Cu–Zn system
242 accepted literature values from 5 paper(s) (experimental 188, model 54); 6 calculated phase diagram(s). 2 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (11) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 188 |
| model | 54 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 66 |
| activity / EMF / Gibbs energy | 176 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | N. David, J.-M. Fiorani, M. Vilasi, J. Hertz, J. Phase Equilib., 24, 240-48(2003). doi:10.1361/105497103770330541 | 4fa0e63708a02b1f08b44bbb0138c308e8146cf2005b55046a1175cb027fb861 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | M. Jiang, C.P. Wang, X.J. Liu, I. Ohnuma, R. Kainuma, G.P. Vassilev, K. Ishida, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 66, 246-50(2005). doi:10.1016/j.jpcs.2004.08.039 | 00e6afc14ff2edb662983d71abb180d545de5bb8da2b30ab4c014c54706d57bb | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuZn-08Gie.tdb | W. Gierlotka, S.-W. Chen, J. Mater. Res., 23, 258-63(2008). | 6a3bb3f347ded5af8287b69c053e9a879351f5c2da1b3e7f4bc4de0edf6c3f02 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuZn-11Wan.tdb | J. Wang, H. Xu, S. Shang, L. Zhang, Y. Du, W. Zhang, S. Liu, P. Wang, Z.-K. Liu, Calphad, 35, 191-203(2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.02.001 | 1bc8b8df311a816df1eb49c7b294654f7b0f075fc7a2e1dc7329a636d77da462 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuZn-15Lia.tdb | S.-M. Liang, H.-M. Hsiao, R. Schmid-Fetzer, Calphad, 51, 224-32(2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2015.09.010 | 0e2862d7621854ca4f4d3510c3ea45abe1545ec991384f906d91907b8bbbc841 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | M. Kowalski, P.J. Spencer, J. Phase Equilib., 14, 432-38 (1993). doi:10.1007/BF02671961 | 199a279ec633d57b71ade6e126e576930508f1242924f8345e7aaaf7c21d59b6 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TDB file | T (K) | Phases at the invariant |
|---|---|---|
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 1174.59 | FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.31844) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.35076) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.37169) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 1174.59 | FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.31844) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.35076) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.37169) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 1110.03 | B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.57171) + CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.59871) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.60587) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 1110.03 | BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.57171) + CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.59871) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.60587) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 973.25 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.6887) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.72538) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.81957) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 973.25 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.6887) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.72538) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.81957) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 871.93 | B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.77259) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.79549) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.89233) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 871.93 | BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.77259) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.79549) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.89233) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 832.94 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.69017) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.74296) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.77614) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 832.94 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.69017) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.74296) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.77614) |
| CuZn-03Dav.tdb | 698.02 | HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.87388) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.97563) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.98345) |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | 1175.3 | FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.31859) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.35313) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.37338) |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | 1107.65 | B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.55955) + CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.58845) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.59355) |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | 972.31 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.671) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.71922) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.80263) |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | 972.31 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.671) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.71922) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.80263) |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | 873.38 | B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.773) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.79204) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.8819) |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | 873.38 | BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.773) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.79204) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.8819) |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | 839.22 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.68937) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.75208) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.77893) |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | 839.22 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.68937) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.75208) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.77893) |
| CuZn-05Jia.tdb | 694.44 | HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.87433) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.98109) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.98318) |
| CuZn-08Gie.tdb | 1172.57 | FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.31941) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.35417) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.37496) |
| CuZn-08Gie.tdb | 1107.39 | BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.55772) + CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.5859) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.59344) |
| CuZn-08Gie.tdb | 976.25 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.67725) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.71831) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.80383) |
| CuZn-08Gie.tdb | 873.35 | BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.77298) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.79205) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.88293) |
| CuZn-08Gie.tdb | 831.95 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.69326) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.74853) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.77678) |
| CuZn-08Gie.tdb | 735.89 | BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.49055) + CUZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.49127) + CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.56083) |
| CuZn-08Gie.tdb | 733.56 | FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.3865) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.4446) + CUZN_B2 (x(Zn) 0.44532) |
| CuZn-08Gie.tdb | 692.27 | HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.87434) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.97975) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.98126) |
| CuZn-11Wan.tdb | 1175.13 | FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.32799) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.36208) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.38497) |
| CuZn-11Wan.tdb | 1107.88 | B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.55209) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.58996) + CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.5908) |
| CuZn-11Wan.tdb | 964.66 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.6692) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.72203) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.8068) |
| CuZn-11Wan.tdb | 874.39 | B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.77179) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.791) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.87765) |
| CuZn-11Wan.tdb | 837.31 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.68686) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.75049) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.77784) |
| CuZn-11Wan.tdb | 693.52 | HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.87427) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.98115) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.98127) |
| CuZn-15Lia.tdb | 1174.97 | FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.31892) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.36626) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.37338) |
| CuZn-15Lia.tdb | 1105.86 | B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.55135) + GAMMA_D82 (x(Zn) 0.59561) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.5959) |
| CuZn-15Lia.tdb | 973.57 | GAMMA_D82 (x(Zn) 0.68417) + CUZN3 (x(Zn) 0.71775) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.80283) |
| CuZn-15Lia.tdb | 871.66 | CUZN3 (x(Zn) 0.767) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.79234) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.87772) |
| CuZn-15Lia.tdb | 832.96 | GAMMA_D82 (x(Zn) 0.7001) + CUZN3 (x(Zn) 0.74645) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.77574) |
| CuZn-15Lia.tdb | 698.32 | HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.87489) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.97335) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.98122) |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | 1175.3 | FCC_A1 (x(Zn) 0.31859) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.35313) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.37338) |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | 1108.35 | B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.55798) + CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.58602) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.59174) |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | 972.29 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.67775) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.71923) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.80265) |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | 972.29 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.67775) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.71923) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.80265) |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | 873.38 | BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.773) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.79204) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.8819) |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | 873.38 | B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.773) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.79204) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.8819) |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | 831.95 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.69326) + BCC_A2 (x(Zn) 0.74853) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.7768) |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | 831.95 | CU5ZN8_D82 (x(Zn) 0.69326) + B2_BCC (x(Zn) 0.74853) + HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.7768) |
| CuZn-93Kow-LB.tdb | 694.44 | HCP_IM_A3 (x(Zn) 0.87433) + HCP_A3 (x(Zn) 0.98109) + LIQUID (x(Zn) 0.98318) |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull CuZn-03Dav · CALPHAD hull CuZn-05Jia · CALPHAD hull CuZn-08Gie · CALPHAD hull CuZn-11Wan · CALPHAD hull CuZn-93Kow-LB
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1176 | L + α = β | L: Zn 0.368; α: Zn 0.319; β: Zn 0.361 | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 2, p. 3, row 1 report | |
| 1176 | (Cu) + L ↔ β | β: Zn 0.353 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Kowalski 1993 doi | Table II, p. 2, row 2 report | |
| 1176 | peritectic: (Cu) + L -> β | (Cu): Zn 0.319; β: Zn 0.361; L: Zn 0.368 | experimental | [3] Kowalski 1993 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 1, p. 1, row 1 report | |
| 1176 | peritectic: (Cu) + L -> β | (Cu): Zn 0.319; β: Zn 0.353; L: Zn 0.373 | model | [3] Kowalski 1993 | Table 1, p. 1, row 2 report | |
| 1176 | L + α = β | L: Zn 0.384; α: Zn 0.327; β: Zn 0.361 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 2, p. 3, row 2 report | |
| 1175.3 | peritectic: Liquid + fcc-A1 -> bcc-A2 | Liquid: Zn 0.373; fcc-A1: Zn 0.319; bcc-A2: Zn 0.353 | model | [4] (ed.) 1998 | Table I, p. 206, row 1 report | |
| 1175 | peritectic: α + L ↔ β | α: Zn 0.319; L: Zn 0.372; β: Zn 0.351 | model | [5] David 2003 | Table 1, p. 2, row 2 report | |
| 1175 | (Cu) + L ↔ β | (Cu): Zn 0.361 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Massalski 1986 | Table II, p. 2, row 1 report | |
| 1175 | peritectic: α + L ↔ β | α: Zn 0.319; L: Zn 0.368; β: Zn 0.361 | model | [5] David 2003 cites Miodownik 1994 | Table 1, p. 2, row 1 report | |
| 1174 | (Cu) + L ↔ β | β: Zn 0.354 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 3 report | |
| 1173 | (Cu) + L ↔ β | β: Zn 0.358 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 4 report | |
| 1110 | peritectic: β + L ↔ γ | β: Zn 0.572; L: Zn 0.606; γ: Zn 0.599 | model | [5] David 2003 | Table 1, p. 2, row 4 report | |
| 1108.3 | peritectic: Liquid + bcc-A2 -> CuZn-γ | Liquid: Zn 0.592; bcc-A2: Zn 0.558; CuZn-γ: Zn 0.586 | model | [4] (ed.) 1998 | Table I, p. 206, row 2 report | |
| 1108 | peritectic: β + L -> γ | β: Zn 0.558; γ: Zn 0.591; L: Zn 0.591 | experimental | [3] Kowalski 1993 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 1, p. 1, row 3 report | |
| 1108 | β + L ↔ γ | γ: Zn 0.586 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Kowalski 1993 doi | Table II, p. 2, row 6 report | |
| 1108 | L + β = γ | L: Zn 0.592; β: Zn 0.554; γ: Zn 0.591 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 2, p. 3, row 4 report | |
| 1108 | peritectic: β + L -> γ | β: Zn 0.558; γ: Zn 0.586; L: Zn 0.592 | model | [3] Kowalski 1993 | Table 1, p. 1, row 4 report | |
| 1108 | L + β = γ | L: Zn 0.591; β: Zn 0.558; γ: Zn 0.586 | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 2, p. 3, row 3 report | |
| 1107 | peritectic: β + L ↔ γ | β: Zn 0.558; L: Zn 0.591; γ: Zn 0.591 | model | [5] David 2003 cites Miodownik 1994 | Table 1, p. 2, row 3 report | |
| 1107 | β + L ↔ γ | γ: Zn 0.587 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 8 report | |
| 1107 | β + L ↔ γ | γ: Zn 0.585 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 7 report | |
| 1107 | β + L ↔ γ | β: Zn 0.591; γ: Zn 0.615385 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Massalski 1986 | Table II, p. 2, row 5 report | |
| 976 | γ + L ↔ δ | γ: Zn 0.615385; δ: Zn 0.72 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 12 report | |
| 973 | peritectic: γ + L ↔ δ | γ: Zn 0.689; L: Zn 0.82; δ: Zn 0.725 | model | [5] David 2003 | Table 1, p. 2, row 6 report | |
| 973 | γ + L ↔ δ | γ: Zn 0.724 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 11 report | |
| 973 | γ + L ↔ δ | γ: Zn 0.724 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Massalski 1986 | Table II, p. 2, row 9 report | |
| 973 | L + γ = δ | L: Zn 0.8; γ: Zn 0.692; δ: Zn 0.724 | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 2, p. 3, row 5 report | |
| 973 | peritectic: γ + L ↔ δ | γ: Zn 0.692; L: Zn 0.798; δ: Zn 0.7245 | model | [5] David 2003 cites Miodownik 1994 | Table 1, p. 2, row 5 report | |
| 973 | peritectic: γ + L -> δ | γ: Zn 0.692; δ: Zn 0.724; L: Zn 0.8 | experimental | [3] Kowalski 1993 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 1, p. 1, row 5 report | |
| 973 | peritectic: γ + L -> δ | γ: Zn 0.678; δ: Zn 0.719; L: Zn 0.802 | model | [3] Kowalski 1993 | Table 1, p. 1, row 6 report | |
| 973 | γ + L ↔ δ | γ: Zn 0.615385; δ: Zn 0.719 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Kowalski 1993 doi | Table II, p. 2, row 10 report | |
| 972.5 | peritectic: Liquid + CuZn-γ -> bcc-A2 | Liquid: Zn 0.802; CuZn-γ: Zn 0.678; bcc-A2: Zn 0.719 | model | [4] (ed.) 1998 | Table I, p. 206, row 3 report | |
| 972 | L + γ = δ | L: Zn 0.801; γ: Zn 0.669; δ: Zn 0.72 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 2, p. 3, row 6 report | |
| 873.4 | peritectic: Liquid + bcc-A2 -> hcp-A3 | Liquid: Zn 0.882; bcc-A2: Zn 0.773; hcp-A3: Zn 0.792 | model | [4] (ed.) 1998 | Table I, p. 206, row 4 report | |
| 873 | L + δ = ϵ | L: Zn 0.88; δ: Zn 0.77; ϵ: Zn 0.781 | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 2, p. 3, row 7 report | |
| 873 | δ + L ↔ ϵ | ϵ: Zn 0.792 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Kowalski 1993 doi | Table II, p. 2, row 14 report | |
| 873 | peritectic: δ + L -> ε | δ: Zn 0.773; ε: Zn 0.792; L: Zn 0.882 | model | [3] Kowalski 1993 | Table 1, p. 1, row 8 report | |
| 873 | δ + L ↔ ϵ | ϵ: Zn 0.792 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 16 report | |
| 872 | δ + L ↔ ϵ | ϵ: Zn 0.792 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 15 report | |
| 872 | peritectic: δ + L ↔ ε | δ: Zn 0.773; L: Zn 0.892; ε: Zn 0.795 | model | [5] David 2003 | Table 1, p. 2, row 8 report | |
| 872 | L + δ = ϵ | L: Zn 0.881; δ: Zn 0.775; ϵ: Zn 0.793 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 2, p. 3, row 8 report | |
| 871 | peritectic: δ + L ↔ ε | δ: Zn 0.76; L: Zn 0.879; ε: Zn 0.78 | model | [5] David 2003 cites Miodownik 1994 | Table 1, p. 2, row 7 report | |
| 871 | peritectic: δ + L -> ε | δ: Zn 0.76; ε: Zn 0.781; L: Zn 0.88 | experimental | [3] Kowalski 1993 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 1, p. 1, row 7 report | |
| 871 | δ + L ↔ ϵ | δ: Zn 0.781 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Massalski 1986 | Table II, p. 2, row 13 report | |
| 834 | δ = γ + ϵ | δ: Zn 0.751; γ: Zn 0.687; ϵ: Zn 0.778 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 2, p. 3, row 10 report | |
| 833 | δ + γ ↔ ϵ | δ: Zn 0.74; γ: Zn 0.615385 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Massalski 1986 | Table II, p. 2, row 21 report | |
| 833 | other: δ ↔ γ + ε | δ: Zn 0.743; γ: Zn 0.69; ε: Zn 0.776 | model | [5] David 2003 | Table 1, p. 2, row 10 report | |
| 833 | other: δ ↔ γ + ε | δ: Zn 0.735; γ: Zn 0.7; ε: Zn 0.78 | model | [5] David 2003 cites Miodownik 1994 | Table 1, p. 2, row 9 report | |
| 832 | δ + γ ↔ ϵ | δ: Zn 0.749; γ: Zn 0.615385 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Kowalski 1993 doi | Table II, p. 2, row 22 report | |
| 832 | δ + γ ↔ ϵ | δ: Zn 0.748; γ: Zn 0.615385 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 23 report | |
| 832 | δ + γ ↔ ϵ | δ: Zn 0.749; γ: Zn 0.615385 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 24 report | |
| 832 | eutectoid: δ -> γ + ε | γ: Zn 0.693; δ: Zn 0.749; ε: Zn 0.777 | model | [3] Kowalski 1993 | Table 1, p. 1, row 12 report | |
| 832 | δ = γ + ϵ | δ: Zn 0.748; γ: Zn 0.7; ϵ: Zn 0.78 | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 2, p. 3, row 9 report | |
| 831.9 | eutectoid: bcc-A2 -> CuZn-γ + hcp-A3 | bcc-A2: Zn 0.748; CuZn-γ: Zn 0.693; hcp-A3: Zn 0.777 | model | [4] (ed.) 1998 | Table I, p. 206, row 5 report | |
| 831 | eutectoid: δ -> γ + ε | γ: Zn 0.7; δ: Zn 0.74; ε: Zn 0.78 | experimental | [3] Kowalski 1993 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 1, p. 1, row 11 report | |
| 698 | peritectic: ε + L ↔ η | ε: Zn 0.88; L: Zn 0.9825; η: Zn 0.9717 | model | [5] David 2003 cites Miodownik 1994 | Table 1, p. 2, row 11 report | |
| 698 | ϵ + L ↔ (Zn) | ϵ: Zn 0.972 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Massalski 1986 | Table II, p. 2, row 17 report | |
| 698 | peritectic: ε + L ↔ η | ε: Zn 0.874; L: Zn 0.9835; η: Zn 0.976 | model | [5] David 2003 | Table 1, p. 2, row 12 report | |
| 697 | peritectic: ε + L -> (Zn) | ε: Zn 0.872; (Zn): Zn 0.972; L: Zn 0.983 | experimental | [3] Kowalski 1993 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 1, p. 1, row 9 report | |
| 695 | peritectic: ε + L -> (Zn) | ε: Zn 0.875; (Zn): Zn 0.981; L: Zn 0.983 | model | [3] Kowalski 1993 | Table 1, p. 1, row 10 report | |
| 695 | ϵ + L ↔ (Zn) | (Zn): Zn 0.981 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 cites Kowalski 1993 doi | Table II, p. 2, row 18 report | |
| 695 | L + ϵ = (Zn) | L: Zn 0.983; ϵ: Zn 0.872; (Zn): Zn 0.972 | experimental | [1] Wang 2011 cites Massalski 1986 | Table 2, p. 3, row 11 report | |
| 694.4 | peritectic: Liquid + hcp-A3 -> hcp-Zn | Liquid: Zn 0.983; hcp-A3: Zn 0.874; hcp-Zn: Zn 0.981 | model | [4] (ed.) 1998 | Table I, p. 206, row 6 report | |
| 694 | L + ϵ = (Zn) | L: Zn 0.982; ϵ: Zn 0.874; (Zn): Zn 0.981 | model | [1] Wang 2011 | Table 2, p. 3, row 12 report | |
| 692 | ϵ + L ↔ (Zn) | (Zn): Zn 0.983 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 20 report | |
| 692 | ϵ + L ↔ (Zn) | (Zn): Zn 0.981 | model | [2] Gierlotka 2008 | Table II, p. 2, row 19 report |
Other properties
Activity / EMF / Gibbs energy (176)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMF printed: emf | 0.645 mV | 668 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 174 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.63 mV | 668 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 171 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.62 mV | 668 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 172 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.64 mV | 668 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 175 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.77 mV | 668 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 173 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.77 mV | 672.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 168 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.65 mV | 672.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 169 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.62 mV | 672.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 167 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.64 mV | 672.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 170 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.64 mV | 672.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 166 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.66 mV | 677.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 165 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.63 mV | 677.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 162 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.64 mV | 677.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 161 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.66 mV | 677.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 164 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.78 mV | 677.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 163 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.65 mV | 682.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 157 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.645 mV | 682.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 156 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.68 mV | 682.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 159 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.79 mV | 682.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 158 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.685 mV | 682.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 160 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.65 mV | 687.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 154 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.67 mV | 687.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 152 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.71 mV | 687.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 155 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.8 mV | 687.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 153 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.65 mV | 687.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 151 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.78 mV | 692 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 148 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.63 mV | 692 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 146 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.7 mV | 692 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 150 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.665 mV | 692 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 147 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.67 mV | 692 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 149 report | |
| EMF printed: electromotive force | 0.6 unspecified ± 0.1 | 696 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | p. 6 report | The measured invariant point is situated at 0.6 (± 0.10) mV and 696 K. | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.6 mV | 698 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 145 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.6 mV | 698 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 142 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.6 mV | 698 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 143 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.6 mV | 698 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 144 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.6 mV | 698 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 141 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.71 mV | 701.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 137 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.67 mV | 701.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 138 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.6 mV | 701.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 140 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.6 mV | 701.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 139 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.585 mV | 701.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 136 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.65 mV | 706.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 135 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.7 mV | 706.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 133 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.76 mV | 706.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 132 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.63 mV | 706.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 131 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.645 mV | 706.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 134 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.775 mV | 710.8 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 127 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.69 mV | 710.8 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 129 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.74 mV | 710.8 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 128 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.68 mV | 710.8 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 130 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.68 mV | 710.8 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 126 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.74 mV | 715.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 124 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.87 mV | 715.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 122 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.73 mV | 715.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 125 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.795 mV | 715.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 123 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.7 mV | 715.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 121 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.845 mV | 720.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 118 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.77 mV | 720.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 120 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.92 mV | 720.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 117 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.79 mV | 720.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 119 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.71 mV | 720.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 116 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.71 mV | 725.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 111 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.97 mV | 725.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 112 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.87 mV | 725.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 114 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.9 mV | 725.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 113 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.82 mV | 725.2 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 115 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.01 mV | 730 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 107 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.96 mV | 730 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 108 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.72 mV | 730 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 106 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.87 mV | 730 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 110 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.89 mV | 730 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 109 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.05 mV | 734.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 102 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.02 mV | 734.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 103 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.72 mV | 734.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 101 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.95 mV | 734.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 104 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.92 mV | 734.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 105 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.08 mV | 739.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 98 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.96 mV | 739.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 100 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1 mV | 739.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 99 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.73 mV | 739.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 96 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.09 mV | 739.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 97 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.05 mV | 744.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 95 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.08 mV | 744.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 94 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.155 mV | 744.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 93 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.22 mV | 744.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 92 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.73 mV | 744.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 91 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.28 mV | 749.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 87 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.23 mV | 749.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 88 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.12 mV | 749.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 90 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.16 mV | 749.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 89 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.74 mV | 749.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 86 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.34 mV | 754.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 82 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.3 mV | 754.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 83 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.23 mV | 754.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 84 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.19 mV | 754.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 85 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.74 mV | 754.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 81 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.75 mV | 758.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 76 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.4 mV | 758.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 77 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.32 mV | 758.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 79 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.27 mV | 758.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 80 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.38 mV | 758.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 78 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.35 mV | 764 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 75 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.76 mV | 764 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 71 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.46 mV | 764 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 73 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.46 mV | 764 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 72 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.39 mV | 764 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 74 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.52 mV | 768.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 67 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.5 mV | 768.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 69 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.56 mV | 768.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 68 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.45 mV | 768.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 70 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.77 mV | 768.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 66 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.78 mV | 773.3 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 61 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.58 mV | 773.3 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 64 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.51 mV | 773.3 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 62 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.65 mV | 773.3 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 63 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.54 mV | 773.3 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 65 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.79 mV | 778.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 56 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.52 mV | 778.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 57 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.645 mV | 778.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 60 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.68 mV | 778.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 59 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.75 mV | 778.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 58 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.79 mV | 782.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 51 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.53 mV | 782.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 52 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.75 mV | 782.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 55 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.77 mV | 782.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 54 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.85 mV | 782.9 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 53 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.54 mV | 787.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 47 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.85 mV | 787.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 50 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.9 mV | 787.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 49 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.96 mV | 787.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 48 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.8 mV | 787.6 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 46 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.92 mV | 792.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 45 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.08 mV | 792.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 43 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.06 mV | 792.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 44 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.555 mV | 792.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 42 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.81 mV | 792.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 41 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.56 mV | 797.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 37 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.2 mV | 797.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 38 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.82 mV | 797.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 36 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.03 mV | 797.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 40 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.15 mV | 797.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 39 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.57 mV | 802.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 32 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.33 mV | 802.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 33 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.83 mV | 802.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 31 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.19 mV | 802.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 35 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.27 mV | 802.1 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 34 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.57 mV | 807 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 27 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.5 mV | 807 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 28 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.35 mV | 807 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 30 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.84 mV | 807 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 26 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.44 mV | 807 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 29 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.85 mV | 811.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 21 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.58 mV | 811.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 24 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.58 mV | 811.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 22 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.52 mV | 811.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 23 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.49 mV | 811.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 25 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.59 mV | 816.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 17 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.73 mV | 816.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 19 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.53 mV | 816.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 18 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.66 mV | 816.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 20 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.855 mV | 816.5 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 16 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.82 mV | 821.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 15 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.6 mV | 821.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 12 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.86 mV | 821.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 11 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.55 mV | 821.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 13 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.88 mV | 821.4 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 14 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.61 mV | 825.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 7 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.56 mV | 825.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 8 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.985 mV | 825.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 10 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.875 mV | 825.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 6 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 3.04 mV | 825.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 9 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 1.61 mV | 830.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.04, Zn 0.96 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 2 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 0.89 mV | 830.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.02, Zn 0.98 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 1 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 3.18 mV | 830.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.1, Zn 0.9 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 5 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 3.22 mV | 830.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.08, Zn 0.92 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 4 report | |
| EMF printed: emf | 2.58 mV | 830.7 | UNKNOWN alloy: Cu 0.06, Zn 0.94 | experimental | [5] David 2003 | Table 2, p. 2, row 3 report |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- Jiong Wang, Honghui Xu, Shunli Shang, Lijun Zhang, Yong Du, Wenqing Zhang et al., Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the Cu–Si–Zn system with the refined description for the Cu–Zn system, Calphad 35, 191-203 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2011.02.001
- Wojciech Gierlotka, Sinn-wen Chen, Thermodynamic descriptions of the Cu–Zn system, J. Mater. Res. 23, 258-263 (2008). doi:10.1557/jmr.2008.0035
- M. Kowalski, P. J. Spencer, Thermodynamic reevaluation of the Cu-Zn system, JPE 14, 432-438 (1993). doi:10.1007/bf02671961
- I. Ansara, A. T. Dinsdale, M. H. Rand (eds.), COST 507: Thermochemical database for light metal alloys, Volume 2, EUR 18499 EN, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (1998), ISBN 92-828-3902-8.
- N. David, J-M. Fiorani, M. Vilasi, J. Hertz, Thermodynamic reevaluation of the Cu-Zn system by electromotive force measurements in the zinc-rich part, JPE 24, 240-248 (2003). doi:10.1361/105497103770330541