Pd–Y system

66 accepted literature values from 2 paper(s) (experimental 18, model 48); 1 calculated phase diagram(s).

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · interactive phase diagram · phases (15) · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence class	Values
experimental	18
model	48

Accepted values by property group
Property group	Values
invariant reaction	26
phase transition	10
formation	28
mixing / partial	2

Calculated phase diagrams

Binary phase diagrams calculated with pycalphad 0.11.2 from the SGTE binary collection (Hallstedt 2025, CC BY 4.0). Evidence class: model.

Assessments with a calculated phase diagram
TDB file	Assessment	SHA-256	Links
PdY-00Du.tdb	Z. Du, H. Yang, C. Li, J. Alloys Compd., 297, 185-91(2000). doi:10.1016/S0925-8388(99)00582-4	`d90b41729a78d724a3681a2acc17a09875ad34889671887a107f47222af6a072`	viewer · TDB · JSON

Calculated three-phase invariants (model, mole fraction of the second component)
TDB file	T (K)	Phases at the invariant
PdY-00Du.tdb	1751.15	LIQUID (x(Y) 0.98206) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 1) + BCC_A2 (x(Y) 1)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1653.06	PD4Y3 (x(Y) 0.42857) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.45344) + PDY_B2 (x(Y) 0.5)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1653.06	PD4Y3 (x(Y) 0.42857) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.45336) + PDY_B2 (x(Y) 0.5)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1577.1	PD3Y_L12 (x(Y) 0.25) + PD2Y (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.34845)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1577.1	PD3Y_L12 (x(Y) 0.25) + PD2Y (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.34836)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1546.25	LIQUID (x(Y) 0.37822) + PD3Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.4) + PD4Y3 (x(Y) 0.42857)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1546.25	LIQUID (x(Y) 0.37829) + PD3Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.4) + PD4Y3 (x(Y) 0.42857)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1516.51	PD2Y (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.36927) + PD3Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.4)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1516.51	PD2Y (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.3693) + PD3Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.4)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1516.51	PD2Y (x(Y) 0.33333) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.36923) + PD3Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.4)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1476.84	FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0.12567) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.14359) + PD3Y_L12 (x(Y) 0.20315)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1317.74	PD3Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.4) + PD3Y2_LT (x(Y) 0.4) + PD4Y3 (x(Y) 0.42857)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1317.74	PD2Y (x(Y) 0.33333) + PD3Y2_LT (x(Y) 0.4) + PD3Y2_HT (x(Y) 0.4)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1232.82	PDY_B2 (x(Y) 0.5016) + PD2Y3 (x(Y) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.63856)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1182.99	LIQUID (x(Y) 0.74009) + PDY3_D011 (x(Y) 0.75) + HCP_A3 (x(Y) 1)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1182.94	PD2Y5 (x(Y) 0.71429) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.7396) + PDY3_D011 (x(Y) 0.75)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1181.97	PD2Y3 (x(Y) 0.6) + LIQUID (x(Y) 0.68798) + PD2Y5 (x(Y) 0.71429)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1173.65	PDY_B2 (x(Y) 0.50065) + PDY_B33 (x(Y) 0.50099) + PD2Y3 (x(Y) 0.6)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1173.65	PDY_B2 (x(Y) 0.50065) + PDY_B33 (x(Y) 0.50099) + PD2Y3 (x(Y) 0.6)
PdY-00Du.tdb	1143.46	PD4Y3 (x(Y) 0.42857) + PDY_B33 (x(Y) 0.5) + PDY_B2 (x(Y) 0.5)
PdY-00Du.tdb	777.05	FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0.1145) + PD7Y (x(Y) 0.125) + PD3Y_L12 (x(Y) 0.20821)
PdY-00Du.tdb	777.05	FCC_A1 (x(Y) 0.1145) + PD7Y (x(Y) 0.125) + PD3Y_L12 (x(Y) 0.20821)

Convex hulls: Materials Project DFT hull · OQMD DFT hull

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Pd–Y system (26)
T (K)	Reaction / phases	Compositions (mole fraction)	Class	Source	Location
1752	Liq.+b.c.c.(Y)->h.c.p.(Y)	Liq.: Y 0.9808; b.c.c.(Y): Y 1; h.c.p.(Y): Y 1	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 1 report
1751	Liq.+b.c.c.(Y)->h.c.p.(Y)	Liq.: Y 0.98; b.c.c.(Y): Y 1; h.c.p.(Y): Y 1	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 2 report
1658	eutectic: Liq.->βPdY+Pd4Y3	Liq.: Y 0.47; βPdY: Y 0.51; Pd4Y3: Y 0.428571	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 16 report
1655	eutectic: Liq.->βPdY+Pd4Y3	Liq.: Y 0.4535; βPdY: Y 0.5; Pd4Y3: Y 0.428571	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 15 report
1579	Liq.+Pd3Y->Pd2Y	Liq.: Y 0.3484; Pd3Y: Y 0.25; Pd2Y: Y 0.333333	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 23 report
1578	Liq.+Pd3Y->Pd2Y	Liq.: Y 0.34; Pd3Y: Y 0.25; Pd2Y: Y 0.333333	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 24 report
1548	Liq.+Pd4Y3->βPd3Y2	Liq.: Y 0.3782; Pd4Y3: Y 0.428571; βPd3Y2: Y 0.4	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 19 report
1547	Liq.+Pd4Y3->βPd3Y2	Liq.: Y 0.38; Pd4Y3: Y 0.428571; βPd3Y2: Y 0.4	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 20 report
1518	eutectic: Liq.->βPd3Y2+Pd2Y	Liq.: Y 0.37; βPd3Y2: Y 0.4; Pd2Y: Y 0.333333	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 22 report
1518	eutectic: Liq.->βPd3Y2+Pd2Y	Liq.: Y 0.3692; βPd3Y2: Y 0.4; Pd2Y: Y 0.333333	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 21 report
1478	eutectic: Liq.->Pd3Y+f.c.c.(Pd)	Liq.: Y 0.15; Pd3Y: Y 0.205; f.c.c.(Pd): Y 0.13	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 28 report
1478	eutectic: Liq.->Pd3Y+f.c.c.(Pd)	Liq.: Y 0.1436; Pd3Y: Y 0.2031; f.c.c.(Pd): Y 0.1257	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 27 report
1233	Liq.+βPdY->Pd2Y3	Liq.: Y 0.66; βPdY: Y 0.52; Pd2Y3: Y 0.6	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 12 report
1232	Liq.+βPdY->Pd2Y3	Liq.: Y 0.6384; βPdY: Y 0.5016; Pd2Y3: Y 0.6	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 11 report
1181	Liq.+h.c.p.(Y)->PdY3	Liq.: Y 0.745; h.c.p.(Y): Y 1; PdY3: Y 0.75	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 4 report
1181	eutectic: Liq.->Pd2Y5+PdY3	Liq.: Y 0.7397; Pd2Y5: Y 0.714286; PdY3: Y 0.75	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 5 report
1181	Liq.+h.c.p.(Y)->PdY3	Liq.: Y 0.7405; h.c.p.(Y): Y 1; PdY3: Y 0.75	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 3 report
1180	eutectic: Liq.->Pd2Y5+Pd2Y3	Liq.: Y 0.688; Pd2Y5: Y 0.714286; Pd2Y3: Y 0.6	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 9 report
1176	eutectic: Liq.->Pd2Y5+Pd2Y3	Liq.: Y 0.7; Pd2Y5: Y 0.714286; Pd2Y3: Y 0.6	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 10 report
1173	βPdY+Pd2Y3->αPdY	βPdY: Y 0.5006; Pd2Y3: Y 0.6; αPdY: Y 0.501	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 33 report
1173	βPdY+Pd2Y3->αPdY	βPdY: Y 0.52; Pd2Y3: Y 0.6; αPdY: Y 0.52	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 34 report
1168	eutectic: Liq.->Pd2Y5+PdY3	Liq.: Y 0.73; Pd2Y5: Y 0.714286; PdY3: Y 0.75	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 6 report
1143	βPdY->Pd4Y3+αPdY	βPdY: Y 0.5; Pd4Y3: Y 0.428571; αPdY: Y 0.5	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 35 report
1143	βPdY->Pd4Y3+αPdY	βPdY: Y 0.51; Pd4Y3: Y 0.428571; αPdY: Y 0.51	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 36 report
777	F.c.c.(Pd)+Pd3Y->Pd7Y	F.c.c.(Pd): Y 0.1145; Pd3Y: Y 0.2082; Pd7Y: Y 0.125	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 29 report
777	F.c.c.(Pd)+Pd3Y->Pd7Y	F.c.c.(Pd): Y 0.105; Pd3Y: Y 0.21; Pd7Y: Y 0.125	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 30 report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Pd–Y system (10)
Phase	Compound	Value	T (K)	Class	MP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)	Source	Location
Pd2Y	Pd2Y	-94.33 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-58.096 (mp-aaacimin)	-77.774 (oqmd-1435845)	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 60 report
Pd2Y5		-68.548 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 12 report
Pd3Y	Pd3Y	-96.08 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-83.156 (mp-aaaaaavn)	-82.911 (oqmd-17986)	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 2 report
Pd3Y	Pd3Y	-58.188 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-83.156 (mp-aaaaaavn)	-82.911 (oqmd-17986)	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 72 report
Pd4Y3	Pd4Y3	-92.3 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-89.218 (mp-aaackveh)	-89.174 (oqmd-1437089)	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 35 report
Pd7RE		-58.188 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 6 report
Pd7Y		-58.188 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 72 report
PdRE3		-62.254 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model			[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 1 report
PdY	PdY	-90.583 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-87.841 (mp-aaacirdg)	-88.327 (oqmd-1366850)	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 22 report
PdY3	PdY3	-62.254 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	model	-45.639 (mp-aaacqsqz)	-45.911 (oqmd-1437344)	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 67 report

Other properties

Phase transition (10)

Phase transition, Pd–Y system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Phase transition	1185 K	1185	Liq.->Pd2Y5 Liq.: Y 0.714286; Pd2Y5: Y 0.714286	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 7 report
Phase transition	1188 K	1188	Liq.->Pd2Y5 Liq.: Y 0.714286; Pd2Y5: Y 0.714286	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 8 report
Phase transition	1318 K	1318	αPd3Y2->βPd3Y2 αPd3Y2: Y 0.4; βPd3Y2: Y 0.4	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 31 report
Phase transition	1318 K	1318	αPd3Y2->βPd3Y2 αPd3Y2: Y 0.4; βPd3Y2: Y 0.4	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 32 report
Phase transition	1683 K	1683	Liq.->Pd4Y3 Liq.: Y 0.428571; Pd4Y3: Y 0.428571	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 18 report
Phase transition	1684 K	1684	Liq.->Pd4Y3 Liq.: Y 0.428571; Pd4Y3: Y 0.428571	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 17 report
Phase transition	1723 K	1723	Liq.->βPdY Liq.: Y 0.5; βPdY: Y 0.5	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 14 report
Phase transition	1724 K	1724	Liq.->βPdY Liq.: Y 0.4985; βPdY: Y 0.5	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 13 report
Phase transition	1973 K	1973	Liq.->Pd3Y Liq.: Y 0.25; Pd3Y: Y 0.25	experimental	[1] Du 2000 cites Loebich 1973 doi	Table 2, p. 5, row 26 report
Phase transition	1973 K	1973	Liq.->Pd3Y Liq.: Y 0.249; Pd3Y: Y 0.25	model	[1] Du 2000	Table 2, p. 5, row 25 report

Formation (18)

Formation, Pd–Y system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	8.189 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Pd2Y alloy: Pd 0.666667, Y 0.333333	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 60 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	13.686 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Pd2Y5 alloy: Pd 0.285714, Y 0.714286	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 12 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	12.943 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Pd3Y alloy: Pd 0.75, Y 0.25	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 72 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	12.51 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Pd3Y alloy: Pd 0.75, Y 0.25	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 2 report
Entropy of formation	4.396 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Pd4Y3 alloy: Pd 0.571429, Y 0.428571	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 35 report
Entropy of formation printed: Entropies of formation	12.943 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Pd7RE alloy: Pd 0.875, Y 0.125	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 6 report
Entropy of formation	12.943 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	Pd7Y alloy: Pd 0.875, Y 0.125	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 72 report
Entropy of formation printed: Entropies of formation	13.89 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	PdRE3 alloy: Pd 0.25, Y 0.75	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 1 report
Entropy of formation	4.145 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	PdY alloy: Pd 0.5, Y 0.5	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 22 report
Entropy of formation printed: ΔfS	13.89 J/mol-atom/K	298.15	PdY3 alloy: Pd 0.25, Y 0.75	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 67 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: Gibbs free energy of formation	-96.7716 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Pd2Y alloy: Pd 0.666667, Y 0.333333	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 60 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG	-72.6285 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Pd2Y5 alloy: Pd 0.285714, Y 0.714286	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 12 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG	-62.047 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Pd3Y alloy: Pd 0.75, Y 0.25	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 72 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: ΔfG	-99.8098 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Pd3Y alloy: Pd 0.75, Y 0.25	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 2 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: Gibbs free energy of formation	-93.6107 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Pd4Y3 alloy: Pd 0.571429, Y 0.428571	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 35 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: Gibbs free energy of formation	-62.047 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Pd7Y alloy: Pd 0.875, Y 0.125	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 72 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: Gibbs free energy of formation	-91.8188 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	PdY alloy: Pd 0.5, Y 0.5	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 22 report
Gibbs energy of formation printed: Gibbs free energy of formation	-66.3953 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	PdY3 alloy: Pd 0.25, Y 0.75	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 5, row 67 report

Mixing / partial (2)

Mixing / partial, Pd–Y system
Property	Value	T (K)	Phases / composition	Class	Source	Location	Quote
Gibbs energy of mixing printed: Gibbs free Energies	-62.047 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	Pd7RE alloy: Pd 0.875, Y 0.125	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 6 report
Gibbs energy of mixing printed: Gibbs free Energies	-66.3953 kJ/mol-atom	298.15	PdY3 alloy: Pd 0.25, Y 0.75	model	[2] Kardellass 2020 cites Du 2000 doi	Table 3, p. 6, row 1 report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

Z. Du, H. Yang, C. Li, Thermodynamic modeling of the Pd–Y system, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 297, 185-191 (2000). doi:10.1016/s0925-8388(99)00582-4
Said Kardellass, Colette Servant, Isabelle Drouelle, Fatima Zahra Chrifi-Alaoui, Mohamed Idbenali, Alyen Abahazem et al., Calphad-type assessment of the Pd-Yb binary system supported by first-principles calculations – Part II: Results, Materials Today: Proceedings 24, 140-150 (2020). doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2019.08.196

Please cite

R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735569
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735859
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD) (version 2026.10), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23735891
R. Arróyave, J. Saal, D. Shin, ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets (version 2026.10; Version 1, machine-extracted), Zenodo (2026). doi:10.5281/zenodo.23736065

Also cite the original source of every value you use (paper_citation / paper_doi, and cited_dois for values the paper cites from earlier work); B. Hallstedt, The SGTE collection of binary datasets, Calphad 89 (2025) 102833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2025.102833 (CC BY 4.0), and the original assessment named in each file; A. Jain et al., The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (2013) 011002, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812323 (CC BY 4.0); J. E. Saal et al., JOM 65 (2013) 1501, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 and S. Kirklin et al., npj Comput. Mater. 1 (2015) 15010, https://doi.org/10.1038/npjcompumats.2015.10 (CC BY 4.0). Version 1, machine-extracted: values were read by language-model readers constrained to quote their source and checked automatically, and the release was then audited on the printed pages by adversarial audits, an independent second review of fit-facing records and a preliminary human review of a frozen sample. Flags such as accepted and ESPEI-ready record screening results, not certification; known issues are listed in the release notes.

@misc{orchid_literature_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Values: thermodynamic and phase-equilibrium values read from the literature}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735569},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}

@misc{orchid_phase_diagrams_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Diagrams: calculated binary phase diagrams}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735859},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735859}
}

@misc{orchid_hulls_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID-Hulls: binary convex hulls (Materials Project, OQMD, assessed CALPHAD)}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23735891},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23735891}
}

@misc{orchid_data_2026,
  author    = {Arr{\'o}yave, Raymundo and Saal, James and Shin, Dongwon},
  title     = {{ORCHID data: umbrella record of the ORCHID datasets}},
  version   = {2026.10},
  publisher = {Zenodo},
  year      = {2026},
  doi       = {10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  url       = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23736065},
  note      = {Version 1, machine-extracted}
}