Cd–Sb–Zn system

17 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (model 17); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
model	17

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	11
crystal structure	6

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Cd–Sb–Zn system (11)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
803.44	quasi-peritectic: L + δ'-Sb3Zn4 -> ω-SbZn + ξ-Sb2Zn3	L: Sb 0.448, Zn 0.485; ω: Sb 0.503, Zn 0.492	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 8, p. 11, row 1 report
801.72	peritectic: L + ω-SbZn + ξ-Sb2Zn3 -> ε-Sb3Zn4	L: Sb 0.445, Zn 0.484; ω: Sb 0.503, Zn 0.491; ε: Sb 0.433, Zn 0.553	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 8, p. 11, row 2 report
766.02	quasi-peritectic: L + γ = β + η	L: Sb 0.38, Zn 0.487	model	[2] Zabdyr 1997	Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report
766.02	quasi-peritectic: L + γ = β + ω	L: Sb 0.412, Zn 0.45; ω: Sb 0.5, Zn 0.449	model	[2] Zabdyr 1997	Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report
728.64	quasi-peritectic: L + ξ-Sb2Zn3 -> ε-Sb3Zn4 + η-Sb2Zn3	L: Sb 0.096, Zn 0.852; ε: Sb 0.43, Zn 0.554	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 8, p. 11, row 3 report
719.86	quasi-peritectic: L + η = β + ζ	L: Sb 0.288, Zn 0.545	model	[2] Zabdyr 1997	Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report
676.47	quasi-peritectic: L + ζ = β + (Zn)	L: Sb 0.021, Zn 0.961; (Zn): Sb 0.0013, Zn 0.997	model	[2] Zabdyr 1997	Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report
564.77	eutectic: L -> ε-Sb3Zn4 + (Cd) + ω-SbZn	L: Sb 0.049, Zn 0.05; (Cd): Sb 0.003, Zn 0.011; ω: Sb 0.5, Zn 0.265; ε: Sb 0.429, Zn 0.412	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 8, p. 11, row 5 report
551	quasi-peritectic: L + β = ω + (Zn)	L: Sb 0.012, Zn 0.333; ω: Sb 0.5, Zn 0.364; (Zn): Sb 3.000e-4, Zn 0.987	model	[2] Zabdyr 1997	Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report
536.2	eutectic: L = ω + (Cd) + (Zn)	L: Sb 0.0072, Zn 0.257; ω: Sb 0.5, Zn 0.358; (Cd): Sb 3.000e-4, Zn 0.045; (Zn): Sb 2.000e-4, Zn 0.988	model	[2] Zabdyr 1997	Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report
533.73	eutectic: L -> ε-Sb3Zn4 + (Cd) + (Zn)	L: Sb 0.013, Zn 0.268; (Cd): Sb 0, Zn 0.041; (Zn): Sb 0, Zn 0.99; ε: Sb 0.429, Zn 0.4445	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 8, p. 11, row 6 report

Other properties

Crystal structure (6)

Crystal structure, Cd–Sb–Zn system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	2.9788 Å	594.3 (<)	(Cd) (Cd): Zn 0.0452	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
Lattice a	2.665 Å	692.2 (<)	(Zn) (Zn): Cd 0.0147	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report
Lattice b	7.7408 Å ± 1.000e-4	298.15	ω-SbZn ω-SbZn: Cd 0.004, Sb 0.495, Zn 0.501	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
Lattice c	8.0977 Å ± 1.000e-4	298.15	ω-SbZn ω-SbZn: Cd 0.004, Sb 0.495, Zn 0.501	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report
Lattice c	5.6167 Å	594.3 (<)	(Cd) (Cd): Zn 0.0452	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
Lattice c	4.947 Å	692.2 (<)	(Zn) (Zn): Cd 0.0147	model	[1] Liu 2009	Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Ya Liu, Jean-Claude Tedenac, Thermodynamic modeling of the Cd–Sb–Zn ternary system, Calphad 33, 684-694 (2009). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2009.08.006
Leszek A. Zabdyr, Phase equilibria in ternary Cd-Sb-Zn system, Calphad 21, 349-358 (1997). doi:10.1016/s0364-5916(97)00036-9

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}