Cu–Tl system

103 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 94, model 9); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 3 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (4) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental94
model9
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
phase equilibrium30
mixing / partial25
activity / EMF / Gibbs energy48

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
CuTl-04Che-LB.tdbP.-Y. Chevalier, unpublished, 2004.83fa28481f84d4bfbb2853844901863cbcdf10fd43d71aa01e4a00a71c74467dviewer · TDB · JSON
CuTl-89Che.tdbP.-Y. Chevalier, Thermochim. Acta, 156, 383-92(1989). doi:10.1016/0040-6031(89)87205-3d1f4279261a86a0f397d0dcd2bf5cc8354499299b5255fbd4e0c15b17ab37e3cviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
CuTl-04Che-LB.tdb1240.3FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 0.00261) + LIQUID#2 (x(Tl) 0.1539) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.83101)
CuTl-04Che-LB.tdb576.71FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.99956) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 0.99999)
CuTl-04Che-LB.tdb576.71FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.99956) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 0.99999)
CuTl-04Che-LB.tdb576.71FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.99956) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 0.99999)
CuTl-04Che-LB.tdb507FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 0) + HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 1)
CuTl-04Che-LB.tdb507FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 1) + HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 1)
CuTl-04Che-LB.tdb507FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 1) + HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 1)
CuTl-89Che.tdb1243.21FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 0.00264) + LIQUID#2 (x(Tl) 0.14916) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.82922)
CuTl-89Che.tdb576.5FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.99924) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 0.99999)
CuTl-89Che.tdb576.5FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 1.000e-5) + LIQUID (x(Tl) 0.99924) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 0.99999)
CuTl-89Che.tdb507FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 0) + HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 1)
CuTl-89Che.tdb507FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 1) + HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 1)
CuTl-89Che.tdb507FCC_A1 (x(Tl) 0) + BCC_A2 (x(Tl) 1) + HCP_A3 (x(Tl) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CuTl-89Che

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (30)

Phase equilibrium, Cu–Tl system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase composition577L2 + f.c.c.
L2: Cu 0.001, Tl 0.999; f.c.c.: Cu 0.99995, Tl 5.000e-5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hansen 1958
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
Phase composition673L2 + f.c.c.
L2: Cu 0.003, Tl 0.997; f.c.c.: Cu 0.9999, Tl 1.000e-4
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hansen 1958
Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
Phase composition773L2 + f.c.c.
L2: Cu 0.008, Tl 0.992; f.c.c.: Cu 0.9998, Tl 2.000e-4
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hansen 1958
Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
Phase composition873L2 + f.c.c.
L2: Cu 0.013, Tl 0.987; f.c.c.: Cu 0.9997, Tl 3.000e-4
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hansen 1958
Table 1, p. 2, row 12
report
Phase composition973L2 + f.c.c.
L2: Cu 0.028, Tl 0.972; f.c.c.: Cu 0.9995, Tl 5.000e-4
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hansen 1958
Table 1, p. 2, row 13
report
Phase composition1073L2 + f.c.c.
L2: Cu 0.048, Tl 0.952; f.c.c.: Cu 0.99905, Tl 9.500e-4
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hansen 1958
Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
Phase composition1173L2 + f.c.c.
L2: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9; f.c.c.: Cu 0.9979, Tl 0.0021
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hansen 1958
Table 1, p. 2, row 15
report
Phase composition1235L1 + f.c.c.
L1: Cu 0.86, Tl 0.14; f.c.c.: Cu 0.99744, Tl 0.00256
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Doerinckel 1906
Table 1, p. 2, row 1
report
Phase composition1241L1 + f.c.c.
L1: Cu 0.878, Tl 0.122; f.c.c.: Cu 0.99741, Tl 0.00259
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Doerinckel 1906
Table 1, p. 2, row 2
report
Phase composition1241L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.17, Tl 0.83; L1: Cu 0.855, Tl 0.145
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Johnen 1955
Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
Phase composition1241L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.1703, Tl 0.8297; L1: Cu 0.855, Tl 0.145
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 17
report
Phase composition1241L2 + f.c.c.
L2: Cu 0.17, Tl 0.83; f.c.c.: Cu 0.99741, Tl 0.00259
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hansen 1958
Table 1, p. 2, row 16
report
Phase composition1253L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.188, Tl 0.812; L1: Cu 0.852, Tl 0.148
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Johnen 1955
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
Phase composition1273L1 + f.c.c.
L1: Cu 0.928, Tl 0.072; f.c.c.: Cu 0.99725, Tl 0.00275
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Doerinckel 1906
Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
Phase composition1308L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.2, Tl 0.8; L1: Cu 0.8, Tl 0.2
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 18
report
Phase composition1313L1 + f.c.c.
L1: Cu 0.965, Tl 0.035; f.c.c.: Cu 0.99829, Tl 0.00171
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Doerinckel 1906
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
Phase composition1313L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.207, Tl 0.793; L1: Cu 0.787, Tl 0.213
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 19
report
Phase composition1343L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.235, Tl 0.765; L1: Cu 0.74, Tl 0.26
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 20
report
Phase composition1353L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.262, Tl 0.738; L1: Cu 0.832, Tl 0.168
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Johnen 1955
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
Phase composition1373L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.244, Tl 0.756; L1: Cu 0.737, Tl 0.263
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 21
report
Phase composition1373L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.255, Tl 0.745; L1: Cu 0.83, Tl 0.17
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Johnen 1955
Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
Phase composition1418L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.317, Tl 0.683; L1: Cu 0.69, Tl 0.31
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 22
report
Phase composition1423L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.314, Tl 0.686; L1: Cu 0.69, Tl 0.31
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 23
report
Phase composition1458L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.348, Tl 0.652; L1: Cu 0.655, Tl 0.345
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 24
report
Phase composition1483L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.389, Tl 0.611; L1: Cu 0.627, Tl 0.373
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 25
report
Phase composition1491L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.4, Tl 0.6; L1: Cu 0.611, Tl 0.389
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 26
report
Phase composition1498L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.409, Tl 0.591; L1: Cu 0.596, Tl 0.404
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 27
report
Phase composition1513L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.451, Tl 0.549; L1: Cu 0.556, Tl 0.444
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 28
report
Phase composition1523L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5; L1: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 29
report
Phase composition1523.15L2 + L1
L2: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5; L1: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 30
report

Mixing / partial (25)

Mixing / partial, Cu–Tl system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
8.368 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.3, Tl 0.7
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 11
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
7.975 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.597, Tl 0.403
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 7
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
6.619 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.3, Tl 0.7
model[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 2, p. 3, row 23
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
4.552 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.2, Tl 0.8
model[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 2, p. 3, row 24
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
5.569 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.703, Tl 0.297
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 5
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
8.632 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 9
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
4.837 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.25, Tl 0.75
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 13
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
8.368 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.547, Tl 0.453
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 8
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
6.276 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.8, Tl 0.2
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 3
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
7.063 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.695, Tl 0.305
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 6
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
5.1 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.797, Tl 0.203
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 4
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
2.272 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
model[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 2, p. 3, row 25
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
6.014 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.3, Tl 0.7
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 12
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
2.615 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.903, Tl 0.097
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
8.176 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.6, Tl 0.4
model[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 2, p. 3, row 20
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
3.269 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 15
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
5.079 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.8, Tl 0.2
model[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 2, p. 3, row 18
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
6.95 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.7, Tl 0.3
model[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 2, p. 3, row 19
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
8.577 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
model[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 2, p. 3, row 21
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
4.446 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.2, Tl 0.8
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 14
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
2.707 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.9, Tl 0.1
model[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 2, p. 3, row 17
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
2.092 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 16
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
7.976 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.398, Tl 0.602
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 10
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
1.439 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.922, Tl 0.078
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Predel 1969 doi
Table 2, p. 3, row 1
report
Enthalpy of mixing
printed: δH
8.075 kJ/mol-atomliquid
alloy: Cu 0.4, Tl 0.6
model[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 2, p. 3, row 22
report

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (48)

Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy, Cu–Tl system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Activity Cu
printed: aCu
0.81 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.4, Tl 0.6
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 6
report
Activity Cu
printed: aCu
0.86 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.7, Tl 0.3
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 3
report
Activity Cu
printed: aCu
0.879 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.8, Tl 0.2
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 2
report
Activity Cu
printed: aCu
0.561 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.2, Tl 0.8
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 8
report
Activity Cu
printed: aCu
0.855 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.6, Tl 0.4
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 4
report
Activity Cu
printed: aCu
0.922 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.9, Tl 0.1
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 1
report
Activity Cu
printed: aCu
0.847 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 5
report
Activity Cu
printed: aCu
0.316 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 9
report
Activity Cu
printed: aCu
0.723 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.3, Tl 0.7
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 7
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.917 11273liquid
alloy: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 6
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.889 11273liquid
alloy: Cu 0.874, Tl 0.126
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 3
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.93 11273liquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 10
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.903 11373liquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 11
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.847 11373liquid
alloy: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 7
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.778 11373liquid
alloy: Cu 0.874, Tl 0.126
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 4
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.875 11373liquid
alloy: Cu 0.2, Tl 0.8
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 9
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.528 11373liquid
alloy: Cu 0.944, Tl 0.056
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 1
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.936 11473liquid
alloy: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 8
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.888 11473liquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 12
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.625 11473liquid
alloy: Cu 0.874, Tl 0.126
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 5
report
Activity Tl
printed: a_Tl
0.411 11473liquid
alloy: Cu 0.944, Tl 0.056
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Yazawa 1948
Table 3, p. 4, row 2
report
Activity Tl
printed: αTl
0.713 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.4, Tl 0.6
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 6
report
Activity Tl
printed: αTl
0.672 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.7, Tl 0.3
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 3
report
Activity Tl
printed: αTl
0.628 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.8, Tl 0.2
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 2
report
Activity Tl
printed: αTl
0.821 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.2, Tl 0.8
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 8
report
Activity Tl
printed: αTl
0.68 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.6, Tl 0.4
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 4
report
Activity Tl
printed: αTl
0.468 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.9, Tl 0.1
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 1
report
Activity Tl
printed: αTl
0.688 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 5
report
Activity Tl
printed: αTl
0.904 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 9
report
Activity Tl
printed: αTl
0.757 11573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.3, Tl 0.7
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 7
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGTl
-4427 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.4, Tl 0.6
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 6
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGCu
-2761 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.4, Tl 0.6
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 6
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGCu
-1971 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.7, Tl 0.3
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 3
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGTl
-5188 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.7, Tl 0.3
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 3
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGCu
-1695 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.8, Tl 0.2
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 2
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGTl
-6079 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.8, Tl 0.2
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 2
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGCu
-7552 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.2, Tl 0.8
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 8
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGTl
-2577 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.2, Tl 0.8
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 8
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGCu
-2046 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.6, Tl 0.4
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 4
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGTl
-5042 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.6, Tl 0.4
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 4
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGCu
-1067 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.9, Tl 0.1
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 1
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGTl
-9916 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.9, Tl 0.1
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 1
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGTl
-4891 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 5
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGCu
-2176 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.5, Tl 0.5
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 5
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGCu
-15054 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 9
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGTl
-1322 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.1, Tl 0.9
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 9
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGCu
-4247 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.3, Tl 0.7
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 7
report
Chemical potential
printed: δGTl
-3648 unknown1573liquid
alloy: Cu 0.3, Tl 0.7
experimental[1] Chevalier 1989
cites Hultgren 1973
Table 4, p. 4, row 7
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. P.-Y. Chevalier, A thermodynamic evaluation of the Cu-TI system, Thermochimica Acta 156, 383-392 (1989). doi:10.1016/0040-6031(89)87205-3