In–Li phases

11 phases (tier A 6, tier B 1, tier C 2, liquid 1, needs_review 1); 9 stable in a calculated diagram. Structure types are assigned only when the stored evidence supports an assignment under the stated tier rules (tier A: standard phase name; tier B: unique Materials Project + OQMD on-hull match, DFT-supported; tier C: one structure stated by the assessment's crystallographic table, assessor-stated); other phases list candidates and are marked needs_review. Stability is from phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad from the SGTE binary collection (evidence class: model).

Data: interactive registry · full JSON · In–Li system page · Markdown · field reference

Phases of the In–Li system (11)
Phase	Structure	Basis	Stability (calculated)	Literature values	TDB models
TETRAGONAL_A6 phase:in-li:a6-tetragonal	In · A6 · tI2 · I4/mmm (139)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–432.71 K, x(Li) 0–0.05008	3	2
BCC_A2 phase:in-li:bcc-a2	W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–454.6 K, x(Li) 1–1	3	2
FCC_A1 phase:in-li:fcc-a1	Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)	0	2
HCP_A3 phase:in-li:hcp-a3	Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194)	tier A: standard phase name	not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)	0	2
IN2LI3 phase:in-li:in2li3	Al2Li3 · hR5 · R-3m (166)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–583.64 K, x(Li) 0.6–0.6	2	2
IN3LI13 phase:in-li:in3li13	In3Li13 · cF128 · Fd-3m (227)	tier B: DFT-supported (unique MP + OQMD match)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–673.13 K, x(Li) 0.8125–0.8125	4	2
INLI_B32 phase:in-li:inli-b32	NaTl · B32 · cF16 · Fd-3m (227)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–901.58 K, x(Li) 0.36842–0.75198	16	2
INLI2 phase:in-li:inli2	GaLi2 · oC12 · Cmcm (63)	tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table)	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–737.89 K, x(Li) 0.66653–0.70585	5	2
INLI3_L12 phase:in-li:inli3-l12	AuCu3 · L1_2 · cP4 · Pm-3m (221)	tier A: standard phase name	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–618.95 K, x(Li) 0.75–0.75	0	1
INLI6 phase:in-li:inli6		needs_review	stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–579.52 K, x(Li) 0.85714–0.85714	4	1
LIQUID phase:in-li:liquid	liquid	liquid	stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 429.75–2500 K, x(Li) 0–1	17	2

TETRAGONAL_A6 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:a6-tetragonal; status assigned
Structure: In · A6 · tI2 · I4/mmm (139); type st:a6-in-ti2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–432.71 K, x(Li) 0–0.05008
Literature: 3 values (3 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:a6-tetragonal
paper: paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:(In)
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:TETRAGONAL_A6

TDB models of TETRAGONAL_A6 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

46: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
47: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN% LI : !

InLi-22Gie.tdb: TETRAGONAL_A6, type code %, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

55: PHASE TETRAGONAL_A6 % 1 1 !
56: CONST TETRAGONAL_A6 : IN% LI : !

Example references (4 of 4; assessments first):

doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02663671 J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v76-150 W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976).
cited as the source of values for this phase

BCC_A2 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:bcc-a2; status assigned
Structure: W · A2 · cI2 · Im-3m (229); type st:a2-w-ci2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–454.6 K, x(Li) 1–1
Literature: 3 values (3 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:bcc-a2
paper: paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:(Li)
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:BCC_A2, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:BCC_A2

TDB models of BCC_A2 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

36: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
37: CONST BCC_A2 : IN LI% : VA : !

InLi-22Gie.tdb: BCC_A2, type code %B, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

45: PHASE BCC_A2 %B 2 1 3 !
46: CONST BCC_A2 : IN LI% : VA : !

Example references (4 of 4; assessments first):

doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02663671 J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v76-150 W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976).
cited as the source of values for this phase

FCC_A1 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:fcc-a1; status assigned
Structure: Cu · A1 · cF4 · Fm-3m (225); type st:a1-cu-cf4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:fcc-a1
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:FCC_A1, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:FCC_A1

TDB models of FCC_A1 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

31: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
32: CONST FCC_A1 : IN LI : VA : !

InLi-22Gie.tdb: FCC_A1, type code %A, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

40: PHASE FCC_A1 %A 2 1 1 !
41: CONST FCC_A1 : IN LI : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase

HCP_A3 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:hcp-a3; status assigned
Structure: Mg · A3 · hP2 · P6_3/mmc (194); type st:a3-mg-hp2; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stability: not stable in 2 calculated diagram(s)
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:hcp-a3
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:HCP_A3, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:HCP_A3

TDB models of HCP_A3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

41: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
42: CONST HCP_A3 : IN LI : VA : !

InLi-22Gie.tdb: HCP_A3, type code %A, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

50: PHASE HCP_A3 %A 2 1 0.5 !
51: CONST HCP_A3 : IN LI : VA : !

Example references (2 of 2; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase

IN2LI3 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:in2li3; status assigned
Structure: Al2Li3 · hR5 · R-3m (166); type st:al2li3-hr5; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (dft_space_group_166_matches_3_structure_types, no_structure_token); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stoichiometry: In 0.4000, Li 0.6000
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–583.64 K, x(Li) 0.6–0.6
Literature: 2 values (2 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:in2li3
paper: paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:In2Li3
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:IN2LI3, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:IN2LI3

TDB models of IN2LI3 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: IN2LI3, type code %, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

56: PHASE IN2LI3 % 2 2 3 !
57: CONST IN2LI3 : IN : LI : !

InLi-22Gie.tdb: IN2LI3, type code %, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

65: PHASE IN2LI3 % 2 2 3 !
66: CONST IN2LI3 : IN : LI : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02663671 J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671
cited as the source of values for this phase

IN3LI13 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:in3li13; status assigned
Structure: In3Li13 · cF128 · Fd-3m (227); type st:in3li13-cf128; tier B: DFT-supported (unique MP + OQMD match); confidence high
Stoichiometry: In 0.1875, Li 0.8125
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–673.13 K, x(Li) 0.8125–0.8125
Literature: 4 values (4 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (6): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:in3li13
mp: mp:mp-aaabdbby
oqmd: oqmd:oqmd-646812
paper: paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:In3Li13
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:IN3LI13, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:IN3LI13

TDB models of IN3LI13 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: IN3LI13, type code %, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

71: PHASE IN3LI13 % 2 3 13 !
72: CONST IN3LI13 : IN : LI : !

InLi-22Gie.tdb: IN3LI13, type code %, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

75: PHASE IN3LI13 % 2 3 13 !
76: CONST IN3LI13 : IN : LI : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02663671 J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671
cited as the source of values for this phase

INLI_B32 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:inli-b32; status assigned
Structure: NaTl · B32 · cF16 · Fd-3m (227); type st:b32-natl-cf16; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Caveat: partitioned order/disorder model in InLi-20Zho.tdb also describes the disordered state
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–901.58 K, x(Li) 0.36842–0.75198
Literature: 16 values (16 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:inli-b32
paper: paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:InLi
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:INLI_B32, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:INLI_B32

TDB models of INLI_B32 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: INLI_B32, type code %, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

51: PHASE INLI_B32 % 2 1 1 !
52: CONST INLI_B32 : IN% LI : IN LI% : !

InLi-22Gie.tdb: INLI_B32, type code %, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

60: PHASE INLI_B32 % 2 1 1 !
61: CONST INLI_B32 : IN% LI : LI% VA : !

Example references (6 of 6; assessments first):

doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02663671 J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19562860302 A. Schneider, O. Hilmer, Wärmeinhalte und Schmelzentropien von NaTl‐Phasen, Zeitschrift anorg allge chemie 286, 97-117 (1956).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19703760107 Renate Thümmel, Wilhelm Klemm, Das Verhalten der Alkalimetalle zu den Metallen der Gruppe III B, Zeitschrift anorg allge chemie 376, 44-63 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v76-150 W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976).
cited as the source of values for this phase

INLI2 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:inli2; status assigned
Structure: GaLi2 · oC12 · Cmcm (63); type st:gali2-oc12; tier C: assessor-stated (Hallstedt 2025 crystallographic table); confidence assessor-stated
Structure source: B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, supplementary crystallographic table (mmc2) doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833
Caveat: not certain from the name or DFT alone (no_structure_token, off_stoichiometric_model); structure as stated in the SGTE crystallographic table for this phase name and system
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 300–737.89 K, x(Li) 0.66653–0.70585
Literature: 5 values (5 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (4): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:inli2
paper: paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:InLi2
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:INLI2, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:INLI2

TDB models of INLI2 (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: INLI2, type code %, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

61: PHASE INLI2 % 2 1 2 !
62: CONST INLI2 : IN% LI : IN LI% : !

InLi-22Gie.tdb: INLI2, type code %, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

70: PHASE INLI2 % 2 1 2 !
71: CONST INLI2 : IN : LI : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02663671 J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671
cited as the source of values for this phase

INLI3_L12 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:inli3-l12; status assigned
Structure: AuCu3 · L1_2 · cP4 · Pm-3m (221); type st:l1-2-aucu3-cp4; tier A: standard phase name; confidence high
Stoichiometry: In 0.2500, Li 0.7500
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–618.95 K, x(Li) 0.75–0.75
Literature: 0 values (0 accepted) from 0 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (2): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:inli3-l12
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:INLI3_L12

TDB models of INLI3_L12 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: INLI3_L12, type code %, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

66: PHASE INLI3_L12 % 2 1 3 !
67: CONST INLI3_L12 : IN : LI : !

Example references (1 of 1; assessments first):

doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase

INLI6 (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:inli6; status needs_review
No structure assigned. Why: no_on_hull_entry_in_both; no_structure_token; sgte_mmc2_row_incomplete
Candidate (literature_printed): (InLi6) · ? — printed with a label mapped to this phase
Candidate (sgte_mmc2): (InLi6) — Hallstedt 2025 mmc2 row for INLI6: InLi6
Stoichiometry: In 0.1429, Li 0.8571
Stability: stable in 1 of 1 calculated diagram(s): 300–579.52 K, x(Li) 0.85714–0.85714
Literature: 4 values (4 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (3): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:inli6
paper: paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:InLi6
tdb: tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:INLI6

TDB models of INLI6 (1): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-22Gie.tdb: INLI6, type code %, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

80: PHASE INLI6 % 2 1 6 !
81: CONST INLI6 : IN : LI : !

Example references (3 of 3; assessments first):

doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02663671 J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v76-150 W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976).
cited as the source of values for this phase

LIQUID (In–Li)

Id: phase:in-li:liquid; status assigned
Structure: liquid; type st:liquid; liquid; confidence high
Stability: stable in 2 of 2 calculated diagram(s): 429.75–2500 K, x(Li) 0–1
Literature: 17 values (16 accepted) from 1 papers
Interactive: phase registry entry

Names (5): corpus: corpus:phase:in-li:liquid
paper: paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:Liquid, paper:10.2298/jmmb210205041g:liquid
tdb: tdb:InLi-20Zho.tdb:LIQUID, tdb:InLi-22Gie.tdb:LIQUID

TDB models of LIQUID (2): PHASE and CONSTITUENT statements as written

InLi-20Zho.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 3296b39d521eca35…

26: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
27: CONST LIQUID:L : IN IN2LI3 LI : !

InLi-22Gie.tdb: LIQUID, type code %, sha256 ef7f71f31b5a62af…

35: PHASE LIQUID:L % 1 1 !
36: CONST LIQUID:L : IN INLI LI : !

Example references (6 of 6; assessments first):

doi:10.2298/JMMB210205041G W. Gierlotka, W. Gasior, A. Debski, M. Zabrocki, J. Mining Metall. B, 58, 75-84(2022).
assessment that models this phase; reports values for this phase
doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101779 X. Zhou, F. Zhang, S. Liu, Y. Du, B. Jin, Calphad, 70, 101779(2020).
assessment that models this phase
doi:10.1007/bf02663671 J. Sangster, A. D. Pelton, The In-Li(Indium-Lithium) system, Journal of Phase Equilibria, 12 (1991) 37-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02663671
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1139/v76-150 W. A. Alexander, L. D. Calvert, R. H. Gamble, K. Schinzel, The lithium–indium system, Can. J. Chem. 54, 1052-1060 (1976).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19562860302 A. Schneider, O. Hilmer, Wärmeinhalte und Schmelzentropien von NaTl‐Phasen, Zeitschrift anorg allge chemie 286, 97-117 (1956).
cited as the source of values for this phase
doi:10.1002/zaac.19703760107 Renate Thümmel, Wilhelm Klemm, Das Verhalten der Alkalimetalle zu den Metallen der Gruppe III B, Zeitschrift anorg allge chemie 376, 44-63 (1970).
cited as the source of values for this phase

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735970
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0); the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_phase_registry_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Registry: phase registry of binary systems}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735970},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}