Gd–Mn system

41 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 16, model 16, unspecified 9); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 31 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental16
model16
unspecified9
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction27
phase transition5
phase equilibrium6
formation3

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdbJ. Groebner, A. Pisch, R. Schmid-Fetzer, J. Alloys Compd., 317-318, 433-37(2001). doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01364-5fa6fb054649c9cbcddbadb0b515f50dc63b1bc6894580da7643e8043741fca8cviewer · TDB · JSON
GdMn-17Wan.tdbJ. Wang, S. Lin, M. Rong, G. Rao, H. Zhou, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 128, 1009-18(2017). doi:10.1007/s10973-016-6000-y0be2e68c2ec5f73ace139f898436a3e08c1141fb06c34d8a44ea4294466ee8acviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1507.85HCP_A3 (x(Mn) 8.000e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 8.600e-4) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.03869)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1410.77LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.92479) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.99884) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.99886)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1359.43LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.88353) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.99847)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1359.43LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.88363) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.99847)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1350.22GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.99861) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1350.22GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.99861) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1322.97GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.8027) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1322.97GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.80306) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1322.97GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.80248) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1214.69LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.52296) + GDMN2_C15 (x(Mn) 0.66667) + GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1214.69LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.52357) + GDMN2_C15 (x(Mn) 0.66667) + GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb1100.8HCP_A3 (x(Mn) 0.00188) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.33891) + GDMN2_C15 (x(Mn) 0.66667)
GdMn-01Gro-LB.tdb980GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 1) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1534.91HCP_A3 (x(Mn) 2.300e-4) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 2.500e-4) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.02455)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1415.45LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.93843) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.99917) + BCC_A2 (x(Mn) 0.99968)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1349.76LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.89852) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.99854) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1349.76LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.89834) + FCC_A1 (x(Mn) 0.99854) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1320.07LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.8787) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1320.07LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.87887) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1320.07LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.87882) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1313.89GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.86723) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1313.89GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.86749) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1313.89GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.86718) + GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1278.13LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.64746) + GDMN2_C15 (x(Mn) 0.66667) + GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1278.13LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.64792) + GDMN2_C15 (x(Mn) 0.66667) + GD6MN23_D8A (x(Mn) 0.7931)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb1092.68HCP_A3 (x(Mn) 0.00125) + LIQUID (x(Mn) 0.33152) + GDMN2_C15 (x(Mn) 0.66667)
GdMn-17Wan.tdb980GDMN12_D2B (x(Mn) 0.92308) + CBCC_A12 (x(Mn) 1) + CUB_A13 (x(Mn) 1)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull GdMn-01Gro-LB

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Gd–Mn system (27)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1530.1peritectic: L + β-Gd ↔ α-GdL: Mn 0.027unspecified[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 19
report
1501peritectic: L + β-Gd ↔ α-Gdmodel[1] Wang 2017
cites Kim 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 18
report
1407peritectic: L + δ-Mn ↔ γ-Mnmodel[1] Wang 2017
cites Grobner 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 21
report
1400.6peritectic: L + δ-Mn ↔ γ-MnL: Mn 0.93unspecified[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 23
report
1400peritectic: L + δ-Mn ↔ γ-Mnmodel[1] Wang 2017
cites Kim 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 22
report
1398peritectic: L + δ-Mn ↔ γ-Mnexperimental[1] Wang 2017
cites Kirchmayr 1967 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 20
report
1360peritectic: L + γ-Mn ↔ β-Mnβ-Mn: Mn 1model[1] Wang 2017
cites Kim 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 24
report
1358peritectic: L + β-Mn ↔ Mn12GdL: Mn 0.887; β-Mn: Mn 1; Mn12Gd: Mn 0.923077model[1] Wang 2017
cites Grobner 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 15
report
1358peritectic: L + β-Mn ↔ Mn12GdL: Mn 0.89; β-Mn: Mn 1; Mn12Gd: Mn 0.923077experimental[1] Wang 2017
cites Kirchmayr 1967 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 14
report
1357.6peritectic: L + γ-Mn ↔ β-MnL: Mn 0.904; β-Mn: Mn 1unspecified[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 25
report
1325eutectic: L ↔ Mn23Gd6 + Mn12GdL: Mn 0.795; Mn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103; Mn12Gd: Mn 0.923077model[1] Wang 2017
cites Grobner 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 10
report
1320peritectic: L + β-Mn ↔ Mn12Gdβ-Mn: Mn 1; Mn12Gd: Mn 0.923077model[1] Wang 2017
cites Kim 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 16
report
1320peritectic: L + β-Mn ↔ Mn12GdL: Mn 0.879; β-Mn: Mn 1; Mn12Gd: Mn 0.923077unspecified[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 17
report
1313.8eutectic: L ↔ Mn23Gd6 + Mn12GdL: Mn 0.867; Mn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103; Mn12Gd: Mn 0.923077unspecified[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 13
report
1313.1eutectic: L ↔ Mn23Gd6 + Mn12GdMn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103; Mn12Gd: Mn 0.923077experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 12
report
1311eutectic: L ↔ Mn23Gd6 + Mn12GdMn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103; Mn12Gd: Mn 0.923077model[1] Wang 2017
cites Kim 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 11
report
1278peritectic: L + Mn23Gd6 ↔ Mn2GdL: Mn 0.647; Mn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103; Mn2Gd: Mn 0.666667unspecified[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 9
report
1277.9peritectic: L + Mn23Gd6 ↔ Mn2GdMn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103; Mn2Gd: Mn 0.666667experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 8
report
1223peritectic: L + Mn23Gd6 ↔ Mn2GdL: Mn 0.52; Mn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103; Mn2Gd: Mn 0.666667experimental[1] Wang 2017
cites Kirchmayr 1967 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 6
report
1214peritectic: L + Mn23Gd6 ↔ Mn2GdL: Mn 0.527; Mn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103; Mn2Gd: Mn 0.666667model[1] Wang 2017
cites Grobner 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 7
report
1103eutectic: L ↔ α-Gd + Mn2GdL: Mn 0.353; Mn2Gd: Mn 0.666667experimental[1] Wang 2017
cites Kirchmayr 1967 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 1
report
1101eutectic: L ↔ α-Gd + Mn2GdL: Mn 0.338; Mn2Gd: Mn 0.666667model[1] Wang 2017
cites Grobner 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 2
report
1093eutectic: L ↔ α-Gd + Mn2GdMn2Gd: Mn 0.666667experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 4
report
1092.2eutectic: L ↔ α-Gd + Mn2GdL: Mn 0.331; Mn2Gd: Mn 0.666667unspecified[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 5
report
1086eutectic: L ↔ α-Gd + Mn2GdMn2Gd: Mn 0.666667model[1] Wang 2017
cites Kim 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 3
report
980peritectoid: Mn12Gd + β-Mn ↔ α-MnMn12Gd: Mn 0.923077; β-Mn: Mn 1; α-Mn: Mn 1unspecified[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 29
report
980peritectoid: Mn12Gd + β-Mn ↔ α-MnMn12Gd: Mn 0.923077; β-Mn: Mn 1; α-Mn: Mn 1model[1] Wang 2017
cites Grobner 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 28
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Gd–Mn system (3)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Mn12GdGdMn12-4 kJ/mol-atom298.15model2.068 (mp-aaabkkpg)1.557 (oqmd-5135)[2] Gröbner 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
Mn23Gd6Gd6Mn23-6.4 kJ/mol-atom298.15model89.384 (mp-aaacpzik)12.168 (oqmd-30388)[2] Gröbner 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report
Mn2GdGdMn2-6.4 kJ/mol-atom298.15model21.064 (mp-aaacjhct)9.268 (oqmd-19430)[2] Gröbner 2001Table 2, p. 3, row 2
report

Other properties

Phase transition (5)

Phase transition, Gd–Mn system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition105 K105magneticexperimental[1] Wang 2017
cites Marcos 2004 doi
p. 2
report
The magnetic transformation temperature of Mn2Gd was reported to be 105 K [24].
Phase transition1283.95 K1283.95peritectic: Mn70Gd30 (as-cast)
alloy: Gd 0.3, Mn 0.7
experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 15
report
Phase transition1313.1 K1313.1eutectic: Mn80Gd20
alloy: Gd 0.2, Mn 0.8
experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 19
report
Phase transition1329 K1329congruent melting: L ↔ Mn23Gd6
L: Mn 0.793103; Mn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103
model[1] Wang 2017
cites Kim 2013 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 26
report
Phase transition1340 K1340congruent melting: L ↔ Mn23Gd6
L: Mn 0.793103; Mn23Gd6: Mn 0.793103
unspecified[1] Wang 2017Table 3, p. 6, row 27
report

Phase equilibrium (6)

Phase equilibrium, Gd–Mn system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase composition1226.92other: Mn50Gd50
liquid: Gd 0.5, Mn 0.5
experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 8
report
Phase composition1229.95other: Mn55Gd45
liquid: Gd 0.45, Mn 0.55
experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 10
report
Phase composition1248.38other: Mn60Gd40
liquid: Gd 0.4, Mn 0.6
experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 12
report
Phase composition1333.72other: Mn70Gd30 (as-cast)
liquid: Gd 0.3, Mn 0.7
experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 16
report
Phase composition1337.54other: Mn75Gd25
liquid: Gd 0.25, Mn 0.75
experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 18
report
Phase composition1340.37other: Mn80Gd20
liquid: Gd 0.2, Mn 0.8
experimental[1] Wang 2017Table 1, p. 3, row 20
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Jiang Wang, Shidong Lin, Maohua Rong, Guanghui Rao, Huaiying Zhou, Experimental investigation and thermodynamic re-assessment of the Mn–Gd binary system, J Therm Anal Calorim 128, 1009-1018 (2017). doi:10.1007/s10973-016-6000-y
  2. J. Gröbner, A. Pisch, R. Schmid-Fetzer, Thermodynamic optimization of the systems Mn–Gd and Mn–Y using new experimental results, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 317-318, 433-437 (2001). doi:10.1016/s0925-8388(00)01364-5