Ce–Dy–Gd–La–Nd–Pr–Sm–Ti system

7 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (unspecified 7); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
unspecified7
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
phase transition7

Other properties

Phase transition (7)

Phase transition, Ce–Dy–Gd–La–Nd–Pr–Sm–Ti system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1713.15 K1713.15other: Dy-Tiunspecified[1] Saengdeejing 2021Table 5, p. 26, row 7
report
Phase transition1773.15 K1773.15other: Gd-Tiunspecified[1] Saengdeejing 2021Table 5, p. 26, row 6
report
Phase transition1923.15 K1923.15other: Ce-Tiunspecified[1] Saengdeejing 2021Table 5, p. 26, row 2
report
Phase transition2056.15 K2056.15other: La-Tiunspecified[1] Saengdeejing 2021Table 5, p. 26, row 1
report
Phase transition2073.15 K2073.15other: Pr-Tiunspecified[1] Saengdeejing 2021Table 5, p. 26, row 3
report
Phase transition2123.15 K2123.15other: Nd-Tiunspecified[1] Saengdeejing 2021Table 5, p. 26, row 4
report
Phase transition2273.15 K2273.15other: Sm-Tiunspecified[1] Saengdeejing 2021Table 5, p. 26, row 5
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Arkapol Saengdeejing, Ying Chen, Osamu Takeda, Masanori Enoki, Satoshi Sugimoto, Hiroshi Ohtani et al., Sm–Ti binary thermodynamic database and phase diagram, Calphad 75, 102357 (2021). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2021.102357