Ce system

27 accepted literature values from 7 paper(s) (experimental 9, model 5, DFT 4, unspecified 9); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	9
model	5
DFT	4
unspecified	9

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
phase transition	2
mixing / partial	2
crystal structure	23

Other properties

Phase transition (2)

Phase transition, Ce system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Phase transition	1001 K	1001	polymorphic: fcc↔bcc	model	[1] Mattern 2014 cites Massalski 1990	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
Phase transition	1071 K	1071	other: bcc-Ce	unspecified	[1] Mattern 2014 cites Gschneidner 1999 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report

Mixing / partial (2)

Mixing / partial, Ce system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	0 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 1	model	[2] Gröbner 2004	Table VIII, p. 11, row 2 report
Enthalpy of mixing printed: ΔH	0 kJ/mol-atom	1923.15	liquid alloy: Ce 1	experimental	[2] Gröbner 2004 cites Ryss 1977	Table VIII, p. 11, row 1 report

Crystal structure (23)

Crystal structure, Ce system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	5.15 Å	298.15	(γ Ce) alloy: Ce 1	experimental	[3] Peng 2011 cites Pavlov 1967	Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report
Lattice a	4.12 Å	298.15	(δ Ce) alloy: Ce 1	experimental	[3] Peng 2011 cites Spedding 1961 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report
Lattice a	4.85 Å	298.15	αCe alloy: Ce 1	unspecified	[4] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
Lattice a	4.85 Å	298.15	αCe αCe: Ce 1	unspecified	[5] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
Lattice a	3.681 Å	298.15	βCe βCe: Ce 1	unspecified	[5] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Lattice a	3.681 Å	298.15	βCe alloy: Ce 1	unspecified	[4] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
Lattice a	5.161 not_printed	298.15	γ(Ce)	experimental	[6] Premović 2017 cites Beaudry 1974 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
Lattice a	5.161 Å	298.15	γCe alloy: Ce 1	unspecified	[4] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 4 report
Lattice a	4.12 not_printed	298.15	δ(Ce) alloy: Ce 1	model	[6] Premović 2017 cites Massalski 1990	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
Lattice a	4.12 Å	298.15	δCe alloy: Ce 1	unspecified	[4] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report
Lattice b	5.161 not_printed	298.15	γ(Ce)	experimental	[6] Premović 2017 cites Beaudry 1974 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
Lattice b	4.12 not_printed	298.15	δ(Ce) alloy: Ce 1	model	[6] Premović 2017 cites Massalski 1990	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
Lattice c	11.857 Å	298.15	βCe βCe: Ce 1	unspecified	[5] Moustaine 2016 cites LomelloeTafin 2006	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Lattice c	11.857 Å	298.15	βCe alloy: Ce 1	unspecified	[4] Dong 2013	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
Lattice c	5.161 not_printed	298.15	γ(Ce)	experimental	[6] Premović 2017 cites Beaudry 1974 doi	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
Lattice c	4.12 not_printed	298.15	δ(Ce) alloy: Ce 1	model	[6] Premović 2017 cites Massalski 1990	Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report
lattice unspecified axis printed: Calculated lattice parameter	3.759 Å		bcc alloy: Ce 1	DFT	[7] Zhang 2008	Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report
lattice unspecified axis printed: Lattice parameter	3.756 Å	1041	Ce alloy: Ce 1	DFT	[7] Zhang 2008	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
lattice unspecified axis printed: Lattice parameter	4.11 Å	1041	Ce alloy: Ce 1	experimental	[7] Zhang 2008 cites Koskenmaki 1981	Table 1, p. 2, row 4 report
lattice unspecified axis printed: Lattice parameter	4.11 Å	1041	Ce (with magnetic) alloy: Ce 1	experimental	[7] Zhang 2008 cites Koskenmaki 1981	Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report
lattice unspecified axis printed: Lattice parameter	3.759 Å	1041	Ce (with magnetic) alloy: Ce 1	DFT	[7] Zhang 2008	Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report
lattice unspecified axis printed: Calculated lattice parameter	3.756 Å	1041	bcc alloy: Ce 1	DFT	[7] Zhang 2008	Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report
lattice unspecified axis printed: Lattice parameter	4.11 Å	1041	bcc alloy: Ce 1	experimental	[7] Zhang 2008 cites Koskenmaki 1981	Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

N. Mattern, Y. Yokoyama, A. Mizuno, J.H. Han, O. Fabrichnaya, H. Wendrock et al., Experimental and thermodynamic assessment of the Ce–Zr system, Calphad 46, 213-219 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.05.002
Joachim Gröbner, Djordje Mirković, Rainer Schmid-Fetzer, Thermodynamic aspects of the constitution, grain refining, and solidification enthalpies of Al-Ce-Si alloys, Metall Mater Trans A 35, 3349-3362 (2004). doi:10.1007/s11661-004-0172-y
Yingbiao Peng, Yong Du, Lijun Zhang, Chunsheng Sha, Shuhong Liu, Feng Zheng et al., Thermodynamic modeling of the C–RE (RE=La, Ce and Pr) systems, Calphad 35, 533-541 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.09.002
H.Q. Dong, X.M. Tao, T. Laurila, V. Vuorinen, M. Paulasto-Kröckel, Thermodynamic modeling of Au–Ce–Sn ternary system, Calphad 42, 38-50 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.07.013
D. Moustaine, K. Mahdouk, Thermodynamic reassessment of the cerium gold binary system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 683, 599-609 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.116
Milena Premović, Yong Du, Fan Zhang, Bo Sundman, Duško Minić, Biao Hu, Phase equilibria in the ternary B-Ce-Cu system with a thermodynamic reassessment of the binary B-Ce system, Thermochimica Acta 657, 185-196 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.tca.2017.10.006
Hui Zhang, Yi Wang, Shunli Shang, Long-Qing Chen, Zi-Kui Liu, Thermodynamic modeling of Mg–Ca–Ce system by combining first-principles and CALPHAD method, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 463, 294-301 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.09.020

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}