Tm system

13 accepted literature values from 3 paper(s) (experimental 3, model 5, DFT 2, unspecified 3); 0 calculated phase diagram(s). 1 further extracted value(s) not accepted by the reader-agreement checks are only in the JSON/CSV.

Data: JSON · CSV · interactive explorer · papers (bibliography) · Markdown

Accepted values by evidence class
Evidence classValues
experimental3
model5
DFT2
unspecified3
Accepted values by property group
Property groupValues
invariant reaction1
phase transition3
formation2
crystal structure7

Invariant reactions (literature)

Invariant reactions reported in the literature for the Tm system (1)
T (K)Reaction / phasesCompositions (mole fraction)ClassSourceLocationQuote
1793.15metatectic/catatectic: L + (betaTm) <-> (alphaTm)L: Tm 1; (betaTm): Tm 1; (alphaTm): Tm 1experimental[1] Kardellass 2014
cites Okamoto 1993
Table 8, p. 10, row 31
report

Formation enthalpies

Literature values in kJ/mol-atom where the per-atom basis is known. DFT columns: the lowest-energy entry at the same composition (Materials Project 2026.04.13, OQMD v1.8; different energy references, never averaged), from dft_parity.json.

Enthalpies of formation, Tm system (2)
PhaseCompoundValueT (K)ClassMP DFT (kJ/mol-atom)OQMD DFT (kJ/mol-atom)SourceLocationQuote
Tm (fcc)-2.68 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dong 2012
cites Wang 2004 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 34
report
Tm (fcc)-2.68 kJ/mol-atom0DFT[2] Dong 2012Table 1, p. 2, row 33
report

Other properties

Phase transition (3)

Phase transition, Tm system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Phase transition1793.15 K1793.15polymorphic: alphaTm <-> betaTm
alphaTm: Tm 1; betaTm: Tm 1
experimental[1] Kardellass 2014
cites Okamoto 1993
Table 8, p. 10, row 32
report
Phase transition1818.15 K1818.15congruent melting: L <-> (betaTm)
L: Tm 1; (betaTm): Tm 1
model[1] Kardellass 2014Table 8, p. 10, row 34
report
Phase transition1818.15 K1818.15congruent melting: L <-> (betaTm)
L: Tm 1; (betaTm): Tm 1
experimental[1] Kardellass 2014
cites Okamoto 1993
Table 8, p. 10, row 33
report

Crystal structure (7)

Crystal structure, Tm system
PropertyValueT (K)Phases / compositionClassSourceLocationQuote
Lattice a3.558 ÅTm
Tm: Tm 1
model[3] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 23
report
Lattice a3.536 Å298.15Tm
Tm: Tm 1
unspecified[3] Djaballah 2015
cites Daou 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 22
report
Lattice a
printed: a
4.918 Å298.15Tm (fcc)
alloy: Tm 1
model[2] Dong 2012Table 1, p. 2, row 35
report
Lattice b3.558 ÅTm
Tm: Tm 1
model[3] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 23
report
Lattice b3.536 Å298.15Tm
Tm: Tm 1
unspecified[3] Djaballah 2015
cites Daou 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 22
report
Lattice c5.523 ÅTm
Tm: Tm 1
model[3] Djaballah 2015Table 1, p. 2, row 23
report
Lattice c5.556 Å298.15Tm
Tm: Tm 1
unspecified[3] Djaballah 2015
cites Daou 1983 doi
Table 1, p. 2, row 22
report

Sources

Reporting papers the values were read from (a value cited from another work names that work in its row).

  1. S. Kardellass, C. Servant, N. Selhaoui, A. Iddaoudi, Thermodynamic evaluations of the iron–lutetium and iron–thulium systems, Calphad 46, 42-54 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.01.003
  2. H.Q. Dong, X.M. Tao, T. Laurila, M. Paulasto-Kröckel, Thermodynamic assessment of Au–Ho and Au–Tm binary systems, Calphad 37, 87-93 (2012). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2012.02.002
  3. Y. Djaballah, A. Said Amer, Ş. Uğur, G. Uğur, A. Hidoussi, A. Belgacem-Bouzida, Thermodynamic description of the Bi–Cs and Bi–Tm system supported by first-principles calculations, Calphad 48, 72-78 (2015). doi:10.1016/j.calphad.2014.11.002