Ga–Ti system

195 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 94, model 82, unspecified 19); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 3 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (13) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	94
model	82
unspecified	19

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	103
crystal structure	92

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	J.-B. Li, J.-C. Tedenac, M.-C. Record, J. Alloys Compd., 358, 133-41(2003). doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(03)00131-2	`6a0eb378d2ba649fdd0ac0a193d36e6f39a96836852ca0a925c9be563e9f7539`	viewer · TDB · JSON
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	Y. liu, J.C. Tedenac, X.P. Su, C. Colinet, J.H. Wang, Calphad, 41, 140-49(2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.02.003	`d69a6604a978c23158613c513c4788dc8dcda0a0b48d34b72f88a503d45954ae`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1704.17	GA4TI5 (x(Ti) 0.58187) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.60435) + GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1704.17	GA4TI5 (x(Ti) 0.58188) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.60439) + GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1702.01	GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.65005) + GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1702.01	GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.65019) + GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1702.01	GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.64967) + GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1693.17	GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.70067) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.74592)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1523.84	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.42217) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.48342) + GA4TI5 (x(Ti) 0.5405)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1439.27	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.34261) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.42118)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1439.27	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.3426) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.42117)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1348.06	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + GA3TI2 (x(Ti) 0.4) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.42887)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1348.06	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + GA3TI2 (x(Ti) 0.4) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.4289)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1348.06	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + GA3TI2 (x(Ti) 0.4) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.42891)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1303.07	GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + GATI3_D019 (x(Ti) 0.75568) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.80428)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1303.07	GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + GATI3_D019 (x(Ti) 0.75564) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.80421)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1213.16	GATI3_D019 (x(Ti) 0.77193) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.83347) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.83562)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1203.07	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.02759) + GA3TI_D022 (x(Ti) 0.25) + GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	1203.07	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.02754) + GA3TI_D022 (x(Ti) 0.25) + GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333)
GaTi-03Li-LB.tdb	302.91	ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 (x(Ti) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0) + GA3TI_D022 (x(Ti) 0.25)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1707.98	GA4TI5 (x(Ti) 0.59407) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.60582) + GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1707.98	GA4TI5 (x(Ti) 0.59425) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.60609) + GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1702.18	GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.65596) + GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1702.18	GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.65574) + GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1702.18	GA3TI5_D8M (x(Ti) 0.625) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.65597) + GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1692.79	GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.6987) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.73134)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1692.79	GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.69887) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.73153)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1523.62	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.40511) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.48789) + GA4TI5 (x(Ti) 0.51907)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1438.87	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.33892) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.40585)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1438.87	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.33892) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.40583)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1347.2	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + GA3TI2 (x(Ti) 0.4) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.4359)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1347.2	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + GA3TI2 (x(Ti) 0.4) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.43601)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1347.2	GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333) + GA3TI2 (x(Ti) 0.4) + GATI_L10 (x(Ti) 0.43602)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1303.01	GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + GATI3_D019 (x(Ti) 0.75968) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.82104)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1303.01	GATI2_B82 (x(Ti) 0.66667) + GATI3_D019 (x(Ti) 0.75967) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.821)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1212.66	GATI3_D019 (x(Ti) 0.76266) + HCP_A3 (x(Ti) 0.83762) + BCC_A2 (x(Ti) 0.83886)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1203.03	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.01745) + GA3TI_D022 (x(Ti) 0.25) + GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	1203.03	LIQUID (x(Ti) 0.01743) + GA3TI_D022 (x(Ti) 0.25) + GA2TI (x(Ti) 0.33333)
GaTi-13Liu.tdb	302.91	ORTHORHOMBIC_A11 (x(Ti) 0) + LIQUID (x(Ti) 0) + GA3TI_D022 (x(Ti) 0.25)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull GaTi-03Li-LB

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ga–Ti system (103)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1773	eutectic: L->b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2	GaTi2: Ga 0.333333, Ti 0.666667	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
1773	eutectic: L–b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi2	GaTi2: Ga 0.333333, Ti 0.666667	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
1733	congruent melting: L–Ga4Ti5	Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.435	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 28 report
1733	congruent melting: L->Ga4Ti5	Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.435	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 36 report
1728	congruent melting: L->Ga3Ti5	Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 28 report
1728	congruent melting: L–Ga3Ti5	Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 22 report
1723	congruent melting: L–GaTi2	GaTi2: Ga 0.333	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 7 report
1723	congruent melting: L->GaTi2	GaTi2: Ga 0.333	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report
1714	congruent melting: L->Ga4Ti5	Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.4296	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 35 report
1714	congruent melting: L–Ga4Ti5	Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.4296	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 27 report
1712	congruent melting: L->Ga4Ti5	Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.4214	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 34 report
1709	congruent melting: L->Ga3Ti5	Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 27 report
1709	congruent melting: L–Ga3Ti5	Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 21 report
1708	eutectic: L->Ga3Ti5+Ga4Ti5	L: Ga 0.394; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.406	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 30 report
1708	congruent melting: L->Ga3Ti5	Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 26 report
1705	congruent melting: L–GaTi2	GaTi2: Ga 0.333	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 6 report
1705	congruent melting: L->GaTi2	GaTi2: Ga 0.333	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report
1704	congruent melting: L->GaTi2	GaTi2: Ga 0.333	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report
1704	eutectic: L–Ga3Ti5 + Ga4Ti5	L: Ga 0.3956; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.4181	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 24 report
1704	eutectic: L->Ga3Ti5+Ga4Ti5	L: Ga 0.3956; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.4181	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 31 report
1703	eutectic: L->Ga3Ti5+Ga4Ti5	L: Ga 0.4; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.42	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 32 report
1703	eutectic: L–Ga3Ti5 + Ga4Ti5	L: Ga 0.4; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.42	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 25 report
1702	eutectic: L->Ga3Ti5+GaTi2	L: Ga 0.344; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.333; GaTi2: Ga 0.375	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 22 report
1702	eutectic: L->Ga3Ti5+GaTi2	L: Ga 0.35; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.333; GaTi2: Ga 0.375	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 23 report
1702	eutectic: L–Ga3Ti5 + GaTi2	L: Ga 0.35; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.333; GaTi2: Ga 0.375	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report
1698	eutectic: L->Ga3Ti5+GaTi2	L: Ga 0.345; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.333; GaTi2: Ga 0.375	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 24 report
1698	congruent melting: L->Ga3Ti5	Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 29 report
1698	eutectic: L–Ga3Ti5 + GaTi2	L: Ga 0.345; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.333; GaTi2: Ga 0.375	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 19 report
1698	congruent melting: L–Ga3Ti5	Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 23 report
1693	eutectic: L->b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2	L: Ga 0.2993; b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.2541; GaTi2: Ga 0.333	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report
1693	eutectic: L->b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2	L: Ga 0.3; b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.27; GaTi2: Ga 0.333	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report
1693	eutectic: L–b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi2	L: Ga 0.3; b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.27; GaTi2: Ga 0.333	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 2 report
1693	eutectic: L–b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi2	L: Ga 0.2993; b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.2541; GaTi2: Ga 0.333	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 1 report
1693	eutectic: L->b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2	L: Ga 0.301; b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.268; GaTi2: Ga 0.333	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report
1673	eutectic: L–Ga3Ti5 + GaTi2	L: Ga 0.362; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.333; GaTi2: Ga 0.375	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 20 report
1673	eutectic: L->Ga3Ti5+GaTi2	L: Ga 0.362; Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.333; GaTi2: Ga 0.375	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 25 report
1560	eutectic: L->b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2	GaTi2: Ga 0.333	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Belousov 1981	Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report
1560	eutectic: L–b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi2	GaTi2: Ga 0.333	unspecified	[2] Li 2003 cites Belousov 1981	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
1524	L+Ga4Ti5->GaTi	L: Ga 0.595; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.481; GaTi: Ga 0.512	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 38 report
1524	peritectic: L + Ga4Ti5–GaTi	L: Ga 0.5779; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.4595; GaTi: Ga 0.5166	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 30 report
1524	L+Ga4Ti5->GaTi	L: Ga 0.5779; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.4595; GaTi: Ga 0.5166	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 39 report
1523	L+Ga4Ti5->GaTi	L: Ga 0.565; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.488; GaTi: Ga 0.51	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 40 report
1523	peritectic: L + Ga4Ti5–GaTi	L: Ga 0.565; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.488; GaTi: Ga 0.51	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 31 report
1515	congruent melting: L->Ga4Ti5	Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.444	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 37 report
1515	congruent melting: L–Ga4Ti5	Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.444	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 29 report
1503	eutectic: L->Ga3Ti5+Ga4Ti5	Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.444	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 33 report
1503	eutectic: L–Ga3Ti5 + Ga4Ti5	Ga3Ti5: Ga 0.375; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.444	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 26 report
1463	congruent melting: L->Ga2Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 54 report
1463	congruent melting: L–Ga2Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 42 report
1457	congruent melting: L->Ga2Ti	L: Ga 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.666667, Ti 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 56 report
1457	L–Ga2Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.666667, Ti 0.333333	experimental	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 44 report
1448	peritectic: L + Ga4Ti5–GaTi	L: Ga 0.64; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.444; GaTi: Ga 0.5	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 32 report
1448	L+Ga4Ti5->GaTi	L: Ga 0.64; Ga4Ti5: Ga 0.444; GaTi: Ga 0.5	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 41 report
1446	congruent melting: L–Ga2Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 43 report
1446	congruent melting: L->Ga2Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 55 report
1441	L–GaTi + Ga2Ti	GaTi: Ga 0.5, Ti 0.5; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.666667, Ti 0.333333	experimental	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 36 report
1441	eutectic: L->GaTi+Ga2Ti	GaTi: Ga 0.5, Ti 0.5; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.666667, Ti 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 46 report
1440	congruent melting: L->Ga2Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 53 report
1440	congruent melting: L–Ga2Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 41 report
1439	eutectic: L->GaTi+Ga2Ti	L: Ga 0.6576; GaTi: Ga 0.579; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 43 report
1439	eutectic: L–GaTi + Ga2Ti	L: Ga 0.6576; GaTi: Ga 0.579; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 33 report
1439	congruent melting: L->Ga2Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 52 report
1439	eutectic: L->GaTi+Ga2Ti	L: Ga 0.661; GaTi: Ga 0.594; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 42 report
1438	eutectic: L->GaTi+Ga2Ti	L: Ga 0.65; GaTi: Ga 0.59; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 44 report
1438	eutectic: L–GaTi + Ga2Ti	L: Ga 0.65; GaTi: Ga 0.59; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 34 report
1433	eutectic: L–GaTi + Ga2Ti	L: Ga 0.652; GaTi: Ga 0.5; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 35 report
1433	eutectic: L->GaTi+Ga2Ti	L: Ga 0.652; GaTi: Ga 0.5; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 45 report
1408	L+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti	L: Ga 0.81; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti: Ga 0.75	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 59 report
1408	peritectic: L + Ga2Ti–Ga3Ti	L: Ga 0.81; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti: Ga 0.75	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 46 report
1348	peritectoid: GaTi + Ga2Ti–Ga3Ti2	GaTi: Ga 0.57; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti2: Ga 0.6	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 38 report
1348	peritectoid: GaTi + Ga2Ti–Ga3Ti2	GaTi: Ga 0.5; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti2: Ga 0.6	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 39 report
1348	GaTi+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti2	GaTi: Ga 0.5; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti2: Ga 0.6	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 50 report
1348	peritectoid: GaTi + Ga2Ti–Ga3Ti2	GaTi: Ga 0.5711; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti2: Ga 0.6	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 37 report
1348	GaTi+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti2	GaTi: Ga 0.57; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti2: Ga 0.6	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 49 report
1348	GaTi+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti2	GaTi: Ga 0.5711; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti2: Ga 0.6	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 48 report
1348	GaTi+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti2	GaTi: Ga 0.5, Ti 0.5; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; Ga3Ti2: Ga 0.6, Ti 0.4	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 51 report
1348	GaTi + Ga2Ti–Ga3Ti2	GaTi: Ga 0.5, Ti 0.5; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; Ga3Ti2: Ga 0.6, Ti 0.4	experimental	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 40 report
1347	GaTi+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti2	GaTi: Ga 0.564; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti2: Ga 0.6	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 47 report
1313	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2->GaTi3	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.155; GaTi2: Ga 0.333; GaTi3: Ga 0.247	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Belousov 1981	Table 2, p. 4, row 15 report
1313	peritectoid: b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi2–GaTi3	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.155; GaTi2: Ga 0.333; GaTi3: Ga 0.247	unspecified	[2] Li 2003 cites Belousov 1981	Table 1, p. 3, row 12 report
1303	peritectoid: b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi2–GaTi3	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.1957; GaTi2: Ga 0.333; GaTi3: Ga 0.2443	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
1303	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2->GaTi3	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.178; GaTi2: Ga 0.333; GaTi3: Ga 0.24	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 12 report
1303	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2->GaTi3	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.1957; GaTi2: Ga 0.333; GaTi3: Ga 0.2443	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 13 report
1303	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2->GaTi3	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.195; GaTi2: Ga 0.333; GaTi3: Ga 0.24	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 14 report
1303	peritectoid: b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi2–GaTi3	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.168; GaTi2: Ga 0.333; GaTi3: Ga 0.247	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Anderko 1957 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 13 report
1303	peritectoid: b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi2–GaTi3	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.195; GaTi2: Ga 0.333; GaTi3: Ga 0.24	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 11 report
1303	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi2->GaTi3	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.168; GaTi2: Ga 0.333; GaTi3: Ga 0.247	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Anderko 1957 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 16 report
1213	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi3->h.c.p.(Ti)	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.1644; GaTi3: Ga 0.2281	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 18 report
1213	peritectoid: b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi3–h.c.p.(Ti)	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.1644; GaTi3: Ga 0.2281	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 14 report
1213	peritectoid: b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi3–h.c.p.(Ti)	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.17; GaTi3: Ga 0.226; h.c.p.(Ti): Ga 0.19	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report
1213	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi3->h.c.p.(Ti)	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.161; GaTi3: Ga 0.237	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 17 report
1213	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi3->h.c.p.(Ti)	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.1; GaTi3: Ga 0.225; h.c.p.(Ti): Ga 0.13	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Anderko 1957 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 21 report
1213	peritectoid: b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi3–h.c.p.(Ti)	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.1; GaTi3: Ga 0.225; h.c.p.(Ti): Ga 0.13	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Anderko 1957 doi	Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report
1213	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi3->h.c.p.(Ti)	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.17; GaTi3: Ga 0.226; h.c.p.(Ti): Ga 0.19	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 19 report
1203	L+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti	L: Ga 0.982; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti: Ga 0.75	model	[1] Liu 2013	Table 2, p. 4, row 57 report
1203	L+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; Ga3Ti: Ga 0.75, Ti 0.25	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 61 report
1203	peritectic: L + Ga2Ti–Ga3Ti	Ga2Ti: Ga 0.666667, Ti 0.333333; Ga3Ti: Ga 0.75, Ti 0.25	experimental	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 48 report
1203	L+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti	L: Ga 0.9724; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.667; Ga3Ti: Ga 0.75	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Li 2003 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 58 report
1203	peritectic: L + Ga2Ti–Ga3Ti	L: Ga 0.9724; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.667; Ga3Ti: Ga 0.75	model	[2] Li 2003	Table 1, p. 3, row 45 report
1198	L+Ga2Ti->Ga3Ti	L: Ga 0.97; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti: Ga 0.75	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 2, p. 4, row 60 report
1198	peritectic: L + Ga2Ti–Ga3Ti	L: Ga 0.97; Ga2Ti: Ga 0.6667; Ga3Ti: Ga 0.75	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Potzschke 1962	Table 1, p. 3, row 47 report
1193	peritectoid: b.c.c.(Ti) + GaTi3–h.c.p.(Ti)	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.125; GaTi3: Ga 0.21; h.c.p.(Ti): Ga 0.09	unspecified	[2] Li 2003 cites Belousov 1981	Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report
1193	b.c.c.(Ti)+GaTi3->h.c.p.(Ti)	b.c.c.(Ti): Ga 0.125; GaTi3: Ga 0.21; h.c.p.(Ti): Ga 0.09	unspecified	[1] Liu 2013 cites Belousov 1981	Table 2, p. 4, row 20 report

Other properties

Crystal structure (92)

Crystal structure, Ga–Ti system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	3.929 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 19 report
Lattice a	3.935 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 3 report
Lattice a	3.9405 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 20 report
Lattice a	3.935 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 21 report
Lattice a	3.9405 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 2 report
Lattice a	3.929 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 13 report
Lattice a	3.929 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 1 report
Lattice a	3.9405 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 14 report
Lattice a	3.795 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 24 report
Lattice a	3.789 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 22 report
Lattice a	5.5625 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 16 report
Lattice a	3.795 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 6 report
Lattice a	5.5625 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 5 report
Lattice a	3.789 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 4 report
Lattice a	3.789 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 15 report
Lattice a	5.5625 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 23 report
Lattice a	6.284 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 11 report
Lattice a	6.284 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 16 report
Lattice a	6.2817 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 12 report
Lattice a	6.2817 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 17 report
Lattice a	6.293 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 18 report
Lattice a	10.22 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report
Lattice a	10.207 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 9 report
Lattice a	10.22 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 7 report
Lattice a	10.1906 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report
Lattice a	10.1906 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 8 report
Lattice a	7.867 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 12 report
Lattice a	7.861 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 10 report
Lattice a	7.8456 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 11 report
Lattice a	7.8456 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report
Lattice a	7.861 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report
Lattice a	3.967 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report
Lattice a	3.967 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 13 report
Lattice a	3.9717 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 14 report
Lattice a	3.978 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 15 report
Lattice a	3.9717 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report
Lattice a	4.514 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report
Lattice a	4.5207 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
Lattice a	4.523 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 6 report
Lattice a	4.514 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 4 report
Lattice a	4.5207 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 5 report
Lattice a	5.7447 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 2 report
Lattice a	5.688 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 3 report
Lattice a	5.7447 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report
Lattice a	5.76 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report
Lattice a	5.76 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 1 report
Lattice c	24.061 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 19 report
Lattice c	24.465 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 3 report
Lattice c	24.406 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 20 report
Lattice c	24.465 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 21 report
Lattice c	24.406 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 2 report
Lattice c	24.061 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 13 report
Lattice c	24.061 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 1 report
Lattice c	24.406 Å	298.15	Ga2Ti alloy: Ti 0.333333	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 14 report
Lattice c	8.523 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 24 report
Lattice c	8.734 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 22 report
Lattice c	8.1178 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 16 report
Lattice c	8.523 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 6 report
Lattice c	8.1178 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 5 report
Lattice c	8.734 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 7, row 4 report
Lattice c	8.734 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 15 report
Lattice c	8.1178 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti alloy: Ti 0.25	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 23 report
Lattice c	4.01 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 11 report
Lattice c	4.01 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 16 report
Lattice c	3.9991 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 12 report
Lattice c	3.9991 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 17 report
Lattice c	3.995 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti2 alloy: Ti 0.4	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 18 report
Lattice c	5.054 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 5 report
Lattice c	4.996 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 9 report
Lattice c	5.054 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 7 report
Lattice c	5.042 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 6 report
Lattice c	5.042 Å	298.15	Ga3Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.625	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 8 report
Lattice c	5.409 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 12 report
Lattice c	5.452 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 10 report
Lattice c	5.4259 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 11 report
Lattice c	5.4259 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 8 report
Lattice c	5.452 Å	298.15	Ga4Ti5 alloy: Ti 0.555556	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 7 report
Lattice c	3.967 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 9 report
Lattice c	3.967 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 13 report
Lattice c	3.9872 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 14 report
Lattice c	3.964 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 15 report
Lattice c	3.9872 Å	298.15	GaTi alloy: Ti 0.5	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 10 report
Lattice c	5.501 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 3 report
Lattice c	5.5222 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 4 report
Lattice c	5.451 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 6 report
Lattice c	5.501 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 4 report
Lattice c	5.5222 Å	298.15	GaTi2 alloy: Ti 0.666667	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 5 report
Lattice c	4.5955 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	experimental	[1] Liu 2013 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 2 report
Lattice c	4.642 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Colinet 2011 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 3 report
Lattice c	4.5955 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	experimental	[2] Li 2003 cites Antonova 2001 doi	Table 2, p. 4, row 2 report
Lattice c	4.64 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	model	[2] Li 2003 cites Villars 1996	Table 2, p. 4, row 1 report
Lattice c	4.64 Å	298.15	GaTi3 alloy: Ti 0.75	model	[1] Liu 2013 cites Sanchez 1984 doi	Table 5, p. 6, row 1 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Y. Liu, J.C. Tedenac, X.P. Su, C. Colinet, J.H. Wang, An updated thermodynamic modeling of the Ga–Ti system, Calphad 41, 140-149 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2013.02.003
Jing-Bo Li, Jean-Claude Tedenac, Marie-Christine Record, Thermodynamic analysis of the Ga–Ti system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 358, 133-141 (2003). doi:10.1016/s0925-8388(03)00131-2

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}