Fe–Mn–Ti system

41 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 36, unspecified 5); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	36
unspecified	5

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
phase equilibrium	41

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (41)

Phase equilibrium, Fe–Mn–Ti system
Property	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase assemblage	1273	TiFe alloy: Fe 0.25, Mn 0.22, Ti 0.53	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Sakaki 2015 doi	Table 6, p. 9, row 7 report
Phase assemblage	1273	TiFe alloy: Fe 0.28, Mn 0.2, Ti 0.52	unspecified	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 6, p. 9, row 6 report
Phase assemblage	1273	TiFe alloy: Fe 0.25, Mn 0.22, Ti 0.53	unspecified	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 6, p. 9, row 8 report
Phase assemblage	1273	TiFe alloy: Fe 0.28, Mn 0.2, Ti 0.52	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Sakaki 2015 doi	Table 6, p. 9, row 5 report
Phase assemblage	1273	TiFe + unidentified phase alloy: Fe 0.23, Mn 0.23, Ti 0.54	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Sakaki 2015 doi	Table 6, p. 9, row 9 report
Phase assemblage	1273	TiFe + βTi alloy: Fe 0.23, Mn 0.23, Ti 0.54	unspecified	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 6, p. 9, row 10 report
Phase assemblage	1373	TiFe alloy: Fe 0.4, Mn 0.1, Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Sakaki 2015 doi	Table 6, p. 9, row 1 report
Phase assemblage	1373	TiFe + C14 Laves alloy: Fe 0.35, Mn 0.15, Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 6, p. 9, row 4 report
Phase assemblage	1373	TiFe + C14 Laves alloy: Fe 0.4, Mn 0.1, Ti 0.5	unspecified	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 6, p. 9, row 2 report
Phase assemblage	1373	TiFe + C14 Laves alloy: Fe 0.35, Mn 0.15, Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Sakaki 2015 doi	Table 6, p. 9, row 3 report
Phase composition	1273	C14 Laves + αFe C14 Laves: Fe 0.7041, Mn 0.0106, Ti 0.2853; αFe: Fe 0.942, Mn 0.0163, Ti 0.0417	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 26 report
Phase composition	1273	C14 Laves + αFe C14 Laves: Fe 0.6986, Mn 0.0146, Ti 0.2868; αFe: Fe 0.9522, Mn 0.0191, Ti 0.0287	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 30 report
Phase composition	1273	C14 Laves + αMn C14 Laves: Fe 0.5698, Mn 0.1776, Ti 0.2526; αMn: Fe 0.584, Mn 0.3032, Ti 0.1128	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 22 report
Phase composition	1273	C14 Laves + αMn C14 Laves: Fe 0.4379, Mn 0.3006, Ti 0.2615; αMn: Fe 0.3931, Mn 0.4679, Ti 0.139	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 13 report
Phase composition	1273	C14 Laves + αMn C14 Laves: Fe 0.5055, Mn 0.2453, Ti 0.2492; αMn: Fe 0.4864, Mn 0.4044, Ti 0.1092	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 16 report
Phase composition	1273	C14 Laves + γFe C14 Laves: Fe 0.6251, Mn 0.1128, Ti 0.2621; γFe: Fe 0.7693, Mn 0.1999, Ti 0.0308	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 23 report
Phase composition	1273	C14 Laves + γFe C14 Laves: Fe 0.661, Mn 0.0729, Ti 0.2661; γFe: Fe 0.8456, Mn 0.1263, Ti 0.0281	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 29 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe TiFe: Fe 0.462, Mn 0.026, Ti 0.512	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Dematteis 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 9, row 4 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe TiFe: Fe 0.475, Mn 0.025, Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Dematteis 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 9, row 3 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe TiFe: Fe 0.45, Mn 0.05, Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Dematteis 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 9, row 7 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe + C14 Laves TiFe: Fe 0.4685, Mn 0.0137, Ti 0.5178; C14 Laves: Fe 0.4997, Mn 0.1387, Ti 0.3616	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 19 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe + C14 Laves TiFe: Fe 0.4785, Mn 0.0214, Ti 0.5001; C14 Laves: Fe 0.6047, Mn 0.0557, Ti 0.3396	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Dematteis 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 9, row 2 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe + C14 Laves TiFe: Fe 0.3254, Mn 0.1675, Ti 0.5071; C14 Laves: Fe 0.2244, Mn 0.3774, Ti 0.3982	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 7 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe + C14 Laves TiFe: Fe 0.4057, Mn 0.0885, Ti 0.5058; C14 Laves: Fe 0.3671, Mn 0.2632, Ti 0.3697	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 10 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe + βTi TiFe: Fe 0.4475, Mn 0.026, Ti 0.5265; βTi: Fe 0.1969, Mn 0.0267, Ti 0.7764	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Dematteis 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 9, row 5 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe + βTi TiFe: Fe 0.4463, Mn 0.027, Ti 0.5267; βTi: Fe 0.1967, Mn 0.0273, Ti 0.776	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Dematteis 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 9, row 6 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe + βTi TiFe: Fe 0.4213, Mn 0.047, Ti 0.5317; βTi: Fe 0.17, Mn 0.05, Ti 0.78	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Dematteis 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 9, row 8 report
Phase composition	1273	TiFe + βTi TiFe: Fe 0.466, Mn 0.011, Ti 0.523; βTi: Fe 0.1999, Mn 0.0143, Ti 0.7858	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022 cites Dematteis 2021 doi	Table 7, p. 9, row 1 report
Phase composition	1273	βTi + TiFe βTi: Fe 0.192, Mn 0.0227, Ti 0.7853; TiFe: Fe 0.4452, Mn 0.0272, Ti 0.5276	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 5 report
Phase composition	1273	βTi + TiFe βTi: Fe 0.1331, Mn 0.1294, Ti 0.7375; TiFe: Fe 0.295, Mn 0.1672, Ti 0.5378	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 4 report
Phase composition	1273	βTi + TiFe βTi: Fe 0.1671, Mn 0.0698, Ti 0.7631; TiFe: Fe 0.3873, Mn 0.0829, Ti 0.5298	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 6 report
Phase composition	1273	βTi + TiFe βTi: Fe 0.1067, Mn 0.1749, Ti 0.7184; TiFe: Fe 0.2371, Mn 0.233, Ti 0.5299	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 1 report
Phase composition	1373	C14 Laves + αFe C14 Laves: Fe 0.7074, Mn 0.0073, Ti 0.2853; αFe: Fe 0.9244, Mn 0.0079, Ti 0.0677	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 27 report
Phase composition	1373	C14 Laves + αFe C14 Laves: Fe 0.7038, Mn 0.0159, Ti 0.2803; αFe: Fe 0.9127, Mn 0.0206, Ti 0.0667	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 31 report
Phase composition	1373	C14 Laves + αMn C14 Laves: Fe 0.466, Mn 0.285, Ti 0.249; αMn: Fe 0.4412, Mn 0.4185, Ti 0.1403	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 14 report
Phase composition	1373	C14 Laves + αMn C14 Laves: Fe 0.5039, Mn 0.2495, Ti 0.2466; αMn: Fe 0.4861, Mn 0.3703, Ti 0.1436	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 17 report
Phase composition	1373	C14 Laves + γFe C14 Laves: Fe 0.6252, Mn 0.1097, Ti 0.2651; γFe: Fe 0.8014, Mn 0.1717, Ti 0.0269	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 24 report
Phase composition	1373	TiFe + C14 Laves TiFe: Fe 0.3148, Mn 0.1688, Ti 0.5164; C14 Laves: Fe 0.2467, Mn 0.3121, Ti 0.4412	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 8 report
Phase composition	1373	TiFe + C14 Laves TiFe: Fe 0.4051, Mn 0.0874, Ti 0.5075; C14 Laves: Fe 0.379, Mn 0.2235, Ti 0.3975	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 11 report
Phase composition	1373	TiFe + C14 Laves TiFe: Fe 0.4534, Mn 0.0388, Ti 0.5078; C14 Laves: Fe 0.4937, Mn 0.1224, Ti 0.3839	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 20 report
Phase composition	1373	βTi + TiFe βTi: Fe 0.1606, Mn 0.1614, Ti 0.678; TiFe: Fe 0.2786, Mn 0.1857, Ti 0.5357	experimental	[1] Zheng 2022	Table 3, p. 4, row 2 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Weisen Zheng, Wei Song, Tong Wu, Jingya Wang, Yanlin He, Xiao-Gang Lu, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic modeling of the ternary Ti–Fe–Mn system for hydrogen storage applications, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 891, 161957 (2022). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161957

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}