Ir–Mo–W system

24 accepted literature values from 1 paper(s) (experimental 12, model 12); 0 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	12
model	12

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
crystal structure	24

Other properties

Crystal structure (24)

Crystal structure, Ir–Mo–W system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Lattice a	2.808 Å		e	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report
Lattice a	9.749 Å		s	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report
Lattice a	2.795 Å		ε	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Lattice a	9.705 Å		σ	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
Lattice a	2.736 Å	298.15	e	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites E 1951	Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report
Lattice a	9.672 Å	298.15	s	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites Knapton 1958	Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report
Lattice a	2.77 Å	298.15	ε	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites Michalik 1963	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Lattice a	9.631 Å	298.15	σ	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites Spooner 1964	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
Lattice b	2.808 Å		e	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report
Lattice b	9.749 Å		s	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report
Lattice b	2.795 Å		ε	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Lattice b	9.705 Å		σ	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
Lattice b	2.736 Å	298.15	e	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites E 1951	Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report
Lattice b	9.672 Å	298.15	s	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites Knapton 1958	Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report
Lattice b	2.77 Å	298.15	ε	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites Michalik 1963	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Lattice b	9.631 Å	298.15	σ	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites Spooner 1964	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report
Lattice c	4.485 Å		e	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 16 report
Lattice c	5.018 Å		s	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 18 report
Lattice c	4.463 Å		ε	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 4 report
Lattice c	4.957 Å		σ	model	[1] Huang 2020	Table 1, p. 3, row 10 report
Lattice c	4.383 Å	298.15	e	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites E 1951	Table 1, p. 3, row 15 report
Lattice c	5.01 Å	298.15	s	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites Knapton 1958	Table 1, p. 3, row 17 report
Lattice c	4.424 Å	298.15	ε	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites Michalik 1963	Table 1, p. 3, row 3 report
Lattice c	4.957 Å	298.15	σ	experimental	[1] Huang 2020 cites Spooner 1964	Table 1, p. 3, row 9 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Y.-Y. Huang, B. Wu, F. Li, L.-L. Chen, Z.-X. Deng, K. Chang, First-principles and CALPHAD-type study of the Ir-Mo and Ir-W systems, J min metall B Metall 56, 109-118 (2020). doi:10.2298/jmmb190211001h

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}