Ge–Nb system

45 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 21, model 19, DFT 5); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 7 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (9) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental21
model19
DFT5
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction30
phase equilibrium5
formation10

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
GeNb-11Gen.tdbT. Geng, C. Li, Z. Du, C. Guo, X. Zhao, H. Xu, J. Alloys Compd., 509, 3080-88(2011). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.00555314e2cadc330d9cc399b689b0ed38dcc38c3845fdb8918c4599b9f0d9481e5viewer · TDB · JSON
GeNb-17Utt.tdbC.A. Utton, I. Papadimitriou, H. Kinoshita, P. Tsakiropoulos, J. Alloys Compd., 717, 303-16(2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.2790c86fa883ab70ed8c2bbcb46d0c0cf0c5ba4c55edef0466e8d5c9196ea5dbeaeviewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
GeNb-11Gen.tdb2291.56LIQUID (x(Nb) 0.52605) + GE2NB3_D88 (x(Nb) 0.58971) + GE3NB5_D8M (x(Nb) 0.60679)
GeNb-11Gen.tdb2176.65LIQUID (x(Nb) 0.77822) + GENB3_A15 (x(Nb) 0.81873) + BCC_A2 (x(Nb) 0.88885)
GeNb-11Gen.tdb2138.3GE3NB5_D8M (x(Nb) 0.63035) + LIQUID (x(Nb) 0.74904) + GENB3_A15 (x(Nb) 0.76095)
GeNb-11Gen.tdb1860.89GE2NB_C40 (x(Nb) 0.34005) + LIQUID (x(Nb) 0.42066) + GE2NB3_D88 (x(Nb) 0.56993)
GeNb-11Gen.tdb1210.78DIAMOND_A4 (x(Nb) 0.00315) + LIQUID (x(Nb) 0.00532) + GE2NB_C40 (x(Nb) 0.32835)
GeNb-17Utt.tdb2175.34LIQUID (x(Nb) 0.78613) + GENB3_A15 (x(Nb) 0.81955) + BCC_A2 (x(Nb) 0.89344)
GeNb-17Utt.tdb2135.63GE3NB5_D8M (x(Nb) 0.62448) + LIQUID (x(Nb) 0.75115) + GENB3_A15 (x(Nb) 0.76694)
GeNb-17Utt.tdb1852.92GE2NB_C40 (x(Nb) 0.33729) + LIQUID (x(Nb) 0.43086) + GE3NB5_D8M (x(Nb) 0.60395)
GeNb-17Utt.tdb1210.98DIAMOND_A4 (x(Nb) 0.00262) + LIQUID (x(Nb) 0.00397) + GE2NB_C40 (x(Nb) 0.32834)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull GeNb-11Gen

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Ge–Nb system (30)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
2453.15congruent melting: L <-> (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.38; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.38experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Jorda 1978 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 13
report
2453.15congruent melting: L <-> (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.37; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.37model[1] Geng 2011
cites Okamoto 2000
Table 1, p. 2, row 14
report
2452.15congruent melting: L <-> (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.382; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.382model[1] Geng 2011Table 1, p. 2, row 15
report
2423.15congruent melting: L <-> (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.357; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.357experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Pan 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 11
report
2338.15congruent melting: L <-> (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.384; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.384experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Muller 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 12
report
2313.15peritectic: L + (Nb5Ge3) <-> (Nb3Ge2)L: Ge 0.468; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.393; (Nb3Ge2): Ge 0.41model[1] Geng 2011Table 1, p. 2, row 30
report
2313.15peritectic: L + (Nb5Ge3) <-> (Nb3Ge2)L: Ge 0.457; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.357; (Nb3Ge2): Ge 0.409experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Pan 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 29
report
2243.15peritectic: L + Bcc-(Nb) <-> (Nb3Ge)L: Ge 0.19; Bcc-(Nb): Ge 0.08; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.18experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Pan 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 1
report
2203.15eutectic: L <-> (Nb3Ge) + (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.265; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.2; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.334experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Pan 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 6
report
2183.15peritectic: L + Bcc-(Nb) <-> (Nb3Ge)L: Ge 0.185; Bcc-(Nb): Ge 0.04; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.183experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Muller 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 2
report
2176.15peritectic: L + Bcc-(Nb) <-> (Nb3Ge)L: Ge 0.22; Bcc-(Nb): Ge 0.111; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.181model[1] Geng 2011Table 1, p. 2, row 5
report
2173.15peritectic: L + Bcc-(Nb) <-> (Nb3Ge)L: Ge 0.22; Bcc-(Nb): Ge 0.115; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.18model[1] Geng 2011
cites Okamoto 2000
Table 1, p. 2, row 4
report
2173.15eutectic: L <-> (Nb3Ge) + (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.218; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.188; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.361experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Muller 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 7
report
2173.15peritectic: L + Bcc-(Nb) <-> (Nb3Ge)L: Ge 0.22; Bcc-(Nb): Ge 0.115; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.18experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Jorda 1978 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 3
report
2138.15eutectic: L <-> (Nb3Ge) + (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.25; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.24; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.37model[1] Geng 2011Table 1, p. 2, row 10
report
2138.15eutectic: L <-> (Nb3Ge) + (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.27; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.23; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.365model[1] Geng 2011
cites Okamoto 2000
Table 1, p. 2, row 9
report
2138.15eutectic: L <-> (Nb3Ge) + (Nb5Ge3)L: Ge 0.27; (Nb3Ge): Ge 0.23; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.371experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Jorda 1978 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 8
report
1953.15congruent melting: L <-> (NbGe2)L: Ge 0.661; (NbGe2): Ge 0.661model[1] Geng 2011
cites Okamoto 2000
Table 1, p. 2, row 23
report
1953.15congruent melting: L <-> (NbGe2)L: Ge 0.67; (NbGe2): Ge 0.67experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Pan 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 21
report
1953.15congruent melting: L <-> (NbGe2)L: Ge 0.665; (NbGe2): Ge 0.665experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Jorda 1978 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 22
report
1953.15congruent melting: L <-> (NbGe2)L: Ge 0.667; (NbGe2): Ge 0.667model[1] Geng 2011Table 1, p. 2, row 24
report
1863.15eutectic: L <-> (Nb5Ge3) + (NbGe2)(Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.375, Nb 0.625; (NbGe2): Ge 0.666667, Nb 0.333333experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Feschotte 1979
Table 1, p. 2, row 18
report
1863.15eutectic: L <-> (Nb3Ge2) + (NbGe2)L: Ge 0.6; (Nb3Ge2): Ge 0.444; (NbGe2): Ge 0.668experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Pan 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 16
report
1862.55eutectic: L <-> (Nb5Ge3) + (NbGe2)L: Ge 0.58; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.43; (NbGe2): Ge 0.66model[1] Geng 2011
cites Okamoto 2000
Table 1, p. 2, row 20
report
1862.55eutectic: L <-> (Nb3Ge2) + (NbGe2)L: Ge 0.58; (Nb3Ge2): Ge 0.43; (NbGe2): Ge 0.66model[1] Geng 2011Table 1, p. 2, row 17
report
1853.15eutectic: L <-> (Nb5Ge3) + (NbGe2)L: Ge 0.592; (Nb5Ge3): Ge 0.444; (NbGe2): Ge 0.662experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Jorda 1978 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 19
report
1223.15peritectic: L + (NbGe2) <-> Diamond-(Ge)L: Ge 1; (NbGe2): Ge 0.687; Diamond-(Ge): Ge 0.999model[1] Geng 2011
cites Okamoto 2000
Table 1, p. 2, row 28
report
1223.15peritectic: L + (NbGe2) <-> Diamond-(Ge)L: Ge 1; (NbGe2): Ge 0.687; Diamond-(Ge): Ge 0.999experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Pan 1970
Table 1, p. 2, row 27
report
1210.95eutectic: L <-> (NbGe2) + Diamond-(Ge)L: Ge 0.995; (NbGe2): Ge 0.672; Diamond-(Ge): Ge 0.997model[1] Geng 2011Table 1, p. 2, row 26
report
1210.15eutectic: L <-> (NbGe2) + Diamond-(Ge)L: Ge 1; (NbGe2): Ge 0.674; Diamond-(Ge): Ge 0.999experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Feschotte 1979
Table 1, p. 2, row 25
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Ge–Nb system (10)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Nb3Ge-30.213 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Utton 2017
cites Papadimitriou 2015 doi
Table 2, p. 6, row 9
report
Nb3Ge-29.387 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Utton 2017
cites Papadimitriou 2015 doi
Table 2, p. 6, row 13
report
Nb3Ge-26.41 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Utton 2017Table 2, p. 6, row 14
report
Nb3Ge-25 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Utton 2017Table 2, p. 6, row 10
report
Nb5Ge3-46.63 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Utton 2017
cites Papadimitriou 2015 doi
Table 2, p. 6, row 5
report
Nb5Ge3-46.53 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Utton 2017
cites Papadimitriou 2015 doi
Table 2, p. 6, row 1
report
Nb5Ge3-42.892 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Utton 2017Table 2, p. 6, row 6
report
Nb5Ge3-42 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Utton 2017Table 2, p. 6, row 2
report
NbGe2-37.87 kJ/mol (basis unstated)0DFT[2] Utton 2017
cites Papadimitriou 2015 doi
Table 2, p. 6, row 17
report
NbGe2-33.24 kJ/mol (basis unstated)298.15model[2] Utton 2017Table 2, p. 6, row 18
report

Other properties

Phase equilibrium (5)

Phase equilibrium, Ge–Nb system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase assemblageNb3Ge2
alloy: Nb 0.6
experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Kloska 1984 doi
Table 3, p. 3, row 4
report
Phase assemblageNb3Ge2
alloy: Nb 0.6
experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Pan 1970
Table 3, p. 3, row 1
report
Phase assemblageNb3Ge2
alloy: Nb 0.6
experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Iijima 1979 doi
Table 3, p. 3, row 3
report
Phase assemblageNb3Ge2
alloy: Nb 0.6
model[1] Geng 2011Table 3, p. 3, row 6
report
Phase assemblage1373.15Nb3Ge2
alloy: Nb 0.6
experimental[1] Geng 2011
cites Richter 2001 doi
Table 3, p. 3, row 5
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. Tai Geng, Changrong Li, Zhenmin Du, Cuiping Guo, Xinqing Zhao, Huibin Xu, Thermodynamic assessment of the Nb–Ge system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 509, 3080-3088 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.12.005
  2. Claire A. Utton, Ioannis Papadimitriou, Hajime Kinoshita, Panos Tsakiropoulos, Experimental and thermodynamic assessment of the Ge-Nb-Si ternary phase diagram, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 717, 303-316 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.04.279