Bi–Sb–Zn system

19 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 1, model 18); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	1
model	18

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	19

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Bi–Sb–Zn system (19)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
810.41	other: β-Zn9Sb7 + β-Zn3Sb2 ↔ L + α-Zn9Sb7	L: Bi 0.1313, Zn 0.4783	model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 1 report
806.65	quasi-peritectic: L + β-Zn9Sb7 ↔ α-Zn9Sb7 + SbZn	L: Bi 0.1415, Zn 0.4421	model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 3 report
801.01	peritectic: δ-Zn4Sb3 + SbZn ↔ L + γ-Zn6Sb5		model	[1] Zhang 2022 cites Minic 2010 doi	Table 9, p. 15, row 2 report
795.32	peritectic: L + β-Zn3Sb2 + α-Zn9Sb7 ↔ β-Zn13Sb10	L: Bi 0.1963, Zn 0.4545	model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 4 report
785.12	quasi-peritectic: L + α-Zn9Sb7 ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + SbZn	L: Bi 0.2469, Zn 0.3991	model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 6 report
764.91	L + δ-Zn4Sb3 + γ-Zn6Sb5 ↔ ε-Zn4Sb3		model	[1] Zhang 2022 cites Minic 2010 doi	Table 9, p. 15, row 5 report
764.56	L + γ-Zn6Sb5 ↔ ε-Zn4Sb3 + SbZn		model	[1] Zhang 2022 cites Minic 2010 doi	Table 9, p. 15, row 7 report
712.64	L + ζ-Zn6Sb4 ↔ ε-Zn4Sb3 + η-Zn3Sb2		model	[1] Zhang 2022 cites Minic 2010 doi	Table 9, p. 15, row 9 report
705.74	quasi-peritectic: L + β-Zn3Sb2 ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + α-Zn3Sb2	L: Bi 0.41, Zn 0.4741	model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 8 report
684.75	eutectic: L ↔ L2 + Hcp(Zn) + α-Zn3Sb2	L: Bi 0.0093, Zn 0.9712	model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 10 report
684.75	quasi-peritectic: L + L2 ↔ Hcp(Zn) + α-Zn3Sb2		model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 12 report
683.91	L + L2 ↔ Hcp(Zn) + α-Zn3Sb2		model	[1] Zhang 2022 cites Minic 2010 doi	Table 9, p. 15, row 13 report
683.91	L ↔ L2 + Hcp(Zn) + α-Zn3Sb2		model	[1] Zhang 2022 cites Minic 2010 doi	Table 9, p. 15, row 11 report
677.83	quasi-peritectic: L + α-Zn3Sb2 ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + Hcp(Zn)	L: Bi 0.2898, Zn 0.6185	model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 14 report
537.19	L + SbZn ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + Rho(Sb)		model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 16 report
536.15	quasi-peritectic: L + SbZn ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + Rho(Sb)		experimental	[1] Zhang 2022 cites Minic 2010 doi	Table 9, p. 15, row 15 report
531.23	L + SbZn ↔ ε-Zn4Sb3 + Rho(Sb)		model	[1] Zhang 2022 cites Minic 2010 doi	Table 9, p. 15, row 17 report
527.93	quasi-peritectic: L + ε-Zn4Sb3 ↔ Hcp(Zn) + Rho(Sb)		model	[1] Zhang 2022 cites Minic 2010 doi	Table 9, p. 15, row 19 report
527.64	eutectic: L ↔ β-Zn13Sb10 + Rho(Sb) + Hcp(Zn)		model	[1] Zhang 2022	Table 9, p. 15, row 18 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Jiyuan Zhang, Yuan Yuan, A coupled experimental and thermodynamic assessment of the Mg-Bi-Sb and Zn-Bi-Sb ternary system and extrapolate to the Mg-Bi-Zn-Sb system, Thermochimica Acta 716, 179327 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2022.179327

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}