In–Li system
22 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 14, model 8); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 5 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.
Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (11) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown
| Evidence class | Values |
|---|---|
| experimental | 14 |
| model | 8 |
| Property group | Values |
|---|---|
| invariant reaction | 20 |
| phase transition | 1 |
| phase equilibrium | 1 |
Calculated phase diagrams
Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.
| TDB file | Assessment | SHA-256 | Links |
|---|---|---|---|
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 | 3296b39d521eca353c878566a377a6d340c00d10ec4729afacdfd9c78c0076bf | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| InLi-22Gie.tdb | W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G | ef7f71f31b5a62afdef9e11439b6ff718b6081df24f830d32b1b220ac27b6f12 | viewer · TDB · JSON |
| TDB file | T (K) | Phases at the invariant |
|---|---|---|
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | 673.13 | INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.75198) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.81393) |
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | 664.28 | INLI2 (x(Li) 0.70585) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.74972) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) |
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | 664.28 | INLI2 (x(Li) 0.7058) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.74965) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) |
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | 618.95 | INLI2 (x(Li) 0.70128) + INLI3_L12 (x(Li) 0.75) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) |
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | 618.95 | INLI2 (x(Li) 0.70125) + INLI3_L12 (x(Li) 0.75) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) |
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | 618.95 | INLI2 (x(Li) 0.70122) + INLI3_L12 (x(Li) 0.75) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) |
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | 568.85 | INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.56633) + IN2LI3 (x(Li) 0.6) + INLI2 (x(Li) 0.66653) |
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | 451 | IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.99214) + BCC_A2 (x(Li) 1) |
| InLi-20Zho.tdb | 432.71 | LIQUID (x(Li) 0.05003) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Li) 0.05008) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.37723) |
| InLi-22Gie.tdb | 663.88 | INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.72013) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.81141) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) |
| InLi-22Gie.tdb | 656.98 | INLI2 (x(Li) 0.66667) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.71622) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) |
| InLi-22Gie.tdb | 583.64 | INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.55294) + IN2LI3 (x(Li) 0.6) + INLI2 (x(Li) 0.66667) |
| InLi-22Gie.tdb | 579.52 | IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) + INLI6 (x(Li) 0.85714) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.94303) |
| InLi-22Gie.tdb | 451.99 | INLI6 (x(Li) 0.85714) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.99729) + BCC_A2 (x(Li) 1) |
| InLi-22Gie.tdb | 431.97 | LIQUID (x(Li) 0.00516) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Li) 0.00876) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.49994) |
Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull InLi-20Zho
Invariant reactions (literature)
| T (K) | Reaction / phases | Compositions (mole fraction) | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 907 | congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLi | Liquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Sangster 1991 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 4 report | |
| 903 | congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLi | Liquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Thummel 1970 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 8 report | |
| 903 | congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLi | Liquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Schneider 1956 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 7 report | |
| 902 | congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLi | Liquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Lamprecht 1969 | Table 3, p. 6, row 6 report | |
| 898 | congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLi | Liquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2022 | Table 3, p. 6, row 9 report | |
| 898 | congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLi | Liquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Grube 1935 | Table 3, p. 6, row 5 report | |
| 733 | polymorphic: InLi ⇄ InLi2 | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Sangster 1991 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 12 report | |
| 732 | polymorphic: InLi ⇄ InLi2 | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2022 | Table 3, p. 6, row 13 report | |
| 673 | InLi+Liquid ⇄ In3Li13 | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; In3Li13: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Sangster 1991 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 15 report | |
| 668 | InLi+Liquid ⇄ In3Li13 | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; In3Li13: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2022 | Table 3, p. 6, row 16 report | |
| 647 | InLi ⇄ InLi2+In3Li13 | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667; In3Li13: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2022 | Table 3, p. 6, row 14 report | |
| 580 | In3Li13+Liquid ⇄ InLi6 | In3Li13: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125; InLi6: In 0.142857, Li 0.857143 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2022 | Table 3, p. 6, row 17 report | |
| 573 | InLi+InLi2 ⇄ In2Li3 | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667; In2Li3: In 0.4, Li 0.6 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2022 | Table 3, p. 6, row 11 report | |
| 568 | InLi+InLi2 ⇄ In2Li3 | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667; In2Li3: In 0.4, Li 0.6 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Sangster 1991 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 10 report | |
| 453.5 | Liquid ⇄ InLi6+(Li) | InLi6: In 0.142857, Li 0.857143 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Alexander 1976 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 19 report | |
| 453 | Liquid ⇄ InLi6+(Li) | InLi6: In 0.142857, Li 0.857143 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2022 | Table 3, p. 6, row 20 report | |
| 452 | Liquid ⇄ InLi6+(Li) | InLi6: In 0.142857, Li 0.857143 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Sangster 1991 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 18 report | |
| 432 | Liquid ⇄ (In)+InLi | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5 | model | [1] Gierlotka 2022 | Table 3, p. 6, row 3 report | |
| 432 | Liquid ⇄ (In)+InLi | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Sangster 1991 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 1 report | |
| 431 | Liquid ⇄ (In)+InLi | InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Alexander 1976 doi | Table 3, p. 6, row 2 report |
Other properties
Phase transition (1)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase transition | 898 K | 898 | congruent transformation | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Grube 1935 | p. 1 report | Grube and Wolf [6] measured the congruent melting temperature of the InLi phase at 898 K and determined the liquidus line as well. |
Phase equilibrium (1)
| Property | Value | T (K) | Phases / composition | Class | Source | Location | Quote |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase assemblage | 850 | InLi alloy: Li 0.65 | experimental | [1] Gierlotka 2022 cites Gasior 1992 | p. 7 report | 1), at the temperature of 850 K, two phases exist: Liquid and InLi. The experimental data shown in Figure 4 exhibit the activity of Li in the solid InLi phase. One can see that the calculation fairly reproduces the experiment. A disagreement can be found between the experimental determination for the composition equalling 0.65 mole fraction of Li and the calculation. The experimental point indica… |
Sources
Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).
- W. Gierlotka, W. Gąsior, A. Dębski, M. Zabrocki, Thermodynamic modelling of the binary indium-lithium system, a promising li-ion battery material, J min metall B Metall 58, 75-84 (2022). doi:10.2298/jmmb210205041g