Gd–Pd system

55 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 17, model 38); 1 calculated phase diagram(s). 5 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (14) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental17
model38
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction26
phase transition8
formation20
mixing / partial1

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
GdPd-00Du.tdbZ. Du, H. Yang, J. Alloys Compd., 312, 181-88(2000). doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(00)01144-0a7d4cf1a658c9d9394f4497e0f47f81e83705368ff001de25e499a59086f67aeviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
GdPd-00Du.tdb1588.48GDPD_B2 (x(Pd) 0.49994) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.54417) + GD3PD4_HT (x(Pd) 0.57143)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1577.7GDPD_B2 (x(Pd) 0.49995) + GD3PD4_LT (x(Pd) 0.57143) + GD3PD4_HT (x(Pd) 0.57143)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1577.7GD3PD4_LT (x(Pd) 0.57143) + GD3PD4_HT (x(Pd) 0.57143) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.60081)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1562.77BCC_A2 (x(Pd) 0.01284) + HCP_A3 (x(Pd) 0.01985) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.02928)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1498.4LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.6545) + GDPD2 (x(Pd) 0.66667) + GDPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.75)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1498.4LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.6546) + GDPD2 (x(Pd) 0.66667) + GDPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.75)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1432.31GD3PD4_LT (x(Pd) 0.57143) + GD2PD3 (x(Pd) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.62864)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1432.31GD3PD4_LT (x(Pd) 0.57143) + GD2PD3 (x(Pd) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.62862)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1427.18GD2PD3 (x(Pd) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.62987) + GDPD2 (x(Pd) 0.66667)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1427.18GD2PD3 (x(Pd) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.62984) + GDPD2 (x(Pd) 0.66667)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1427.18GD2PD3 (x(Pd) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.62988) + GDPD2 (x(Pd) 0.66667)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1402.63GD3PD4_LT (x(Pd) 0.57143) + GD2PD3 (x(Pd) 0.6) + GDPD2 (x(Pd) 0.66667)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1400.24GDPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.78474) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.85056) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.88461)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1308.64LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.38647) + GDPD_B33 (x(Pd) 0.49339) + GDPD_B2 (x(Pd) 0.49367)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1272.74GDPD_B2 (x(Pd) 0.5) + GDPD_B33 (x(Pd) 0.5) + GD3PD4_LT (x(Pd) 0.57143)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1155.27LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.3634) + GD3PD2_D5A (x(Pd) 0.4) + GDPD_B33 (x(Pd) 0.49138)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1084.83GD7PD3_D102 (x(Pd) 0.3) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.30188) + GD3PD2_D5A (x(Pd) 0.4)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1084.83GD7PD3_D102 (x(Pd) 0.3) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.30192) + GD3PD2_D5A (x(Pd) 0.4)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1084.83GD7PD3_D102 (x(Pd) 0.3) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.30178) + GD3PD2_D5A (x(Pd) 0.4)
GdPd-00Du.tdb1057.88HCP_A3 (x(Pd) 0.03176) + LIQUID (x(Pd) 0.23391) + GD7PD3_D102 (x(Pd) 0.3)
GdPd-00Du.tdb810GDPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.77132) + GDPD7 (x(Pd) 0.875) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.8879)
GdPd-00Du.tdb810GDPD3_L12 (x(Pd) 0.77131) + GDPD7 (x(Pd) 0.875) + FCC_A1 (x(Pd) 0.8879)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Gd–Pd system (26)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1593eutectic: liq. -> βGdPd + βGd3Pd4L: Pd 0.53; βGdPd: Pd 0.49; βGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 12
report
1589eutectic: liq. -> βGdPd + βGd3Pd4L: Pd 0.5441; βGdPd: Pd 0.4999; βGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 11
report
1563liq. + bcc(Gd) -> hcp(Gd)L: Pd 0.04; bcc(Gd): Pd 0.01; hcp(Gd): Pd 0.02experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 2
report
1563liq. + bcc(Gd) -> hcp(Gd)L: Pd 0.0293; bcc(Gd): Pd 0.0129; hcp(Gd): Pd 0.0204model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 1
report
1500liq. + GdPd3 -> GdPd2L: Pd 0.65; GdPd3: Pd 0.75; GdPd2: Pd 0.666667experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 28
report
1499liq. + GdPd3 -> GdPd2L: Pd 0.6545; GdPd3: Pd 0.75; GdPd2: Pd 0.666667model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 27
report
1433liq. + βGd3Pd4 -> Gd2Pd3L: Pd 0.635; βGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429; Gd2Pd3: Pd 0.6experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 22
report
1433liq. + βGd3Pd4 -> Gd2Pd3L: Pd 0.6286; βGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429; Gd2Pd3: Pd 0.6model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 21
report
1428eutectic: liq. -> Gd2Pd3 + GdPd2L: Pd 0.6299; Gd2Pd3: Pd 0.6; GdPd2: Pd 0.666667model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 23
report
1425eutectic: liq. -> Gd2Pd3 + GdPd2L: Pd 0.64; Gd2Pd3: Pd 0.6; GdPd2: Pd 0.666667experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 24
report
1403Gd2Pd3 -> αGd3Pd4 + GdPd2Gd2Pd3: Pd 0.6; αGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429; GdPd2: Pd 0.666667experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 26
report
1403Gd2Pd3 -> αGd3Pd4 + GdPd2Gd2Pd3: Pd 0.6; αGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429; GdPd2: Pd 0.666667model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 25
report
1401eutectic: liq. -> GdPd3 + fcc(Pd)L: Pd 0.8506; GdPd3: Pd 0.7847; fcc(Pd): Pd 0.8846model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 31
report
1401eutectic: liq. -> GdPd3 + fcc(Pd)L: Pd 0.86; GdPd3: Pd 0.79; fcc(Pd): Pd 0.88experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 32
report
1311liq. + βGdPd -> αGdPdL: Pd 0.3869; βGdPd: Pd 0.4937; αGdPd: Pd 0.4934model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 13
report
1311liq. + βGdPd -> αGdPdL: Pd 0.36; βGdPd: Pd 0.48; αGdPd: Pd 0.48experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 14
report
1278βGdPd -> αGdPd + αGd3Pd4βGdPd: Pd 0.49; αGdPd: Pd 0.49; αGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 16
report
1278βGdPd -> αGdPd + αGd3Pd4βGdPd: Pd 0.5; αGdPd: Pd 0.5; αGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 15
report
1155liq. + αGdPd -> Gd3Pd2L: Pd 0.34; αGdPd: Pd 0.48; Gd3Pd2: Pd 0.4experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 8
report
1155liq. + αGdPd -> Gd3Pd2L: Pd 0.3634; αGdPd: Pd 0.4914; Gd3Pd2: Pd 0.4model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 7
report
1085liq. + Gd3Pd2 -> Gd7Pd3Gd3Pd2: Pd 0.4; Gd7Pd3: Pd 0.3019model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 5
report
1085liq. + Gd3Pd2 -> Gd7Pd3L: Pd 0.27; Gd3Pd2: Pd 0.4; Gd7Pd3: Pd 0.3experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 6
report
1058eutectic: liq. -> hcp(Gd) + Gd7Pd3L: Pd 0.24; hcp(Gd): Pd 0.014; Gd7Pd3: Pd 0.3experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 4
report
1058eutectic: liq. -> hcp(Gd) + Gd7Pd3L: Pd 0.2339; hcp(Gd): Pd 0.0318; Gd7Pd3: Pd 0.3model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 3
report
810GdPd3 + fcc(Pd) -> GdPd7GdPd3: Pd 0.77; fcc(Pd): Pd 0.892; GdPd7: Pd 0.875experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 34
report
810GdPd3 + fcc(Pd) -> GdPd7GdPd3: Pd 0.7713; fcc(Pd): Pd 0.8879; GdPd7: Pd 0.875model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 33
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Gd–Pd system (7)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Pd2GdGdPd2-80.498 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-77.954 (oqmd-18407)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 62
report
Pd3GdGdPd3-78.078 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-83.652 (mp-aaaabfsd)-83.791 (oqmd-18693)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 4
report
Pd3GdGdPd3-48.335 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-83.652 (mp-aaaabfsd)-83.791 (oqmd-18693)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 74
report
Pd4Gd3Gd3Pd4-82.523 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-87.901 (oqmd-1437083)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 36
report
Pd7GdGdPd7-48.335 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-42.984 (oqmd-1376299)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 74
report
Pd7RE-48.335 kJ/mol-atom298.15model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 8
report
PdGdGdPd-85.265 kJ/mol-atom298.15model-85.094 (mp-aaaaaqxn)-86.932 (oqmd-30400)[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 24
report

Other properties

Phase transition (8)

Phase transition, Gd–Pd system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1578 K1578βGd3Pd4 -> αGd3Pd4
βGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429; αGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429
model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 19
report
Phase transition1578 K1578βGd3Pd4 -> αGd3Pd4
βGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429; αGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429
experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 20
report
Phase transition1628 K1628liq. -> βGd3Pd4
L: Pd 0.571429; βGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429
experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 18
report
Phase transition1629 K1629liq. -> βGd3Pd4
L: Pd 0.571429; βGd3Pd4: Pd 0.571429
model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 17
report
Phase transition1653 K1653liq. -> βGdPd
L: Pd 0.48; βGdPd: Pd 0.5
experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 10
report
Phase transition1654 K1654liq. -> βGdPd
βGdPd: Pd 0.4994
model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 9
report
Phase transition1903 K1903liq. -> GdPd3
GdPd3: Pd 0.7503
model[1] Du 2000Table 3, p. 5, row 29
report
Phase transition1903 K1903liq. -> GdPd3
GdPd3: Pd 0.75
experimental[1] Du 2000
cites Loebich 1973 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 30
report

Formation (13)

Formation, Gd–Pd system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Entropy of formation
printed: ΔfS
6.446 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd2Gd
alloy: Gd 0.333333, Pd 0.666667
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 62
report
Entropy of formation7.63 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd3Gd
alloy: Gd 0.25, Pd 0.75
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 4
report
Entropy of formation
printed: ΔfS
9.402 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd3Gd
alloy: Gd 0.25, Pd 0.75
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 74
report
Entropy of formation
printed: ΔfS
5.79 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd4Gd3
alloy: Gd 0.428571, Pd 0.571429
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 36
report
Entropy of formation9.402 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd7Gd
alloy: Gd 0.125, Pd 0.875
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 74
report
Entropy of formation
printed: Entropies of formation
9.402 J/mol-atom/K298.15Pd7RE
alloy: Gd 0.125, Pd 0.875
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 8
report
Entropy of formation8.684 J/mol-atom/K298.15PdGd
alloy: Gd 0.5, Pd 0.5
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 24
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-82.4199 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd2Gd
alloy: Gd 0.333333, Pd 0.666667
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 62
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-80.3529 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd3Gd
alloy: Gd 0.25, Pd 0.75
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 4
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: ΔfG
-51.1382 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd3Gd
alloy: Gd 0.25, Pd 0.75
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 74
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-84.2493 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd4Gd3
alloy: Gd 0.428571, Pd 0.571429
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 36
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: Gibbs free energy of formation
-51.1382 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd7Gd
alloy: Gd 0.125, Pd 0.875
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 74
report
Gibbs energy of formation
printed: ΔfG
-87.8541 kJ/mol-atom298.15PdGd
alloy: Gd 0.5, Pd 0.5
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 5, row 24
report

Mixing / partial (1)

Mixing / partial, Gd–Pd system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Gibbs energy of mixing
printed: Gibbs free Energies
-51.1382 kJ/mol-atom298.15Pd7RE
alloy: Gd 0.125, Pd 0.875
model[2] Kardellass 2020
cites Du 2000 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 8
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Zhenmin Du, Haifang Yang, Thermodynamic assessment of the Gd–Pd system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 312, 181-188 (2000). doi:10.1016/s0925-8388(00)01144-0
  2. Said Kardellass, Colette Servant, Isabelle Drouelle, Fatima Zahra Chrifi-Alaoui, Mohamed Idbenali, Alyen Abahazem et al., Calphad-type assessment of the Pd-Yb binary system supported by first-principles calculations – Part II: Results, Materials Today: Proceedings 24, 140-150 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.196