Ce–Mo system

22 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 7, model 9, unspecified 6); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (4) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental7
model9
unspecified6
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction12
phase equilibrium10

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CeMo-10Cha.tdbW. Chan, M.C. Gao, O.N. Dogan, P. King, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus., 31, 414-20(2010). doi:10.1007/s11669-010-9753-1faf1991c7387bbb6a125cd08e5cb168fe4d719a2f2b477061890f50a091a8b34viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CeMo-10Cha.tdb2805.01LIQUID (x(Mo) 0.32354) + LIQUID#2 (x(Mo) 0.92739) + BCC_A2 (x(Mo) 0.9969)
CeMo-10Cha.tdb1072LIQUID (x(Mo) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Mo) 0) + BCC_A2#2 (x(Mo) 1)
CeMo-10Cha.tdb1000FCC_A1 (x(Mo) 0) + BCC_A2#2 (x(Mo) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Mo) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ce–Mo system (12)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2805.15L2 <-> L1 + MoL2: Mo 0.9274; L1: Mo 0.3235; Mo: Mo 0.9969model[1] Chan 2010Table 2, p. 4, row 4
report
2800.15L2 <-> L1 + MoL2: Mo 0.905; L1: Mo 0.32; Mo: Mo 0.996unspecified[1] Chan 2010
cites Massalski 1990
Table 2, p. 4, row 3
report
2800.15L2 <-> L1 + MoL2: Mo 0.905; L1: Mo 0.24; Mo: Mo 0.996unspecified[1] Chan 2010
cites Palenzona 1996 doi
Table 2, p. 4, row 2
report
2800.15L2 <-> L1 + MoL2: Mo 0.933; L1: Mo 0.32; Mo: Mo 0.997unspecified[1] Chan 2010
cites Brewer 1980
Table 2, p. 4, row 1
report
1072.15L + Mo <-> δCeL: Mo 0; Mo: Mo 1; δCe: Mo 0model[1] Chan 2010Table 2, p. 4, row 7
report
1071.15L + Mo <-> δCeunspecified[1] Chan 2010
cites Massalski 1990
Table 2, p. 4, row 6
report
1071.15L + Mo <-> δCeL: Mo 7.000e-4unspecified[1] Chan 2010
cites Brewer 1980
Table 2, p. 4, row 5
report
1000.15δCe + Mo <-> γCeδCe: Mo 0; Mo: Mo 1; γCe: Mo 0model[1] Chan 2010Table 2, p. 4, row 9
report
999.15δCe + Mo <-> γCeδCe: Mo 0; Mo: Mo 1; γCe: Mo 0experimental[1] Chan 2010
cites Massalski 1990
Table 2, p. 4, row 8
report
334.15γCe <-> Mo + βCeγCe: Mo 0; Mo: Mo 1; βCe: Mo 0experimental[1] Chan 2010
cites Massalski 1990
Table 2, p. 4, row 10
report
283.15γCe <-> Mo + βCeunspecified[1] Chan 2010
cites Gschneidner 2010
Table 2, p. 4, row 11
report
283.15γCe <-> Mo + βCeγCe: Mo 0; Mo: Mo 1; βCe: Mo 0model[1] Chan 2010Table 2, p. 4, row 12
report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (10)

Phase equilibrium, Ce–Mo system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase composition1073.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.999984, Mo 1.600e-5; L: Ce 0.999984, Mo 1.600e-5
experimental[1] Chan 2010
cites Gaume-Mahn 1962
Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
Phase composition1073.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.999999, Mo 1.000e-6; L: Ce 0.999999, Mo 1.000e-6
model[1] Chan 2010Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
Phase composition1173.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.999964, Mo 3.600e-5; L: Ce 0.999964, Mo 3.600e-5
experimental[1] Chan 2010
cites Gaume-Mahn 1962
Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report
Phase composition1173.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.999995, Mo 5.000e-6; L: Ce 0.999995, Mo 5.000e-6
model[1] Chan 2010Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
Phase composition1373.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.999922, Mo 7.800e-5; L: Ce 0.999922, Mo 7.800e-5
model[1] Chan 2010Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
Phase composition1373.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.999781, Mo 2.190e-4; L: Ce 0.999781, Mo 2.190e-4
experimental[1] Chan 2010
cites Gaume-Mahn 1962
Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
Phase composition1473.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.999744, Mo 2.560e-4; L: Ce 0.999744, Mo 2.560e-4
experimental[1] Chan 2010
cites Gaume-Mahn 1962
Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
Phase composition1473.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.999758, Mo 2.420e-4; L: Ce 0.999758, Mo 2.420e-4
model[1] Chan 2010Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
Phase composition1573.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.999345, Mo 6.550e-4; L: Ce 0.999345, Mo 6.550e-4
model[1] Chan 2010Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report
Phase composition1573.15liquid + L
liquid: Ce 0.99708, Mo 0.00292; L: Ce 0.99708, Mo 0.00292
experimental[1] Chan 2010
cites Daane 1954
Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Wren Chan, Michael C. Gao, Ömer N. Doğan, Paul King, Thermodynamic Assessment of Mo-Ce and Mo-Y Systems, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 31, 414-420 (2010). doi:10.1007/s11669-010-9753-1