Ga–Gd–Nb system

32 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 15, model 17); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental15
model17
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction32

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ga–Gd–Nb system (32)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2871.15monotectic: L ↔ L2 + (Nb)L: Nb 0.00898model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 43
report
2406.15peritectic: L + (Nb) ↔ GaNb3L: Nb 0.74; (Nb): Nb 0.81experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Okamoto 1990
Table 1, p. 7, row 15
report
2385.15peritectic: L + (Nb) ↔ GaNb3L: Nb 0.77; (Nb): Nb 0.84model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 16
report
2309.15eutectic: L ↔ GaNb3 + Ga3Nb5L: Nb 0.7277model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 14
report
2286.15eutectic: L ↔ GaNb3 + Ga3Nb5L: Nb 0.69experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Okamoto 1990
Table 1, p. 7, row 13
report
2087.15peritectic: L + Ga3Nb5 ↔ °Ga4Nb5L: Nb 0.39model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 2
report
2086.15peritectic: L + Ga3Nb5 ↔ °Ga4Nb5L: Nb 0.43experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Okamoto 1990
Table 1, p. 7, row 1
report
1846.15peritectic: L°+°Ga4Nb5°↔°Ga5Nb4L: Nb 0.162experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Okamoto 1990
Table 1, p. 7, row 3
report
1839.15eutectic: L +↔ (αGd) + (βNb)L: Nb 9.500e-5model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 44
report
1837.15peritectic: L°+°Ga4Nb5°↔°Ga5Nb4L: Nb 0.15model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 4
report
1831.15peritectic: L°+°Ga5Nb4°↔°ht_Ga4NbL: Nb 0.134experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Okamoto 1990
Table 1, p. 7, row 5
report
1803.15peritectic: L°+°Ga5Nb4°↔°ht_Ga4NbL: Nb 0.1145model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 6
report
1781.15metatectic/catatectic: L + (αGd) ↔ (βGd)L: Gd 0.0095experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Palenzona 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 7, row 37
report
1781.15metatectic/catatectic: L + (αGd) ↔ (βGd)L: Gd 0.00969model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 38
report
1751.15other: ht_Ga4Nb°↔°L+°Ga13Nb5L: Nb 7.500e-4experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Okamoto 1990
Table 1, p. 7, row 7
report
1741.15peritectic: L + Ga2Gd ↔ GaGdL: Gd 0.0055experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Palenzona 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 7, row 29
report
1736.15other: ht_Ga4Nb°↔°L+°Ga13Nb5L: Nb 5.500e-4model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 8
report
1731.15peritectic: L + Ga2Gd ↔ GaGdL: Gd 0.00536model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 30
report
1666.15peritectic: L + Ga13Nb5 ↔ Ga3NbL: Nb 0.045experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Okamoto 1990
Table 1, p. 7, row 9
report
1666.15peritectic: L + Ga13Nb5 ↔ Ga3NbL: Nb 0.031model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 10
report
1648.15peritectic: L + GaGd ↔ Ga2Gd3L: Gd 0.00628model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 32
report
1646.15peritectic: L + GaGd ↔ Ga2Gd3L: Gd 0.00615experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Palenzona 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 7, row 31
report
1637.15peritectic: L + Ga2Gd3 ↔ Ga3Gd5L: Gd 0.00656model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 34
report
1636.15peritectic: L + Ga2Gd3 ↔ Ga3Gd5L: Gd 0.0064experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Palenzona 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 7, row 33
report
1396.15eutectic: L ↔ Ga3Gd5 + (αGd)L: Gd 0.008experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Palenzona 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 7, row 35
report
1370.15eutectic: L ↔ Ga3Gd5 + (αGd)L: Gd 0.0085model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 36
report
679.15peritectic: L + Ga2Gd ↔ Ga6GdL: Gd 4.000e-5experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Palenzona 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 7, row 25
report
670.15peritectic: L + Ga2Gd ↔ Ga6GdL: Gd 5.000e-6model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 26
report
576.15peritectic: L+ Ga3Nb ↔ (Ga)L: Nb 0model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 20
report
576.15peritectic: L+ Ga3Nb ↔ (Ga)experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Okamoto 1990
Table 1, p. 7, row 19
report
576.15eutectic: L + (Ga)↔ Ga6GdL: Gd 0model[1] Tamim 2023Table 1, p. 7, row 24
report
575.15eutectic: L + (Ga)↔ Ga6GdL: Gd 1.000e-5experimental[1] Tamim 2023
cites Palenzona 1990 doi
Table 1, p. 7, row 23
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Rkia Tamim, Olivier Rapaud, Rémy Boulesteix, Alexandre Maître, Thermodynamic assessment of the Ga–Gd, Ga–Nb and Gd–Nb binary phase diagrams towards the Ga–Gd–Nb system, Calphad 82, 102596 (2023). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2023.102596