-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 18 report
312	eutectic: L -> α-BiRb3 + BCC_A2	α-BiRb3: Rb 0.75	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 17 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Bi–Rb system (41)
Phase	Compound	Value	T (K)	Class	MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	Source	Location
Bi2Rb		-35.533 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 6 report
Bi2Rb		-35.5 per mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Liu 2013	Table 3, p. 4, row 2 report
Bi2Rb	Bi2Rb	-35.5 kJ/mol-atom		model	-31.18 (mp-aaaabikj)	-29.992 (oqmd-647552)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 2 report
Bi2Rb	Bi2Rb	-34.433 kJ/mol-atom		model	-31.18 (mp-aaaabikj)	-29.992 (oqmd-647552)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 3 report
Bi2Rb	Bi2Rb	-31.917 kJ/mol-atom		model	-31.18 (mp-aaaabikj)	-29.992 (oqmd-647552)	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 4 report
Bi2Rb		-30.434 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 5 report
Bi2Rb	Bi2Rb	-25.9 kJ/mol-atom ± 2	298.15	experimental	-31.18 (mp-aaaabikj)	-29.992 (oqmd-647552)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Voronin 1974	Table 4, p. 7, row 1 report
Bi2Rb		-25.9 per mol-atom ± 2	298.15	experimental			[2] Liu 2013 cites Voronin 1974	Table 3, p. 4, row 1 report
Bi2Rb3	Bi2Rb3	-41.735 kJ/mol-atom		model	-29.396 (mp-aaacqrwt)	-31.006 (oqmd-1435540)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 18 report
Bi2Rb3	Bi2Rb3	-41.6 kJ/mol-atom		model	-29.396 (mp-aaacqrwt)	-31.006 (oqmd-1435540)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 19 report
Bi2Rb3		-41.6 per mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Liu 2013	Table 3, p. 4, row 6 report
Bi2Rb3	Bi2Rb3	-40.5 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	experimental	-29.396 (mp-aaacqrwt)	-31.006 (oqmd-1435540)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 20 report
Bi2Rb3	Bi2Rb3	-36.598 kJ/mol-atom		model	-29.396 (mp-aaacqrwt)	-31.006 (oqmd-1435540)	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 21 report
Bi2Rb3	Bi2Rb3	-36.4 kJ/mol-atom ± 2	298.15	experimental	-29.396 (mp-aaacqrwt)	-31.006 (oqmd-1435540)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Voronin 1974	Table 4, p. 7, row 17 report
Bi2Rb3		-36.4 per mol-atom ± 2	298.15	experimental			[2] Liu 2013 cites Voronin 1974	Table 3, p. 4, row 5 report
Bi2Rb3		-35.709 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 23 report
Bi2Rb3		-34.913 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 22 report
Bi4Rb5	Bi4Rb5	-40.8 kJ/mol-atom		model	-32.389 (mp-aaacrkdo)	-34.447 (oqmd-1914415)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 12 report
Bi4Rb5		-40.8 per mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Liu 2013	Table 3, p. 4, row 4 report
Bi4Rb5	Bi4Rb5	-39.866 kJ/mol-atom		model	-32.389 (mp-aaacrkdo)	-34.447 (oqmd-1914415)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 13 report
Bi4Rb5	Bi4Rb5	-39.618 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	experimental	-32.389 (mp-aaacrkdo)	-34.447 (oqmd-1914415)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 11 report
Bi4Rb5		-37.795 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 16 report
Bi4Rb5	Bi4Rb5	-36.77 kJ/mol-atom		model	-32.389 (mp-aaacrkdo)	-34.447 (oqmd-1914415)	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 14 report
Bi4Rb5	Bi4Rb5	-35.1 kJ/mol-atom ± 2	298.15	experimental	-32.389 (mp-aaacrkdo)	-34.447 (oqmd-1914415)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Voronin 1974	Table 4, p. 7, row 10 report
Bi4Rb5		-35.1 per mol-atom ± 2	298.15	experimental			[2] Liu 2013 cites Voronin 1974	Table 3, p. 4, row 3 report
Bi4Rb5		-34.693 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 15 report
BiRb		-38.131 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 9 report
BiRb	BiRb	-35.975 kJ/mol-atom		model	-32.944 (mp-aaaabuaj)	-34.733 (oqmd-1798865)	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 7 report
BiRb		-35.056 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 8 report
BiRb3		-38.8 per mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Liu 2013	Table 3, p. 4, row 8 report
BiRb3		-37.2 per mol-atom ± 2	298.15	experimental			[2] Liu 2013 cites Voronin 1974	Table 3, p. 4, row 7 report
ßBiRb3	BiRb3	-38.61 kJ/mol-atom		model	-30.793 (mp-aaabgjwh)	-32.922 (oqmd-28765)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 30 report
ßBiRb3		-38.272 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 33 report
ßBiRb3	BiRb3	-34.621 kJ/mol-atom		model	-30.793 (mp-aaabgjwh)	-32.922 (oqmd-28765)	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 31 report
ßBiRb3		-30.218 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 32 report
αBiRb3	BiRb3	-41.875 kJ/mol-atom		model	-30.793 (mp-aaabgjwh)	-32.922 (oqmd-28765)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 26 report
αBiRb3	BiRb3	-38.8 kJ/mol-atom		model	-30.793 (mp-aaabgjwh)	-32.922 (oqmd-28765)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 25 report
αBiRb3		-38.661 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 29 report
αBiRb3	BiRb3	-37.2 kJ/mol-atom ± 2	298.15	experimental	-30.793 (mp-aaabgjwh)	-32.922 (oqmd-28765)	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Voronin 1974	Table 4, p. 7, row 24 report
αBiRb3	BiRb3	-34.746 kJ/mol-atom		model	-30.793 (mp-aaabgjwh)	-32.922 (oqmd-28765)	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 27 report
αBiRb3		-32.963 kJ/mol-atom	0	DFT			[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 28 report

Other properties

Formation (29)

Formation, Bi–Rb system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-1.883 J/mol-atom/K		Bi2Rb alloy: Rb 0.333333	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 3 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	0.455 J/mol-atom/K		Bi2Rb alloy: Rb 0.333333	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 4 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-3.5 J/mol-atom/K		Bi2Rb alloy: Rb 0.333333	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 2 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-5.6 J/mol-atom/K		Bi2Rb3 alloy: Rb 0.6	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 19 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	0.754 J/mol-atom/K		Bi2Rb3 alloy: Rb 0.6	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 21 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	12.42 J/mol-atom/K		Bi2Rb3 alloy: Rb 0.6	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 18 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	0.399 J/mol-atom/K		Bi4Rb5 alloy: Rb 0.555556	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 14 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-4.9 J/mol-atom/K		Bi4Rb5 alloy: Rb 0.555556	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 12 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-3.522 J/mol-atom/K		Bi4Rb5 alloy: Rb 0.555556	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 13 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	0.396 J/mol-atom/K		BiRb alloy: Rb 0.5	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 7 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-5.9 J/mol-atom/K		ßBiRb3 alloy: Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 30 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-1.152 J/mol-atom/K		ßBiRb3 alloy: Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 31 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-6.5 J/mol-atom/K		αBiRb3 alloy: Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Liu 2013 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 25 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-1.4 J/mol-atom/K		αBiRb3 alloy: Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 4, p. 7, row 27 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-10.175 J/mol-atom/K		αBiRb3 alloy: Rb 0.75	model	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 26 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-2.9 J/mol-atom/K ± 5	298.15	Bi2Rb alloy: Rb 0.333333	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Voronin 1974	Table 4, p. 7, row 1 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-3.5 per mol-atom	298.15	Bi2Rb alloy: Rb 0.333333	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 3, p. 4, row 2 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-2.9 per mol-atom ± 5	298.15	Bi2Rb alloy: Rb 0.333333	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Voronin 1974	Table 3, p. 4, row 1 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-10 J/mol-atom/K ± 5.4	298.15	Bi2Rb3 alloy: Rb 0.6	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Voronin 1974	Table 4, p. 7, row 17 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-5.6 per mol-atom	298.15	Bi2Rb3 alloy: Rb 0.6	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 3, p. 4, row 6 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-3.88 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Bi2Rb3 alloy: Rb 0.6	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Cao 2014 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 20 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-10 per mol-atom ± 5.4	298.15	Bi2Rb3 alloy: Rb 0.6	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Voronin 1974	Table 3, p. 4, row 5 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-9.2 J/mol-atom/K ± 5.4	298.15	Bi4Rb5 alloy: Rb 0.555556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Voronin 1974	Table 4, p. 7, row 10 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	12.97 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Bi4Rb5 alloy: Rb 0.555556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Petric 1988 doi	Table 4, p. 7, row 11 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-9.2 per mol-atom ± 5.4	298.15	Bi4Rb5 alloy: Rb 0.555556	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Voronin 1974	Table 3, p. 4, row 3 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-4.9 per mol-atom	298.15	Bi4Rb5 alloy: Rb 0.555556	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 3, p. 4, row 4 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-6.5 per mol-atom	298.15	BiRb3 alloy: Rb 0.75	model	[2] Liu 2013	Table 3, p. 4, row 8 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-9.6 per mol-atom ± 5.9	298.15	BiRb3 alloy: Rb 0.75	experimental	[2] Liu 2013 cites Voronin 1974	Table 3, p. 4, row 7 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	-9.6 J/mol-atom/K ± 5.9	298.15	αBiRb3 alloy: Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Voronin 1974	Table 4, p. 7, row 24 report

Crystal structure (64)

Crystal structure, Bi–Rb system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	9.672 Å	0	Bi2Rb Bi2Rb: Bi 0.67, Rb 0.33; Bi₂Rb: Bi 0.67, Rb 0.33	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report
Lattice a	9.422 Å	0	Bi2Rb Bi2Rb: Bi 0.67, Rb 0.33; Bi₂Rb: Bi 0.67, Rb 0.33	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report
Lattice a	9.537 Å	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
Lattice a	9.942 Å	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 16 report
Lattice a	13.275 Å	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
Lattice a	12.695 Å	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report
Lattice a	14.418 Å	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
Lattice a	15.119 Å	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
Lattice a	6.565 Å	0	α BiRb3 α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb₃: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report
Lattice a	6.258 Å	0	α BiRb3 α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb₃: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 20 report
Lattice a	8.673 Å	0	β BiRb3 β BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; β BiRb₃: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 23 report
Lattice a	9.144 Å	0	β BiRb3 β BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; β BiRb₃: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 22 report
Lattice a	8.989 Å		β BiRb3 β BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; β BiRb₃: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gnutzmann 1961 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 24 report
Lattice a	9.625 Å	298.15	Bi2Rb Bi2Rb: Bi 0.67, Rb 0.33; Bi₂Rb: Bi 0.67, Rb 0.33	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Emmerling 2004 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report
Lattice a	9.735 Å	298.15	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report
Lattice a	12.945 Å	298.15	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report
Lattice a	14.741 Å	298.15	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Emmerling 2004 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report
Lattice a	6.489 Å	298.15	α BiRb3 α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb₃: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Chuntonov 1977	Table 1, p. 2, row 21 report
Lattice b	9.768 Å	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
Lattice b	10.26 Å	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 16 report
Lattice b	5.865 Å	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
Lattice b	5.647 Å	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report
Lattice b	7.305 Å	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
Lattice b	7.639 Å	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
Lattice b	10.075 Å	298.15	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report
Lattice b	5.785 Å	298.15	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report
Lattice b	7.501 Å	298.15	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Emmerling 2004 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report
Lattice c	9.516 Å	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
Lattice c	9.928 Å	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 16 report
Lattice c	12.075 Å	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
Lattice c	11.65 Å	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report
Lattice c	13.593 Å	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
Lattice c	14.195 Å	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
Lattice c	11.634 Å	0	α BiRb3 α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb₃: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 19 report
Lattice c	11.108 Å	0	α BiRb3 α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb₃: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 20 report
Lattice c	9.715 Å	298.15	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report
Lattice c	12.018 Å	298.15	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report
Lattice c	13.92 Å	298.15	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Emmerling 2004 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report
Lattice c	11.489 Å	298.15	α BiRb3 α BiRb3: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75; α BiRb₃: Bi 0.25, Rb 0.75	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Chuntonov 1977	Table 1, p. 2, row 21 report
lattice alpha	90 °	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
lattice alpha	90 °	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
lattice alpha	90 °	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report
lattice alpha	90 °	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
lattice alpha	90 °	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
lattice alpha	90 °	298.15	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report
lattice alpha	90 °	298.15	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report
lattice alpha	90 °	298.15	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Emmerling 2004 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report
lattice beta	106.01 °	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
lattice beta	105.5 °	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 16 report
lattice beta	111.81 °	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
lattice beta	112.12 °	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report
lattice beta	113.29 °	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
lattice beta	113.25 °	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
lattice beta	105.34 °	298.15	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report
lattice beta	112.78 °	298.15	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report
lattice beta	113.03 °	298.15	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Emmerling 2004 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report
lattice gamma	90 °	0	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 17 report
lattice gamma	90 °	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 13 report
lattice gamma	90 °	0	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 14 report
lattice gamma	90 °	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
lattice gamma	90 °	0	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	DFT	[1] Dziri 2022	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
lattice gamma	90 °	298.15	Bi2Rb3 Bi2Rb3: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6; Bi₂Rb₃: Bi 0.4, Rb 0.6	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2000 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 18 report
lattice gamma	90 °	298.15	Bi4Rb5 Bi4Rb5: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556; Bi₄Rb₅: Bi 0.444, Rb 0.556	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Gascoin 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 15 report
lattice gamma	90 °	298.15	BiRb BiRb: Bi 0.5, Rb 0.5	experimental	[1] Dziri 2022 cites Emmerling 2004 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

F. Dziri, Y. Djaballah, E. Belbacha, A. Belgacem Bouzida, Thermodynamic Reassessment of the Bi-Rb System Supported by Ab-Initio Calculations, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 43, 382-392 (2022). doi:10.1007/s11669-022-00968-3
Miao Liu, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Cuiping Guo, Chunju Niu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Bi–Rb binary system, Thermochimica Acta 551, 27-32 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2012.10.012

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}