In–Li system

22 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 14, model 8); 2 calculated phase diagram(s). 5 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (11) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental14
model8
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction20
phase transition1
phase equilibrium1

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB fileAssessmentSHA-256Links
InLi-20Zho.tdbX. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.1017793296b39d521eca353c878566a377a6d340c00d10ec4729afacdfd9c78c0076bfviewer · TDB · JSON
InLi-22Gie.tdbW. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022). doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041Gef7f71f31b5a62afdef9e11439b6ff718b6081df24f830d32b1b220ac27b6f12viewer · TDB · JSON
Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB fileT (K)Phases at the invariant
InLi-20Zho.tdb673.13INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.75198) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.81393)
InLi-20Zho.tdb664.28INLI2 (x(Li) 0.70585) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.74972) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125)
InLi-20Zho.tdb664.28INLI2 (x(Li) 0.7058) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.74965) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125)
InLi-20Zho.tdb618.95INLI2 (x(Li) 0.70128) + INLI3_L12 (x(Li) 0.75) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125)
InLi-20Zho.tdb618.95INLI2 (x(Li) 0.70125) + INLI3_L12 (x(Li) 0.75) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125)
InLi-20Zho.tdb618.95INLI2 (x(Li) 0.70122) + INLI3_L12 (x(Li) 0.75) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125)
InLi-20Zho.tdb568.85INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.56633) + IN2LI3 (x(Li) 0.6) + INLI2 (x(Li) 0.66653)
InLi-20Zho.tdb451IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.99214) + BCC_A2 (x(Li) 1)
InLi-20Zho.tdb432.71LIQUID (x(Li) 0.05003) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Li) 0.05008) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.37723)
InLi-22Gie.tdb663.88INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.72013) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.81141) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125)
InLi-22Gie.tdb656.98INLI2 (x(Li) 0.66667) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.71622) + IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125)
InLi-22Gie.tdb583.64INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.55294) + IN2LI3 (x(Li) 0.6) + INLI2 (x(Li) 0.66667)
InLi-22Gie.tdb579.52IN3LI13 (x(Li) 0.8125) + INLI6 (x(Li) 0.85714) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.94303)
InLi-22Gie.tdb451.99INLI6 (x(Li) 0.85714) + LIQUID (x(Li) 0.99729) + BCC_A2 (x(Li) 1)
InLi-22Gie.tdb431.97LIQUID (x(Li) 0.00516) + TETRAGONAL_A6 (x(Li) 0.00876) + INLI_B32 (x(Li) 0.49994)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull · CALPHAD hull InLi-20Zho

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the In–Li system (20)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
907congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLiLiquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 4
report
903congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLiLiquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Thummel 1970 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 8
report
903congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLiLiquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Schneider 1956 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 7
report
902congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLiLiquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Lamprecht 1969
Table 3, p. 6, row 6
report
898congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLiLiquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5model[1] Gierlotka 2022Table 3, p. 6, row 9
report
898congruent melting: Liquid ⇄ InLiLiquid: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Grube 1935
Table 3, p. 6, row 5
report
733polymorphic: InLi ⇄ InLi2InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 12
report
732polymorphic: InLi ⇄ InLi2InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667model[1] Gierlotka 2022Table 3, p. 6, row 13
report
673InLi+Liquid ⇄ In3Li13InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; In3Li13: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 15
report
668InLi+Liquid ⇄ In3Li13InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; In3Li13: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125model[1] Gierlotka 2022Table 3, p. 6, row 16
report
647InLi ⇄ InLi2+In3Li13InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667; In3Li13: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125model[1] Gierlotka 2022Table 3, p. 6, row 14
report
580In3Li13+Liquid ⇄ InLi6In3Li13: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125; InLi6: In 0.142857, Li 0.857143model[1] Gierlotka 2022Table 3, p. 6, row 17
report
573InLi+InLi2 ⇄ In2Li3InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667; In2Li3: In 0.4, Li 0.6model[1] Gierlotka 2022Table 3, p. 6, row 11
report
568InLi+InLi2 ⇄ In2Li3InLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5; InLi2: In 0.333333, Li 0.666667; In2Li3: In 0.4, Li 0.6experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 10
report
453.5Liquid ⇄ InLi6+(Li)InLi6: In 0.142857, Li 0.857143experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Alexander 1976 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 19
report
453Liquid ⇄ InLi6+(Li)InLi6: In 0.142857, Li 0.857143model[1] Gierlotka 2022Table 3, p. 6, row 20
report
452Liquid ⇄ InLi6+(Li)InLi6: In 0.142857, Li 0.857143experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 18
report
432Liquid ⇄ (In)+InLiInLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5model[1] Gierlotka 2022Table 3, p. 6, row 3
report
432Liquid ⇄ (In)+InLiInLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Sangster 1991 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 1
report
431Liquid ⇄ (In)+InLiInLi: In 0.5, Li 0.5experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Alexander 1976 doi
Table 3, p. 6, row 2
report

Other properties

Phase transition (1)

Phase transition, In–Li system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition898 K898congruent transformationexperimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Grube 1935
p. 1
report
Grube and Wolf [6] measured the congruent melting temperature of the InLi phase at 898 K and determined the liquidus line as well.

Phase equilibrium (1)

Phase equilibrium, In–Li system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase assemblage850InLi
alloy: Li 0.65
experimental[1] Gierlotka 2022
cites Gasior 1992
p. 7
report
1), at the temperature of 850 K, two phases exist: Liquid and InLi. The experimental data shown in Figure 4 exhibit the activity of Li in the solid InLi phase. One can see that the calculation fairly reproduces the experiment. A disagreement can be found between the experimental determination for the composition equalling 0.65 mole fraction of Li and the calculation. The experimental point indica…

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. W. Gierlotka, W. Gąsior, A. Dębski, M. Zabrocki, Thermodynamic modelling of the binary indium-lithium system, a promising li-ion battery material, J min metall B Metall 58, 75-84 (2022). doi:10.2298/jmmb210205041g